[zones-discuss] Parameters in /etc/system in the zone

2009-10-21 Thread Yanakiev, Vladimir
 
Hi, All!

I have a zone question - to my knowledge /etc/system in a zone has very
little meaning, as these are kernel parameters. But still certain things
can be set using this file. Is there a list of parameters for
/etc/system, that work in a zone? I am asking in general, not for
specific issue...

Thanks!

Vladi

This e-mail and its attachments are confidential and solely for the
intended addressee(s). Do not share or use them without Fannie Mae's
approval. If received in error, contact the sender and delete them.
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [zones-discuss] Parallel mount question

2009-07-02 Thread Yanakiev, Vladimir
After removing NFS, we got yet another corruption - I just heard they
use Samba on this file system. So, let me ask the question - Samba is
supported in zone, running on LOFS - is this correct?

Thanks!

Vladi 


This e-mail and its attachments are confidential and solely for the
intended addressee(s). Do not share or use them without Fannie Mae's
approval. If received in error, contact the sender and delete them.


-Original Message-
From: william.ro...@sun.com [mailto:william.ro...@sun.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 2:00 PM
To: Yanakiev, Vladimir
Cc: zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zones-discuss] Parallel mount question

Hello Vladi,

Yes you can use LOFS to all your zones to share the file system 
providing r/w access. I would even say that this is your BEST option.

NFS mount in your local zones of a file system shared by the global zone

is absolutely not supported (including autofs access of course).

HTH,
William.


On 06/29/09 18:25, Yanakiev, Vladimir wrote:
 Need a help with a problem. We have VxFS file system, created in a
 global zone, and mounted under non-global zone as LOFS. Later, two new
 zones were created on the same server, that needed access to the very
 same file system. Someone decided to NFS-shareout this file system
from
 the global zone, and NFS mount it on these two new zones. This (to my
 understanding) after few weeks corrupted bravely the file system, and
 today we experienced the same for second time.
 
 My question is - can I keep the file system in the global zone, loop
 back it (with LOFS) to all three zones, providing r/w access to all of
 them, without risk to corrupt it again?
 
 Thanks in advance for the help!
 
 Vladi
 ___
 zones-discuss mailing list
 zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [zones-discuss] Parallel mount question

2009-07-02 Thread Yanakiev, Vladimir
What about /dev/smb? Will it be created in the zone during install, or we have 
to use mknod for it? To my memories, /dev/ is read only in the zone. Also, what 
will happen, if /dev/smb is simply not there? 


This e-mail and its attachments are confidential and solely for the intended 
addressee(s). Do not share or use them without Fannie Mae's approval. If 
received in error, contact the sender and delete them.


-Original Message-
From: zones-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org 
[mailto:zones-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Nicolas Dorfsman
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 9:50 AM
To: Zones discuss
Subject: Re: [zones-discuss] Parallel mount question


Le 2 juil. 09 à 15:46, Yanakiev, Vladimir a écrit :

 After removing NFS, we got yet another corruption - I just heard they
 use Samba on this file system. So, let me ask the question - Samba is
 supported in zone, running on LOFS - is this correct?

Samba is user-land.
AFAIK any userland tasks is supported...


Nico
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [zones-discuss] Parallel mount question

2009-07-02 Thread Yanakiev, Vladimir
$ uname -a
SunOS acust01 5.10 Generic_13-02 sun4u sparc SUNW,Netra-T12
$ ls -ld /dev/smb
drwxr-xr-x   2 root other   6656 Sep 25  2007 /dev/smb
$ ps -ef |grep smb
root  2863 1   0   Jun 28 ?   0:00 ./smbd -D -d 1 -l 
/export/apps/samba/var -s /export/apps/samba/lib/smb.conf
root  2865 1   0   Jun 28 ?   0:08 ./nmbd -D -d 1 -l 
/export/apps/samba/var -s /export/apps/samba/lib/smb.conf
root  2867  2863   0   Jun 28 ?   0:00 ./smbd -D -d 1 -l 
/export/apps/samba/var -s /export/apps/samba/lib/smb.conf
  s5uvry 20280 20249   0 11:11:36 pts/7   0:00 grep smb 


This e-mail and its attachments are confidential and solely for the intended 
addressee(s). Do not share or use them without Fannie Mae's approval. If 
received in error, contact the sender and delete them.


-Original Message-
From: zones-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org 
[mailto:zones-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Nicolas Dorfsman
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 10:58 AM
To: Zones discuss
Subject: Re: [zones-discuss] Parallel mount question


Le 2 juil. 09 à 16:47, Yanakiev, Vladimir a écrit :

 What about /dev/smb? Will it be created in the zone during install,  
 or we have to use mknod for it? To my memories, /dev/ is read only  
 in the zone. Also, what will happen, if /dev/smb is simply not there?

Hu ?  What's that ?

Did you see this on a Linux Kernel or on a Solaris  ?


Nico

___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org


[zones-discuss] Parallel mount question

2009-06-29 Thread Yanakiev, Vladimir
Need a help with a problem. We have VxFS file system, created in a
global zone, and mounted under non-global zone as LOFS. Later, two new
zones were created on the same server, that needed access to the very
same file system. Someone decided to NFS-shareout this file system from
the global zone, and NFS mount it on these two new zones. This (to my
understanding) after few weeks corrupted bravely the file system, and
today we experienced the same for second time.

My question is - can I keep the file system in the global zone, loop
back it (with LOFS) to all three zones, providing r/w access to all of
them, without risk to corrupt it again?

Thanks in advance for the help!

Vladi
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [zones-discuss] how to find global-zone from zone

2007-08-29 Thread Yanakiev, Vladimir
This is easy:

In the global zone

[EMAIL PROTECTED] zoneadm list
global
labv490-01z3
labv490-01z2
labv490-01z6
labv490-01z7
labv490-01z4
labv490wsz1
labv490wsz2
labv490wsz3
labv490-01z1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

In the non-global

[EMAIL PROTECTED] zoneadm list
labv490-01z1 

If the output form zoneadm list shows the word global, you are in the
global zone. If there is no global, you are in a non-global zone.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brandorr
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 9:27 AM
To: John Chase
Cc: zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zones-discuss] how to find global-zone from zone

On 8/29/07, John Chase [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


  Remco,

  There is no command to display the Global zone of a non-global zone
  but there are a few tricks that I have heard of.

  One is to create a file in the zone path of each zone and then read
it
  from the non-global
  On the Global
 touch /zone_path/root/etc/global.hostname

  On the non
 ls -l /etc/global*

  -JOhn


  Remco Fugers wrote:
  Hi,

  I was wondering if it's possible to find out to which global zone
  a zone is related.  (And not from Globalzone point of view!)

  It might happen (as a sysadmin) that you login to a zone but you need
to
 perform maintenance in the global zone ( i.e. Veritas VM -stuff).

In a related, but similar situation. How does one know that they are
actually in a non-global zone vs a global zone? (Using a committed
interface).

-Brian

  Thanks in advance

  Remco


  

 ___
 zones-discuss mailing list
 zones-discuss@opensolaris.org


  --

 **


   John Chase
  /___/\ (Technical Support OS Group)
  _\_ \\ \ Sun Support Services
  _\__\ \\ /
  / / \/_/ / Sun Microsystems Inc.
 /___/ / __\//\ 1 Network Drive BLDG 4
 \___\//\ __/ / Burlington, MA 01803-0903
  /__/ / /\ / M/S UBUR04-268
  \___/ \\ \ EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  \ \ \\ 1-800-USA4-SUN
  \___\/

 **


 ___
 zones-discuss mailing list
 zones-discuss@opensolaris.org



-- 
- Brian Gupta

http://opensolaris.org/os/project/nycosug/
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [zones-discuss] zonecfg question

2007-08-02 Thread Yanakiev, Vladimir
Here is the output:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] zonecfg -z labv490-01z5 delete -F
labv490-01z5: Zone state is invalid for the requested operation
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

-Original Message-
From: Mike Gerdts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 5:30 PM
To: Yanakiev, Vladimir
Cc: zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zones-discuss] zonecfg question

On 8/1/07, Yanakiev, Vladimir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] zonecfg -F -z labv490-01z5 delete
 zonecfg: illegal option -- F
 usage:  zonecfg help
 zonecfg -z zone   (interactive)
 zonecfg -z zone command
 zonecfg -z zone -f command-file
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Try this:

zonecfg -z labv490-01z5 delete -F

-- 
Mike Gerdts
http://mgerdts.blogspot.com/
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [zones-discuss] zonecfg question

2007-08-02 Thread Yanakiev, Vladimir
That was my first question - I can not figure out how this did happened.
We have the xml, but the entry in the index file is missing. Maybe, the
zoneadm -z...delete command got interrupted in the middle?... Fixing the
problem by deleting the file is obvious, but the second question is,
isn't it more adequate zonecfg to be able to handle this set problems?
Isn't it better the -F option to disregard the status (or, the lack of
it at all)? If we agree that this is not correct action, we have to open
bug/fix?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 9:31 AM
To: Yanakiev, Vladimir
Cc: Mike Gerdts; zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zones-discuss] zonecfg question

Yanakiev, Vladimir wrote:
  
 Here it is:
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] zoneadm list -cv
   ID NAME STATUS PATH  
0 global   running/ 
1 labv490-01z3 running/export/zones/labv490-01z3/main
2 labv490-01z2 running/export/zones/labv490-01z2/main
4 labv490wsz2  running/export/zones/labv490wsz2/main
5 labv490wsz3  running/export/zones/labv490wsz3/main
6 labv490-01z1 running/export/zones/labv490-01z1/main
7 labv490wsz1  running/export/zones/labv490wsz1/main
8 labv490-01z6 running/export/zones/labv490-01z6/main
   16 labv490-01z7 running/export/zones/labv490-01z7/main
   43 labv490-01z4 running/export/zones/labv490-01z4/main
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 As you can see, because the index file doesn't have info for the zone,
 zoneadm will report nothing about it!

Ok, wasn't aware of this problem :-)
Any idea on how this occurred, i.e. steps taken to create the zonecfg 
for the zone without the index file getting updated, is this in a 
veritas cluster by any chance?


Is there an xml file in /etc/zones for labv490-01z5?
If not one could run zonecfg to create one, otherwise the only route I 
can see is to update the index file manually ( need to be careful here )

to include a reference to the missing zone, then retry.

But I'd be interested in why this missing entry occurred to start with.

Enda


 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 9:16 AM
 To: Yanakiev, Vladimir
 Cc: Mike Gerdts; zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
 Subject: Re: [zones-discuss] zonecfg question
 
 Hi
 What does zonadm -z labv490-01z5 have to say, ie is the zone in a
state 
 other than installed?
 
 so the complete steps for an installed zone are:
 zoneadm list -cv ( just to see zone state )
 
 zoneadm -z labv490-01z5 halt  ( if not in installed state )
 zoneadm -z labv490-01z5 uninstall -F
 zonecfg -z labv490-01z5 delete -F
 
 if above fails then give the complete output from above commands, 
 including the zoneadm list -cv.
 
 
 Enda
 
 
 Yanakiev, Vladimir wrote:
 Here is the output:

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] zonecfg -z labv490-01z5 delete -F
 labv490-01z5: Zone state is invalid for the requested operation
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 -Original Message-
 From: Mike Gerdts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 5:30 PM
 To: Yanakiev, Vladimir
 Cc: zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
 Subject: Re: [zones-discuss] zonecfg question

 On 8/1/07, Yanakiev, Vladimir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] zonecfg -F -z labv490-01z5 delete
 zonecfg: illegal option -- F
 usage:  zonecfg help
 zonecfg -z zone   (interactive)
 zonecfg -z zone command
 zonecfg -z zone -f command-file
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Try this:

 zonecfg -z labv490-01z5 delete -F

 

___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [zones-discuss] zonecfg question

2007-08-02 Thread Yanakiev, Vladimir
No, there are no Veritas products on this server:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] pkginfo |grep VRTS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] zfs list |grep z5
DG1/demo  24.5K  63.2G  24.5K
/export/zones/labv490-01z5/fs/export/demo 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 9:48 AM
To: Yanakiev, Vladimir
Cc: zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zones-discuss] zonecfg question

Yanakiev, Vladimir wrote:
 That was my first question - I can not figure out how this did
happened.
 We have the xml, but the entry in the index file is missing. Maybe,
the
 zoneadm -z...delete command got interrupted in the middle?... Fixing
the
 problem by deleting the file is obvious, but the second question is,
 isn't it more adequate zonecfg to be able to handle this set problems?
 Isn't it better the -F option to disregard the status (or, the lack of
 it at all)? If we agree that this is not correct action, we have to
open
 bug/fix?

hmm, hard to tell what happened I guess.
the zoneadm delete was run was it?
or is this some kind of say veritas cluster env, where the zonecfg did 
not get propogated to the node in question?

I'm not in development, but I'd tend to agree that if such an 
inconsistency is detected, it would be good if we could somehow force 
the cleanup. But I'd let zones dev comment more on that one.

Enda
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 9:31 AM
 To: Yanakiev, Vladimir
 Cc: Mike Gerdts; zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
 Subject: Re: [zones-discuss] zonecfg question
 
 Yanakiev, Vladimir wrote:
  
 Here it is:

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] zoneadm list -cv
   ID NAME STATUS PATH  
0 global   running/ 
1 labv490-01z3 running/export/zones/labv490-01z3/main
2 labv490-01z2 running/export/zones/labv490-01z2/main
4 labv490wsz2  running/export/zones/labv490wsz2/main
5 labv490wsz3  running/export/zones/labv490wsz3/main
6 labv490-01z1 running/export/zones/labv490-01z1/main
7 labv490wsz1  running/export/zones/labv490wsz1/main
8 labv490-01z6 running/export/zones/labv490-01z6/main
   16 labv490-01z7 running/export/zones/labv490-01z7/main
   43 labv490-01z4 running/export/zones/labv490-01z4/main
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 As you can see, because the index file doesn't have info for the
zone,
 zoneadm will report nothing about it!
 
 Ok, wasn't aware of this problem :-)
 Any idea on how this occurred, i.e. steps taken to create the zonecfg 
 for the zone without the index file getting updated, is this in a 
 veritas cluster by any chance?
 
 
 Is there an xml file in /etc/zones for labv490-01z5?
 If not one could run zonecfg to create one, otherwise the only route I

 can see is to update the index file manually ( need to be careful here
)
 
 to include a reference to the missing zone, then retry.
 
 But I'd be interested in why this missing entry occurred to start
with.
 
 Enda
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 9:16 AM
 To: Yanakiev, Vladimir
 Cc: Mike Gerdts; zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
 Subject: Re: [zones-discuss] zonecfg question

 Hi
 What does zonadm -z labv490-01z5 have to say, ie is the zone in a
 state 
 other than installed?

 so the complete steps for an installed zone are:
 zoneadm list -cv ( just to see zone state )

 zoneadm -z labv490-01z5 halt  ( if not in installed state )
 zoneadm -z labv490-01z5 uninstall -F
 zonecfg -z labv490-01z5 delete -F

 if above fails then give the complete output from above commands, 
 including the zoneadm list -cv.


 Enda


 Yanakiev, Vladimir wrote:
 Here is the output:

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] zonecfg -z labv490-01z5 delete -F
 labv490-01z5: Zone state is invalid for the requested operation
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 -Original Message-
 From: Mike Gerdts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 5:30 PM
 To: Yanakiev, Vladimir
 Cc: zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
 Subject: Re: [zones-discuss] zonecfg question

 On 8/1/07, Yanakiev, Vladimir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] zonecfg -F -z labv490-01z5 delete
 zonecfg: illegal option -- F
 usage:  zonecfg help
 zonecfg -z zone   (interactive)
 zonecfg -z zone command
 zonecfg -z zone -f command-file
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Try this:

 zonecfg -z labv490-01z5 delete -F

 
 ___
 zones-discuss mailing list
 zones-discuss@opensolaris.org

___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [zones-discuss] zonecfg question

2007-08-02 Thread Yanakiev, Vladimir
Yes, John, that's my understanding too - zonecfg is supposed delete both
the entry in the index file, and the xml. But, somehow we ended with
this awkward status. It makes sense to me if zonecfg detects such
status, to send one extra Status missing - are you sure to
delete?-type of message, and remove the xml... It looks like there is
no logic in the code of zonecfg for the cases when there is trouble with
the index file...
 

This e-mail and its attachments are confidential and solely for the
intended addressee(s). Do not share or use them without Fannie Mae's
approval. If received in error, contact the sender and delete them.

 



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 10:25 AM
To: Yanakiev, Vladimir
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zones-discuss] zonecfg question



While I don't have a reason why the index entry is missing
I'd just like to add that the index entry stays until a delete occurs.
zonecfg -z xxx delete

-John

Yanakiev, Vladimir wrote: 

No, there are no Veritas products on this server:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] pkginfo |grep VRTS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] zfs list |grep z5
DG1/demo  24.5K  63.2G  24.5K
/export/zones/labv490-01z5/fs/export/demo 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 9:48 AM
To: Yanakiev, Vladimir
Cc: zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zones-discuss] zonecfg question

Yanakiev, Vladimir wrote:
  

That was my first question - I can not figure out how
this did


happened.
  

We have the xml, but the entry in the index file is
missing. Maybe,


the
  

zoneadm -z...delete command got interrupted in the
middle?... Fixing


the
  

problem by deleting the file is obvious, but the second
question is,
isn't it more adequate zonecfg to be able to handle this
set problems?
Isn't it better the -F option to disregard the status
(or, the lack of
it at all)? If we agree that this is not correct action,
we have to


open
  

bug/fix?



hmm, hard to tell what happened I guess.
the zoneadm delete was run was it?
or is this some kind of say veritas cluster env, where the
zonecfg did 
not get propogated to the node in question?

