Re: [WSG] Input Desired

2005-11-28 Thread Damian Sweeney

The current redesign and css file:

http://teagarden.biz/newindex.htmhttp://teagarden.biz/newindex.htm
http://teagarden.biz/teagard3.csshttp://teagarden.biz/teagard3.css

I'm having a lot of problems with margins and incorporating other 
dimensional concepts into the site.

I welcome all comments. Thx



A few quick impressions and suggestions:

Add a doctype declaration at the top [1]
Validate your html [2] and css [3]
For margins and such, start with PIE [4]

I find the text (particularly in the side navigation) too small
I'd prefer a sans serif font for the nav links and for the text in your header
There is not enough contrast between the link text colour and the background

Note that Samuel's comment about changing br to br / will depend 
on your doctype choice. If you go with html then those can stay how 
they are. However, you might want to create the spacing and effects 
you desire through your css, rather than manipulating your code for 
presentational purposes.


(I'm on a Mac using Firefox 1.07, btw)

Cheers,

Damian

[1] http://htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/doctype.html
[2] http://validator.w3.org/
[3] http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/
[4] http://www.positioniseverything.net/
--
--
Damian Sweeney
Learning Skills Adviser (online)
Language and Learning Skills Unit
Instructional Designer, AIRport Project
Equity, Language and Learning Programs
University of Melbourne
723 Swanston St
Parkville 3010
www.services.unimelb.edu.au/ellp/
www.services.unimelb.edu.au/llsu/
airport.unimelb.edu.au/
ph 03 8344 9370, fax 03 9349 1039

This email and any attachments may contain personal information or 
information that is otherwise confidential or the subject of 
copyright. Any unauthorised use, disclosure or copying of any part of 
it is prohibited. The University does not warrant that this email or 
any attachments are free from viruses or defects. Please check any 
attachments for viruses and defects before opening them. If this 
email is received in error please delete it and notify us by return 
email or by phoning (03) 8344 9370.

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Clearleft.com

2005-09-20 Thread Damian Sweeney
Hi Andy,

Great look and feel. I like the font sizes, they're refreshingly readable.

One wierd issue though. In Firefox on Debian (sarge), trying to use the
mousewheel dies half way down the page. I usually only encounter problems
like this with things like google ads and flash animations, but with those
if I move the mouse away and resume using the wheel it works. With
clearleft I can't continue to scroll at all with the wheel until I move
the vertical scroll bar manually. It's a small issue to be sure, but if
anyone can figure it out, I guess it would be the 'web-design supergroup'
;-). I'll check the behaviour on my Mac at work when I get in.

Just went to check in a couple of other browsers - Opera is fine, but the
site dropped off the radar when trying to test in anything else.

Cheers,

Damian


 We've just launched our new company website, and would love your
 feedback.

 http://www.clearleft.com/



**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



[WSG] Verb this link (WAS Click here--reference)

2005-09-20 Thread Damian Sweeney
This thread has got me thinking. If verbs are not the go in link 
text, where does that leave us with 'skip to' links at the beginning 
of a page? Should we just use 'main content' or 'navigation/menu'?


Also, Richard. The text sounds more passive because I've put it in 
the passive voice. You can nominalise [1] most phrases to put them 
into the passive, however, this does change the emphasis, as you 
mentioned. If we want links to be incorporated into the flow of the 
language and make sense out of context then should we be constrained 
to a particular style of writing to achieve this?


Still open minded about this, just curious what others are thinking.

Cheers,

Damian

[1] http://unilearning.uow.edu.au/academic/3b.html


Hey Damian,

Very valid point! It's not too difficult to turn a verb into an adjective.
Somehow, though, reading your example I get the feeling that it's a 
very passive voice to read in.

It almost *feels* like:

   Here's the Registration Form (which by the way you can also fill in).

What else would you do with an online form?
You could print it, but again 'print' (and 'register') seem to be 
different verbs to 'complete' and 'fill in'.

They sound like context-specific Tasks rather than simply actions.
In which case, I'd probably want to use the verb as the link text - 
it seems more forceful (at least from a marketing perspective) and 
there's absolutely no confusion as to what you are being asked to do:


   Register! Don't just look at the registration form and decide 
whether or not to.


In response to Christian's claim - sorry but no one said we were 
abandoning the title attribute at all!

This is a question of usability, rather than accessibility.

R  :o)


--
Damian Sweeney
Learning Skills Adviser (online)
Language and Learning Skills Unit
Instructional Designer, AIRport Project
Equity, Language and Learning Programs
University of Melbourne
723 Swanston St
Parkville 3010
www.services.unimelb.edu.au/ellp/
www.services.unimelb.edu.au/llsu/
airport.unimelb.edu.au/
ph 03 8344 9370, fax 03 9349 1039

This email and any attachments may contain personal information or 
information that is otherwise confidential or the subject of 
copyright. Any unauthorised use, disclosure or copying of any part of 
it is prohibited. The University does not warrant that this email or 
any attachments are free from viruses or defects. Please check any 
attachments for viruses and defects before opening them. If this 
email is received in error please delete it and notify us by return 
email or by phoning (03) 8344 9370.

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Clearleft.com

2005-09-20 Thread Damian Sweeney


Apparently it's a Firefox bug relating to overflow:auto.

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97283



Ah, cool. Site is fine in latest Firefox on OS X.


