[Zope-CMF] Re: [dev] i18n improvements - a proposal
Dieter Maurer wrote: yuppie wrote at 2005-8-9 19:11 +0200: ... 2.) Using different domains for different products: While 'cmf_default' should be used by the core products (CMFCore, CMFDefault, CMFTopic, CMFSetup) I'd like to use 'cmf_calendar' for CMFCalendar. Can we give CMFCore its own domain? We would like to use CMFCore without any reference to CMFDefault. Frankly I hate domains. The less domains there are, the better. Myself, I'd much rather have a single cmf domain for everything in CMF. Let addon frameworks like Plone or CPS add their own for their own use, but I think it's folly to have several domains for pure CMF packages. Florent -- Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) CTO, Director of RD +33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests
[Zope-CMF] Re: [dev] i18n improvements - a proposal
yuppie wrote: Can we give CMFCore its own domain? We would like to use CMFCore without any reference to CMFDefault. Frankly I hate domains. The less domains there are, the better. Myself, I'd much rather have a single cmf domain for everything in CMF. Let addon frameworks like Plone or CPS add their own for their own use, but I think it's folly to have several domains for pure CMF packages. Does that mean you are voting against using 'cmf_calendar' in CMFCalendar? I'm -0 on cmf_calendar. But definetly -1 on separating the rest into cmf_core, cmf_default, etc. Florent -- Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) CTO, Director of RD +33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests
[Zope-CMF] Re: [dev] i18n improvements - a proposal
yuppie wrote: Hi! Hi Yuppie, +1 from me all the way! Just one minor question out of curiosity: i18nextract.py is quite zope3 specific, but with some modifications it seems to work quite well for CMF. I'd like to add a modified i18nextract.py to the root of the CMF repository. How about making the original i18nextract.py more generic from the onset instead of having the CMF provide its own? Raphael ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests
