Re: [Xenomai-core] Is anybody using the pSOS skin in userland?
Philippe, The sm_ident patch is fine. Thanks Ronny On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Philippe Gerum wrote: > On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 22:42 +0100, ronny meeus wrote: > > Hello > > > > we are investigating to usage of the pSOS+ skin to port a large legacy > > pSOS application to Linux. > > The application model consist of several processes in which the > > application lives. All processes will make use of the pSOS library. > > > > After playing around with the library for some time we have observed > > several missing service calls, bugs and differences in behaviour > > compared to a real pSOS implementation: > > - missing sm_ident > > > http://git.xenomai.org/?p=xenomai-rpm.git;a=commit;h=26e916ecc3f8b71cd8ce4c4194555ee0cc4aa018 > > > > - missing t_getreg / t_setreg in userland (patch already included in > > 2.5.5) > > - not possible to use skin from the context of different processes > > (patch already included in 2.5.5) > > - added support for identical task/queue/semaphore/region names by > > making names unique. > > - strange behaviour in pSOS message queue (see post "Possible memory > > leak in psos skin message queue handling"). > > > > I can (and will) deliver patches for all issues I have found, but I'm > > wondering whether there are other people using the pSOS skin (in > > userland) in a real live application. The target for my project would > > be an embedded system with strong reliability requirements (very > > stable / long running etc). > > Any feedback is welcome and appreciated. > > > > It is not clear to me either which tests are executed before a new > > version is released. Is there any test-suite available for the pSOS > > skin? > > > > Best regards, > > Ronny > > > > > > ___ > > Xenomai-core mailing list > > Xenomai-core@gna.org > > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core > > -- > Philippe. > > > ___ Xenomai-core mailing list Xenomai-core@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core
Re: [Xenomai-core] Is anybody using the pSOS skin in userland?
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 22:42 +0100, ronny meeus wrote: > Hello > > we are investigating to usage of the pSOS+ skin to port a large legacy > pSOS application to Linux. > The application model consist of several processes in which the > application lives. All processes will make use of the pSOS library. > > After playing around with the library for some time we have observed > several missing service calls, bugs and differences in behaviour > compared to a real pSOS implementation: > - missing sm_ident http://git.xenomai.org/?p=xenomai-rpm.git;a=commit;h=26e916ecc3f8b71cd8ce4c4194555ee0cc4aa018 > - missing t_getreg / t_setreg in userland (patch already included in > 2.5.5) > - not possible to use skin from the context of different processes > (patch already included in 2.5.5) > - added support for identical task/queue/semaphore/region names by > making names unique. > - strange behaviour in pSOS message queue (see post "Possible memory > leak in psos skin message queue handling"). > > I can (and will) deliver patches for all issues I have found, but I'm > wondering whether there are other people using the pSOS skin (in > userland) in a real live application. The target for my project would > be an embedded system with strong reliability requirements (very > stable / long running etc). > Any feedback is welcome and appreciated. > > It is not clear to me either which tests are executed before a new > version is released. Is there any test-suite available for the pSOS > skin? > > Best regards, > Ronny > > > ___ > Xenomai-core mailing list > Xenomai-core@gna.org > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core -- Philippe. ___ Xenomai-core mailing list Xenomai-core@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core
Re: [Xenomai-core] Is anybody using the pSOS skin in userland?
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 22:42 +0100, ronny meeus wrote: > Hello > > we are investigating to usage of the pSOS+ skin to port a large legacy > pSOS application to Linux. > The application model consist of several processes in which the > application lives. All processes will make use of the pSOS library. > > After playing around with the library for some time we have observed > several missing service calls, bugs and differences in behaviour > compared to a real pSOS implementation: > - missing sm_ident > - missing t_getreg / t_setreg in userland (patch already included in > 2.5.5) > - not possible to use skin from the context of different processes > (patch already included in 2.5.5) > - added support for identical task/queue/semaphore/region names by > making names unique. > - strange behaviour in pSOS message queue (see post "Possible memory > leak in psos skin message queue handling"). > > I can (and will) deliver patches for all issues I have found, but I'm > wondering whether there are other people using the pSOS skin (in > userland) in a real live application. The target for my project would > be an embedded system with strong reliability requirements (very > stable / long running etc). > Any feedback is welcome and appreciated. > > It is not clear to me either which tests are executed before a new > version is released. T-e-s-t? What's this? We are proud to deliver the greatest uncertainty, where the deepest fears about upgrading may turn into the highest hopes. And vice-versa. > Is there any test-suite available for the pSOS skin? This is a good start, used to validate the Xenomai SOLO implementation. http://git.denx.de/?p=xenomai-solo.git;a=tree;f=psos/testsuite;h=54411570e19dec40e14a1226084024c05c0f3e53;hb=ee9c11895ac7cf2d72b1158a4836a4465f478a0b This needs to be slightly adapted to run over the current Xenomai 2.x architecture, but the test logic of course is the same. > > Best regards, > Ronny > > > ___ > Xenomai-core mailing list > Xenomai-core@gna.org > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core -- Philippe. ___ Xenomai-core mailing list Xenomai-core@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core
