[Zope-dev] ZCatalog hackery
Hi guys, I've got a problem with ZCatalog. I've got plenty of large objects, ranging from 100KB to 100MB in size. Needless to say, these take up a lot of processor time when indexed by the ZCatalog. Now, these object have to be moved from time to time, only moved, so that one or two of the related columns and indexes are affected (the path and the parent container id); is there a way to go around this so that those two, the one column and the index are updated, and not, let's say the indexed body (which is 100KB - 100MB in size) ? Thanks, Morten ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] TransWarp preview release (AOP tools only)
This looks very interesting, Phillip. I haven't downloaded the package yet, but I read the wiki and it finally made sense once I understood the goal (I think): TW lets you set up the class inheritance hierarchy at runtime. In normal OO methodology, you can only extend classes. With TW, you can also slip your own version of a base class into a class hierarchy (without actually modifying the Python class hierarchy, of course.) What is your vision of integrating AOP into a persistent object system? Would one drop in an object that modifies the class loading mechanism so that the classes come from a TW component rather than Python modules? Shane "Phillip J. Eby" wrote: It's here... the first preview release of TransWarp. The bad news is, it only contains working versions of the aspect-oriented programming tools (the rest of the package is in flux). The good news is: 1. It's a *robust* working version, with 114 unit tests to prove it, and 2. There's state-of-the-art documentation, including such cutting-edge technology as tutorials, and super-simple examples. :) You can find the software at: http://www.zope.org/Members/pje/TransWarp/ and the online documentation at: http://www.zope.org/Members/pje/Wikis/TransWarp/ Comments welcome. Enjoy. ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] ZCatalog hackery
[Casey Duncan] | Actually what I wrote assumes you are passing a Catalog not a ZCatalog. | So you will need to change it for a ZCatalog to: I figured that out. :-) There is one problem, the uids stored in the Catalog are based on the path of the object, so I guess I'll have to make a copy of the records, and then paste it in under the new uid (path). -Morten ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] TransWarp preview release (AOP tools only)
At 09:37 AM 3/1/01 -0500, Shane Hathaway wrote: This looks very interesting, Phillip. I haven't downloaded the package yet, but I read the wiki and it finally made sense once I understood the goal (I think): TW lets you set up the class inheritance hierarchy at runtime. In normal OO methodology, you can only extend classes. With TW, you can also slip your own version of a base class into a class hierarchy (without actually modifying the Python class hierarchy, of course.) That's a good way of describing the *function* of the AOP part of TransWarp. The goal is not so much to set up the inheritance hierarchy at runtime, as to allow you to configure various versions of the same component, and to write seperately-managed "aspects" for different areas of concern. The targeted time is not really "runtime" so much as "build time". Runtime is a side-effect of how it's done, and it can be useful for things like selecting an OS-specific or other environment-sensitive aspect at application startup. But the main goals of the AOP portion are being able to instantiate customized versions of "third-party" components, and to be able to mix-and-match implementations for different areas of concern. For example, wxPython vs. Tkinter vs. Win32, SQL vs LDAP vs ZODB, and so on. TransWarp in the larger picture will also deal with generative programming; the UML-driven parts will generate aspects that contain structural information (inheritance, associations, aggregations, attributes, etc.) that can then be merged with non-structural aspects. The ability to "set up the class inheritance hierarchy at runtime" provided by the AOP tools will then allow you to define what an "attribute" is, and give it publishability, security permissions, or a GUI rendering. There is actually code in the preview release to do this structural generation for the UML metamodel (if loaded from MMX format), and it's even rudimentarily tested (one unit test that just makes sure it doesn't blow up altogether) but the "StructuralModel" aspects that implement attributes and associations are currently broken, not yet updated for the true AOP model. Earlier versions of TransWarp did class generation as an integral part of the GP system, not as a GP+AOP system, and I'm still adapting a lot of stuff to take advantage of AOP and to use a cleaner metadata mechanism. What is your vision of integrating AOP into a persistent object system? Would one drop in an object that modifies the class loading mechanism so that the classes come from a TW component rather than Python modules? Not necessary. If you dig into the TransWarpFAQ page in the Wiki, you'll see a question that explains how to make TW-generated classes work with pickle and cPickle. It just requires one additional argument at aspect-weaving time, to specify the module which the generated classes should be registered with. This means that TW's AOP features are functional right now, today, with ZODB. (As long as the classes are generated in good ol' Python module files.) Now, as to whether TW will be fully compatible with Zope 3 "persistent modules", that's a different question. In the conversation I had with Jim in January, based on his description of the module refresh mechanism and of import proxies, I would say that TW-generated classes would not properly refresh when a persistent module that they were dependent on changed. (Because TW will generate new class objects from the imported classes rather than referencing them via the proxy.) But that's based on a very early notion of how Z3 persistent modules would work. One reason I've been racing like mad to get the preview release out is so that, after seeing the usefulness of TW for the Zope 3 component architecture, y'all might be interested in considering implementations for module persistence besides proxying. :) IMHO, a "rollback importer" approach ala unittest might be better suited for TW-ish components, and have fewer weird side effects for persistent modules generally. I don't like unittest's mechanism for *doing* the rollback, and Zope would need a thread-specific version of sys.modules, as well as a mechanism to purge the cache of any objects which were loaded after any of the purged modules, but I think the basic idea is sound. ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] ZCatalog hackery
Casey Duncan wrote: "Morten W. Petersen" wrote: Hi guys, I've got a problem with ZCatalog. I've got plenty of large objects, ranging from 100KB to 100MB in size. Needless to say, these take up a lot of processor time when indexed by the ZCatalog. Now, these object have to be moved from time to time, only moved, so that one or two of the related columns and indexes are affected (the path and the parent container id); is there a way to go around this so that those two, the one column and the index are updated, and not, let's say the indexed body (which is 100KB - 100MB in size) ? Thanks, Morten There is no built-in way. however I see no reason that the Catalog could not be extended to do this with a bit of python coding. A catalog contains a collection called indexes that contains the indexes themselves (what else?). An External method could be written like so (not tested): def partialReindexObject(catalog, indexes, uid, object): rid = catalog.uids.get[uid] for idx_key in indexes: idx = catalog.indexes[idx_key].__of__(catalog) idx.unindex_object(rid) idx.index_object(rid, object, None) I think that will do it. Pass the names of the indexes as a sequence in indexes, and data_record_id_ as the uid. The above does not update any meta-data in the catalog. Actually what I wrote assumes you are passing a Catalog not a ZCatalog. So you will need to change it for a ZCatalog to: def partialReindexObject(zcatalog, indexes, uid, object): catalog = zcatalog._catalog rid = catalog.uids.get[uid] for idx_key in indexes: idx = catalog.indexes[idx_key].__of__(catalog) idx.unindex_object(rid) idx.index_object(rid, object, None) Sorry about that. -- | Casey Duncan | Kaivo, Inc. | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `-- ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] How is memory shared between Zope threads?
Hello all, I have noticed incosistencies between Zope threads when objects change. It appears that some threads see the new image of the object while others see the old image. Can anyone enlighten me on how Zope ensures that all threads are seeing the same images? Or at least point me to the modules in the source that handle these matters? Naively, I can think of 2 approaches: a shared memory approach or a separate memory per thread with notifications. Zope behaves like each thread as its own copy of in-memory pieces and sometimes these per/thread memory blocks do not get updated. System info: Zope 2.1.6, Redhat 6.2, PC arch Thanks, Erik ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] Weird Re-Indexing Errors after move to Zope 2.3.1b1
Hi, Since moving one of our servers from Zope 2.2.4 to 2.3.1b1, we've been frequently getting this weird error when trying to do something that requires an object to be re-indexed in the Catalog: Error Type: AttributeError Error Value: 'tuple' object has no attribute 'append' Traceback: Traceback (innermost last): snip File /usr/local/zope/cases/Products/aProduct/aProduct.py, line xxx, in index_something (Object: Traversable) File /usr/local/zope/Zope-2.3.1b1-src/lib/python/Products/ZCatalog/ZCatalog.py, line 411, in catalog_object (Object: Traversable) File /usr/local/zope/Zope-2.3.1b1-src/lib/python/Products/ZCatalog/Catalog.py, line 382, in catalogObject File /usr/local/zope/current/lib/python/SearchIndex/UnTextIndex.py, line 394, in index_object File /usr/local/zope/current/lib/python/SearchIndex/UnTextIndex.py, line 305, in insertReverseIndexEntry AttributeError: 'tuple' object has no attribute 'append' Any ideas what's going on here or how to fix it? cheers, Chris ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] Increased system CPU cycles under heavy load?
