RE: [WSG] links with same names

2004-11-04 Thread Andreas Boehmer [Addictive Media]

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of Edwart Visser
> Sent: Thursday, 4 November 2004 7:35 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [WSG] links with same names
> 
> 
> Ok, but then there is the answer, isnt it?
> 
> Take a look at this example... http://www.flashpro.nl/wsg/  
> 
> Doesn't this work in screenreaders then?


This looks like a pretty good solution to me. Works in JAWS.



**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



RE: [WSG] links with same names

2004-11-04 Thread Edwart Visser
Ok, but then there is the answer, isnt it?

Take a look at this example... http://www.flashpro.nl/wsg/  

Doesn't this work in screenreaders then?

Gr,

Edwart

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Patrick H. Lauke
Sent: donderdag 4 november 2004 09:19
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] links with same names

Edwart Visser wrote:
> Just an idea... I don't know how screenreaders manage this but take a 
> look at this:
> 
> 
>   .readmoreTitle { display: none; }
> 

Unfortunately not a viable option, as some screenreaders then completely
miss out on it.
http://www.google.com/search?q=screenreaders+%22display%3Anone%22

Patrick H. Lauke
_
re.dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re-
+ dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



Re: [WSG] links with same names

2004-11-04 Thread Cameron Muir

.readmoreTitle { text-indent: -9000px; }

might be better for screen readers.
Edwart Visser wrote:
Just an idea... I don't know how screenreaders manage this but take a look
at this:

.readmoreTitle { display: none; }

Read more
class="readmoreTitle">: [title] 

Would this be an option?
Edwart Visser
Designer
Wisdom TMLC
T + 31 [0]592 305 000
F + 31 [0]592 305 026
M + 31 [0]6 254 14 980
W www.wisdomtmlc.com
Online onderzoek? Kijk op www.surv-e.nl! 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: donderdag 4 november 2004 01:34
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] links with same names

So the ability to have the titles of links read out by screenreaders 
can be influenced by a setting?

Relying on that setting is dangerous, don't you think? If the users 
have the reading of title attributes turned off, they won't hear any 
difference between the links. In fact, no users of screenreaders I have 
met so far could hear the title attributes.

Good point Andreas, that is why i think that title attributes should be used
with caution, if the text is important don't put it in the title attribute.
plain text is best.
Also remember that title attributes are device dependent, keyboard users
cannot access them.
A reasonable way around the issue is what they do on the age/sydney morning
herald They have the heading as a link and and also a "more" link (both
point to the full text of the article)
Example:
Police arrest possible sex attacker
[11:30am] A Sydney rail commuter believes he saw someone resembling the
identikit picture of a serial sex attacker. more
it would be better if the more link had a title attribute, but the main
point is that   screen reader users have at least one clearly stated link
to the article.
In reference to to title content:
I think it is better to have repeated  words such as "more" or "full text"
at the end of the title text rather than the beginning
Examples:
america has spoken - full text
police arrest sex attacker -full text
As when read out of context the important and defining information is
"frontloaded" and allows easier identification of a particular link with a
list of links.
with regards
Steven Faulkner
Web Accessibility Consultant
National Information & Library Service (NILS)
454 Glenferrie Road
Kooyong Victoria 3144
Phone: (613) 9864 9281
Fax: (613) 9864 9210
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
National Information Library Service
A subsidiary of RBS.RVIB.VAF Ltd.
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**


**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**


Re: [WSG] links with same names

2004-11-04 Thread Patrick H. Lauke
Edwart Visser wrote:
Just an idea... I don't know how screenreaders manage this but take a look
at this:

.readmoreTitle { display: none; }

Unfortunately not a viable option, as some screenreaders then completely 
miss out on it.
http://www.google.com/search?q=screenreaders+%22display%3Anone%22

Patrick H. Lauke
_
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**


RE: [WSG] links with same names

2004-11-04 Thread Edwart Visser
Just an idea... I don't know how screenreaders manage this but take a look
at this:


.readmoreTitle { display: none; }


Read more: [title] 

Would this be an option?

Edwart Visser
Designer

Wisdom TMLC

T + 31 [0]592 305 000
F + 31 [0]592 305 026
M + 31 [0]6 254 14 980
W www.wisdomtmlc.com

Online onderzoek? Kijk op www.surv-e.nl! 


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: donderdag 4 november 2004 01:34
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] links with same names


>So the ability to have the titles of links read out by screenreaders 
>can be influenced by a setting?

