Re: [wsjt-devel] FYI: My Yaesu FT-991 seems to work well with Hamlib built 21-01-2021 at 11:16

[Bensay 1]

Dear Bill,

Thanks for your answer,
Kinda Texas style shoot first talk later.
Sorry my second mail was draft one and was also send.

Best greetings from Houston / TX.

Benjamin L / F4FPR / K5AW

Le 21 janv. 2021 à 13:49, Bill Somerville  a écrit :


Hi Benjamin,

apologies, but I do have you down to test with the FT-991. Uwe was just 
offering his observations. You are jumping the gun, I have not yet sent out the 
test version and test plan. Please be patient you are not missing out.

73
Bill
G4WJS.

On 21/01/2021 12:36, Bensay 1 wrote:
Hi Bill,

I just check back my outbox to be sure about this but yesterday at 5:28pm I 
offered to be part of the test for the only yaesu rig I own and wasn’t yet 
offered to test the Yaesu FT-991.

Let’s me know about it.

73s

Benjamin L / F4FPR / K5AW

Le 21 janv. 2021 à 13:07, Bill Somerville 
<mailto:g4...@classdesign.com> a écrit :


Hi Benjamin,

you responded with an offer to test two rigs, I chose the one that no one else 
had offered at that time. I am trying to spread the work across as many 
responders as possible without duplication.

73
Bill
G4WJS.

On 21/01/2021 11:44, Bensay 1 wrote:
Dear Bill,

Wasn’t I the first one responder for FT-991 ?

73s

Benjamin L / F4FPR / K5AW

Le 21 janv. 2021 à 11:55, Bill Somerville 
<mailto:g4...@classdesign.com> a écrit :


Hi Uwe,

thanks for the update. I need quite specific test run and also to see the 
diagnostic trace. I will send out a test plan once some issues for another rig 
have been resolved.

73
Bill
G4WJS.

On 21/01/2021 10:46, DG2YCB, Uwe wrote:

Hi Bill and Mike,

For your information: I have just compiled wsjt-x v2.3.0-rc3 with a freshly
created hamlib (Build Date: 21-01-2021 at 11:16, source files from hamlib
master repository). Result: My Yaesu FT-991 seems to work without any
problems. Frequency changes and TX / RX work perfectly in both directions. I
did not find any undesirable effects.

73 de Uwe, DG2YCB

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. Januar 2021 17:47
An: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Betreff: Re: [wsjt-devel] Request to Yaesu rig owners

On 20/01/2021 15:30, Bill Somerville wrote:


Hi All,

apologies for the cross-posting.

Due to some recent Hamlib updates to resolve long standing issues with
band changing on modern Yaesu rigs it has become necessary to do some
urgent tests to verify correct behaviour. This concerns the following
rigs and their variants:

FT-450
FT-891
FT-950
FT-991
FT-2000
FTdx1200
FTdx3000
FTdx5000
FTdx9000
FTdx101
FTdx10

I am looking for owners of one of these rigs who are willing to run a
short test to gather diagnostics to verify correct Hamlib behaviour.
It will require downloading and installing a test version of WSJT-X
and running a short test plan, then sending back a log file. It should
only take about 30 minutes to complete. If the test passes that will
be all, if there are failures there will be an opportunity to help
with further tests to help with fixing any defects found.

The urgency is because I want to complete this exercise on as many of
the above rig models before the imminent General Availability (GA)
release of WSJT-X v2.3.0. Without this verification we will not be
able to ship with the latest Hamlib library code, which means many
recent defect repairs and support for new rigs will not be available.

I currently have access to to an FT-2000 so that one is already dealt
with.

Thanks in advance.

73
Bill
G4WJS.


Hi all,

thanks to those who have kindly responded so far. I will initially chose
one of you for each rig model to do the tests, on a first replied -
first chosen basis, so apologies to those who don't get chosen, your
offer is still much appreciated. We have quite good coverage so far but
no responses yet from owners of the following models:

FT-950
FTdx9000
FTdx10

73
Bill
G4WJS.


___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] FYI: My Yaesu FT-991 seems to work well with Hamlib built 21-01-2021 at 11:16

[Bensay 1]

Then Uwe reply 11 minutes later with the same offer - same rig at 5:39pm;

First reply - First chosen basis.

