RE: [WSG] Standards Publication
Chris wrote: Has any knowledgeable soul read: Web Standards Design Guide (Internet Series) No and I am not racing out to order it either. I am slowly reading Kevin Ruse's previous book in that series - XML for Web Designers Using Macromedia Studio MX 2004 and while I learning a bit about XML (an area I completely lack knowledge), the HTML and CSS in that book makes me cringe. The HTML is basic and uses table for everything and the CSS is fairly primitive. It was like the code I wrote four or more years ago. Seeing that book was published in April 2004, I find it difficult to believe that Kevin Ruse has learnt enough in the year between books, to create a book on Web Standards that would interest me. This email is from the Department of Consumer and Employment Protection and any information or attachments to it may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please reply mail to the sender informing them of the error and delete all copies from your computer system, including attachments and your reply email. As the information is confidential you must not disclose, copy or use it in any manner. ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
[WSG] multi-lingual
Hello. I have a question. I've been doing a lot of multi-lingual sites lately, and I usually separate them into individual sites based on language, and indicate so properly in the code. However, one of my clients wants two languages integrated into one site (basically two languages, one next to the other, but in different colors). My question is, how do I code this so that it makes sense? For individual languages sites, I add: lang=en xml:lang=en (changing the language, of course) But if I'm putting two languages on one page, how is that done? Can I use: lang=en,pt xml:lang=en,pt (or something similar)? Thanks, in advance, for your assistance. -- ~john _ Dr. Zeus Web Design http://www.DrZeus.net content without clutter ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] multi-lingual
G'day However, one of my clients wants two languages integrated into one site (basically two languages, one next to the other, but in different colors). My question is, how do I code this so that it makes sense? For individual languages sites, I add: lang=en xml:lang=en (changing the language, of course) But if I'm putting two languages on one page, how is that done? Can I use: If you mean putting them side by side in columns (e.g. floating divs), you could use the lang attribute on individual divs. div lang=pt.../div div lang=en.../div Or to make it easier, set the html element to lang=en and put lang=pt only on the elements (divs or whatever you're using) with portuguese content. Regards -- Bert Doorn, Better Web Design http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/ Fast-loading, user-friendly websites ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] style sheet set up - ADMIN
ADMIN
Please remember a few basic guidelines:
http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
- Trim replies where possible
- Code samples are fine, but not full pages of html or css code - much
better to link to these items
The last post was a prime candidate for trimming AND linking!
Russ
/*STYLE RULES FOR HOME PAGE...*/
html
{height: 100%;
margin-bottom: 1px;}
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
Re: [WSG] multi-lingual
Ah, I see. What about mixing languages in the KEYWORDS and DESCRIPTION? Is that a problem? ~john _ Dr. Zeus Web Design http://www.DrZeus.net content without clutter on 5/30/2005 10:00 AM Bert Doorn said the following: G'day However, one of my clients wants two languages integrated into one site (basically two languages, one next to the other, but in different colors). My question is, how do I code this so that it makes sense? For individual languages sites, I add: lang=en xml:lang=en (changing the language, of course) But if I'm putting two languages on one page, how is that done? Can I use: If you mean putting them side by side in columns (e.g. floating divs), you could use the lang attribute on individual divs. div lang=pt.../div div lang=en.../div Or to make it easier, set the html element to lang=en and put lang=pt only on the elements (divs or whatever you're using) with portuguese content. Regards ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
[WSG] Signature markup
Guys n' gals, What would be the best way to mark-up something like: All the best, Tatham Oddie They aren't really separate paragraphs so this is wrong: pAll the best,/p pTatham Oddie/p This just looks hideous: p All the best,br / Tatham Oddie /p This seems like misuse (but looks visually perfect with no extra CSS): dl dtAll the best,/dt ddTatham Oddie/dd /dl Any ideas? opinions? Thanks, Tatham Oddie Technical Director, Fuel Advance www.fueladvance.com ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] multi-lingual
john wrote: Ah, I see. What about mixing languages in the KEYWORDS and DESCRIPTION? Is that a problem? From http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/global.html#edef-META : - META and search engines A common use for META is to specify keywords that a search engine may use to improve the quality of search results. When several META elements provide language-dependent information about a document, search engines may filter on the lang attribute to display search results using the language preferences of the user. For example, -- For speakers of US English -- META name=keywords lang=en-us content=vacation, Greece, sunshine -- For speakers of British English -- META name=keywords lang=en content=holiday, Greece, sunshine -- For speakers of French -- META name=keywords lang=fr content=vacances, Gregrave;ce, soleil -- Regards -- Bert Doorn, Better Web Design http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/ Fast-loading, user-friendly websites ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Signature markup
On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 20:06 +1000, Tatham Oddie wrote: This just looks hideous: p All the best,br / Tatham Oddie /p Really? That's a shame, because I have a feeling that's correct. They're not in separate paragraphs, but they are on separate lines, and are therefore separated by a line break (yeah, I know, br / is theoretically semantically null... shrug!) Looks okay to me... Kind Regards, Joshua Street base10solutions Website: http://www.base10solutions.com.au/ Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02) 8572-6021 Mobile: 0425 808 469 Multimedia Development Agency E-mails and any attachments sent from base10solutions are to be regarded as confidential. Please do not distribute or publish any of the contents of this e-mail without the senders consent. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to the e-mail, and then delete the message without making copies or using it in any way. Although base10solutions takes precautions to ensure that e-mail sent from our accounts are free of viruses, we encourage recipients to undertake their own virus scan on each e-mail before opening, as base10solutions accepts no responsibility for loss or damage caused by the contents of this e-mail. ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] multi-lingual
Oh, duh. If all else fails, read the W3 specs. If that doesn't work? Follow them. Thanks again. ~john _ Dr. Zeus Web Design http://www.DrZeus.net content without clutter on 5/30/2005 11:08 AM Bert Doorn said the following: john wrote: Ah, I see. What about mixing languages in the KEYWORDS and DESCRIPTION? Is that a problem? From http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/global.html#edef-META : - META and search engines A common use for META is to specify keywords that a search engine may use to improve the quality of search results. When several META elements provide language-dependent information about a document, search engines may filter on the lang attribute to display search results using the language preferences of the user. For example, -- For speakers of US English -- META name=keywords lang=en-us content=vacation, Greece, sunshine -- For speakers of British English -- META name=keywords lang=en content=holiday, Greece, sunshine -- For speakers of French -- META name=keywords lang=fr content=vacances, Gregrave;ce, soleil -- Regards ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
[WSG] Hardcore CSS problems - http://testdrive.whatcanido.com.au/
Guys n gals, I have a fairly hardcore CSS implementation in the works and its almost there. However, Im having a few minor bugs. Guess where? Did I hear you say IE6Win? *applause* Basically: The cap on the bottom block is positioned incorrectly. Any text in the bottom block, or bottom right nav cant be selected it seems there is something sitting on top of it. The logo top-left cant be clicked it seems there is something sitting on top of it. The buttons top-right cant be clicked it seems there is something sitting on top of them. The URL is: http://testdrive.whatcanido.com.au/ The best rendering currently occurs in FF1.0.4. Optimisation hasnt been started yet so dont complain too loudly about the load times. On that not however, if anyone has some good ideas on how to cut some bloat out, please let me know. Thanks, Tatham Oddie Technical Director, Fuel Advance www.fueladvance.com
Re: [WSG] Signature markup
I'd have to agree. It's not a list, and shouldn't be marked up as one. It's a single paragraph with a line break. Looks pretty straight-forward if you ask me. ~john _ Dr. Zeus Web Design http://www.DrZeus.net content without clutter on 5/30/2005 11:10 AM Joshua Street said the following: On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 20:06 +1000, Tatham Oddie wrote: This just looks hideous: p All the best,br / Tatham Oddie /p Really? That's a shame, because I have a feeling that's correct. They're not in separate paragraphs, but they are on separate lines, and are therefore separated by a line break (yeah, I know, br / is theoretically semantically null... shrug!) Looks okay to me... Kind Regards, Joshua Street base10solutions Website: http://www.base10solutions.com.au/ Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02) 8572-6021 Mobile: 0425 808 469 Multimedia Development Agency E-mails and any attachments sent from base10solutions are to be regarded as confidential. Please do not distribute or publish any of the contents of this e-mail without the senders consent. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to the e-mail, and then delete the message without making copies or using it in any way. Although base10solutions takes precautions to ensure that e-mail sent from our accounts are free of viruses, we encourage recipients to undertake their own virus scan on each e-mail before opening, as base10solutions accepts no responsibility for loss or damage caused by the contents of this e-mail. ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Signature markup
The whole notion that it should be marked up as a list kind of reminds me of this post... http://www.mezzoblue.com/archives/2005/03/31/too_far/index.php I think we're all in danger of doing that! Josh On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 12:17 +0100, john wrote: I'd have to agree. It's not a list, and shouldn't be marked up as one. It's a single paragraph with a line break. Looks pretty straight-forward if you ask me. ~john _ Dr. Zeus Web Design http://www.DrZeus.net content without clutter on 5/30/2005 11:10 AM Joshua Street said the following: On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 20:06 +1000, Tatham Oddie wrote: This just looks hideous: p All the best,br / Tatham Oddie /p Really? That's a shame, because I have a feeling that's correct. They're not in separate paragraphs, but they are on separate lines, and are therefore separated by a line break (yeah, I know, br / is theoretically semantically null... shrug!) Looks okay to me... Kind Regards, Joshua Street base10solutions Website: http://www.base10solutions.com.au/ Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02) 8572-6021 Mobile: 0425 808 469 Multimedia Development Agency E-mails and any attachments sent from base10solutions are to be regarded as confidential. Please do not distribute or publish any of the contents of this e-mail without the senders consent. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to the e-mail, and then delete the message without making copies or using it in any way. Although base10solutions takes precautions to ensure that e-mail sent from our accounts are free of viruses, we encourage recipients to undertake their own virus scan on each e-mail before opening, as base10solutions accepts no responsibility for loss or damage caused by the contents of this e-mail. ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
RE: [WSG] Signature markup
Ok... Thanks for your help. I was just checking there wasn't some funky über-geeky new way of doing it... If I'm smacking all my neighbours and clients over the head about semantic mark-up I want to make sure I'm doing it properly. Thanks, Tatham Oddie Technical Director, Fuel Advance www.fueladvance.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of john Sent: Monday, 30 May 2005 9:18 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Signature markup I'd have to agree. It's not a list, and shouldn't be marked up as one. It's a single paragraph with a line break. Looks pretty straight-forward if you ask me. ~john _ Dr. Zeus Web Design http://www.DrZeus.net content without clutter on 5/30/2005 11:10 AM Joshua Street said the following: On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 20:06 +1000, Tatham Oddie wrote: This just looks hideous: p All the best,br / Tatham Oddie /p Really? That's a shame, because I have a feeling that's correct. They're not in separate paragraphs, but they are on separate lines, and are therefore separated by a line break (yeah, I know, br / is theoretically semantically null... shrug!) Looks okay to me... Kind Regards, Joshua Street base10solutions Website: http://www.base10solutions.com.au/ Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02) 8572-6021 Mobile: 0425 808 469 Multimedia Development Agency E-mails and any attachments sent from base10solutions are to be regarded as confidential. Please do not distribute or publish any of the contents of this e-mail without the senders consent. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to the e-mail, and then delete the message without making copies or using it in any way. Although base10solutions takes precautions to ensure that e-mail sent from our accounts are free of viruses, we encourage recipients to undertake their own virus scan on each e-mail before opening, as base10solutions accepts no responsibility for loss or damage caused by the contents of this e-mail. ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
RE: [WSG] multi-lingual
Hello John, See http://www.w3.org/International/tutorials/language-decl/en/all.html#Slide006 0 and http://www.w3.org/TR/i18n-html-tech-lang/#ri20040728.121358444 The lang and xml:lang attributes can and should only specify one language at a time, as they indicate the language of the text you are currently dealing with. You can indicate that the document as a whole has two primary languages using the HTTP header. Meta elements may also serve the same purpose, but it is not clear to what extent they are used by anyone. Hope that helps, RI Richard Ishida W3C contact info: http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/ W3C Internationalization: http://www.w3.org/International/ Publication blog: http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of john Sent: 30 May 2005 09:11 To: web standards list Subject: [WSG] multi-lingual Hello. I have a question. I've been doing a lot of multi-lingual sites lately, and I usually separate them into individual sites based on language, and indicate so properly in the code. However, one of my clients wants two languages integrated into one site (basically two languages, one next to the other, but in different colors). My question is, how do I code this so that it makes sense? For individual languages sites, I add: lang=en xml:lang=en (changing the language, of course) But if I'm putting two languages on one page, how is that done? Can I use: lang=en,pt xml:lang=en,pt (or something similar)? Thanks, in advance, for your assistance. -- ~john _ Dr. Zeus Web Design http://www.DrZeus.net content without clutter ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Definition lists for comments in blogs
What would be wrong with doing something like this? h3Comment Title/h3 p Posted by foobar on foobar /p div p Comment text /p /div On 5/30/05, Andrew Krespanis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Heh, well if the blockquote approach is considered overkill, you'll choke on what I actually use for my comments... ol li dl dtAndrew said:/dt ddpThis is my comment. It is the definition of 'Andrew said' within this context./p/dd /dl dl class=date dtComment posted on:/dt dd9:15 am, 28th of May 2005/dd /dl /li /ol my 2c :) Andrew. http://leftjustified.net/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** -- Rowan Lewis (AKA. The Wolf) ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
RE: [WSG] style sheet set up
FWIW, my personal preference within a CSS file is to group all the properties relating to a particular selector into a single declaration. I've seen many people declare properties for, say, p in multiple locations. That makes it difficult to get a complete picture of the styles applied for p. I also tend to group together all variants on p, eg. p#first, p.second, even div#third p. hth, RI Richard Ishida W3C contact info: http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/ W3C Internationalization: http://www.w3.org/International/ Publication blog: http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Gilbert Sent: 28 May 2005 17:10 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: [WSG] style sheet set up is there any standard way to set up the flow of a style sheet? I usually try and use just one style sheet and start with global elements such as body, p, table, li etc. followed by elements as they flow on a page from header to footer. I use one stylesheet even though with a large site, this can become quite large. Looking for suggestions/thoughts on what others do such as multiple stylesheets vs. one big one, layout of styles, etc. thanks in advance, -- ::Bruce:: ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Definition lists for comments in blogs
What would be wrong with doing something like this? h3Comment Title/h3 p Posted by foobar on foobar /p div p Comment text /p /div Nothing 'wrong', as such. The div surrounding the 'comment text' paragraph is superfluous and could be dropped, but semantically it's pretty sound. The semantic question to ask there: is each individual comment really a subsection of the page? (which a header signifies). The answer could be yes or no there, I err on no but I see how people could differ. If you were to mark up three comments using your above example, you have 3 different sub-sections in your page structure. Ultimately, the reason for preferring a definition list is that the spec says you can use it to structure a dialogue and since that's what comments are, it does rather make sense. Using a definition list describes everything you've achieved with p and h3, but /also/ makes it very clear that the comments are a related sequence. Arguably a dl also describes a much closer relationship between the comment title (h3 -- dt) and the information (date , author and comment text (all dd)), than a heading and following paragraphs. There's not much in it really, and there comes a point when choosing one highly-optimised semantic structure over another highly-optimised semantic structure shouldn't matter. Both are pretty good. Ben ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Standards Publication
Hi, Will pass on this one. Thanks. C On May 30, 2005, at 12:39 AM, Nick Cowie wrote: Chris wrote: Has any knowledgeable soul read: Web Standards Design Guide (Internet Series) No and I am not racing out to order it either. I am slowly reading Kevin Ruse's previous book in that series - XML for Web Designers Using Macromedia Studio MX 2004 and while I learning a bit about XML (an area I completely lack knowledge), the HTML and CSS in that book makes me cringe. The HTML is basic and uses table for everything and the CSS is fairly primitive. It was like the code I wrote four or more years ago. Seeing that book was published in April 2004, I find it difficult to believe that Kevin Ruse has learnt enough in the year between books, to create a book on Web Standards that would interest me. This email is from the Department of Consumer and Employment Protection and any information or attachments to it may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please reply mail to the sender informing them of the error and delete all copies from your computer system, including attachments and your reply email. As the information is confidential you must not disclose, copy or use it in any manner. ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Where to start?: Need to make a really junk code page to standards-compliant
Jack Saat schrieb: I have a really Junk code page you can view on http://www.extraheight.com/ and need to make this code standards-compliant. But want keep the same layout minus of course the clear view problems. There is so much junk in the code and I do not know where to start. :( From the scratch. If you need the same layout: Should standards-compliant read accessible? - Note the order of the inserts at the image: /horizontal/ black-blue-yellow-white in comparison with the add-to-cart-table: /vertical/ yellow-black-blue-white - Note that the 0.5inch column shows in fact a 1.5inch blue insert and the 1.5 column shows a 0.5inch black insert. - Note that the columns are blue-yellow/olive-orange and can wrongly match with the blue and yellow insert. This can lead to misunderstanding and reclamations (who wants to be a giant-for-a-day with the wrong color and the wrong height in the shoes?). Swap the axis of this table, than sort the rows. And yes, it's tabular data. OT: - I would expect a photo from a nice, tall couple in the sunset and/or happy successful college boys and girls in a social situation or a funny photo from a NBA team and a small guy (you know what I mean) instead of repeating the same boring sports shoe photo at each page. - The entire site mixes ExtraHeight and Extraheight in text and image. - The English on this site should be better than mine. Ingo ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Where to start?: Need to make a really junk code page to standards-compliant
Drop it all and start from scratch, the layout is quite simple. -- Jan Brasna aka JohnyB :: www.alphanumeric.cz | www.janbrasna.com ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Hardcore CSS problems - http://testdrive.whatcanido.com.au/
Tatham Oddie wrote: I have a fairly hardcore CSS implementation in the works and its almost there. However, Im having a few minor bugs. Guess where? Did I hear you say IE6Win? *applause* The URL is: http://testdrive.whatcanido.com.au/ Optimisation hasnt been started yet so dont complain too loudly about the load times. On that not however, if anyone has some good ideas on how to cut some bloat out, please let me know. Thanks, Tatham Oddie While using the Web Dev toolbar to view the CSS on the website, it /crashed/ both my Mozilla browser and my Firefox browser! Ouch! You meant it when you said hardcore CSS implementaiton. ;-) Just an FYI to others who might try the same. Z u l e m a O r t i z w e b d e s i g n e r email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] website : http://zoblue.com/ weblog : http://blog.zoblue.com/ browser : http://getfirefox.com/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] style sheet set up
SAUD _ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: what on earth I will fuck you soon I am sorry Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new Resources site!
Re: [WSG] style sheet set up
Hi, Pardon me if I'm missing the joke. But I get enough junk mail, so I can do without obscenities coming from sources I rely on as support for my livelihood. Thank You On May 30, 2005, at 2:41 PM, SAUD _ wrote: SAUD _ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: what on earth I will fuck you soon I am sorry ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] style sheet set up - THREAD CLOSED
ADMIN THREAD CLOSED This list does not allow swearing - as clearly indicated in the guidelines. The offender was unsubscribed and blocked. Please do not reply to this or other obscene messages onlist. If you have a problem with a post or a closed thread, please email [EMAIL PROTECTED] - do not take out your anger or frustration on 1900 innocent people. Thanks Russ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Definition lists for comments in blogs
On 5/30/05 4:49 AM Rowan Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this out: What would be wrong with doing something like this? h3Comment Title/h3 p Posted by foobar on foobar /p div p Comment text /p /div The only thing I can think of is: are you aware of the origin of fubar (which is the correct spelling of foobar)? It's totally weird how usage of fubar has been so distorted on the web. Whatever. Rick ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
RE: [WSG] Definition lists for comments in blogs
That may be because most people don't know it's an acronym. Foobar IS F.U.B.A.R. Christie Mason -Original Message- Rick Faaberg The only thing I can think of is: are you aware of the origin of fubar (which is the correct spelling of foobar)? It's totally weird how usage of fubar has been so distorted on the web. Whatever. Rick ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Definition lists for comments in blogs
The discussion of Definition lists for comments in blogs has been a great so far. Please don't stray off-topic. Ben WSG Core That may be because most people don't know it's an acronym. Foobar IS The only thing I can think of is: are you aware of the origin of fubar ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Definition lists for comments in blogs
Foobar IS F.U.B.A.R. It isn't, it's only derived from it. See http://kb.iu.edu/data/aetq.html -- Jan Brasna aka JohnyB :: www.alphanumeric.cz | www.janbrasna.com ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