Just went to check in a couple of other browsers - Opera is fine, but the
site dropped off the radar when trying to test in anything else.


Um, do you mean that the site doesn't work in any other browser 
other than Opera or Firefox? Can I ask what you tested it on?


Sorry, my bad. I should have been clearer. The site failed to load 
from about 3:30am Melbourne for a couple of hours. Can't remember 
when it came back, but when it did the site worked well on other 
browsers.


Cheers,

Damian

--
--
Damian Sweeney
Learning Skills Adviser (online)
Language and Learning Skills Unit
Instructional Designer, AIRport Project
Equity, Language and Learning Programs
University of Melbourne
723 Swanston St
Parkville 3010
www.services.unimelb.edu.au/ellp/
www.services.unimelb.edu.au/llsu/
airport.unimelb.edu.au/
ph 03 8344 9370, fax 03 9349 1039

This email and any attachments may contain personal information or 
information that is otherwise confidential or the subject of 
copyright. Any unauthorised use, disclosure or copying of any part of 
it is prohibited. The University does not warrant that this email or 
any attachments are free from viruses or defects. Please check any 
attachments for viruses and defects before opening them. If this 
email is received in error please delete it and notify us by return 
email or by phoning (03) 8344 9370.

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Click here--reference

2005-09-19 Thread Damian Sweeney


I haven't made up my mind about verbs in links yet, but a counter 
example to yours Richard:


However, for pages where you're asked to register for a conference, 
for example, there's no way you'd put:


Register for the 
http://www.forbesconferences.com/?page=registerForbes Conference.




How about:

Fill in the a 
href=http://www.forbesconferences.com/?page=register;Forbes 
Conference Registration Form/a.


Damian

--
--
Damian Sweeney
Learning Skills Adviser (online)
Language and Learning Skills Unit
Instructional Designer, AIRport Project
Equity, Language and Learning Programs
University of Melbourne
723 Swanston St
Parkville 3010
www.services.unimelb.edu.au/ellp/
www.services.unimelb.edu.au/llsu/
airport.unimelb.edu.au/
ph 03 8344 9370, fax 03 9349 1039

This email and any attachments may contain personal information or 
information that is otherwise confidential or the subject of 
copyright. Any unauthorised use, disclosure or copying of any part of 
it is prohibited. The University does not warrant that this email or 
any attachments are free from viruses or defects. Please check any 
attachments for viruses and defects before opening them. If this 
email is received in error please delete it and notify us by return 
email or by phoning (03) 8344 9370.

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Suckerfish nav moving page background image

2005-08-30 Thread Damian Sweeney
Seems fine here in FF on Mac. The flyouts cause a horizontal toolbar 
to appear which makes the vertical one increase, but no jumping 
backgrounds.


Damian


Make sure you shrink the browser width down so that the flyouts would
cause vertical scrollbars.

  

  I have an odd problem with my page background image
  jumping, when certain nodes on the suckerfish nav are
  hovered over. The site is
  here:
  http://media.compliance.org.au/home.asp
 
  If you hover over the last 2 nodes (specifically, Resources  Shop,
  FAQ) with your browser width set to just bit wider than the
  actual site (with the CENTERED layout style set) you'll
  notice the whole page background image jump. It looks like
  it's trying to stay centered with the content of the page,
  which is logical I suppose, but unfortunate. Happens in IE and FF.
 
  The only fix I've come up with is to set the last 2 nodes to
  fly left, but I'd rather make the page background stay put

   without altering my nav.


**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Suckerfish nav moving page background image

2005-08-30 Thread Damian Sweeney


There's a js style switcher on the page at the top right for those 
with better ideas than mine:


How about moving the background image info from the body to the 
#container in layout-centre.css?


Damian


G'day


Here's a screenshot of what I'm experiencing
http://media.compliance.org.au/data/jumpy_bkg.gif
Note that you also need to have the page set to the centered layout
for it to happen.

Uhmmm.  What do you mean with have the page set to the centered 
layout?  Is this some obscure browser option or plug-in? 
I do get the jumping horizontal scrollbar, which is a direct effect 
of the content expanding with the long text on submenu items.


Regards --
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
http://www.betterwebdesign.com.au/
Fast-loading, user-friendly websites

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Accessibility, the possibilities

2005-08-23 Thread Damian Sweeney


With cache cleared and connected directly to the internet I started 
to suspect some dns shenanigans. I get Rick and Peter's behaviour 
from my home box, but from my work machine I see things differently.


Try http://69.93.55.164/topics/userscience/accessibility/

Cheers,

Damian


On 8/22/05 10:18 PM Damian Sweeney [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this
out:


 I get a 404 for http://www.alistapart.com/topics/accessibility/



Works for me.


 and a page full of articles for

  http://www.alistapart.com/topics/userscience/accessibility/

404

Okay, now everybody immediately clear caches and turn off proxy and try
again, okay? :-)

Rick Faaberg

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



--
Damian Sweeney
Learning Skills Adviser (online)
Language and Learning Skills Unit
Instructional Designer, AIRport Project
Equity, Language and Learning Programs
University of Melbourne
723 Swanston St
Parkville 3010
www.services.unimelb.edu.au/ellp/
www.services.unimelb.edu.au/llsu/
airport.unimelb.edu.au/
ph 03 8344 9370, fax 03 9349 1039

This email and any attachments may contain personal information or 
information that is otherwise confidential or the subject of 
copyright. Any unauthorised use, disclosure or copying of any part of 
it is prohibited. The University does not warrant that this email or 
any attachments are free from viruses or defects. Please check any 
attachments for viruses and defects before opening them. If this 
email is received in error please delete it and notify us by return 
email or by phoning (03) 8344 9370.