Let’s me know.

Benjamin L / F4FPR / K5AW

Le 21 janv. 2021 à 13:36, Bensay 1  a écrit :

 Hi Bill,

I just check back my outbox to be sure about this but yesterday at 5:28pm I 
offered to be part of the test for the only yaesu rig I own and wasn’t yet 
offered to test the Yaesu FT-991.

Let’s me know about it.

73s

Benjamin L / F4FPR / K5AW

Le 21 janv. 2021 à 13:07, Bill Somerville  a écrit :


Hi Benjamin,

you responded with an offer to test two rigs, I chose the one that no one else 
had offered at that time. I am trying to spread the work across as many 
responders as possible without duplication.

73
Bill
G4WJS.

On 21/01/2021 11:44, Bensay 1 wrote:
Dear Bill,

Wasn’t I the first one responder for FT-991 ?

73s

Benjamin L / F4FPR / K5AW

Le 21 janv. 2021 à 11:55, Bill Somerville 
<mailto:g4...@classdesign.com> a écrit :


Hi Uwe,

thanks for the update. I need quite specific test run and also to see the 
diagnostic trace. I will send out a test plan once some issues for another rig 
have been resolved.

73
Bill
G4WJS.

On 21/01/2021 10:46, DG2YCB, Uwe wrote:

Hi Bill and Mike,

For your information: I have just compiled wsjt-x v2.3.0-rc3 with a freshly
created hamlib (Build Date: 21-01-2021 at 11:16, source files from hamlib
master repository). Result: My Yaesu FT-991 seems to work without any
problems. Frequency changes and TX / RX work perfectly in both directions. I
did not find any undesirable effects.

73 de Uwe, DG2YCB

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. Januar 2021 17:47
An: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Betreff: Re: [wsjt-devel] Request to Yaesu rig owners

On 20/01/2021 15:30, Bill Somerville wrote:


Hi All,

apologies for the cross-posting.

Due to some recent Hamlib updates to resolve long standing issues with
band changing on modern Yaesu rigs it has become necessary to do some
urgent tests to verify correct behaviour. This concerns the following
rigs and their variants:

FT-450
FT-891
FT-950
FT-991
FT-2000
FTdx1200
FTdx3000
FTdx5000
FTdx9000
FTdx101
FTdx10

I am looking for owners of one of these rigs who are willing to run a
short test to gather diagnostics to verify correct Hamlib behaviour.
It will require downloading and installing a test version of WSJT-X
and running a short test plan, then sending back a log file. It should
only take about 30 minutes to complete. If the test passes that will
be all, if there are failures there will be an opportunity to help
with further tests to help with fixing any defects found.

The urgency is because I want to complete this exercise on as many of
the above rig models before the imminent General Availability (GA)
release of WSJT-X v2.3.0. Without this verification we will not be
able to ship with the latest Hamlib library code, which means many
recent defect repairs and support for new rigs will not be available.

I currently have access to to an FT-2000 so that one is already dealt
with.

Thanks in advance.

73
Bill
G4WJS.


Hi all,

thanks to those who have kindly responded so far. I will initially chose
one of you for each rig model to do the tests, on a first replied -
first chosen basis, so apologies to those who don't get chosen, your
offer is still much appreciated. We have quite good coverage so far but
no responses yet from owners of the following models:

FT-950
FTdx9000
FTdx10

73
Bill
G4WJS.


___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] FYI: My Yaesu FT-991 seems to work well with Hamlib built 21-01-2021 at 11:16

[Bensay 1]

Hi Bill,

I just check back my outbox to be sure about this but yesterday at 5:28pm I 
offered to be part of the test for the only yaesu rig I own and wasn’t yet 
offered to test the Yaesu FT-991.

Let’s me know about it.

73s

Benjamin L / F4FPR / K5AW

Le 21 janv. 2021 à 13:07, Bill Somerville  a écrit :


Hi Benjamin,

you responded with an offer to test two rigs, I chose the one that no one else 
had offered at that time. I am trying to spread the work across as many 
responders as possible without duplication.

