Re: [Xenomai-core] [Xenomai-help] Experimenting with Analogy. Bugs found?

2010-03-12 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
 2. Looks like it is not possible to setup an endless acquisition. If I
 set .stop_src = TRIG_NONE and .stop_arg = 0, the command submission goes
 fine, but I obtain an ENOENT error at the first a4l_sys_read(). I have
 no idea on where to look to track down this issue.

The attached patch (against Alex git three) fixes the problem, in the
case of analog input. I haven't test the same condition for analog output.

Cheers,
-- 
Daniele

diff --git a/include/analogy/buffer.h b/include/analogy/buffer.h
index 0e8f279..e7b2416 100644
--- a/include/analogy/buffer.h
+++ b/include/analogy/buffer.h
@@ -253,7 +253,8 @@ static inline int __abs_put(a4l_buf_t * buf, unsigned long count)
 	if ((old / buf-size) != (count / buf-size))
 		set_bit(A4L_BUF_EOBUF_NR, buf-evt_flags);
 
-	if (count = buf-end_count)
+	/* In the case of continuos acquisition end_count is zero */
+	if ((buf-end_count != 0)  (count = buf-end_count))
 		set_bit(A4L_BUF_EOA_NR, buf-evt_flags);
 
 	return 0;
@@ -303,10 +304,15 @@ static inline unsigned long __count_to_get(a4l_buf_t * buf)
 {
 	unsigned long ret;
 
-	if (buf-end_count != 0  (buf-end_count  buf-prd_count))
+	/* In the case of continuos acquisition end_count is zero */
+	if (buf-end_count != 0) {
+		if (buf-end_count  buf-prd_count)
+			ret = buf-prd_count;
+		else
+			ret = buf-end_count;
+	} else {
 		ret = buf-prd_count;
-	else
-		ret = buf-end_count;
+	}
 
 	if (ret  buf-cns_count)
 		ret -= buf-cns_count;
___
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core


Re: [Xenomai-core] [PULL REQUEST] analogy: bug fixes

2010-03-20 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
Alexis Berlemont wrote:
 The following changes since commit 8cfc1103fe1cf9e700698e8230baf562ffb5cf06:
Gilles Chanteperdrix (1):
  x86 syscalls: make __xn_get_eip a macro
 
 are available in the git repository at:
 
git://git.xenomai.org/xenomai-abe.git analogy

Hello. Looking at your pull request, I see that my patch for correct
buffer handling when using .stop_src  = TRIG_NONE is not included. Does
the patch need some more work? Or it simply get lost on the way?

Thanks. Cheers,
-- 
Daniele

___
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core


Re: [Xenomai-core] [PULL REQUEST] analogy: bug fixes

2010-03-24 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
Alexis Berlemont wrote:
 Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
 Alexis Berlemont wrote:
 The following changes since commit 8cfc1103fe1cf9e700698e8230baf562ffb5cf06:
Gilles Chanteperdrix (1):
  x86 syscalls: make __xn_get_eip a macro

 are available in the git repository at:

git://git.xenomai.org/xenomai-abe.git analogy
 Hello. Looking at your pull request, I see that my patch for correct
 buffer handling when using .stop_src  = TRIG_NONE is not included. Does
 the patch need some more work? Or it simply get lost on the way?
 I have not forgotten it. I did not include it for two reasons:
 - I have not found time to (fully) test it
 - I wanted to properly modify the test program cmd_read so as to allow
   continuous acquisisitions 

Hi Alexis. Sorry for the late response. That's fine, I just wanted to be
sure that the patch was not dropped by mistake. I'll test continuous
output today and let you know if any other bugfix is necessary. I can
also look into providing a patch for cmd_read and cmd_write.

Cheers,
-- 
Daniele

___
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core


Re: [Xenomai-core] [PULL REQUEST] analogy: bug fixes

2010-03-25 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
 Alexis Berlemont wrote:
 If you want to test infinite acquisitions right now, you can clone my
 git repository. I just pushed the modifications on it. I have not made
 a pull request yet because I want to be sure there is no regression. 
 
 Thanks! I'll test it as soon as possible.

I'm testing it now.

 I think I just stumbled into the ring buffer bug you fixed in your
 repository :-) It took me a while to understand if the problem was in
 the hardware, in my code, or somewhere else in the stack...

Unfortunately my ring buffer problem is not fixed by you patch. What I'm
experiencing is exposed by this (pseudo) code:

a4l_open(dsc, device)
a4l_mmap(dsc, subdevice, bufsize, map)
a4l_snd_command(dsc, cmd)

/* preload buffer */
written = write_to_buffer(map, bufsize)

/* send internal trigger */
a4l_snd_insn(dsc,

cnt = 0;
while (1)
  a4l_mark_bufrw(dsc, subdevice, written, towrite);
  cnt += written;
  /* 1 */
  written = write_buffer(map + (cnt % bufsize), towrite)


The problem is that at the place marked with (1) the total extension of
the buffer region that gets written exceeds the ring buffer allocated
memory. That is ((cnt % bufsize) + towrite)  bufsize !

I do not know if this should be handled in my code, or in the driver.
This situation is not handled in the cmd_write example code (where a
simple memcpy() is done).

What do you think?

Cheers,
-- 
Daniele

___
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core


[Xenomai-core] Bug in a4l_get_chan

2010-03-26 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
Hello Alexis,

I found that a4l_get_chan() in buffer.c does not work for subdevices
that use a global channels description struct (mode =
A4L_CHAN_GLOBAL_CHANDESC in the a4l_chdesc_t structure).

The problem is that a4l_get_chan() iterates (twice) on the chan_desc
array looking for channel descriptions at indexes higher than 0, also in
the case where those are not populated because the subdevice uses a
single channel description structure for all channels.

This bug is quite bas, as it triggers a kernel oops for a integer
division by zero when an a4l_cmd_t command is issued with a channels
description array that does not have the channel id 0 as first acquired
channel. You can easily reproduce the bug using the ni_pcimio driver,
using cmd_read with the parameter -c 1.