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



RE: [WSG] Accessibility, the possibilities

2005-08-22 Thread Damian Sweeney

Hmm, alistapart is back with a funky new design

and

structure


alistapart has many articles on accesibility
http://www.alistapart.com/topics/accessibility/



should be:

http://www.alistapart.com/topics/userscience/accessibility/

Damian

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



RE: [WSG] Accessibility, the possibilities

2005-08-22 Thread Damian Sweeney

Well, this is curious.

I get a 404 for http://www.alistapart.com/topics/accessibility/

and a page full of articles for 
http://www.alistapart.com/topics/userscience/accessibility/


Can anyone break this deadlock?

Damian


  From: Damian Sweeney

 Hmm, alistapart is back with a funky new design

 alistapart has many articles on accesibility

  http://www.alistapart.com/topics/accessibility/

 

 should be:

  http://www.alistapart.com/topics/userscience/accessibility/

Damian,

Your link gave me a 404. I'm really not sure what you are on about.
My link works  http://www.alistapart.com/topics/accessibility/

--
Peter Williams
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



--
Damian Sweeney
Learning Skills Adviser (online)
Language and Learning Skills Unit
Instructional Designer, AIRport Project
Equity, Language and Learning Programs
University of Melbourne
723 Swanston St
Parkville 3010
www.services.unimelb.edu.au/ellp/
www.services.unimelb.edu.au/llsu/
airport.unimelb.edu.au/
ph 03 8344 9370, fax 03 9349 1039

This email and any attachments may contain personal information or 
information that is otherwise confidential or the subject of 
copyright. Any unauthorised use, disclosure or copying of any part of 
it is prohibited. The University does not warrant that this email or 
any attachments are free from viruses or defects. Please check any 
attachments for viruses and defects before opening them. If this 
email is received in error please delete it and notify us by return 
email or by phoning (03) 8344 9370.

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] accessibility - opening new windows philosophy

2005-08-15 Thread Damian Sweeney
Hi Ted,

I would say let the user decide. Wherever possible I try to provide enough
information in the link itself so that the user knows what to expect and
can proceed as they wish. Many people will set up their browser to deal
with different file types according to their preference (open the document
in the browser, open it in the application, download the file). Opening in
a new window removes user choice. By providing a plain link you give users
the option that you use of `right-click - open in new window`. How do I
choose to open a new-window-link in the current window if that is my
preference?

The only time I open links (to web pages) in a new window is when I have
to place a link inside someone else's frame and I warn the user that I'm
doing it. I wouldn't use a new window for the downloadable documents you
are referring to.

Unexpected pdfs are annoying, especially for low-bandwidth users. So, I
would recommend something like:

a href=document.pdfSome stuff (pdf format, 200kb)/a

Include all the info in the link, if you can, for people who only read the
links.

Cheers,

Damian

 Hi All



 We've had a discussion at work about pdf documents and hijacking the
user's
 browser / making it more user-friendly.  What is the general feeling
towards
 having pdf and other non-html documents open in a new window?


--
Damian Sweeney
Learning Skills Adviser (online)
Language and Learning Skills Unit
Instructional Designer, AIRport Project
Equity, Language and Learning Programs
University of Melbourne
723 Swanston St
Parkville 3010
www.services.unimelb.edu.au/ellp/
www.services.unimelb.edu.au/llsu/
airport.unimelb.edu.au/
ph 03 8344 9370, fax 03 9349 1039

This email and any attachments may contain personal information or 
information that is otherwise confidential or the subject of
copyright. Any unauthorised use, disclosure or copying of any part of  it
is prohibited. The University does not warrant that this email or  any
attachments are free from viruses or defects. Please check any
attachments for viruses and defects before opening them. If this
email is received in error please delete it and notify us by return  email
or by phoning (03) 8344 9370.






**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Learning The DOM

2005-07-18 Thread Damian Sweeney
 How much JavaScript do you know?

Next to none.

 What kind of things about DOM Scripting need clarifying?

Potential pitfalls, how browser support differs and what constitutes
'behaviour'.

 Do you want to see examples of cool stuff with a kind of DOM
 Scripting for dummies style explanation or more sober articles with
 a more geeky leaning?


Geek me up.

 Please share your personal experiences: what's your skill level with
 JavaScript compared to say, CSS or XHTML? What's your opinion of
 JavaScript?


I'm reasonably confident with XHTML and CSS, but haven't really touched
JavaScript yet. It's looming as an important aspect of my work, so I want
to use it the 'right' way from the start. In the past I've frowned on
JavaScript often because the sites that relied on it annoyed me. Now I
think it has good applications for accessibility and seems more robust. It
will always be 'icing on the cake' for our site, though, because we still
support browsers (and users) who don't deal with it.

 The answers you give will really, really help determine the direction
 that the Task Force takes.


I look forward to it. Thanks in advance for the effort.

Damian

 Thanks,

 Jeremy
 --
 Jeremy Keith

 a d a c t i o

 http://adactio.com/




**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



RE: [WSG] HR - Presentation or Structure?

2005-07-12 Thread Damian Sweeney

I don't think anyone here is arguing for HTML to be not accessible,
but I feel what Mike may be trying to point out is that visual 
design can be an important part of the meaning.


Then you are teaching/presenting material in the visual register and 
therefore presenting inherently inaccessible material. What you then 
need to do is transform the material.




MathML is a classic example of this.


Correct! http://www.ozewai.org/2004/presentations/smith.doc

(Essentially, a big equation can be broken down into component parts. 
This can make it easier for blind users to read the equation and for 
sighted users to understand the equation. The equation is the same, 
it is just constructed in a more accessible form.)


It is accessible (except that for visual browsers it will only work 
on modern browsers) in that it can be interpreted by screen readers.


It is not accessible until you realign the original material so that 
it is not constructed purely for the visual register.


In so many ways we must ensure that our content is as accessible as 
possible but it is wishful thinking to assume it is equally 
accessible or that one medium (vision) is not favoured over another. 
Yes the technology (HTML) does not favour it but human practice of 
communication does.


It is not the human practice of communication, but the assumptions we 
make when authoring the material in the first place - even before it 
gets to the web.


Cheers,

Damian

--
Damian Sweeney
Learning Skills Adviser (online)
Language and Learning Skills Unit
Instructional Designer, AIRport Project
Equity, Language and Learning Programs
University of Melbourne
723 Swanston St
Parkville 3010
www.services.unimelb.edu.au/ellp/
www.services.unimelb.edu.au/llsu/
airport.unimelb.edu.au/
ph 03 8344 9370, fax 03 9349 1039

This email and any attachments may contain personal information or 
information that is otherwise confidential or the subject of 
copyright. Any unauthorised use, disclosure or copying of any part of 
it is prohibited. The University does not warrant that this email or 
any attachments are free from viruses or defects. Please check any 
attachments for viruses and defects before opening them. If this 
email is received in error please delete it and notify us by return 
email or by phoning (03) 8344 9370.

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



RE: [WSG] HR - Presentation or Structure?

2005-07-12 Thread Damian Sweeney

Grant replies:
Well, no. MathML by its nature is not purely for the visual register.
And no - we should not have to realign a complex formula if the
materials merit it because what we are doing then is making the content
less accessible/comprehensible for many people to allow it to be equally
accessible to all. If breaking the formula up into little chunks makes
comprehension harder for the vast majority of people then we should not
do it and I do not agree with your assertion that breaking a complex
formula will make it more understandable - it may in fact undermine the
learning. In most learning materials complexity builds throughout the
learning.


Breaking the formula into smaller chunks made it easier for all 
learners to comprehend (not stated explicitly in the paper, but 
mentioned at the conference).



We should be very wary of dumbing down content in the name of
accessibility. Accessibility is a continuum not an absolute and we often
have to make judgement calls that balance the interests of one group of
people against another. Equally accessible doesn't exist. As accessible
as possible is a fine aim.


I'm not saying we should change the formula or dumb it down. The 
information inherent in the equation remains the same, but as with 
many aspects of accessibility, by transforming it we can make it 
easier for everyone.


For me accessibility starts before we create the content, not after. 
I'm not saying it's easy, but my experience has been that accessible 
design from the ground up results in better content, not worse.


Cheers,

Damian

--
Damian Sweeney
Learning Skills Adviser (online)
Language and Learning Skills Unit
Instructional Designer, AIRport Project
Equity, Language and Learning Programs
University of Melbourne
723 Swanston St
Parkville 3010
www.services.unimelb.edu.au/ellp/
www.services.unimelb.edu.au/llsu/
airport.unimelb.edu.au/
ph 03 8344 9370, fax 03 9349 1039

This email and any attachments may contain personal information or 
information that is otherwise confidential or the subject of 
copyright. Any unauthorised use, disclosure or copying of any part of 
it is prohibited. The University does not warrant that this email or 
any attachments are free from viruses or defects. Please check any 
attachments for viruses and defects before opening them. If this 
email is received in error please delete it and notify us by return 
email or by phoning (03) 8344 9370.

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] html nowrap question

2005-06-27 Thread Damian Sweeney
Hi Ted,

The nowrap attribute is not a valid Strict element (either in HTML or
XHTML doctypes). It is a valid attribute in both HTML 4 and XHTML 1.0
Transitional doctypes. However, in XHTML it must have a value
(nowrap=nowrap). This combination is still valid HTML 4 Transitional.

I'd suggest using td nowrap=nowrap in preparation for your move to
XHTML 1.0 Transitional. When you're ready to move to CSS you can start
styling these td elements to avoid wrapping and then remove the attribute
altogether (in preparation for your future move to Strict :-) ).

Cheers,

Damian

 Hi All

 I'm working on some old pages and trying to make them as valid as
 possible.
 We are not ready to begin changing the CSS yet, so I need to keep
 attributes
 correct at the html level.

 Here's my question. What is the proper way to put nowrap in a td?
 It currently looks like td nowrap  I would think it should be td
 nowrap=nowrap or something like that.

 The pages are currently html with no doctype. I'm hoping to shift them to
 XHTML 1.0 transitional soon and prepare them for future conversion to CSS
 layout. It's an enormous site, which explains the slow progress.

 Thanks
 Ted




**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



RE: [WSG] alt tags and image captions

2005-06-04 Thread Damian Sweeney
 -Original Message-
 From: Hope Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Saturday, 4 June 2005 12:40 PM
 To: Web Standards Group
 Subject: [WSG] alt tags and image captions

 Having never seen/heard a screen reader in action, I am
 uncertain about how
 to make some aspects of coding user-friendly for those using
 screen readers.