73
Bill
G4WJS.

On 21/01/2021 11:44, Bensay 1 wrote:
Dear Bill,

Wasn’t I the first one responder for FT-991 ?

73s

Benjamin L / F4FPR / K5AW

Le 21 janv. 2021 à 11:55, Bill Somerville 
<mailto:g4...@classdesign.com> a écrit :


Hi Uwe,

thanks for the update. I need quite specific test run and also to see the 
diagnostic trace. I will send out a test plan once some issues for another rig 
have been resolved.

73
Bill
G4WJS.

On 21/01/2021 10:46, DG2YCB, Uwe wrote:

Hi Bill and Mike,

For your information: I have just compiled wsjt-x v2.3.0-rc3 with a freshly
created hamlib (Build Date: 21-01-2021 at 11:16, source files from hamlib
master repository). Result: My Yaesu FT-991 seems to work without any
problems. Frequency changes and TX / RX work perfectly in both directions. I
did not find any undesirable effects.

73 de Uwe, DG2YCB

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. Januar 2021 17:47
An: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Betreff: Re: [wsjt-devel] Request to Yaesu rig owners

On 20/01/2021 15:30, Bill Somerville wrote:


Hi All,

apologies for the cross-posting.

Due to some recent Hamlib updates to resolve long standing issues with
band changing on modern Yaesu rigs it has become necessary to do some
urgent tests to verify correct behaviour. This concerns the following
rigs and their variants:

FT-450
FT-891
FT-950
FT-991
FT-2000
FTdx1200
FTdx3000
FTdx5000
FTdx9000
FTdx101
FTdx10

I am looking for owners of one of these rigs who are willing to run a
short test to gather diagnostics to verify correct Hamlib behaviour.
It will require downloading and installing a test version of WSJT-X
and running a short test plan, then sending back a log file. It should
only take about 30 minutes to complete. If the test passes that will
be all, if there are failures there will be an opportunity to help
with further tests to help with fixing any defects found.

The urgency is because I want to complete this exercise on as many of
the above rig models before the imminent General Availability (GA)
release of WSJT-X v2.3.0. Without this verification we will not be
able to ship with the latest Hamlib library code, which means many
recent defect repairs and support for new rigs will not be available.

I currently have access to to an FT-2000 so that one is already dealt
with.

Thanks in advance.

73
Bill
G4WJS.


Hi all,

thanks to those who have kindly responded so far. I will initially chose
one of you for each rig model to do the tests, on a first replied -
first chosen basis, so apologies to those who don't get chosen, your
offer is still much appreciated. We have quite good coverage so far but
no responses yet from owners of the following models:

FT-950
FTdx9000
FTdx10

73
Bill
G4WJS.


___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] FYI: My Yaesu FT-991 seems to work well with Hamlib built 21-01-2021 at 11:16

[Bensay 1]

Dear Bill,

Wasn’t I the first one responder for FT-991 ?

73s

Benjamin L / F4FPR / K5AW

Le 21 janv. 2021 à 11:55, Bill Somerville  a écrit :


Hi Uwe,

thanks for the update. I need quite specific test run and also to see the 
diagnostic trace. I will send out a test plan once some issues for another rig 
have been resolved.

73
Bill
G4WJS.

On 21/01/2021 10:46, DG2YCB, Uwe wrote:

Hi Bill and Mike,

For your information: I have just compiled wsjt-x v2.3.0-rc3 with a freshly
created hamlib (Build Date: 21-01-2021 at 11:16, source files from hamlib
master repository). Result: My Yaesu FT-991 seems to work without any
problems. Frequency changes and TX / RX work perfectly in both directions. I
did not find any undesirable effects.

73 de Uwe, DG2YCB

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. Januar 2021 17:47
An: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Betreff: Re: [wsjt-devel] Request to Yaesu rig owners

On 20/01/2021 15:30, Bill Somerville wrote:


Hi All,

apologies for the cross-posting.