I'm looking into providing a patch, but I have some difficulties in
understanding the rational of this part of analogy code...

Cheers,
-- 
Daniele

___
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core


Re: [Xenomai-core] [PULL REQUEST] analogy: bug fixes

2010-03-29 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
Alexis Berlemont wrote:
 There is a bug in cmd_write and cmd_read. I have should have taken
 into account the buffers edges. I will fix it. The function
 a4l_mark_bufrw() is not designed to handle boundaries, that is why its
 arguments represent data size not addresses.

That makes sense. I can provide a patch for cmd_read and cmd_write, as i
got the same kind of code working in my own test programs, but I'm quite
busy right now...

Cheers,
-- 
Daniele


___
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core


Re: [Xenomai-core] Analogy: cancel ongoing commands when a device is closed

2010-03-29 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
Alexis Berlemont wrote:
 Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
 After fixing analogy to permit continuous acquisition, I discovered that
 ongoing commands are not canceled when a device is closed (I obtain a
 DMA buffer owerwrite warning in the kernel log when I abruptly terminate
  my acquisition program).

 I think this is quite a surprising behavior. I would expect that the
 commands are canceled when there isn't a data consumer any more. Would
 it be possible to cancel any ongoing command on device close? If there
 is agreement on this, I can look into providing a patch.

 The close should indeed stop any occurring acquisition. I implemented
 this behaviour. It is in my git repository.

Hi Alexis. I have been working with analogy from your git three and I
should say that the new behavior, in my use case, is worst than the
previous.

Now, when a device is closed, all accurring acquisition are terminated,
also the ones that haven't been started by the current process. While it
is possible to use at the same time two different subdevices, from two
different processes, now it is not possible to terminate one process and
leave the other one running. I think that the correct behavior would be
to terminate just the acquisitions started by the current process.
However, I have no idea on how difficult this would be.

This bring me also to the fact that there isn't currently a way to
prevent two concurrent processes to access the same subdevice,
interfering each other. Would it possible to have a lock() method, as
comedi has?

Thanks. Cheers,
-- 
Daniele

___
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core


[Xenomai-core] Analogy: improve a4l_find_range()

2010-03-29 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
Hello Alexis, I wrote a small patch to improve a4l_find_range().

As many every other functions expect to have the range specified as its
idx into the struct describing the subdevice it is useful have it
returned from a4l_find_range(). I also made returning a pointer to the
range struncture optional.

I also attache a simple patch to clean up trailing whitespaces in the
range.c file.

Cheers,
-- 
Daniele
commit ec80d59f5ecfdc74b45d9da7edfdb54f6cab555a
Author: Daniele Nicolodi nicol...@science.unitn.it
Date:   Mon Mar 29 22:11:44 2010 +0200

Make a4l_find_range() more useful by returning the idx of the most suitable range too.

diff --git a/src/drvlib/analogy/range.c b/src/drvlib/analogy/range.c
index 934c52a..fc4e302 100644
--- a/src/drvlib/analogy/range.c
+++ b/src/drvlib/analogy/range.c
@@ -154,8 +154,9 @@ int a4l_sizeof_subd(a4l_sbinfo_t *subd)
  * @param[in] max Maximal limit value
  * @param[out] rng Found range
  *
- * @return 0 on success. Otherwise:
+ * @return The index of the most suitable range on success. Otherwise:
  *
+ * - -ENOENT is returned if a suitable range is not found.
  * - -EINVAL is returned if some argument is missing or wrong;
  *idx_subd, idx_chan and the dsc pointer should be checked; check
  *also the kernel log (dmesg); WARNING: a4l_fill_desc() should
@@ -171,10 +172,14 @@ int a4l_find_range(a4l_desc_t * dsc,
 	int i, ret;
 	long lmin, lmax;
 	a4l_chinfo_t *chinfo;
-	a4l_rnginfo_t *rnginfo;
+	a4l_rnginfo_t *rnginfo, *tmp = NULL;
+	unsigned int idx_rng = -ENOENT;
+
+	if (rng != NULL)
+		*rng = NULL;
 
 	/* Basic checkings */
-	if (dsc == NULL || rng == NULL)
+	if (dsc == NULL)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	/* a4l_fill_desc() must have been called on this descriptor */
@@ -184,38 +189,39 @@ int a4l_find_range(a4l_desc_t * dsc,
 	/* Retrieves the ranges count */
 	ret = a4l_get_chinfo(dsc, idx_subd, idx_chan, chinfo);
 	if (ret  0)
-		goto out_get_range;
+		return ret;
 
 	/* Initializes variables */
 	lmin = (long)(min * A4L_RNG_FACTOR);
 	lmax = (long)(max * A4L_RNG_FACTOR);
-	*rng = NULL;
 
 	/* Performs the research */
 	for (i = 0; i  chinfo-nb_rng; i++) {
 
 		ret = a4l_get_rnginfo(dsc, idx_subd, idx_chan, i, rnginfo);
 		if (ret  0)
-			goto out_get_range;
+			return ret;
 
 		if (A4L_RNG_UNIT(rnginfo-flags) == unit 
 		rnginfo-min = lmin  rnginfo-max = lmax) {
 
-			if (*rng != NULL) {
-if (rnginfo-min = (*rng)-min 
-rnginfo-max = (*rng)-max)
-	*rng = rnginfo;
-			} else
-*rng = rnginfo;
+			if (tmp != NULL) {
+if (rnginfo-min = tmp-min 
+rnginfo-max = tmp-max) {
+	idx_rng = i;
+	tmp = rnginfo;
+}
+			} else {
+idx_rng = i;
+tmp = rnginfo;
+			}
 		}
 	}
 
-out_get_range:
-
-	if (ret  0)
-		*rng = NULL;
+	if (rng != NULL)
+		*rng = tmp;
 