 If you have got Windows XP or Windows 2000 you should have a screenreader
 (Narrator) installed. In my case I find it under Programs  Accessories 
 Accessiblity  Narrator. It's not as good as Jaws, but probably enough to
 get an idea of how they work.


Another option, especially for those of us not used to hearing web sites,
is the Fangs extension to Firefox. This gives a text version of what Jaws
(the most widely used screen reading software) would say aloud. I find
this a much easier way to deal with developing for screen readers. I have
used a screen reader to test my site and it was difficult.

 Specifically, I find my alt tags are almost always the same
 as my captions.
 For example, if I insert an image of Joe Smith, my code might
 look something
 like this:

 pimg src=images/joe_smith.jpg alt=Joe Smith //p
 p class=photocaptionJoe Smith/p
 Does the screen reader read, Joe Smith Joe Smith?

 Yeah, they will repeat it. If I remember correctly they will read
 something
 like Image Joe Smith, Joe Smith.


Fangs: Graphic Joe Smith Joe Smith

 If so, I
 would have
 thought that this repetition would get very annoying
 especially if there are
 a lot of images on the page.

 I guess it would be a bit repetitive. With an alt tag you generally write
 what can be seen in the image. Joe Smith doesn't really tell me whether
 the image you have is a photo of Joe Smith, Joe Smith the cartoon
 character,
 or a signature of Joe Smith. So to be a bit more specific you would
 probably
 write into the alt tag Photo of Joe Smith. Depending on the purpose of
 the
 photo, you might even have more detail in the alt tag: Photo of Joe Smith
 at the last accounting conference.


This is certainly true for photos. For other images (logos, etc) they
often have another semantic meaning in the page. A corporate logo for
example is often also a link to the home page. In this case I wouldn't use
'my company logo', but rather 'my corporate home page'.

Fangs: Graphic link my corporate home page

If the image adds nothing to the meaning of the page, either put it in
your css as a background-image or include an empty alt tag img alt=

 Hope this helps.


likewise,

Damian

 Andreas Boehmer
 User Experience Consultant

 Phone: (03) 9386 8907
 Mobile: (0411) 097 038
 http://www.addictiveMedia.com.au
 Consulting | Accessibility | Usability | Development







**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] a elements and what they can contain

2005-05-26 Thread Damian Sweeney

re: a elements may only contain other inline elements

hang on,
so if i have an anchor tag wrapped around an image (display:inline by
default), its deemed fine by the validator, but if I make that image
display:block via the css, (for design purposes, which must be a
pretty common practice on many, many sites - including many i've
designed) would that practice be frowned upon if the validator could
validate your markup *and* the corresponding css at the same time?

possibly some bigger questions there - one being, why shouldnt you be
able to wrap a anchor around a block level element? i know the
difference between inline and block, and the fact that block elements
cant be inside inline elements - but this particular anchor question
seems a bit shakey

pete


You should use the markup that makes sense without styles in the 
first instance, IMHO. The choice to use display:block is rarely a 
structural one and is usually presentational. Therefore display:block 
the content of your a tags to your heart's content (or should that 
be main content?).


As to your question about a tags for block level elements, can you 
give an example when you would use this? I haven't come across one 
yet, but I'd be curious if there is a need.


Cheers,

Damian

--
Damian Sweeney
Learning Skills Adviser (online)
Language and Learning Skills Unit
Instructional Designer, AIRport Project
Equity, Language and Learning Programs
University of Melbourne
723 Swanston St
Parkville 3010
www.services.unimelb.edu.au/ellp/
www.services.unimelb.edu.au/llsu/
airport.unimelb.edu.au/
ph 03 8344 9370, fax 03 9349 1039

This email and any attachments may contain personal information or 
information that is otherwise confidential or the subject of 
copyright. Any unauthorised use, disclosure or copying of any part of 
it is prohibited. The University does not warrant that this email or 
any attachments are free from viruses or defects. Please check any 
attachments for viruses and defects before opening them. If this 
email is received in error please delete it and notify us by return 
email or by phoning (03) 8344 9370.

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] why doesn't this validate with w3c.org and what to do about it

2005-05-26 Thread Damian Sweeney

I have some comments within my CSS to let me or anyone else know what
is controlling what

eg:
/*aligns list in middle of page*/
p.middle{test-align:center}


'test' this:
p.middle{text-align:center}


validation doesn't like this.is there a fix? or should I just ignore???

TIA

--
::Bruce::
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



--
Damian Sweeney
Learning Skills Adviser (online)
Language and Learning Skills Unit
Instructional Designer, AIRport Project
Equity, Language and Learning Programs
University of Melbourne
723 Swanston St
Parkville 3010
www.services.unimelb.edu.au/ellp/
www.services.unimelb.edu.au/llsu/
airport.unimelb.edu.au/
ph 03 8344 9370, fax 03 9349 1039

This email and any attachments may contain personal information or 
information that is otherwise confidential or the subject of 
copyright. Any unauthorised use, disclosure or copying of any part of 
it is prohibited. The University does not warrant that this email or 
any attachments are free from viruses or defects. Please check any 
attachments for viruses and defects before opening them. If this 
email is received in error please delete it and notify us by return 
email or by phoning (03) 8344 9370.