Due to some recent Hamlib updates to resolve long standing issues with
band changing on modern Yaesu rigs it has become necessary to do some
urgent tests to verify correct behaviour. This concerns the following
rigs and their variants:

FT-450
FT-891
FT-950
FT-991
FT-2000
FTdx1200
FTdx3000
FTdx5000
FTdx9000
FTdx101
FTdx10

I am looking for owners of one of these rigs who are willing to run a
short test to gather diagnostics to verify correct Hamlib behaviour.
It will require downloading and installing a test version of WSJT-X
and running a short test plan, then sending back a log file. It should
only take about 30 minutes to complete. If the test passes that will
be all, if there are failures there will be an opportunity to help
with further tests to help with fixing any defects found.

The urgency is because I want to complete this exercise on as many of
the above rig models before the imminent General Availability (GA)
release of WSJT-X v2.3.0. Without this verification we will not be
able to ship with the latest Hamlib library code, which means many
recent defect repairs and support for new rigs will not be available.

I currently have access to to an FT-2000 so that one is already dealt
with.

Thanks in advance.

73
Bill
G4WJS.


Hi all,

thanks to those who have kindly responded so far. I will initially chose
one of you for each rig model to do the tests, on a first replied -
first chosen basis, so apologies to those who don't get chosen, your
offer is still much appreciated. We have quite good coverage so far but
no responses yet from owners of the following models:

FT-950
FTdx9000
FTdx10

73
Bill
G4WJS.


___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] Request to Yaesu rig owners

[Bensay 1]

Hi Bill,

I own an FT-991 so I might be able to run the test.
Let’s me know.

73s

Benjamin L / F4FPR / K5AW

> Le 20 janv. 2021 à 16:33, Bill Somerville  a écrit :
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> apologies for the cross-posting.
> 
> Due to some recent Hamlib updates to resolve long standing issues with band 
> changing on modern Yaesu rigs it has become necessary to do some urgent tests 
> to verify correct behaviour. This concerns the following rigs and their 
> variants:
> 
> FT-450
> FT-891
> FT-950
> FT-991
> FT-2000
> FTdx1200
> FTdx3000
> FTdx5000
> FTdx9000
> FTdx101
> FTdx10
> 
> I am looking for owners of one of these rigs who are willing to run a short 
> test to gather diagnostics to verify correct Hamlib behaviour. It will 
> require downloading and installing a test version of WSJT-X and running a 
> short test plan, then sending back a log file. It should only take about 30 
> minutes to complete. If the test passes that will be all, if there are 
> failures there will be an opportunity to help with further tests to help with 
> fixing any defects found.
> 
> The urgency is because I want to complete this exercise on as many of the 
> above rig models before the imminent General Availability (GA) release of 
> WSJT-X v2.3.0. Without this verification we will not be able to ship with the 
> latest Hamlib library code, which means many recent defect repairs and 
> support for new rigs will not be available.
> 
> I currently have access to to an FT-2000 so that one is already dealt with.
> 
> Thanks in advance.
> 
> 73
> Bill
> G4WJS.
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> wsjt-devel mailing list
> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] Release Candidate: WSJT-X 2.3.0-rc1 Band hopping issue.

[Bensay 1]

Hi Bill,

Sure, here you will find the WSJT-X settings file : https://we.tl/t-2waVjevjyU

Many thanks for your next clues.

73
Benjamin
F4FPR – AG5HQ

De : Bill Somerville 
Envoyé : mardi 29 septembre 2020 13:07
À : wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Objet : Re: [wsjt-devel] Release Candidate: WSJT-X 2.3.0-rc1 Band hopping issue.

Hi Benjamin,

thanks for the extra details, can you send you WSJT-X settings file please? The 
location of the settings file (WSJT-X.ini) is shown in the User Guide:

https://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/wsjtx-doc/wsjtx-main-2.3.0-rc1.html#_file_locations

73
Bill
G4WJS.

On 29/09/2020 08:59, Bensay 1 wrote:
Dear Bill,

Sure,
Radio is set to
Yeasu FT-991.
I’m on RX only situation for my yesterday test.
I was on rx onto 630m band
Band hopping was set but TX disabled and Tx % set to 0.
After this band hopping was selected but doesn’t seem to be functional.
I for try only push the Tune button and release it, then my band hopping RX 
only was ok;
I can reproduce it easily if I close WSJT-X and then open it again same issue 
until I TX at least once (Tune or TX);
Unusual isn’t it :) ?