>Relying on that setting is dangerous, don't you think? If the users 
>have the reading of title attributes turned off, they won't hear any 
>difference between the links. In fact, no users of screenreaders I have 
>met so far could hear the title attributes.


Good point Andreas, that is why i think that title attributes should be used
with caution, if the text is important don't put it in the title attribute.
plain text is best.

Also remember that title attributes are device dependent, keyboard users
cannot access them.

A reasonable way around the issue is what they do on the age/sydney morning
herald They have the heading as a link and and also a "more" link (both
point to the full text of the article)

Example:
Police arrest possible sex attacker
[11:30am] A Sydney rail commuter believes he saw someone resembling the
identikit picture of a serial sex attacker. more

it would be better if the more link had a title attribute, but the main
point is that   screen reader users have at least one clearly stated link
to the article.

In reference to to title content:
I think it is better to have repeated  words such as "more" or "full text"
at the end of the title text rather than the beginning
Examples:
america has spoken - full text
police arrest sex attacker -full text

As when read out of context the important and defining information is
"frontloaded" and allows easier identification of a particular link with a
list of links.


with regards

Steven Faulkner
Web Accessibility Consultant
National Information & Library Service (NILS)
454 Glenferrie Road
Kooyong Victoria 3144
Phone: (613) 9864 9281
Fax: (613) 9864 9210
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

National Information Library Service
A subsidiary of RBS.RVIB.VAF Ltd.


**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



Re: [WSG] links with same names

2004-11-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
you could also use a "text image" such as gif or jpg with an alt like:
alt = Link :: LINK NAME HERE

-- 
Brian Ussery 
beta testing: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

b e ussery imagery co. athens - atlanta - asheville
http://www.beussery.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
706.296.3446
905.935.4396f
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



Re: [WSG] links with same names

2004-11-03 Thread Steven . Faulkner

>So the ability to have the titles of links read out by screenreaders
>can be influenced by a setting?

>Relying on that setting is dangerous, don't you think? If the users
>have the reading of title attributes turned off, they won't hear any
>difference between the links. In fact, no users of screenreaders I have
>met so far could hear the title attributes.


Good point Andreas, that is why i think that title attributes should be
used with caution, if the text is important don't put it in the title
attribute.
plain text is best.

Also remember that title attributes are device dependent, keyboard users
cannot access them.

A reasonable way around the issue is what they do on the age/sydney morning
herald
They have the heading as a link and and also a "more" link (both point to
the full text of the article)

Example:
Police arrest possible sex attacker
[11:30am] A Sydney rail commuter believes he saw someone resembling the
identikit picture of a serial sex attacker. more

it would be better if the more link had a title attribute, but the main
point is that   screen reader users have at least one clearly stated link
to the article.

In reference to to title content:
I think it is better to have repeated  words such as "more" or "full text"
at the end of the title text rather than the beginning
Examples:
america has spoken - full text
police arrest sex attacker -full text

As when read out of context the important and defining information is
"frontloaded" and allows easier identification of a particular link with a
list of links.


with regards

Steven Faulkner
Web Accessibility Consultant
National Information & Library Service (NILS)
454 Glenferrie Road
Kooyong Victoria 3144
Phone: (613) 9864 9281
Fax: (613) 9864 9210
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

National Information Library Service
A subsidiary of RBS.RVIB.VAF Ltd.


**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



Re: [WSG] links with same names

2004-11-03 Thread Patrick H. Lauke
Andreas Boehmer wrote:
So the ability to have the titles of links read out by screenreaders 
can be influenced by a setting? 

Relying on that setting is dangerous, don't you think?
Of course it is. The best option by far, in my opinion, is having the 
news item title as the actual link, but you were looking for alternatives.

It would also be conceivable to use a small image that signifies the 
"read entire article" concept, and expanding it fully in the alt 
attribute alt="read this article: [TITLE OF ARTICLE]" - or using CSS 
image replacement for this purpose.

> If the users
have the reading of title attributes turned off, they won't hear any 
difference between the links. In fact, no users of screenreaders I have 
met so far could hear the title attributes.
Just to throw in a devil's advocate type comment: the onus is also on 
the user to know how to use their AT, and how to configure it properly 
(although I'd say the screenreader developers are to blame for mostly 
having this option OFF by default...I'm looking at you, FreedomScientifc)

Patrick H. Lauke
_
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**


Re: [WSG] links with same names

2004-11-03 Thread Andreas Boehmer
> you can make use of the title attribute to make the links unique, 
while 
> still "visually" having them appear short and similar.
> 
> read 
> article
> 
> best practice with regards to titles suggests that the link text 
should 
> be repeated in the title itself. also be aware that in the case of 
> screenreaders the output users will hear depends on the verbosity 
> settings they have enabled.