-	return ret;
+	return idx_rng;
 }
 
 /**
commit 10dca3a6ae97cff6b2ebf9cf595283ffac94af44
Author: Daniele Nicolodi nicol...@science.unitn.it
Date:   Mon Mar 29 22:13:03 2010 +0200

Remove trailing white spaces.

diff --git a/src/drvlib/analogy/range.c b/src/drvlib/analogy/range.c
index fc4e302..51b0405 100644
--- a/src/drvlib/analogy/range.c
+++ b/src/drvlib/analogy/range.c
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ int a4l_sizeof_subd(a4l_sbinfo_t *subd)
 	   channels are acquired in one shot); for other kind of
 	   subdevice, the user must use a4l_sizeof_chan() so as to
 	   find out the size of the channel he wants to use */
-	if ((subd-flags  A4L_SUBD_TYPES) != A4L_SUBD_DIO  
+	if ((subd-flags  A4L_SUBD_TYPES) != A4L_SUBD_DIO 
 	(subd-flags  A4L_SUBD_TYPES) != A4L_SUBD_DI 
 	(subd-flags  A4L_SUBD_TYPES) != A4L_SUBD_DO)
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ int a4l_find_range(a4l_desc_t * dsc,
  *
  * @param[in] chan Channel descriptor
  * @param[in] rng Range descriptor
- * @param[out] dst Ouput buffer 
+ * @param[out] dst Ouput buffer
  * @param[in] src Input buffer
  * @param[in] cnt Count of transfer to copy
  *
@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ int a4l_rawtoul(a4l_chinfo_t * chan, unsigned long *dst, void *src, int cnt)
 	if (chan == NULL)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	/* Find out the size in memory */ 
+	/* Find out the size in memory */
 	size = a4l_sizeof_chan(chan);
 
 	/* Get the suitable accessor */
@@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ int a4l_rawtoul(a4l_chinfo_t * chan, unsigned long *dst, void *src, int cnt)
 		j++;
 	}
 
-	return j;	
+	return j;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ int a4l_rawtoul(a4l_chinfo_t * chan, unsigned long *dst, void *src, int cnt)
  *
  * @param[in] chan Channel descriptor
  * @param[in] rng Range descriptor
- * @param[out] dst Ouput buffer 
+ * @param[out] dst Ouput buffer
  * @param[in] src Input buffer
  * @param[in] cnt Count of conversion to perform
  *
@@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ int a4l_rawtof(a4l_chinfo_t * chan,
 	if (rng == NULL || chan == NULL)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	/* Find out the size in memory */ 
+	/* Find out the size in memory */
 	size = a4l_sizeof_chan(chan);
 
 	/* Get the suitable accessor */
@@ -366,7 +366,7 @@ int a4l_rawtof(a4l_chinfo_t * chan,
  *
  * @param[in] chan

[Xenomai-core] Analogy: A4L_CHAN_AREF_* and AREF_* and other macros

2010-03-29 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
Hello Alexis,

I have noticed that in Analogy headers there are two sets of macros to
define channels references, one with prefix A4L_CHAN_AREF_ and the other
with prefix AREF_. I think keeping both is confusing and dangerous,
because similar symbols are defined with different numerical values!

The later form is the one used in comedi API and drivers, but i think it
is better to prefix all exported symbols and constants with a namespace
like string. I would be for keeping only the former form.

If you agree, I can provide a patch for you to review.

Similarly, I would rename TRIG_ constants to something like A4L_TRIG_,
and while at it I think TRIG_WAKE_EOS should become A4L_CMD_WAKE_EOS, as
it is a command flag and not a trigger source.

Similarly, it would be nice also to rename other macros defined in
command.h, adding at least a common A4L_ prefix. While at it I think
that, maybe after a rename to make their purpose more clear, CR_* macros
should be exposed to user space too.

If you think API breakage should be avoided, even in a so early stage of
development and diffusion, we can keep the old definitions for a while,
issuing deprecation warning (in this case those symbols would have to be
exposed as constant variables where to apply the __deprecated__ gcc
attribute).

Let me know what you think about this proposal.

Cheers,
-- 
Daniele


___
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core


Re: [Xenomai-core] Question about getting system time

2010-05-19 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
On 19/05/10 07:49, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
 Jan Kiszka wrote:
 Just like it seems to be the case for Steve (unless I misunderstood his
 reply), it is very useful for us being able to time-stamp events in RT
 context that need to be correlated with events stamped in non-RT
 (including non-Xenomai) parts or even on other systems: (offline) data
 fusion, logging, tracing. I even bet that this is currently the major
 use case for synchronized clocks, only a smaller part already has the
 need to synchronize timed activities on a common clock source. But there
 is huge potential in the second part once we can provide a stable
 infrastructure.
 
 I already had such issues, and I did not solve them by modifying Xenomai
 core.

I'm using Xenomai for scientific data acquisition, so I'm quite
interested to the issue. Can I ask you to detail how you solved the issue?

Maybe it's not much related, but there is any possibility to synchronize
either linux or xenomay clocks to an external clock source, let say the
GPS timing signal from a GPS receiver?

Thanks. Cheers,
-- 
Daniele

___
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core


Re: [Xenomai-core] [git pull] Patch queue for 2.5.x

2010-10-02 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
On 02/10/10 08:40, Jan Kiszka wrote:
 The following changes since commit 5e7cfa5c25672e4478a721eadbd6f6c5b4f88a2f:
 
   nucleus/sched: fix rescheduling bit test macros (2010-09-30 02:34:27 +0200)
 
 are available in the git repository at:
   git://git.xenomai.org/xenomai-jki.git for-2.5.x
 
 Jan Kiszka (8):
   RTDM: Protect xnshadow_ppd_get via nklock
   Fix symbolic status ouput of root threads
   Create watchdog as non-blockable timer
   native: Improve documentation of rt_task_join and rt_task_delete
   x86: Add PCI ID of Series 5/3400 Intel chipset to SMI workaround
   x86: Add PCI ID of 631xESB/632xESB/3100 Intel chipset to SMI workaround
   x86: Add PCI ID of Intel ICH9M-E chipset to SMI workaround

This patch reads:

+#ifdef PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ICH9_1
+#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ICH9_1 0x2917
+#endif

shouldn't it be #ifndef ... #define ... #endif instead?

   x86: Add PCI ID of Intel ICH9M chipset to SMI workaround

Same for this one.

