Re: [Zope-dev] zope.testrunner and nose count doctests differently
On 11/3/11 12:13 PM, Chris Withers wrote: On 03/11/2011 11:05, Jim Fulton wrote: On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 5:14 AM, Chris Withersch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote: Hi Michael, On 03/11/2011 09:12, Michael Howitz wrote: Run both test runners with the option -vv to see which tests are run. (I did this for your code and the list of tests seems to be equal.) It would be interesting for the rest of us to know the length of that list. $ bin/test -m testfixtures.tests.test_docs -vv Running tests at level 1 Running zope.testrunner.layer.UnitTests tests: Set up zope.testrunner.layer.UnitTests in 0.000 seconds. Running: testfixtures/docs/api.txt testfixtures/docs/changes.txt testfixtures/docs/comparing.txt testfixtures/docs/components.txt testfixtures/docs/datetime.txt testfixtures/docs/description.txt testfixtures/docs/development.txt testfixtures/docs/exceptions.txt testfixtures/docs/files.txt testfixtures/docs/index.txt testfixtures/docs/installation.txt testfixtures/docs/license.txt testfixtures/docs/logging.txt testfixtures/docs/mocking.txt testfixtures/docs/streams.txt testfixtures/docs/utilities.txt Note that the above are 16 files ... Ran 316 tests with 0 failures and 0 errors in 0.150 seconds. ... containing what zope.testrunner considers 316 individual tests. Tearing down left over layers: Tear down zope.testrunner.layer.UnitTests in 0.000 seconds. $ bin/nosetests testfixtures/tests/test_docs.py -vv nose.config: INFO: Ignoring files matching ['^\\.', '^_', '^setup\\.py$'] testfixtures_nose/docs/api.txt ... ok testfixtures_nose/docs/changes.txt ... ok testfixtures_nose/docs/comparing.txt ... ok testfixtures_nose/docs/components.txt ... ok testfixtures_nose/docs/datetime.txt ... ok testfixtures_nose/docs/description.txt ... ok testfixtures_nose/docs/development.txt ... ok testfixtures_nose/docs/exceptions.txt ... ok testfixtures_nose/docs/files.txt ... ok testfixtures_nose/docs/index.txt ... ok testfixtures_nose/docs/installation.txt ... ok testfixtures_nose/docs/license.txt ... ok testfixtures_nose/docs/logging.txt ... ok testfixtures_nose/docs/mocking.txt ... ok testfixtures_nose/docs/streams.txt ... ok testfixtures_nose/docs/utilities.txt ... ok These are the same 16 files (I assume) that nose considers one test each irrespective of their content. The individual tests in there are run but not counted separately. Is it this what's confusing you? It certainly confused me when I noticed this for the first time. I'd even consider this a bug in node's reporting but never dared to file a ticket. Raphael -- Ran 16 tests in 0.141s My guess is that when you're using the zope testruner, you're somehow picking up zope.testing.doctest, which counts each doctest example as a test. The code uses Manuel, under both nose and zope.testrunner: from doctest import REPORT_NDIFF,ELLIPSIS from glob import glob from manuel import doctest,codeblock,capture from manuel.testing import TestSuite from os.path import dirname,join,pardir def test_suite(): m = doctest.Manuel(optionflags=REPORT_NDIFF|ELLIPSIS) m += codeblock.Manuel() m += capture.Manuel() return TestSuite( m, *glob(join(dirname(__file__),pardir,pardir,'docs','*.txt')) ) cheers, Chris ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] [Plone-developers] experimental.broken - Graceful handling of broken interfaces and components in the ZODB
On 11/7/11 10:36 AM, Malthe Borch wrote: On 7 November 2011 09:17, Ross Pattersonm...@rpatterson.net wrote: The intention of this package is to see if the implementation of broken object handling is correct and robust enough to merge into zope.interface and zope.component themselves. Is this the right approach? If not why and what would be better? How might this approach be improved? (removed plone-dev from cc). Isn't it symptom treatment though? Yes, it is but the symptom is severe and not uncommon. The problem Ross is addressing here just happens way too often in the real world to simply say Sorry, user error. Just my 2 cents, Raphael If you've got an add-on which adds marker interfaces to general objects, shouldn't that add-on remove – or no longer provide – those same interfaces when it's uninstalled? At least in Plone, you can easily query content objects providing a particular set of interfaces. I think it's a non-goal to be able to run a system without all the required software – which is how I understand it when you just do a hard remove of an add-on without a prior soft remove. \malthe ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ) ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-CMF] GenericSetup backport
On 5/26/11 10:39 PM, Godefroid Chapelle wrote: [..] Further, I think it is a real advantage for the product developers if they can migrate their tests to p.a.testing while keeping Plone 3 compatibility. FWIW: whatever the solution ends up being I'd welcome such an option as well. Raphael Hanno Gotcha ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests
Re: [Zope-dev] CSRF protection for z3c.form
On 4/6/11 7:43 PM, Roger wrote: [..] I think to protect the form is just a part of a concept. Another part must be to prevent to inject JavaScript in user generated content. If an application allows to post JS in a blog post or comment etc. it should be possible to use easydmx to read and re-use the secure form token. (not approved but should work) For that reason both CMF as well as Plone clean user input by stripping nasty tags and such - at least per default. Raphael One of my bigger concern is also that such a token will break a lot of our tests which whould force us to use custom non security token generating form classes. I'm fine in general for implement such a concept in z3c.form but it should be optional. Why not offer additional form classes or a mixin for support such token? Regards Roger Ineichen Laurence ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ) ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-CMF] Problem with offline buildout
Charlie Clark wrote: Hi, Hi Charlie, I'm testing deploying a current project using buildout's offline mode. I have a complete download cache but I'm still getting errors: We have no distributions for products.cmfcore that satisfies 'products.cmfcore'. Neither this nor the subsequent traceback give much of a clue as to exactly what is needed to satisfy the constraint. Any ideas? Depending on what you mean by complete download cache and whether or not you are using 'extends' for some version pinning (or the like) it may help to add an 'extends-cache' setting to your buildout cache and/or make sure you use zc.buildout 1.4.1 (or higher). That's at least how I understand http://manage.plone.org/documentation/manual/developer-manual/managing-projects-with-buildout/creating-a-buildout-defaults-file HTH Raphael Charlie ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests
[Zope] Re: the grand reunion
Yuri wrote: Hi! Hi Yuri, [..] I would like to have an easy way to develop without having to be subject to dependencies from other envinroment, minimize the effort to mantain it and focus on doing things :) Maybe not exactly what you are asking for but I recommend you play with buildout a bit - I'm sure you'll appreciate the ease with which you can manage independent installations in a repeatable and easily modifiable way. Is one big zope installation, with multiple instances, well suited for this tasks? Or is better different zope versions? What about the various Data.fs, is better to have them separated by application or by zope envinroment? I mean all the Plone in a single Data.fs or each one in a separated Data.fs? Without further knowing how these sites might be related or not this is hard to answer but often times I prefer to have separate Zope instances (- different ZODBs) for different Plone sites. Even if they share substantial configuration/add-ons etc. Again, using buildout makes it a snap to create and maintain as many Zope instances as you want. And using a common buildout cache they can also mostly share the basic installation. Just my 2 cents, Raphael So, what is the best approach to migrate the three servers? ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ) ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
[Zope] Re: You are not allowed to access 'a particular str' in this context
Gerhard Schmidt wrote: [..] Any Idea how to fix this. What happens when you add __allow_access_to_unprotected_subobjects__ = 1 to your type definition? (Good old Zope 2 magic, yeah ...) Raphael Gerhard ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ) ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
[Zope-dev] Re: more on stacked component registries
Chris Withers wrote: [..] Actually, it doesn't. The handling of __bases__ appears to be done in the functions of the mysterious zope.interface.ro module. (that ro thing takes the biscuit for obscure naming :-( ) Without having a clue my first guess would be that this means 'Resolution Order' as we have 'mro' (Method Resolution Order) and 'iro' (Interface Resolution Order) for instance. But I could be completely off track ;-) Raphael Am I off base here? If so, more info please! :-) ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope] Re: Intercept request
David Chelimsky wrote: [..] BTW - I'm using ZPT, not DTML. I'm guessing I can do this with a simple script that I include on every page, yes? That could work, but seems a bit error prone - that's why I'm looking for some sort of request hook. But maybe that's my best option within Zope. Thoughts? Are you saying you want an access rule? http://www.zope.org/Documentation/Books/ZopeBook/2_6Edition/ZopeServices.stx Raphael ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
[Zope] Re: pointers on predicting ZODB size based on size of files to be imported?
michael nt milne wrote: Hi Is there any documentation anywhere or advice on being able to estimate the size of a potential Zope ZODB instance based on the size of a current site? For example if you were to have a site of say 5 gb consisting of HTML pages, graphics, images, pdfs, word docs, excel files etc : are there any pointers anywhere on roughly how many gigs of ZODB this would take up? Obviously word, excel and other binary formats will likely translate to more weight... Also are there any ZODB growth prediction charts at all? There is no general answer to this question other than it depends ;-) In addition to the raw amount of data that you listed the most important additional piece of information you didn't provide is how busy people will be changing things. As any change or edit to an object causes this object to be written to the ZODB again your ZODB can grow (almost) arbitrarily fast until you pack it again. As packing removes the history (up to a point) it is again a policy decision on your side how much history you want or need to keep. With regard to the overhead added by having a file live in the ZODB versus being on the file system I think you shouldn't even worry. For a first estimate this difference shouldn't matter. There are exceptions, of course, like when you add Archetypes to the picture as AT tends to add a lot of overhead but that's not really a ZODB issue. Just my 2 cents. Raphael -- michael ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ) ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
[Zope] Re: storing python objects
David Bear wrote: I need to run an external method to use some python functions that are restricted within zope. I'm thinking an easy way to get the data back would be to just store basic python objects within zodb; tupples, lists, dictionaries. but I've never seen this documented anywhere. Is it possible to store basic python objects directly in zodb? AND then use a zpt to read the data? I'm thinking a simple thing would be to create an external method that returns a dictionary. Then I could have script call the method, and stored the dictionary on zodb. Then have a zpt publish the dictionary. Is this even easily possible, or are there alternatives to doing something similar? Google for 'PersistentList' and/or 'PersistentMapping' Raphael ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
[Zope-dev] Re: Undeprecation of manage_afterAdd and manage_beforeDelete?
Hanno Schlichting wrote: Hi. [..] Thoughts? +1 Raphael PS: ... not to mention the 700 add-ons that are out there for Plone alone ... Hanno ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ) ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope] Re: [Fwd: zope error] Install issues - build errors
Dapo Ladimeji wrote: Hi I am having trouble installing Zope on a redhat linux. I seem to always get build errors whether trying Zope 2.10 or Zope 3. At first it seems Ok - I attach the initial lines. the full verbose error message is in the attached email. This is frustrating as it has taken many hours trying to resolve. I trust someone knows what the problem is: yum install python2.4-dev (or something similar) Raphael ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
[Zope] Re: Conditional import of annotations for Zope 2.9 and 2.10: how?
Maurits van Rees wrote: Hi, [..] What other options are there to do this in zcml? Or should I take my loss and translate the zope/(app/)annotations/configure.zcml file (which only registers one adapter) into python code? More a workaround than a solution but have you tried doing it the new way (Zope-2.10) and introducing backwards compatibility via a module alias to make zope.annotations also available as zope.app.annotations? Raphael ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
[Zope] Re: How can I make class variables store in the zodb??
Stephen How wrote: [...] Originally, I wanted to use a lot of class variables, as this was my perspective from plain-old python. However, I've learned that I really want to put everything possible into the schema, as it makes the AT future proof, and more robust. It automatically creates accessors and mutators for these fields as well, which is preferred programming style. I typically just change the visibility attributes of the field for privacy, and style in base_view. However, I don't think there's a FieldType for a dictionary or array, so I use plain-old class variables for them. There is the RecordField (for handling dicts) and RecordsField (for handling lists of dicts) available from ATExtensions http://www.neuroinf.de/LabTools/ATExtensions-0_5.tgz Raphael PS: Does anyone know how to move a project from one svn repository (our own) to another one (svn.plone.org) without loosing history? Then I could move it there. ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
[Zope-dev] Re: Site Error
AP Meyer wrote: Is this a known bug? Yes. But Dieter fixed in recently in CVS HEAD (I think) Raphael Working without automatic refresh is very unhandy ;-) thanks Andre ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