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] frames

2005-05-12 Thread Damian Sweeney
I canĀ“t see other way to create a chat page 
without frames. This is the only (IMHO) thing I 
use frames.

Of course, there are many ways to use it, as 
evil ways, but in a chat you got to have two 
frames, at least: one where you put the form, 
and another where you read the messages. This 
one you have to put a meta tag with auto 
refresh, or a javascript with a timeout function 
to update the page and let your user know what 
is going on. And the other the form where your 
user will send the message.
I use AChat (http://atutor.ca/achat/index.php) to 
chat with my partner during the day. I think it's 
a nice implementation of frames. The version I 
use isn't standards compliant (this may have 
changed), but it handles focus very well and is 
produced by people who know their accessibility 
backwards (the Adaptive Technology Resource 
Centre at the University of Toronto).

Damian
I have tried many ways to do it without frames, 
but, in this case, frames fit perfectly.

Cheers,
Francisco.
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**

--
Damian Sweeney
Learning Skills Adviser (online)
Language and Learning Skills Unit
Instructional Designer, AIRport Project
Equity, Language and Learning Programs
University of Melbourne
723 Swanston St
Parkville 3010
www.services.unimelb.edu.au/ellp/
www.services.unimelb.edu.au/llsu/
airport.unimelb.edu.au/
ph 03 8344 9370, fax 03 9349 1039
This email and any attachments may contain 
personal information or information that is 
otherwise confidential or the subject of 
copyright. Any unauthorised use, disclosure or 
copying of any part of it is prohibited. The 
University does not warrant that this email or 
any attachments are free from viruses or defects. 
Please check any attachments for viruses and 
defects before opening them. If this email is 
received in error please delete it and notify us 
by return email or by phoning (03) 8344 9370.
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] Valid blockquote scenarios?

2005-05-06 Thread Damian Sweeney
 Roger Johansson wrote:

 Unless I'm misreading the W3C Recommendation, blockquote elements can
 only have block-level content. That makes the second example
 incorrect. From  http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/text.html#h-9.2.2 :
 So yes, the p (or some other block-level element) is necessary, and it
 goes inside the blockquote element.

 Have a look: http://grabun.com/tmp/block-no-p.html


Valid Transitional, but not Strict (1.0).

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] The mother of all html references?

2005-05-03 Thread Damian Sweeney
I quite like the simplicity of http://htmlhelp.org/. It has a nice 
list of html 4.0 tags and you can hide deprecated ones. It also has a 
css reference, but unfortunately it's also not up to date.

Damian
I've been using this online html reference 
(http://www.htmlreference.com/) for the past 6 months or so, and so 
far it's been fine.

Can anyone recommend another on-line reference that they prefer so I 
can take a look?

Cole

--
Damian Sweeney
Learning Skills Adviser (online)
Language and Learning Skills Unit
Instructional Designer, AIRport Project
Equity, Language and Learning Programs
University of Melbourne
723 Swanston St
Parkville 3010
www.services.unimelb.edu.au/ellp/
www.services.unimelb.edu.au/llsu/
airport.unimelb.edu.au/
ph 03 8344 9370, fax 03 9349 1039
This email and any attachments may contain personal information or 
information that is otherwise confidential or the subject of 
copyright. Any unauthorised use, disclosure or copying of any part of 
it is prohibited. The University does not warrant that this email or 
any attachments are free from viruses or defects. Please check any 
attachments for viruses and defects before opening them. If this 
email is received in error please delete it and notify us by return 
email or by phoning (03) 8344 9370.
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] Weird CSS validation issue

2004-11-24 Thread Damian Sweeney
Granted, it's weird. What happens if you separate the media 
declarations? I say that because I noticed a long list of warnings 
half way down related to a particular media type (not sure which 
one). It might be that the validator is balking at some styles even 
though they are valid for the screen. Or maybe it's parsing its own 
parse tree because there's more than one media?

Damian
Hey all,
I'm still fairly new to CSS and wanted to validate my CSS before 
asking some advice from this group, but I keep getting weird errors 
ONLY when I validate the online CSS file. I'm using the W3C CSS 
Validation Service: 
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/

I can validate my local copy of the CSS file and receive no errors, 
however when I try and validate my online version, it has errors 
everywhere. Actually, I didn't think the items that it's reporting 
were errors. For example, I'm using % for font-size - but it doesn't 
like this. It also fails on my shorthand hex colours (ie. #000 
instead of #00).

The XHTML file validates fine, both locally and online.
Here's the relevant addresses:
http://www.lakemac.com.au/new/default.htmhttp://www.lakemac.com.au/new/default.htm
http://www.lakemac.com.au/new/css/screen_home.csshttp://www.lakemac.com.au/new/css/screen_home.css
What am I doing wrong? Thanks in advance for your help.
Best Regards,
Paul Hempsall
Web Developer
Lake Macquarie City Council
Tel: (02) 4921 0713
Fax: (02) 4958 7257
Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://www.lakemac.com.au/http://www.lakemac.com.au

This information is intended for the addressee only. The use, 
copying or distribution of this message or any information it 
contains, by anyone other than the addressee is prohibited by the 
sender.

Any views expressed in this communication are those of the 
individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them 
to be the views of Council.

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] Sometimes you just cant help people ...