73 de Benjamin L / F4FPR / AG5HQ


Le 29 sept. 2020 à 02:47, Bill Somerville 
<mailto:g4...@classdesign.com> a écrit :

On 29/09/2020 00:29, Bill Somerville wrote:
On 29/09/2020 00:11, Bensay 1 wrote:

Dear WSJT-X Devels,

I just upgraded my WSJT-X version up to the 2.3.0-rc1;
But unfortunately the band hopping seems to be defective;
Is this a known issue ?
Rig : FT-991 (Yaesu)
Windows 10 pro Beelink computer.
Cat is working well but Band hopping does not , and WSJT-X doesn’t display 
night / day / sunrise / sunset.

Thanks for your next advice.

73 de Benjamin L / F4FPR - AG5HQ

Hi Benjamin,

thanks for the issue report, I can confirm this is a regression. It will be 
fixed for the next release.

73
Bill
G4WJS.

Hi Benjamin,

I have changed my mind on this issue. I cannot reproduce it. What do you have 
selected for "Settings->Radio->Rig"?

73
Bill
G4WJS.


___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] 160m FST4W frequency

[Bensay 1]

Hi Pino 

in fact that concern all ITU Region 1 except some country with additional 
allocation.
An frequency below 1850 is definitely needed.

73

Benjamin L / F4FPR / AG5HQ

> Le 29 sept. 2020 à 02:25, Pino Zollo  a écrit :
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I have noticed that the frequency chosen for FST4W in 160m band is
> 1,908000 
> 
> Please chose a frequency below 1850 as here in ZP land we are allowed
> only from 1800 to 1850.
> 
> TU
> 
> Pino ZP4KFX
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> wsjt-devel mailing list
> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] Release Candidate: WSJT-X 2.3.0-rc1 Band hopping issue.

[Bensay 1]

Dear Bill,

Sure,
Radio is set to
Yeasu FT-991.
I’m on RX only situation for my yesterday test.
I was on rx onto 630m band
Band hopping was set but TX disabled and Tx % set to 0.
After this band hopping was selected but doesn’t seem to be functional.
I for try only push the Tune button and release it, then my band hopping RX 
only was ok;
I can reproduce it easily if I close WSJT-X and then open it again same issue 
until I TX at least once (Tune or TX);
Unusual isn’t it :) ?

73 de Benjamin L / F4FPR / AG5HQ

Le 29 sept. 2020 à 02:47, Bill Somerville  a écrit :


On 29/09/2020 00:29, Bill Somerville wrote:
On 29/09/2020 00:11, Bensay 1 wrote:
Dear WSJT-X Devels,

I just upgraded my WSJT-X version up to the 2.3.0-rc1;
But unfortunately the band hopping seems to be defective;
Is this a known issue ?
Rig : FT-991 (Yaesu)
Windows 10 pro Beelink computer.
Cat is working well but Band hopping does not , and WSJT-X doesn’t display 
night / day / sunrise / sunset.

Thanks for your next advice.

73 de Benjamin L / F4FPR - AG5HQ

Hi Benjamin,

thanks for the issue report, I can confirm this is a regression. It will be 
fixed for the next release.

73
Bill
G4WJS.

Hi Benjamin,

I have changed my mind on this issue. I cannot reproduce it. What do you have 
selected for "Settings->Radio->Rig"?

73
Bill
G4WJS.

___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] Release Candidate: WSJT-X 2.3.0-rc1 Band hopping issue.

[Bensay 1]

Dear WSJT-X Devels,

I just upgraded my WSJT-X version up to the 2.3.0-rc1;
But unfortunately the band hopping seems to be defective;
Is this a known issue ?
Rig : FT-991 (Yaesu)
Windows 10 pro Beelink computer.
Cat is working well but Band hopping does not , and WSJT-X doesn’t display 
night / day / sunrise / sunset.

Thanks for your next advice.