Cheers,
-- 
Daniele

___
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core


Re: [Xenomai-core] Analogy regressions in xenomai 2.5.5.1

2010-10-12 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
On 12/10/10 10:56, Philippe Gerum wrote:
 When I proposed some easy changes to the analogy API, to make it much
 less confusing with trivial changes, Alexis expressed concerns about API
 stability. What about functional stability? I think the reported ones
 are major problems easily catch with simple pre-release tests...
 
 Do not hesitate to provide them.

I'll try to write something later today. There is a testing
infrastructure where those test should fit? I haven't found one in
xenomai source code.

Cheers,
-- 
Daniele

___
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core


Re: [Xenomai-core] Analogy regressions in xenomai 2.5.5.1

2010-10-13 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
On 13/10/10 08:31, Alexis Berlemont wrote:
 1. Buffer management is badly broken. It is not possible to run any
 acquisition command that wraps around in the ring buffer. That can be
 simply reproduced with:

 cmd_read -v d analogy0 -s 0 -S 0

 after a while it will fail with: cmd_read: a4l_read failed (ret=-32).
 In dmesg the driver reports: Analogy: MITE: DME overwrite of free area.
 
 OK. Maybe, it is not Analogy's buffer management; it may be specific
 to the NI driver. Did you try to reproduce the bug with another driver
 (analogy_fake for example)? It may be due to some fix I made this
 summer (which is surprising, I thought I tested the change quite
 exhaustively... Sorry for that).

The problem is probably in the NI driver. I'm unable to reproduce the
bug with the analogy_fake driver. See attached test script.

 2. Buffer is kept memory mapped after the mapping process dies. If a
 process mapping a device buffer dies before un-mapping the buffer, it is
 not possible to reconfigure the bnuffer. a4l_set_bufsize fails with
 error code 32 and dmesg read Analogy: a4l_ioctl_bufcfg: please unmap
 before configuring buffer. Sinche the mapping process died I do not
 know how to do this.

 With a 2.4.x release, did you manage to reproduce the bug?

I'm unable to reproduce the bug with xenomai 2.5.3. See attached test.
It depends on a patch to make the --read-buffer-size and
--write-buffer-size options to analogy_config to effectively work. Also
attached. I do not have a 2.5.4 version handy.

Cheers,
-- 
Daniele



test_buffer_bug.sh
Description: Bourne shell script


test_mmap_bug.sh
Description: Bourne shell script
/**
 * analogy for linux - input command test program
 */

#include stdio.h
#include stdlib.h
#include unistd.h
#include sys/mman.h
#include errno.h
#include getopt.h
#include string.h

#include analogy/analogy.h

/* default device name */
#define DEVICE analogy0

#define DEBUG(frmt, args...) fprintf(stderr, frmt\n, ##args)
#define ERROR(frmt, args...) fprintf(stderr, frmt\n, ##args)

int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
 int rv = 0;
 unsigned long bufsize;
 void *map = NULL;
 a4l_desc_t dsc;

 char *filename = argv[1];

 /* open the device */
 rv = a4l_open(dsc, filename);
 if (rv  0) {
  ERROR(analogy open);
  return rv;
 }

 /* cancel any command which might be in progress */
 a4l_snd_cancel(dsc, dsc.idx_read_subd);
 
 /* get buffer size to map */
 rv = a4l_get_bufsize(dsc, dsc.idx_read_subd, bufsize);
 if (rv  0) {
  ERROR(analogy get bufsize);
  return rv;
 }

 /* map read subdevice buffer */
 rv = a4l_mmap(dsc, dsc.idx_read_subd, bufsize, map);
 if (rv  0) {
  ERROR(analogy mmap);
  return rv;
 }

 if (argc  2) {
  DEBUG(BUG!);
 } else { 
  /* unmap subdevice buffer */
  munmap(map, bufsize);
 }
 
 /* close file descriptor */
 a4l_close(dsc);
 
 exit(0);
}

commit e7ac38f3f45e439a8d383f3b4adafbb97bf543fe
Author: Daniele Nicolodi nicol...@science.unitn.it
Date:   Wed Oct 13 16:03:30 2010 +0200

Make the --read-buffer-size and --write-buffer-size otpions effective.

diff --git a/src/utils/analogy/analogy_config.c b/src/utils/analogy/analogy_config.c
index 1482322..2ce3ddd 100644
--- a/src/utils/analogy/analogy_config.c
+++ b/src/utils/analogy/analogy_config.c
@@ -31,28 +31,25 @@
 
 #include analogy/analogy.h
 
-/* Declare precompilation constants */
-#define __NBMIN_ARG 2
-#define __NBMAX_ARG 3
-#define __OPTS_DELIMITER ,
+enum action {
+	ATTACH_DRIVER,
+	DETACH_DRIVER,
+	CONFIGURE_BUFFER_SIZE,
+};
 
-/* Declare prog variables */
-int vlevel = 1;
-int unatt_act = 0;
-struct option a4l_conf_opts[] = {
-	{help, no_argument, NULL, 'h'},
-	{verbose, no_argument, NULL, 'v'},
-	{quiet, no_argument, NULL, 'q'},
-	{version, no_argument, NULL, 'V'},
-	{remove, no_argument, NULL, 'r'},
-	{read-buffer-size, required_argument, NULL, 'R'},
-	{write-buffer-size, required_argument, NULL, 'W'},
-	{0},
+enum subdevice {
+	READ_SUBDEVICE,
+	WRITE_SUBDEVICE,
 };
 