2004-11-24 Thread Damian Sweeney
I still use the 'skip' so as to convey that the link is within the 
page. Similar logic applies to 'Back/Return to top'. Is my logic 
flawed in this regard? What do usability gurus out there think?

Damian
In discussion's I've been involved in, the best link text describes 
the link's destination, not the action it takes -- this is pretty 
much how most other navigation works.

So
skip to content = main content
main content is preferred because it gets pronounced properly by 
screen readers.

I describe accesskeys in an accessibility page, and don't bother 
markingup or styling them in any way to exposed them to users. I use 
content generation in my own user stylesheet to see them.

Using the title attribute to descibe the accesskey is a good idea.
Terrence Wood.
snip /
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] Site critique please

2004-11-22 Thread Damian Sweeney
I like the design.
You're getting a couple of CSS validation errors. Also, I think you 
should be consistent in the positioning of your main menu. If you 
need the left column for sub-navigation inside the site, then use the 
horizontal style on the home page as well.

Damian
Hi everyone
Would very much appreciate  feedback as to any problems or mistakes. 
Thank you.

www.mwg.green.net.au/testpages/mwgindex.html
Lyn

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] Positioning text

2004-11-16 Thread Damian Sweeney
Try z-index:
http://www.w3schools.com/css/pr_pos_z-index.asp
Damian
I am trying to get the graphic logo (CRF logo above)  in my header to be
positioned behind the grapic and between (CRF) and This is some text for
testing purposes. Does anyone have any ideas? Thank you.
HTML: http://www.choroideremia.org/New/CRFHeader.htm
CSS: http://www.choroideremia.org/New/CRF_css1.css
Angus MacKinnon
MacKinnon Crest Saying
Latin -  Audentes Fortuna Juvat
English - Fortune Assists The Daring
Web page: http://members.shaw.ca/dabneyadfm
Choroideremia Research Foundation Inc.
http://www.choroideremia.org
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] problem with print style sheet

2004-11-15 Thread Damian Sweeney
 Works here. I printed to pdf using Firefox 1.0PR on Mac OS X. The 
resulting file can be found at:

http://members.iinet.net.au/~damianfs/KDPV.pdf
What software is giving you this problem?
Damian
Hello,
I'm working on a site 
(http://www.cdkd.be/nl/home.phphttp://www.cdkd.be/nl/home.php) and 
there is a problem with one of the pages if you want to print.

If you print the following page: 
http://www.cdkd.be/nl/participatie.phphttp://www.cdkd.be/nl/participatie.php.
You will see the titel on the first page, white space and the 
following text on the second page.

The other pages on the site are printing fine.
Can someone help me?
Greetings!
Bram Janssens

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] Height in IE6 for Windows

2004-11-14 Thread Damian Sweeney
 have redesigned a header for a web page. Firefox 1.0 displays the HTML and
CSS just what I am trying to achieve. However, IE6 ignores the height in
 #logowrapper {. Why? And how do I fix it? Thank you.
HTML: http://www.choroideremia.org/HNew/CRFHeader.htm
I get a 404 error on this URL and can't guess the right page.
Again?
Damian

CSS: http://www.choroideremia.org/New/CRF_css1.css
Angus MacKinnon
MacKinnon Crest Saying
Latin -  Audentes Fortuna Juvat
English - Fortune Assists The Daring
Web page: http://members.shaw.ca/dabneyadfm
Choroideremia Research Foundation Inc.
http://www.choroideremia.org
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] Height in IE6 for Windows

2004-11-14 Thread Damian Sweeney
Damian
HTML: http://www.choroideremia.org/HNew/CRFHeader.htm
 I get a 404 error on this URL and can't guess the right page.
Sorry. I should check my typing.
HTML: http://www.choroideremia.org/New/CRFHeader.htm
CSS: http://www.choroideremia.org/New/CRFHeader.htm
IE is not your only issue. Safari has only a thin line (apparently 
ignoring the min-height setting) above the h1 making it unreadable.

Damian
Angus MacKinnon
MacKinnon Crest Saying
Latin -  Audentes Fortuna Juvat
English - Fortune Assists The Daring
Web page: http://members.shaw.ca/dabneyadfm
Choroideremia Research Foundation Inc.
http://www.choroideremia.org
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] Height in IE6 for Windows

2004-11-14 Thread Damian Sweeney
Damian
I took out the min-height: out. Does that make any change?
HTML: http://www.choroideremia.org/New/CRFHeader.htm
CSS: http://www.choroideremia.org/New/CRF_css1.css
This now looks broken in Firefox (image smaller and too high) and the 
image doesn't display at all in Safari.  You've also now got height: 
4empx in the logowrapper definition.

Damian
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


RE: [WSG] Help with fieldset in a li

2004-10-28 Thread Damian Sweeney
Thanks to Susan, Steven and Roger for the replies so far.
A couple of questions for clarification:
* If no fieldset is used for the individual questions, how does a 
screen reader associate the question with the radio group? The label 
will differentiate the options, but what about the questions?
* It sounds like a long legend is a bad idea - correct?
* In a page where there is only one form and one semantically linked 
set of form controls is a fieldset necessary/desirable?
* If fieldsets are nested, how does a screen reader handle the 
legends? Are they concatenated for each form control or is only the 
legend from the parent fieldset used?