73 de Benjamin L / F4FPR - AG5HQ

> Le 28 sept. 2020 à 17:41, N1BUG  a écrit :
> 
> Hi Bill,
> 
> Thanks for confirming my thinking. Linear amplification would not be popular 
> due to higher initial cost and greatly reduced efficiency.
> 
> You are correct that long periods of time to transmit the sender's call sign 
> is nothing new. Single frequency QRSS used to be common with dot=60 seconds, 
> dash=180 seconds. Dual frequency QRSS (DFCW) with dot and dash as long as 120 
> seconds each has been used; 60 and 90 seconds per dot/dash are more common in 
> recent times. There are other modes which fall into this category as well.
> 
> 73,
> Paul N1BUG
> 
> 
>> On 9/28/20 11:05 AM, Bill Somerville wrote:
>> Hi Paul,
>> you are correct, sending a side-tone for CW identification is a non-starter 
>> for a mode that is designed to utilize a constant envelope type of 
>> modulation. Apart from that requiring users to use linear amplification, 
>> quite an ask when expecting to utilize up to half hour transmissions using 
>> aerial with no better than 1% efficiency and the necessary high input power 
>> required to get even close to the usual 1W EIRP limits. Extra bandwidth used 
>> for the extra tone and the mixing products with the wanted data signal would 
>> also be unwelcome.
>> I note also that the length of time to successfully transmit the senders 
>> callsign cannot be a new issue, QRSS techniques have surely already been 
>> used that take several tens of minutes to complete a callsign transmission. 
>> A quick Goole search says that QRSS rates as slow as one minute per dot/dash 
>> (dual frequency keying) have been successfully employed.
>> 73
>> Bill
>> G4WJS.
> 
> 
> ___
> wsjt-devel mailing list
> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] user_hardware file issue

[Bensay 1]

Dear Devel List,

I actually face an issue with the most recent version of WSJT-X;

WSJT-X are set to use an Yaesu FT-991;
But at each band change with CAT it keep calling an non existant file : 
user_hardware + band value.

I've read this on the WSJT-X doc :
"Depending on your station and antenna setup, band changes might require other 
switching besides retuning your radio. To make this possible in an automated 
way, whenever WSJT-X executes a successful band-change command to a 
CAT-controlled radio, it looks for a file named user_hardware.bat, 
user_hardware.cmd, user_hardware.exe, or user_hardware in the working 
directory. If one of these is found, WSJT-X tries to execute the command

user_hardware nnn
In the above command nnn is the band-designation wavelength in meters. You must 
write your own program, script, or batch file to do the necessary switching at 
your station."

In the past version I never face that situation before.

I've create an user_hardware.bat with only @Echo off inside of the file but 
still no change.

Is this an already known issue ?

73s de Benjamin - F4FPR


___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

[wsjt-devel] RE : RE : FT-991A config problem

[Bensay 1]

Over there :
https://sourceforge.net/projects/wsjt/files/wsjtx-1.9.1/wsjtx-1.9.1-win32.exe/download


Provenance : Courrier<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> pour 
Windows 10


De : Tom Pickles 
Envoyé : Monday, June 8, 2020 12:12:53 AM
À : WSJT software development 
Objet : Re: [wsjt-devel] RE : FT-991A config problem

Where can I find the old 1.9 versions so I can go back to that and see if it 
works?


From: Bensay 1 
Sent: Sunday, June 7, 2020 4:58 PM
To: WSJT software development 
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] RE : FT-991A config problem


Looks like WSJT-X can’t connect at all to the rig,



First guess :



Busy COM port ?

Wrong configuration ?

Did you try to temporarily downgrade to 2.1.2 version and try if it’s work with 
that one ?

https://sourceforge.net/projects/wsjt/files/wsjtx-2.1.2/



If it’s work with 2.1.2 it’s seem to be a version issue.



If it’s the same it’s another kind of issue.



Benjamin – F4FPR



De : Tom Pickles 
Envoyé : dimanche 7 juin 2020 23:42
À : WSJT software development 
Objet : Re: [wsjt-devel] RE : FT-991A config problem





[cid:image001.png@01D63D27.51F46B80]



From: Bensay 1 mailto:bensam...@hotmail.com>>
Sent: Sunday, June 7, 2020 4:37 PM
To: WSJT software development 
mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>>
Subject: [wsjt-devel] RE : FT-991A config problem



Dear Tom,



My FT-991 works fine with the 2.2.1 version.



Whats the error message from your side ?



Benjamin – F4FPR



Provenance : Courrier<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> pour 
Windows 10



De : Tom Pickles<mailto:cdr...@hotmail.com>
Envoyé le :dimanche 7 juin 2020 23:36
À : wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Objet :[wsjt-devel] FT-991A config problem



WSJT-X Ver 2.2.1 claimed to have fixed the config problem for the FT-991A.  
Downloaded it and still have the same problem.  Now I can't find the old 
version that worked.

Tom W2PIX


___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] RE : FT-991A config problem

[Bensay 1]

Looks like WSJT-X can't connect at all to the rig,

First guess :

Busy COM port ?
Wrong configuration ?
Did you try to temporarily downgrade to 2.1.2 version and try if it's work with 
that one ?
https://sourceforge.net/projects/wsjt/files/wsjtx-2.1.2/

If it's work with 2.1.2 it's seem to be a version issue.

If it's the same it's another kind of issue.

Benjamin - F4FPR

De : Tom Pickles 
Envoyé : dimanche 7 juin 2020 23:42
À : WSJT software development 
Objet : Re: [wsjt-devel] RE : FT-991A config problem


[cid:image001.png@01D63D27.51F46B80]

From: Bensay 1 mailto:bensam...@hotmail.com>>
Sent: Sunday, June 7, 2020 4:37 PM
To: WSJT software development 
mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>>
Subject: [wsjt-devel] RE : FT-991A config problem


Dear Tom,



My FT-991 works fine with the 2.2.1 version.



Whats the error message from your side ?



Benjamin - F4FPR



Provenance : Courrier<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> pour 
Windows 10



De : Tom Pickles<mailto:cdr...@hotmail.com>
Envoyé le :dimanche 7 juin 2020 23:36
À : wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Objet :[wsjt-devel] FT-991A config problem



WSJT-X Ver 2.2.1 claimed to have fixed the config problem for the FT-991A.  
Downloaded it and still have the same problem.  Now I can't find the old 
version that worked.

Tom W2PIX


___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

[wsjt-devel] RE : FT-991A config problem

[Bensay 1]

Dear Tom,

My FT-991 works fine with the 2.2.1 version.

Whats the error message from your side ?

Benjamin – F4FPR

Provenance : Courrier pour 
Windows 10

De : Tom Pickles
Envoyé le :dimanche 7 juin 2020 23:36
À : wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Objet :[wsjt-devel] FT-991A config problem

WSJT-X Ver 2.2.1 claimed to have fixed the config problem for the FT-991A.  
Downloaded it and still have the same problem.  Now I can't find the old 
version that worked.
Tom W2PIX

___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT-991 Hamlib issue on WSJT-X2.2.0

[Bensay 1]

Dear WSJT-X Devel team,

Many thanks for your patience and the help;

I’ve just discovered a bug with the most recent WSJT-X version 2.2.0 released 
two days ago.

Everything seem to works fine except the cat control.

My configuration :

Mini pc running Windows 10 /32 bits / version 1909
Rig Yaesu FT-991 (Last EU firmware) / Usb to pc control (COM 3 standard / COM 4 
Enhanced port).

All the functions works like a charm on WSJT-X/2.2.0-Rc3 and previous version.
But when I’ve update to WSJT-X2.2.0 this evening the audio and decode functions 
works fine but the VFO/CAT control give me an error.
“Hamlib error : invalid parameter while getting current frequency”;

Here is my radio settings onto WSJT-X (not change since my first config of the 
app) :

Rig : Yaesu FT-991
Pooling : 1s
Serial port : COM4
Speed : 38400 (always works fine)
Data bits : 8
Stop bits : 2
Handshake : Hardware
PTT Method : CAT
Split : None
Mode : None

But if I downgrade to 2.2.0rc(1-2-3) or lower version , CAT come back as normal.

Is the new version of WSJT-X2.2.0 implement a new version of hamlib ?
Manual Hamlib update didn’t change a thing.

Reboot tried, full uninstall tried.
It’s definitely an hamlib issue on the new version.

Many thanks for your soon help & clues.

73s de Benjamin – F4FPR / AG5HQ.

Ps : If required I will be glad to help to the French translation of WSJT-X
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel