Re: [ZION] Voting and parties (was Re: Cuba and Castro)

2002-10-23 Thread Cousin Bill
At some point in the past, Stephen wrote:

 To make sure the Democrats in an area don't band together and elect a
 Republican candidate who can't possibly win the general election, and
 vice versa.
-
This happens, I'm sure.  I mentioned before that this is the way things are
done in Georgia.  Whenever someone loses a primary, they inevitably use this
as an excuse for losing.  It doesn't make much sense, though, when both
parties are holding primaries.  I have mainly voted in Republican primaries.
Off hand, I don't recall ever voting in a Democratic primary, but I wouldn't
deny it.  Before I became of voting age, I understand that practically
everything in Georgia was determined at the Democratic primary because the
Republican party didn't have much of a chance at anything.  That is no
longer the case, though Democrats still maintain a firm grip on a lot of
offices.

BTW, I have sent in my absentee ballot.  I have no idea whether it will
actually be counted or not.  There were many offices in which I voted for
neither the Democrat or Republican candidate.  I am a firm believer in
voting for who you think is best, not who you think will win.  That includes
the liberal use of write-in voting.  (I have voted for Grampa Bill many
times in the past, and for two offices this time around.  Gramma Letty, too,
for that matter.)

Cousin Bill

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




RE: [ZION] Voting and parties (was Re: Cuba and Castro)

2002-10-22 Thread Stephen Beecroft
-Marc-
 In the U.S. every voter registers for a party (or as an
 independent -- as I recall the rules vary considerably from

This is not correct.

-Mark-
 What?  You mean to say that you cannot vote in the US unless
 you register your preference?  Is that true?

No, it is not true. Many states do require you to register in order to 
vote in the primaries, though.

 And if it is, what's the point of it?

To make sure the Democrats in an area don't band together and elect a 
Republican candidate who can't possibly win the general election, and 
vice versa.

 Since your vote is secret, why register a preference?

In a primary, you may only vote within your registered party if you live 
in a state with such rules. Some states don't have any such rules, which 
I consider to be a mistake (the lack of such rules, I mean).

 As to voting or supporting a party: I'm not sure that I follow
 what Elder Jensen was saying.  What's the point of voting for a
 party if you don't accept their policies?

Obviously, I can't speak for Elder Jensen, but I suspect the general 
authorities are concerned about the lack of opposition to the 
Republicans in Utah. This lack of political balance allows the 
Republicans to bend the rules and control state politics without an 
effective counterbalance. Personally, I'm not sure that's so much worse 
than the perpetual gridlock you so often get with more balanced state 
legislatures. In any case, it is vastly preferable to having a bunch of 
Democrats in charge.

Stephen

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Re: [ZION] Voting and parties (was Re: Cuba and Castro)

2002-10-22 Thread Marc A. Schindler


Stephen Beecroft wrote:

 -Marc-
  In the U.S. every voter registers for a party (or as an
  independent -- as I recall the rules vary considerably from

 This is not correct.

Please don't interrupt. If you read the whole post, I made clear that this was to
vote in party conventions -- what you call primaries.


--
Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland

“We do not think that there is an incompatibility between words and deeds; the
worst thing is to rush into action before the consequences have been properly
debated…To think of the future and wait was merely another way of saying one was
a coward; any idea of moderation was just an attempt to disguise one’s unmanly
character; ability to understand a question from all sides meant that one was
totally unfitted for action.” – Pericles about his fellow-Athenians, as quoted by
Thucydides in “The Peloponessian Wars”

Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the author
solely; its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the author’s employer,
nor those of any organization with which the author may be associated.

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^^===
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^^===




RE: [ZION] Voting and parties (was Re: Cuba and Castro)

2002-10-22 Thread Stephen Beecroft
-Marc-
 In the U.S. every voter registers for a party (or as an
 independent -- as I recall the rules vary considerably from

-Stephen-
 This is not correct.

-Marc-
 Please don't interrupt.

Oops. My bad. I had thought this was John Redelfs' discussion list, not 
Marc Schindler's lecture hall. Silly me.

 If you read the whole post, I made clear that this was to
 vote in party conventions -- what you call primaries.

Wrong. Your first paragraph was: Being a 'member' of a party in our 
Westminster system means something different than it does in the U.S. In 
the U.S. every voter registers for a party (or as an independent -- as I 
recall the rules vary considerably from state to state, as to how the 
states elect their delegates to the party national conventions). So to 
say that my late father was a Democrat means that he was registered as a 
Democrat. As it happens, this is pretty meaningless, because the vote is 
secret, and you can vote for whomever you like.

This paragraph clearly was referring to the general election, since you 
said affiliation was meaningless and that you can vote for whomever 
you like, something not possible in primaries. Only in your next 
paragraph did you go on to discuss primaries.

Even if you had made clear that this was to vote in...primaries, 
you're still wrong. In no sense is it true that [i]n the U.S. every 
voter registers for a party (or as an independent). A great many voters 
do not register under any affiliation whatsoever, and some states allow 
participation in primaries without a declared affiliation.

tweak Maybe you should read your own posts more carefully. 
Alternatively, you could admit when you're wrong...oh, never mind. No 
use dwelling in a land of fantasy. /tweak

Tweakin' Stephen

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Re: [ZION] Voting and parties (was Re: Cuba and Castro)

2002-10-22 Thread Marc A. Schindler
Exactly. I was referring to state party conventions, what you call in US English,
primaries.

Stephen Beecroft wrote:

 -Marc-
  In the U.S. every voter registers for a party (or as an
  independent -- as I recall the rules vary considerably from

 -Stephen-
  This is not correct.

 -Marc-
  Please don't interrupt.

 Oops. My bad. I had thought this was John Redelfs' discussion list, not
 Marc Schindler's lecture hall. Silly me.

  If you read the whole post, I made clear that this was to
  vote in party conventions -- what you call primaries.

 Wrong. Your first paragraph was: Being a 'member' of a party in our
 Westminster system means something different than it does in the U.S. In
 the U.S. every voter registers for a party (or as an independent -- as I
 recall the rules vary considerably from state to state, as to how the
 states elect their delegates to the party national conventions). So to
 say that my late father was a Democrat means that he was registered as a
 Democrat. As it happens, this is pretty meaningless, because the vote is
 secret, and you can vote for whomever you like.

 This paragraph clearly was referring to the general election, since you
 said affiliation was meaningless and that you can vote for whomever
 you like, something not possible in primaries. Only in your next
 paragraph did you go on to discuss primaries.

 Even if you had made clear that this was to vote in...primaries,
 you're still wrong. In no sense is it true that [i]n the U.S. every
 voter registers for a party (or as an independent). A great many voters
 do not register under any affiliation whatsoever, and some states allow
 participation in primaries without a declared affiliation.

 tweak Maybe you should read your own posts more carefully.
 Alternatively, you could admit when you're wrong...oh, never mind. No
 use dwelling in a land of fantasy. /tweak

 Tweakin' Stephen

 /
 ///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
 ///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
 /


--
Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland

“We do not think that there is an incompatibility between words and deeds; the
worst thing is to rush into action before the consequences have been properly
debated…To think of the future and wait was merely another way of saying one was
a coward; any idea of moderation was just an attempt to disguise one’s unmanly
character; ability to understand a question from all sides meant that one was
totally unfitted for action.” – Pericles about his fellow-Athenians, as quoted by
Thucydides in “The Peloponessian Wars”

Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the author
solely; its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the author’s employer,
nor those of any organization with which the author may be associated.

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^^===
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^^===





RE: [ZION] Voting and parties (was Re: Cuba and Castro)

2002-10-22 Thread Stephen Beecroft
-Marc-
 Exactly. I was referring to state party conventions, what you
 call in US English, primaries.

Interesting. So, then, what did you intend to say when you wrote:

 So to say that my late father was a Democrat means that he
 was registered as a Democrat. As it happens, this is pretty
 meaningless, because the vote is secret, and you can vote
 for whomever you like.

If you were referring to primaries, then why did you say that 
affilliation was meaningless, because...you can vote for whomever you 
like? This is clearly false, even in primaries. And you never did 
respond to the question of why your statement, [i]n the U.S. every 
voter registers for a party (or as an independent), was not false on 
its face, given that not all states require registration in a party to 
participate in primaries, much less the general election.

Clarifyingly,

Stephen

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^




Re: [ZION] Voting and parties (was Re: Cuba and Castro)

2002-10-22 Thread Marc A. Schindler


Stephen Beecroft wrote:

 -Marc-
  Exactly. I was referring to state party conventions, what you
  call in US English, primaries.

 Interesting. So, then, what did you intend to say when you wrote:

  So to say that my late father was a Democrat means that he
  was registered as a Democrat. As it happens, this is pretty
  meaningless, because the vote is secret, and you can vote
  for whomever you like.


sigh You know, this isn't rocket science. All you have to do is read, not cut
and paste selectively in what appears to be a deliberately polemical way. I had
already made my point about state conventions, then went on to write what you've
quoted. Again you've quoted me out of context.  This particular reference is to
voting following the primaries. Was it that hard to figure out, or are you your
own worst enemy when it comes to understanding what others write?


 If you were referring to primaries, then why did you say that
 affilliation was meaningless, because...you can vote for whomever you
 like? This is clearly false, even in primaries. And you never did
 respond to the question of why your statement, [i]n the U.S. every
 voter registers for a party (or as an independent), was not false on
 its face, given that not all states require registration in a party to
 participate in primaries, much less the general election.


Because I thought it was a dumb question, if you really insist on an answer. If
you want me to be tactful, give me room to be tactful.


 Clarifyingly,

 Stephen


Be careful what you ask for. You might get it. Clarification, in this case.

--
Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland

“We do not think that there is an incompatibility between words and deeds; the
worst thing is to rush into action before the consequences have been properly
debated…To think of the future and wait was merely another way of saying one was
a coward; any idea of moderation was just an attempt to disguise one’s unmanly
character; ability to understand a question from all sides meant that one was
totally unfitted for action.” – Pericles about his fellow-Athenians, as quoted by
Thucydides in “The Peloponessian Wars”

Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the author
solely; its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the author’s employer,
nor those of any organization with which the author may be associated.

/
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html  ///
/

==^^===
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^^===