Cheers,
Damian
One benefit of using fieldset and legend for screen reader users is that
nearly all readers will read the legend before every input label within a
fieldset. This can be very helpful with forms that require the same
information within different sections of the form. For example, if you need
put in name, phone number etc for a number of different people, the form
input labels for each person will be the same - the layout of the form may
make the different sections of the form obvious for visual users of the
site, but the difference may not be obvious if you can't see. However, when
you use fieldset and legend (with say a legend of purchaser for one person)
then the reader will read the labels within this fieldset as purchaser name,
purchaser phone number etc.
An article with some more information about form accessibility can be found
at http://www.usability.com.au/resources/forms.cfm
Hope this is helpful
Roger
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Susan R. Grossman
Sent: Friday, 29 October 2004 1:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] Help with fieldset in a li

  Firstly, am I using fieldset and legend in the correct semantic manner?
My understanding is that fieldset is meant to group all the similar
form elements together, not to diferentiate each input.A group of
numbered questions are all related to each other,  and the entire
thing should be in one fieldset with one legend.   If you were to add
a second group of numbered questions starting the numbers over again
because they are related to each other, but not to the first group of
numbered questions, then you would use a second fieldset and legend.
(a new one, not nested)
At least this  is how I've interepreted and used the fieldset.   An
everyday example is a login form.   The fieldset goes around the
username and password text boxes as well as the radio button for
remembering your password, with the legend on the login text.   Any
other fields like submitting for a lost password would be in a
separate fieldset with new legend of forgotten password.
--
Susan R. Grossman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
Damian Sweeney
Instructional Designer, AIRport Project
Equity, Language and Learning Programs
University of Melbourne
723 Swanston St
Parkville 3010
www.services.unimelb.edu.au/ellp/
ph 03 8344 9370, fax 03 9349 1039
This email and any attachments may contain personal information or 
information that is otherwise confidential or the subject of 
copyright. Any unauthorised use, disclosure or copying of any part of 
it is prohibited. The University does not warrant that this email or 
any attachments are free from viruses or defects. Please check any 
attachments for viruses and defects before opening them. If this 
email is received in error please delete it and notify us by return 
email or by phoning (03) 8344 9370.
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


RE: [WSG] Help with fieldset in a li

2004-10-28 Thread Damian Sweeney
 In a page where there is only one form and one semantically linked
set of form controls is a fieldset necessary/desirable?
I think while desirable it is not necessary, unless you have a radio button
or checkbox group.
But why not use the fieldset element to structure the form  instead of
putting in a div or some other container? remeber the legend is optional.
The main reason for using an ol is that this is a well-established 
convention for questionnaires and helps to structure the feedback for 
responses (which is often per question for my purposes).

Also, I would have thought that modern screen readers would be able 
to group radio and checkbox groups based on name attributes. Is this 
not the case?

Anyway, based on the responses I'm currently thinking I'll do things this way:
http://members.iinet.net.au/~damianfs/sample2.html
where the fieldset only encloses the radio buttons in a group. This 
fixes the positioning problem for the list items in Firefox and IE 
and seems semantically sound to me. No legends are used.

Thanks again for the excellent responses,
Damian
--
Damian Sweeney
Instructional Designer, AIRport Project
Equity, Language and Learning Programs
University of Melbourne
723 Swanston St
Parkville 3010
www.services.unimelb.edu.au/ellp/
ph 03 8344 9370, fax 03 9349 1039
This email and any attachments may contain personal information or 
information that is otherwise confidential or the subject of 
copyright. Any unauthorised use, disclosure or copying of any part of 
it is prohibited. The University does not warrant that this email or 
any attachments are free from viruses or defects. Please check any 
attachments for viruses and defects before opening them. If this 
email is received in error please delete it and notify us by return 
email or by phoning (03) 8344 9370.
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] Site Review Request

2004-10-26 Thread Damian Sweeney
Regarding skip to content links, I found this article recently 
about usability testing of screen reader users:

http://www.stcsig.org/usability/newsletter/0304-observing.html
In particular under the 'Many want to skip the navigation, but don't 
use that feature' section:

Some developers have used the phrase Skip to Content instead of 
Skip Navigation. Good idea. But it does not work because content 
in English can be a noun or an adjective. JAWS reads it here as an 
adjective with the accent on the second syllable. So it does not make 
sense to users. A solution that does seem to work is Skip to Main 
Content. JAWS reads that correctly as the noun content with the 
accent on the first syllable.

Cheers,
Damian
I like it.  Clean and simple.
IMO, you should include a skip to content link for the screen readers.
~john
_
Dr. Zeus Web Development
http://www.DrZeus.net
content without clutter

Daniel Bowling wrote:
Hello, I would greatly appreciate any feedback for my personal site
regarding design, standards compliance, usability and general code
quality.
http://www.danbowling.com
Thank you for your time,
Dan Bowling
W: http://www.danbowling.com

--
Damian Sweeney
Instructional Designer, AIRport Project
Equity, Language and Learning Programs
University of Melbourne
723 Swanston St
Parkville 3010
www.services.unimelb.edu.au/ellp/
ph 03 8344 9370, fax 03 9349 1039
This email and any attachments may contain personal information or 
information that is otherwise confidential or the subject of 
copyright. Any unauthorised use, disclosure or copying of any part of 
it is prohibited. The University does not warrant that this email or 
any attachments are free from viruses or defects. Please check any 
attachments for viruses and defects before opening them. If this 
email is received in error please delete it and notify us by return 
email or by phoning (03) 8344 9370.
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**