+/* Verbosity level */
+int vlevel = 1;
+
+/* Driver specific Options delimiter */
+#define DELIMITER ,
+
 int compute_opts(char *opts, unsigned int *nb, unsigned long *res)
 {
-
 	int ret = 0, len, ofs;
 
 	/* Check arg and inits it */
@@ -67,7 +64,7 @@ int compute_opts(char *opts, unsigned int *nb, unsigned long *res)
 	do {
 		(*nb)++;
 		len = strlen(opts);
-		ofs = strcspn(opts, __OPTS_DELIMITER);
+		ofs = strcspn(opts, DELIMITER);
 		if (res != NULL) {
 			res[(*nb) - 1] = strtoul(opts, NULL, 0);
 			if (errno != 0) {
@@ -104,79 +101,57 @@ void do_print_usage(void)
 		\t\t -W, --write-buffer-size: write buffer size in kB\n);
 }
 
-int main(int argc, char *argv[])
+int detach_driver(const char *devfile)
 {
-	int c;
-	char *devfile;
-	a4l_lnkdesc_t lnkdsc;
-	int chk_nb, ret = 0, fd = -1;
-
-	/* Init the descriptor structure

Re: [Xenomai-core] Analogy regressions in xenomai 2.5.5.1

2010-10-15 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
Hi Alexis,

do you have the possibility to look at those bugs soonish? Otherwise I
can try to fix them, but I would need some hints on where I should look
in the code.

Thank you. Cheers,
-- 
Daniele

___
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core


Re: [Xenomai-core] Analogy regressions in xenomai 2.5.5.1

2010-10-15 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
On 15/10/10 12:15, Alexis Berlemont wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Do not worry. I have not forgotten.

Sorry, I didn't want to imply that you forgot about the issues.

It was just to let you know that I'm willing to work on the issues, but
I do not know the code well enough to be able to isolate the issue
without spending quite a lot of time. If you give me an hint I'll be
happy to help, in a way compatible to my PhD thesis writing... :-)

I think analogy is a nice project, and I think that with xenomai 3.0
where the RTDM layer would not depend anymore on ipipe I think it has
the potential to overtake comedi, and I would like to invest more time
on it.

Cheers,
-- 
Daniele

___
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core


Re: [Xenomai-core] Problems with gcc 4.6.0 (rt_task_shadow fails with ENOSYS)

2011-07-11 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
On 07/07/11 22:47, Anders Blomdell wrote:
 When compiling kernel 2.6.37.3 and xenomai 2.5.6 with gcc version 4.6.0 
 20110530 (Red Hat 4.6.0-9) (GCC), programs fail with -ENOSYS in 
 rt_task_shadow. If compiled with gcc version 4.5.1 20100924 (Red Hat 
 4.5.1-4) (GCC) everything works as expected.

I just want to note that I encountered the same problem on Debian
testing. Unfortunately I can not provide more details right now (I'm at
the Amaldi9 conference in Cardiff, any Xenomai dev or user around?)

Cheers,
-- 
Daniele

___
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core


Re: [Xenomai-core] Problems with gcc 4.6.0 (rt_task_shadow fails with ENOSYS)

2011-07-26 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
On 11/07/11 20:43, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
 On 07/07/2011 11:47 PM, Anders Blomdell wrote:
 When compiling kernel 2.6.37.3 and xenomai 2.5.6 with gcc version 4.6.0 
 20110530 (Red Hat 4.6.0-9) (GCC), programs fail with -ENOSYS in 
 rt_task_shadow. If compiled with gcc version 4.5.1 20100924 (Red Hat 
 4.5.1-4) (GCC) everything works as expected.
 
 I think it is due to the modifications of syscall.h I made to implement
 pseudo-signals handling, which implementation was never finished, and
 removed in xenomai-head. Could you try xenomai-head to see if you get
 the failure? I tried backporting it, but the code evolved too much in
 both repositories, the backport needs to spend some time on it, so, I
 would like to know whether it is really needed.

Has this issue been investigated further? I may have the occasion to try
again to compile a Xenomai kernel with gcc 4.6 this week and I would
like to know where to start to debug and solve this issue.

Thank you. Cheers,
-- 
Daniele



___
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core


Re: [Xenomai-core] Problems with gcc 4.6.0 (rt_task_shadow fails with ENOSYS)

2011-07-28 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
On 27/07/11 20:55, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
 The issue has been investigated, as explained in the mail you are
 quoting, it seems to be due to the implementation of pseudo-signals
 which as in xenomai 2.5 code and no longer is in xenomai-head code.
 
 In order to get confirmation, I am still waiting for someone to test
 xenomai-head with gcc 4.6.

Thank you Gilles.

I was checking if any confirmation of the cause of the bug was given,
just to not waste the limited time I have to test this performing a test
with known results. I'll compile xenomai-head with gcc 4.6 and report my
results.

Cheers,
-- 
Daniele

___
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core


[Xenomai-core] xenomai-head compile failure

2011-08-09 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
Hello,

I'm compiling xenomai-head on i386 debian/testing. I found that the file
src/skins/posix/wrappers.c is missing an include of signal.h for the
definition of pthread_kill().

Cheers,
-- 
Daniele

___
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core


Re: [Xenomai-core] gcc-4.6 issue

2011-08-11 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
On 11/08/11 13:43, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
 I submitted the debian bug, beside what is the cause of the problem,
 binaries compiled with gcc-4.6 are not usable, but binaries compiled
 with gcc-4.4 are. I'm compiling xenomai-head right now (this requires
 compiling both user space and kernel space, so testing requires some
 more time). I'll let you know ASAP.

Hello,

I compiled linux 2.6.38.8 and xenomai-head with gcc-4.6. The obtained
kernel boots fine but xenomai services do not: latency hangs right after
the sched_setscheduler system call. With the same kernel I compiled user
space with gcc-4.4 and xenomia services work just fine.

Cheers,
-- 
Daniele

___
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core


Re: [Xenomai-core] gcc-4.6 issue

2011-08-11 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
On 11/08/11 19:22, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:

 Please try and find the point in the latency test where the hang happens
 (it probably happens when calling a xenomai service, so, not
 sched_setscheduler), and then post the two disassemblies of this service
 implementation in libnative.so, the one compiled with 4.4, the other
 with 4.6.

The latency test hangs in rt_task_create() attached the function
disassemblies obtained with gcc-4.4 and gcc-4.6. Hope that this helps,
those are Aramaic to me.

Cheers,
-- 
Daniele
4f90 rt_task_create:
4f90:   55  push   %ebp
4f91:   31 c0   xor%eax,%eax
4f93:   89 e5   mov%esp,%ebp
4f95:   57  push   %edi
4f96:   56  push   %esi
4f97:   53  push   %ebx
4f98:   83 ec 7csub$0x7c,%esp
4f9b:   e8 17 d8 ff ff  call   27b7 __i686.get_pc_thunk.bx
4fa0:   81 c3 24 17 00 00   add$0x1724,%ebx
4fa6:   53  push   %ebx
4fa7:   89 c3   mov%eax,%ebx
4fa9:   b8 2b 02 00 02  mov$0x200022b,%eax
4fae:   cd 80   int$0x80
4fb0:   5b  pop%ebx
4fb1:   8b 45 08mov0x8(%ebp),%eax
4fb4:   8d 75 a0lea-0x60(%ebp),%esi
4fb7:   8b 7d 18mov0x18(%ebp),%edi
--
4ff9:   75 11   jne500c rt_task_create+0x7c
4ffb:   e8 98 d5 ff ff  call   2598 getpagesize@plt
5000:   8d b8 00 40 00 00   lea0x4000(%eax),%edi
5006:   89 bb cc 00 00 00   mov%edi,0xcc(%ebx)
500c:   8b 55 10mov0x10(%ebp),%edx
500f:   85 d2   test   %edx,%edx
5011:   75 07   jne501a rt_task_create+0x8a
5013:   c7 45 90 00 80 00 00movl   $0x8000,-0x70(%ebp)
501a:   c7 44 24 04 01 00 00movl   $0x1,0x4(%esp)
5021:   00 
5022:   89 34 24mov%esi,(%esp)
5025:   e8 ce d4 ff ff  call   24f8 
pthread_attr_setinheritsched@plt
502a:   8b 45 14mov0x14(%ebp),%eax
502d:   c7 45 e4 00 00 00 00movl   $0x0,-0x1c(%ebp)
5034:   85 c0   test   %eax,%eax
5036:   0f 8e bc 00 00 00   jle50f8 rt_task_create+0x168
503c:   c7 44 24 04 01 00 00movl   $0x1,0x4(%esp)
5043:   00 
5044:   89 34 24mov%esi,(%esp)
5047:   e8 9c d4 ff ff  call   24e8 
pthread_attr_setschedpolicy@plt
504c:   8b 45 14mov0x14(%ebp),%eax
504f:   89 45 e4mov%eax,-0x1c(%ebp)
5052:   8d 45 e4lea-0x1c(%ebp),%eax
5055:   89 44 24 04 mov%eax,0x4(%esp)
5059:   89 34 24mov%esi,(%esp)
505c:   e8 07 d5 ff ff  call   2568 
pthread_attr_setschedparam@plt
5061:   8b 45 90mov-0x70(%ebp),%eax
5064:   39 f8   cmp%edi,%eax
5066:   73 02   jae506a rt_task_create+0xda
5068:   89 f8   mov%edi,%eax
506a:   89 44 24 04 mov%eax,0x4(%esp)
506e:   89 34 24mov%esi,(%esp)
5071:   e8 82 d5 ff ff  call   25f8 
pthread_attr_setstacksize@plt
5076:   8b 7d 18mov0x18(%ebp),%edi
5079:   81 e7 00 04 00 00   and$0x400,%edi
507f:   89 7d 90mov%edi,-0x70(%ebp)
5082:   74 5c   je 50e0 rt_task_create+0x150
5084:   8d 45 c4lea-0x3c(%ebp),%eax
5087:   89 44 24 0c mov%eax,0xc(%esp)
508b:   8d 83 cc e7 ff ff   lea-0x1834(%ebx),%eax
5091:   89 44 24 08 mov%eax,0x8(%esp)
5095:   8d 45 e0lea-0x20(%ebp),%eax
5098:   89 74 24 04 mov%esi,0x4(%esp)
509c:   89 04 24mov%eax,(%esp)
509f:   e8 e4 d5 ff ff  call   2688 __real_pthread_create@plt
50a4:   85 c0   test   %eax,%eax
50a6:   75 28   jne50d0 rt_task_create+0x140
50a8:   8b 7d 94mov-0x6c(%ebp),%edi
50ab:   53  push   %ebx
50ac:   89 fb   mov%edi,%ebx
50ae:   b8 2b 02 00 01  mov$0x100022b,%eax
50b3:   cd 80   int$0x80
50b5:   5b  pop%ebx
50b6:   85 c0   test   %eax,%eax
50b8:   89 c6   mov%eax,%esi
50ba:   74 

Re: [Xenomai-core] gcc-4.6 issue

2011-08-12 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
On 12/08/11 01:18, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
 The following patch seems to do the trick. It makes the assumption that 
 when compiling with -fomit-frame-pointer, we have one more register, so
 the R constraint will always be able to avoid choosing eax, and eax 
 will be free for the muxcode, so that the compiler will not choose the 
 m alternative.

It works, indeed. Thank you Gilles.

May this patch be backported to the stable branch?

Cheers,
-- 
Daniele

___
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core


Re: [Xenomai-core] gcc-4.6 issue

2011-08-12 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
On 12/08/11 10:18, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
 On 12/08/11 01:18, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
 The following patch seems to do the trick. It makes the assumption that 
 when compiling with -fomit-frame-pointer, we have one more register, so
 the R constraint will always be able to avoid choosing eax, and eax 
 will be free for the muxcode, so that the compiler will not choose the 
 m alternative.
 
 It works, indeed. Thank you Gilles.

I've spoken to early. The patch does not work for the posix skin.
Posix skin services return function not implemented errors when
xenomai user space is compiled with the patch and gcc-4.6, they work
just fine when compiled with gcc-4.4 (without the patch).

Cheers,
-- 
Daniele

___
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core


[Xenomai-core] Analogy: idx_write_subd field in a4l_desc_t

2011-09-27 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
Hello,

I'm using xenomai-head on a 2.6.38.8 kernel on x86 with a NI-6251 DAQ
board. In this configuration the idx_write_subd field of the a4l_desc_t
structure filled by a4l_open() is not set to the proper value but is set
to NULL.

In previous xanomai/analogy releases this was working properly. Has some
initialization code been removed in the latest analogy drivers refactoring?

Thank you. Cheers,
-- 
Daniele

___
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core


Re: [Xenomai-core] Analogy: idx_write_subd field in a4l_desc_t

2011-10-04 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
On 01/10/11 00:03, Alexis Berlemont wrote:
 I'm using xenomai-head on a 2.6.38.8 kernel on x86 with a NI-6251 DAQ
 board. In this configuration the idx_write_subd field of the a4l_desc_t
 structure filled by a4l_open() is not set to the proper value but is set
 to NULL.

 In previous xanomai/analogy releases this was working properly. Has some
 initialization code been removed in the latest analogy drivers refactoring?
 
 Yes. Formerly, on both sides (kernel and user), we used some
 description fields (idx_read_subd and idx_write_subd) so as to quickly
 identify default asynchronous input and output subdevices and to link
 them with buffers (into which, input / output data are copied).

...

 For API / ABI compatibility reasons, I waited a major release before
 removing the fields idx_{read, write}_subd. I should have thought
 twice before removing their initializations. I will fix that soon,
 sorry.

Hello Alexis,

the rational of the change is clear, however having the field in the
structure, but with the wrong value is confusing, especially so because
the documentation does not mention that this field is deprecated and its
value should not be trusted.

I would remove the field altogether, or put back the initialization and
mention the deprecation in the documentation.

 I implemented this change more than one year ago (here is on of the
 many related commits 58ebd5b7efe0cc0ac1e82991d12125ce34dfeee3). That
 was already present in 2.5. Which version were you formerly using?

I thought I was using Xenomai 2.5.6.

Cheers,
-- 
Daniele

___
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core


Re: [Xenomai-core] Analogy: idx_write_subd field in a4l_desc_t

2011-10-04 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
On 01/10/11 20:07, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
 For API / ABI compatibility reasons, I waited a major release before
 removing the fields idx_{read, write}_subd. I should have thought
 twice before removing their initializations. I will fix that soon,
 sorry.
 
 2.6 is a new major release, and not out yet, so, if you want to remove
 something, it is still time.

If we are open to some partially backward incompatible changes I propose
to also change the meaning of the a4l_desc_t board_name field, to really
be the board name, instead of the driver name. I find this information
more useful when enumerating devices in my setup.

I would also like to propose a patch to demote some messages, logged at
each interrupt, in the ni_pcimio driver from the info to the debug
level. I run continuous acquisitions and those kernel messages pollute
my syslog with not much added value and fill my disc with redundant
information.

Cheers,
-- 
Daniele

___
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core


Re: [Xenomai-core] Analogy: idx_write_subd field in a4l_desc_t

2011-10-04 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
On 04/10/11 13:17, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
 If you want things merged, send the patches, they will reach
 xenomai-head repository through Alex.

Of course. Here is my simple patch.

Thank you. Cheers,
-- 
Daniele
From 6944fe7465e1eb614cf9db3eccceb93d77bf95f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniele Nicolodi nicol...@science.unitn.it
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 14:49:27 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] analogy: demote some messages logged in mio_common
 driver code to debug level

---
 .../analogy/national_instruments/mio_common.c  |   24 ++--
 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/ksrc/drivers/analogy/national_instruments/mio_common.c b/ksrc/drivers/analogy/national_instruments/mio_common.c
index a68cf2c..4303934 100644
--- a/ksrc/drivers/analogy/national_instruments/mio_common.c
+++ b/ksrc/drivers/analogy/national_instruments/mio_common.c
@@ -835,8 +835,8 @@ static void handle_a_interrupt(a4l_dev_t *dev,
 	if((subd-flags  A4L_SUBD_TYPES) == A4L_SUBD_UNUSED)
 		return;
 
-	a4l_info(dev, ni_mio_common: interrupt: 
-		 a_status=%04x ai_mite_status=%08x\n,status, ai_mite_status);
+	a4l_dbg(1, drv_dbg, dev, ni_mio_common: interrupt: 
+		a_status=%04x ai_mite_status=%08x\n,status, ai_mite_status);
 	ni_mio_print_status_a(status);
 
 #if (defined(CONFIG_XENO_DRIVERS_ANALOGY_NI_MITE) || \
@@ -847,9 +847,9 @@ static void handle_a_interrupt(a4l_dev_t *dev,
 	if (ai_mite_status  ~(CHSR_INT | CHSR_LINKC | CHSR_DONE | CHSR_MRDY |
 			   CHSR_DRDY | CHSR_DRQ1 | CHSR_DRQ0 | CHSR_ERROR |
 			   CHSR_SABORT | CHSR_XFERR | CHSR_LxERR_mask)) {
-		a4l_info(dev, ni_mio_common: interrupt: 
-			 unknown mite interrupt, ack! (ai_mite_status=%08x)\n,
-			 ai_mite_status);
+		a4l_dbg(1, drv_dbg, dev, ni_mio_common: interrupt: 
+			unknown mite interrupt, ack! (ai_mite_status=%08x)\n,
+			ai_mite_status);
 		a4l_buf_evt(subd, A4L_BUF_ERROR);
 	}
 #endif /* CONFIG_XENO_DRIVERS_ANALOGY_NI_MITE */
@@ -858,8 +858,8 @@ static void handle_a_interrupt(a4l_dev_t *dev,
 	if (status  (AI_Overrun_St | AI_Overflow_St | AI_SC_TC_Error_St |
 		  AI_SC_TC_St | AI_START1_St)) {
 		if (status == 0x) {
-			a4l_info(dev, ni_mio_common: interrupt: 
- a_status=0x.  Card removed?\n);
+			a4l_dbg(1, drv_dbg, dev, ni_mio_common: interrupt: 
+a_status=0x.  Card removed?\n);
 			/* TODO: we probably aren't even running a command now,
 			   so it's a good idea to be careful.
 			   we should check the transfer status */
@@ -869,8 +869,8 @@ static void handle_a_interrupt(a4l_dev_t *dev,
 		}
 		if (status  (AI_Overrun_St | AI_Overflow_St |
 			  AI_SC_TC_Error_St)) {
-			a4l_info(dev, ni_mio_common: interrupt: 
- ai error a_status=%04x\n, status);
+			a4l_dbg(1, drv_dbg, dev, ni_mio_common: interrupt: 
+ai error a_status=%04x\n, status);
 			ni_mio_print_status_a(status);
 
 			shutdown_ai_command(subd);
@@ -881,7 +881,7 @@ static void handle_a_interrupt(a4l_dev_t *dev,
 			return;
 		}
 		if (status  AI_SC_TC_St) {
-			a4l_info(dev, ni_mio_common: SC_TC interrupt\n);
+			a4l_dbg(1, drv_dbg, dev, ni_mio_common: SC_TC interrupt\n);
 			if (!devpriv-ai_continuous) {
 shutdown_ai_command(subd);
 			}
@@ -914,8 +914,8 @@ static void handle_a_interrupt(a4l_dev_t *dev,
 
 	status = devpriv-stc_readw(dev, AI_Status_1_Register);
 	if (status  Interrupt_A_St)
-		a4l_info(dev, ni_mio_common: interrupt: 
-			  didn't clear interrupt? status=0x%x\n, status);
+		a4l_dbg(1, drv_dbg, dev, ni_mio_common: interrupt: 
+			 didn't clear interrupt? status=0x%x\n, status);
 }
 
 static void ack_b_interrupt(a4l_dev_t *dev, unsigned short b_status)
-- 
1.7.6.3

___
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core


[Xenomai-core] patch: build: restore building of xeno-config man page

2011-10-04 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
Hello,

here is a simple patch to the build system to restore the building of
xeno-config man page. It got lost some time ago. I noticed that it was
missing because debian packages failed to build.

Cheers,
-- 
Daniele
From 958e522ea5aad32e9cd227e572be4ffbaff73ef9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniele Nicolodi nicol...@science.unitn.it
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 14:59:49 +0200
Subject: build: restore building of xeno-config man page

---
 doc/man/Makefile.am |6 +++---
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/man/Makefile.am b/doc/man/Makefile.am
index c2f753a..18f2bd1 100644
--- a/doc/man/Makefile.am
+++ b/doc/man/Makefile.am
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-man1_MANS = clocktest.man cyclictest.man irqbench.man irqloop.man \
-	klatency.man latency.man rtcanconfig.man \
-	rtcanrecv.man rtcansend.man switchbench.man \
+man1_MANS = xeno-config.man clocktest.man cyclictest.man irqbench.man	\
+	irqloop.man klatency.man latency.man rtcanconfig.man	\
+	rtcanrecv.man rtcansend.man switchbench.man			\
 	switchtest.man xeno.man
-- 
1.7.6.3

___
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core


[Xenomai-core] patch: testsuite: add missing include

2011-10-04 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
Hello,

the posix/leks regression test in the test suite failed to build on
debian testing due to a missing include. The attached patch fixes the
problem.

Cheers,
-- 
Daniele
From 795a866c1080987ec772492fec223db8d1a2a4a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniele Nicolodi nicol...@science.unitn.it
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 15:14:44 +0200
Subject: testsuite: add missing include

---
 src/testsuite/regression/posix/leaks.c |2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/testsuite/regression/posix/leaks.c b/src/testsuite/regression/posix/leaks.c
index 7326572..6c8cee9 100644
--- a/src/testsuite/regression/posix/leaks.c
+++ b/src/testsuite/regression/posix/leaks.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 #include stdio.h
 #include stdlib.h
-
+#include signal.h
 #include unistd.h
 #include pthread.h
 #include fcntl.h
-- 
1.7.6.3

___
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core


Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH xenomai-head] testsuite: fix compiler error 'SIGALRM, undeclared'

2011-10-12 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
On 12/10/11 12:59, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
 On 10/12/2011 11:44 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
 Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Grandegger w...@denx.de
 ---
  src/testsuite/regression/posix/leaks.c |1 +
  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

 diff --git a/src/testsuite/regression/posix/leaks.c 
 b/src/testsuite/regression/posix/leaks.c
 index 7326572..f9dd34d 100644
 --- a/src/testsuite/regression/posix/leaks.c
 +++ b/src/testsuite/regression/posix/leaks.c
 @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
  #include fcntl.h
  #include sys/mman.h
  #include semaphore.h
 +#include signal.h
  #include mqueue.h
  
  #include nucleus/heap.h
 
 Applied, thanks.
 

Wans't that the same error fixed by commit
aa44db3d5ee270c3b92a1017f7c136ffa1e2cc4d?

Cheers,
-- 
Daniele


___
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core