yuppie wrote:
Can we give "CMFCore" its own domain?
We would like to use "CMFCore" without any reference to
"CMFDefault".
Frankly I hate domains. The less domains there are, the better.
Myself, I'd much rather have a single "cmf" domain for everything in
CMF. Let addon frameworks like Plone or CPS add their own for their
own use, but I think it's folly to have several domains for pure CMF
packages.
Does that mean you are voting against using 'cmf_calendar' in CMFCalendar?
I'm -0 on cmf_calendar.
But definetly -1 on separating the rest into cmf_core, cmf_default, etc.
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) CTO, Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Zope-CMF maillist - [email protected]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf
See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests
