Re: [1st] OS 9.2.2 on a PM 6300?

2005-06-05 Thread Ken Watanabe
> So I guess I go back to my original question: has anyone tried this > patch for 9.2.x on a 6300 before? Is it compatible or will I break my > System and have to do a clean install? Nat, When doing this, it would be best to start with a clean install in the first place. So if you have an exter

Re: [1st] OS 9.2.2 on a PM 6300?

2005-06-05 Thread Deneal Schilmeister \(Portege\)
Me too! Everytime I try a OS newer then 8.1 I'm told that something (I forget no what) is missing. I have a Newer G3 card in mine. ___ Deneal Schilmeister St. Louis - Cincinnati 1997 SL500 http://homepage.mac.com/deneals/SL500.htm -Original Message- On Behalf Of

Re: [1st] OS 9.2.2 on a PM 6300?

2005-06-05 Thread glen
victoria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 6/5/05, 3:30 PM: > > In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > From: victoria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [1st] OS 9.2.2 on a PM 6300? > Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2005 17:52:57 +0100 > > > > > On 6/4/05, Norman Burns <[EMAIL

Re: [1st] OS 9.2.2 on a PM 6300?

2005-06-05 Thread victoria
On 6/4/05, Norman Burns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Nat, I have OS 9.2.2 running on a 6100 without patching. I did not even realise that it might be an unsupported machine. My advice would be to try it as is. Regards, Norman. Hi could you email me a copy of your system profiler report (

Re: [1st] OS 9.2.2 on a PM 6300?

2005-06-05 Thread Nat Hall
Are you sure you're not running 9.1? Have you changed the machines gestalt ID or do you have any CPU upgrades installed? The installer should not even have allowed you to run an installation of anything over 9.1 on a stock 6100. Just for kicks, though, I tried running an un-patched installer for