So the ability to have the titles of links read out by screenreaders 
can be influenced by a setting? 

Relying on that setting is dangerous, don't you think? If the users 
have the reading of title attributes turned off, they won't hear any 
difference between the links. In fact, no users of screenreaders I have 
met so far could hear the title attributes.

> Patrick H. Lauke
> _
> re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
> [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
> www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
> http://redux.deviantart.com
> 
> **
> The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
> 
>  See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
>  for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
> **
> 
> 
> 

Andreas Boehmer
User Experience Consultant

Phone: (03) 9417 0468
Mobile: (0411) 097 038
http://www.addictiveMedia.com.au
Consulting | Accessibility | Usability | Development
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



RE: [WSG] links with same names

2004-11-03 Thread Peter Firminger
Predictable is a good thing. Expectations met! Usability has a lot to do
with predictability. The 'kiss' principle is always a good place to start.

> The whole Find out more about ... at the bottom of each page looks too
> predictable.

You can adjust the words to suit the site e.g.:

Find out more about 
More about 
Read 
More on 
Full text: ""

Depends on how your s are written and how you are accessing them
(hand coding or dynamic content output). If it's a custom built CMS you
could even add a data field specifically for this link (a short title
maybe). If it's hand coded then you can write a friendly link each time.

P


**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



Re: [WSG] links with same names

2004-11-03 Thread Patrick H. Lauke
Richard Czeiger wrote:
The whole Find out more about ... at the bottom of each page looks too
predictable.
since when is "predictable" a bad thing when it comes to usability and 
user interfaces?

Patrick H. Lauke
_
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**


Re: [WSG] links with same names

2004-11-03 Thread Patrick H. Lauke
you can make use of the title attribute to make the links unique, while 
still "visually" having them appear short and similar.

read 
article

best practice with regards to titles suggests that the link text should 
be repeated in the title itself. also be aware that in the case of 
screenreaders the output users will hear depends on the verbosity 
settings they have enabled.

Patrick H. Lauke
_
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**


Re: [WSG] links with same names

2004-11-03 Thread Richard Czeiger
Personally, coming up with links that don't end in click here at the end of
an article or section is something I find really difficult...

The whole Find out more about ... at the bottom of each page looks too
predictable.

:o(

Richard

- Original Message -
From: "Andreas Boehmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 9:44 AM
Subject: [WSG] links with same names


One problem I come across regularly is the issue of not giving multiple
links the same names. Let's say I have got a list of dynamically
created news items, each one of them having a summary and a link
to "read more". Obviously this is inaccessible: 10 links all
saying "read more" is not terribly helpful to anybody. But I would love
to know how people solve this problem?

Personally, I sometimes make the title of the news item the actual
link, but I feel this is not user-friendly enough.

Another option is to make the "read me" link unique by including the
title of the news item in it (e.g. "Read more about the new
Benchmarking for Educational Effectiveness Program"). The length of
this link shows for itself that it is not the best solution either.

Has anybody come up with better ways of solving this problem?



Andreas Boehmer
User Experience Consultant

Phone: (03) 9417 0468
Mobile: (0411) 097 038
http://www.addictiveMedia.com.au
Consulting | Accessibility | Usability | Development
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



[WSG] links with same names

2004-11-03 Thread Andreas Boehmer
One problem I come across regularly is the issue of not giving multiple 
links the same names. Let's say I have got a list of dynamically 
created news items, each one of them having a summary and a link 
to "read more". Obviously this is inaccessible: 10 links all 
saying "read more" is not terribly helpful to anybody. But I would love 
to know how people solve this problem?

Personally, I sometimes make the title of the news item the actual 
link, but I feel this is not user-friendly enough. 

Another option is to make the "read me" link unique by including the 
title of the news item in it (e.g. "Read more about the new 
Benchmarking for Educational Effectiveness Program"). The length of 
this link shows for itself that it is not the best solution either.

Has anybody come up with better ways of solving this problem? 



Andreas Boehmer
User Experience Consultant

Phone: (03) 9417 0468
Mobile: (0411) 097 038
http://www.addictiveMedia.com.au
Consulting | Accessibility | Usability | Development
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**