I'm not in development, but I'd tend to agree that if such an 
inconsistency is detected, it would be good if we could somehow
force 
the cleanup. But I'd let zones dev comment more on that one.

Enda
  

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 9:31 AM
To: Yanakiev, Vladimir
Cc: Mike Gerdts; zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zones-discuss] zonecfg question

Yanakiev, Vladimir wrote:


 
Here it is:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] zoneadm list -cv
  ID NAME STATUS PATH

   0 global   running/

   1 labv490-01z3 running
/export/zones/labv490-01z3/main
   2 labv490-01z2 running
/export/zones/labv490-01z2/main
   4 labv490wsz2  running
/export/zones/labv490wsz2/main
   5 labv490wsz3  running
/export/zones/labv490wsz3/main
   6 labv490-01z1 running
/export/zones/labv490-01z1/main
   7 labv490wsz1  running
/export/zones/labv490wsz1/main
   8 labv490-01z6 running
/export/zones/labv490-01z6/main
  16 labv490-01z7 running
/export/zones/labv490-01z7/main
  43 labv490-01z4 running
/export/zones/labv490-01z4/main
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

As you can see, because the index file doesn't
have info for the
  

zone,
  

zoneadm will report nothing about it!
  

Ok, wasn't aware of this problem :-)
Any idea on how this occurred, i.e. steps taken to
create the zonecfg 
for the zone without the index file getting updated

[zones-discuss] zonecfg question

2007-08-01 Thread Yanakiev, Vladimir
I am not able to explain how did we get into this problem, but somehow
we ended up in the situation when there was xml file for a zone in
/etc/zones, but there was not entry in /etc/zones/index file for it.
This has the following effect:



The entry for labv490-01z5 is not in the index
file:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] cat index
# Copyright 2004 Sun Microsystems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
# Use is subject to license terms.
#
# ident @(#)zones-index1.2
04/04/01 SMI
#
# DO NOT EDIT: this file is
automatically generated by zoneadm(1M)
# and zonecfg(1M).  Any manual changes
will be lost.
#
global:installed:/

labv490-01z3:installed:/export/zones/labv490-01z3/main:0034-ffbf-f78
d-ffbf-f7600100

labv490-01z2:installed:/export/zones/labv490-01z2/main:0034-ffbf-f78
d-ffbf-f7600100

labv490wsz2:installed:/export/zones/labv490wsz2/main:0035-ffbf-f79c-
ffbf-f7700100

labv490wsz3:installed:/export/zones/labv490wsz3/main:0035-ffbf-f7a4-
ffbf-f7780100

labv490-01z4:installed:/export/zones/labv490-01z4/main:0034-ffbf-f78
d-ffbf-f7600100

labv490-01z1:installed:/export/zones/labv490-01z1/main:1e8e9aa7-1588-ebe
1-f882-b4fee4bb2e37

labv490wsz1:installed:/export/zones/labv490wsz1/main:0035-ffbf-f78c-
ffbf-f7600100

labv490-01z6:installed:/export/zones/labv490-01z6/main:0bbebb5c-4579-e5f
b-9f4a-cf150bbe79ff

labv490-01z7:installed:/export/zones/labv490-01z7/main:9fd602de-cf38-663
f-8e5d-9be369e5a705

But it can be processed with no problems:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] zonecfg -z labv490-01z5
verify
[EMAIL PROTECTED] echo $?
0

Problem happens when we try to remove the zone:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] zonecfg -z labv490-01z5
delete
Are you sure you want to delete zone
labv490-01z5 (y/[n])? y
Zone labv490-01z5 not in configured
state; delete not allowed.  Use -F to force delete.

Suggested option not recognized:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] zonecfg -F -z
labv490-01z5 delete
zonecfg: illegal option -- F
usage:  zonecfg help
zonecfg -z zone
(interactive)
zonecfg -z zone command
zonecfg -z zone -f
command-file
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

First question is, how we ended up with the problem - is thee a way to
break the zonecfg -z name delete command, so it will remove only the
index, leaving the xml? And second, why the force option -F doesn't
work?

This e-mail and its attachments are confidential and solely for the
intended addressee(s). Do not share or use them without Fannie Mae's
approval. If received in error, contact the sender and delete them.

 
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org