Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] [10] Review Request: 8184435 Cleanup of javadoc in javax.print package

2017-08-25 Thread Phil Race
I don't see that this changes the spec. in a way that needs a CSR. So I'll review it but it is possible that you may be told it can be withdrawn as unnecessary. FYI I reviewed this mostly by reading the specdiff so I wasn't looking directly at source only changes like line length. I'm not sure

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] [10] Review Request: 8184435 Cleanup of javadoc in javax.print package

2017-08-24 Thread Sergey Bylokhov
Hello. CSR is created: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8186753 On 21.08.17 20:03, Sergey Bylokhov wrote: On 13.08.2017 23:23, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote: In that case, will this be required to have 2nd part? 43 * {@link DocFlavor DocFlavor} There are manyof them in other files too like

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] [10] Review Request: 8184435 Cleanup of javadoc in javax.print package

2017-08-21 Thread Sergey Bylokhov
On 13.08.2017 23:23, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote: In that case, will this be required to have 2nd part? 43 * {@link DocFlavor DocFlavor} There are manyof them in other files too like DocFlavor.java 1206 * stream ({@link java.io.Reader java.io.Reader} Other than that, it looks ok to me (btw, I have

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] [10] Review Request: 8184435 Cleanup of javadoc in javax.print package

2017-08-13 Thread Prasanta Sadhukhan
Hi Sergey, On 8/12/2017 5:38 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote: Hi, Prasanta. Thank you for review! The new version: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8184435/webrev.08/ webrev diff v07 vs v08: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8184435/webrev.08/v7_v8.diff See comments inline. On 07.08.2017 3:29, Pras

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] [10] Review Request: 8184435 Cleanup of javadoc in javax.print package

2017-08-11 Thread Sergey Bylokhov
Hi, Prasanta. Thank you for review! The new version: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8184435/webrev.08/ webrev diff v07 vs v08: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8184435/webrev.08/v7_v8.diff See comments inline. On 07.08.2017 3:29, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote: Hi Sergey, javax/print/Doc.java 52 *

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] [10] Review Request: 8184435 Cleanup of javadoc in javax.print package

2017-08-07 Thread Prasanta Sadhukhan
Hi Sergey, javax/print/Doc.java 52 * {@link javax.print.attribute} should be {@link javax.print.attribute javax.print.attribute}, I guess 83 * interface Doc should be interface {@code Doc} javax/print/DocFlavor.java 347 * {@link java.awt.datatransfer.DataFlavor}. should be {@link java.awt.da

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] [10] Review Request: 8184435 Cleanup of javadoc in javax.print package

2017-08-04 Thread Sergey Bylokhov
Any volunteers? =) On 16.07.2017 16:42, Sergey Bylokhov wrote: Hello, Please review the fix for jdk10. The cleanup was done in the same way as for datatransfer, sound and accessibility packages(see links in the CR). I suggest to check the specdiff first, because for some methods the specific