Hello all, I apologize if this might be more appropriate for a Linux list. From our time-series graphs, we are noticing that the percentage of CPU cycles spent on 'system' tasks grows considerably under heavy load. Does anyone know what kinds of operations fall under 'system'? Task switching, paging, these kinds of things? When load is light, it appears that the same 1 or 2 Zope threads will handle the requests. As load increases, then more threads get into the mix. How likely is it that this increase in 'system' CPU cycles is stemming from having to switch between the Zope threads? Perhaps Zope goes into a near dead-lock state and starts to spend a bunch of time waiting for other threads to release a lock? The reason I mention this is that we don't notice the increased amount of 'system' CPU when the load increases on other servers (Apache, MySQL) on other machines. System info: Zope 2.1.6, Redhat 6.2, PC arch Thanks, Erik ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Weird Re-Indexing Errors after move to Zope 2.3.1b1
This is an artifact of a problem in the reindexing code that should be gone in the next release. - Original Message - From: "Chris Withers" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 12:36 PM Subject: [Zope-dev] Weird Re-Indexing Errors after move to Zope 2.3.1b1 Hi, Since moving one of our servers from Zope 2.2.4 to 2.3.1b1, we've been frequently getting this weird error when trying to do something that requires an object to be re-indexed in the Catalog: Error Type: AttributeError Error Value: 'tuple' object has no attribute 'append' Traceback: Traceback (innermost last): snip File /usr/local/zope/cases/Products/aProduct/aProduct.py, line xxx, in index_something (Object: Traversable) File /usr/local/zope/Zope-2.3.1b1-src/lib/python/Products/ZCatalog/ZCatalog.py, line 411, in catalog_object (Object: Traversable) File /usr/local/zope/Zope-2.3.1b1-src/lib/python/Products/ZCatalog/Catalog.py, line 382, in catalogObject File /usr/local/zope/current/lib/python/SearchIndex/UnTextIndex.py, line 394, in index_object File /usr/local/zope/current/lib/python/SearchIndex/UnTextIndex.py, line 305, in insertReverseIndexEntry AttributeError: 'tuple' object has no attribute 'append' Any ideas what's going on here or how to fix it? cheers, Chris ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ) ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Weird Re-Indexing Errors after move to Zope 2.3.1b1
This is an artifact of a problem in the reindexing code that should be gone in the next release. Is there a workaround in the meantime? This is turning into a real showstopper for one of NIP's most important projects right now :~( desperately, Chris ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Weird Re-Indexing Errors after move to Zope 2.3.1b1
No. Sorry. There should be a release of 2.3.1b2 later today. Hint: the problem is caused by attempting to append to a tuple. Converting the tuple to a list beforehand would liekly solve the problem until you can move to a newer release. - Original Message - From: "Chris Withers" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Chris McDonough" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 2:10 PM Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] Weird Re-Indexing Errors after move to Zope 2.3.1b1 This is an artifact of a problem in the reindexing code that should be gone in the next release. Is there a workaround in the meantime? This is turning into a real showstopper for one of NIP's most important projects right now :~( desperately, Chris ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Weird Re-Indexing Errors after move to Zope 2.3.1b1
Release postponed til at least tomorrow, sorry. - Original Message - From: "Chris McDonough" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Chris Withers" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 2:31 PM Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] Weird Re-Indexing Errors after move to Zope 2.3.1b1 No. Sorry. There should be a release of 2.3.1b2 later today. Hint: the problem is caused by attempting to append to a tuple. Converting the tuple to a list beforehand would liekly solve the problem until you can move to a newer release. - Original Message - From: "Chris Withers" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Chris McDonough" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 2:10 PM Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] Weird Re-Indexing Errors after move to Zope 2.3.1b1 This is an artifact of a problem in the reindexing code that should be gone in the next release. Is there a workaround in the meantime? This is turning into a real showstopper for one of NIP's most important projects right now :~( desperately, Chris ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ) ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] CopySupport issues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a reason why the manage_main call at the end of manage_copyObjects and manage_cutObjects in CopySupport gets called as self.manage_main(REQUEST) instead of self.manage_main(self, REQUEST)? Using the first form, we found that the manage_main call was dying because it couldn't acquire various attributes and methods it needed (eg, manage_page_header :). The second form just makes sense... This has been fixed in 2.3.1 (collector patch #2006) In the Copy operation of manage_pasteObjects, the manage_afterClone is called before the object is added to its container. We'd much prefer the object to be both added to the container and re-got so it the manage_afterClone call may make use of acquired information. This is of use specifically for us so that the object may determine its new URL and catalog itself with our (Z)Catalog. Oddly enough, a call to getPhysicalPath() on the object works, so I can work around this problem. Well, mostly. I'd still like to have access to the parents - so if anyone has any hints, I'd love to hear 'em. Richard -- Richard Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior Software Developer, Bizar Software (www.bizarsoftware.com.au) ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] Is ZFormulator alive?
ZFormulator looks like it will do some pretty neat things, but it also looks like it is "dormant". Does anyone use it, or know if it is compatible with Zope 2.2.x and/or Zope 2.3? Thanks -paul ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] Zope 2.3.0 AccessControl/SecurityInfo.py
Sorry if these have already been fixed in 2.3.1, I haven't had time to
upgrade yet.
I fixed a small bug in SecurityInfo that made
SecurityInfo.setPermissionDefault() impossible to use:
191c191
self.roles[permission_name] = rdict.keys()
---
self.roles[permission_name] = rdict
def setPermissionDefault(self, permission_name, roles):
"""Declare default roles for a permission"""
rdict = {}
for role in roles:
rdict[role] = 1
if self.roles.get(permission_name, rdict) != rdict:
LOG('SecurityInfo', WARNING, 'Conflicting default role'
'declarations for permission "%s"' % permission_name)
self._warnings = 1
self.roles[permission_name] = rdict.keys()
My other problem was that I wanted to setup some default permissions
that are used programatically in my product (i.e. they aren't used to
protect any specific methods, but the methods themselves check for the
permission.) A small change to ClassSecurityInfo.apply() allows you to
call SecurityInfo.setPermissionDefault() to create new permissions, even
if they aren't attached to any methods:
239a240,242
for permission_name in self.roles.keys():
if not ac_permissions.has_key(permission_name):
ac_permissions[permission_name] = ()
def apply(self, classobj):
"""Apply security information to the given class object."""
dict = classobj.__dict__
# Check the class for an existing __ac_permissions__ and
# incorporate that if present to support older classes or
# classes that haven't fully switched to using SecurityInfo.
if dict.has_key('__ac_permissions__'):
for item in dict['__ac_permissions__']:
permission_name = item[0]
self._setaccess(item[1], permission_name)
if len(item) 2:
self.setDefaultRoles(permission_name, item[2])
# Set __roles__ for attributes declared public or private.
# Collect protected attribute names in ac_permissions.
ac_permissions = {}
for name, access in self.names.items():
if access in (ACCESS_PRIVATE, ACCESS_PUBLIC, ACCESS_NONE):
dict['%s__roles__' % name] = access
else:
if not ac_permissions.has_key(access):
ac_permissions[access] = []
ac_permissions[access].append(name)
# Now transform our nested dict structure into the nested tuple
# structure expected of __ac_permissions__ attributes and set
# it on the class object.
getRoles = self.roles.get
__ac_permissions__ = []
for permission_name in self.roles.keys():
if not ac_permissions.has_key(permission_name):
ac_permissions[permission_name] = ()
permissions = ac_permissions.items()
permissions.sort()
for permission_name, names in permissions:
roles = getRoles(permission_name, ())
if len(roles):
entry = (permission_name, tuple(names), tuple(roles))
else:
entry = (permission_name, tuple(names))
__ac_permissions__.append(entry)
dict['__ac_permissions__'] = tuple(__ac_permissions__)
# Take care of default attribute access policy
access = getattr(self, 'access', _marker)
if access is not _marker:
dict['__allow_access_to_unprotected_subobjects__'] = access
if getattr(self, '_warnings', None):
LOG('SecurityInfo', WARNING, 'Class "%s" had conflicting '
'security declarations' % classobj.__name__)
-Randy
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] dtml-in: next-batches
I'm running Zope 2.2.2, and I'm trying to use the batching stuff for the dtml-in tag, however, I can't seem to access any attributes off the 'next-batches' or 'previous-batches' mapping object that's supposed to be available, with the attributes 'batch-start-index', 'batch-end-index', and 'batch-size'. However, my example code (see below) blows up with a key error when trying to access any of these. Is this a bug, or am I just misunderstanding how to use this thing? I wrote an external method to dir the 'next-batches' object, and it seems the only attributes available are: ['data', 'items', 'query_string', 'start_name_re'] -Brett p dtml-in "mystuff.retseq()" size=5 start=start dtml-var sequence-item /dtml-in /p p dtml-in "mystuff.retseq()" size=5 start=start previous a href="dtml-var absolute_url/batch_me?start=dtml-var previous-sequence-start-index"Previous/a /dtml-in dtml-in "mystuff.retseq()" size=5 start=start next overlap=-1 dtml-try dtml-in next-batches dtml-var batch-start-indexbr /dtml-in dtml-except pre dtml-var error_typebr dtml-var error_valuebr dtml-var error_tbbr /pre /dtml-try a href="dtml-var absolute_url/batch_me?start=dtml-var next-sequence-start-index"Next/a /dtml-in /p ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] ZDebug conflicts with MailHost?
Hi, On Zope 2.3.0 and 2.3.1b1, the following method produces an error when ZDebug is installed; If I remove ZDebug, it works fine. dtml-sendmail mailhost=MailHost To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Test This is a test /dtml-sendmail With ZDebug the content of the sendmail tag is ignored; sendmail.send is called with all arguments empty. Traceback: Error type: TypeError Error value: len() of unsized object Traceback (innermost last): File /opt/Zope-2.3.0-linux2-x86/lib/python/ZPublisher/Publish.py, line 222, in publish_module File /opt/Zope-2.3.0-linux2-x86/lib/python/ZPublisher/Publish.py, line 187, in publish File /opt/Zope-2.3.0-linux2-x86/lib/python/Zope/__init__.py, line 221, in zpublisher_exception_hook (Object: ApplicationDefaultPermissions) File /opt/Zope-2.3.0-linux2-x86/lib/python/ZPublisher/Publish.py, line 171, in publish File /opt/Zope-2.3.0-linux2-x86/lib/python/ZPublisher/mapply.py, line 160, in mapply (Object: mailtest) File /opt/Zope-2.3.0-linux2-x86/lib/python/ZPublisher/Publish.py, line 112, in call_object (Object: mailtest) File /opt/Zope-2.3.0-linux2-x86/lib/python/OFS/DTMLMethod.py, line 189, in __call__ (Object: mailtest) File /opt/Zope/lib/python/Products/ZDebug/DTMLLocator.py, line 103, in __call__ (Object: mailtest) File /opt/Zope-2.3.0-linux2-x86/lib/python/DocumentTemplate/DT_String.py, line 538, in __call__ (Object: mailtest) File /opt/Zope/lib/python/Products/ZDebug/DTMLDebug.py, line 307, in debug_render_blocks File /opt/Zope/lib/python/Products/ZDebug/DTMLDebug.py, line 239, in debugException (Object: MailHost) File /opt/Zope/lib/python/Products/ZDebug/DTMLDebug.py, line 305, in debug_render_blocks File /opt/Zope-2.3.0-linux2-x86/lib/python/Products/MailHost/SendMailTag.py, line 188, in render (Object: MailHost) File /opt/Zope-2.3.0-linux2-x86/lib/python/Products/MailHost/MailHost.py, line 222, in send (Object: MailHost) File /opt/Zope-2.3.0-linux2-x86/lib/python1.5/smtplib.py, line 465, in sendmail File /opt/Zope-2.3.0-linux2-x86/lib/python1.5/smtplib.py, line 349, in mail File /opt/Zope-2.3.0-linux2-x86/lib/python1.5/smtplib.py, line 118, in quoteaddr File /opt/Zope-2.3.0-linux2-x86/lib/python1.5/rfc822.py, line 451, in parseaddr File /opt/Zope-2.3.0-linux2-x86/lib/python1.5/rfc822.py, line 496, in getaddrlist File /opt/Zope-2.3.0-linux2-x86/lib/python1.5/rfc822.py, line 504, in getaddress File /opt/Zope-2.3.0-linux2-x86/lib/python1.5/rfc822.py, line 484, in gotonext TypeError: (see above) -- -- Itai Tavor -- "Je sautille, donc je suis."-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]-- - Kermit the Frog -- -- -- -- "If you haven't got your health, you haven't got anything" -- ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
