https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50934
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/50933
—
Sincerely,
William Brown
Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
arallel. If anything I'd just need to code into my openldap migration
tool to ignore the rfc2307 schema oids since we already have them in the
compat.
So, does drafting a rfc2307compat.ldif sound reasonable at this point? Do we
think this is worth adding a draft rfc online as well,
> On 3 Mar 2020, at 11:18, William Brown wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 3 Mar 2020, at 04:32, thierry bordaz wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 3/2/20 7:24 AM, William Brown wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> As you may know, I'm currently working on
> On 3 Mar 2020, at 04:32, thierry bordaz wrote:
>
>
>
> On 3/2/20 7:24 AM, William Brown wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> As you may know, I'm currently working on a migration utility to help move
>> from other ldap servers to 389-ds. Something that I have no
p options
* Upgrades of the server should not affect the rfc2307 vs rfc2307bis status
* A dsctl tool to allow changing between the rfc2307/rfc2307bis.
Thoughts? Concern? Ideas? Comments?
[0] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-howard-rfc2307bis-02
—
Sincerely,
William Brown
Senior Software Engineer,
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50913
—
Sincerely,
William Brown
Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50900
—
Sincerely,
William Brown
Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le
hey everyone,
I joined at UTC+10 22:00, and was in the room for 10 minutes but didn't hear
from anyone. Did I miss something?
—
Sincerely,
William Brown
Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389
> On 6 Feb 2020, at 18:40, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
>
>
> On 02/06/2020 12:57 AM, William Brown wrote:
>>
>>> On 5 Feb 2020, at 20:08, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 02/05/2020 10:53 AM, thierry bordaz wrote:
>>>>
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50885
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/50618
—
Sincerely,
William Brown
Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> On 5 Feb 2020, at 20:08, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
>
>
> On 02/05/2020 10:53 AM, thierry bordaz wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2/5/20 2:30 AM, William Brown wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 5 Feb 2020, at 03:10, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
>>>>
>>>
itial
> replication agreement that ipa-replica-manage did not remove.
I'm certainly not able to produce a reproduction case from these steps ... This
is why I have questioned what ipa-replica-install is doing in a previous email,
and I think that we need a bet
https://pagure.io/389-ds-portal/pull-request/13
https://pagure.io/389-ds-portal/issue/1
—
Sincerely,
William Brown
Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> On 3 Feb 2020, at 23:43, Jay Fenlason wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 10:38:59AM +1000, William Brown wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 1 Feb 2020, at 12:10, Jay Fenlason wrote:
>>>
>>> I have a small FreeIPA deployment of ~6-8 servers running on
> 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/M
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50870
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/50859
—
Sincerely,
William Brown
Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50846
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/50694
—
Sincerely,
William Brown
Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50845
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/50787
—
Sincerely,
William Brown
Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
ugin, or
something like uidunique.c.
Hope that's interesting to you,
—
Sincerely,
William Brown
Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 3
,
—
Sincerely,
William Brown
Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50832
—
Sincerely,
William Brown
Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50808
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/50790
—
Sincerely,
William Brown
Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50801
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/50798
Thanks everyone!
—
Sincerely,
William Brown
Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/50786
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50788
--
Sincerely,
William
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi all,
Thanks to Howard's advice on mutrace, and the addition of systemtap probes I
have some more data and a few things I can start to action and work on to
improve the server performance I hope.
The next step was two fold - measure the timing of "do_search" excluding the
connection code,
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50718
--
Sincerely,
William
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
> On 11 Dec 2019, at 20:29, thierry bordaz wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/11/19 1:21 AM, William Brown wrote:
>>
>>> On 10 Dec 2019, at 19:15, thierry bordaz wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi William,
>>>
>>> Thanks for these very interesting resu
rs
> to use it, the performance impact in production will be valid point.
I haven't noticed any "intrusiveness" from USDT so far? How were you running
the stap scripts?
>
> best regards
> thierry
>
>
>
> On 12/9/19 6:16 AM, William Brown wrote:
>>
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists
Hi all,
Following last weeks flamegraph runs, I wanted to find more details on exactly
what was happening. While flamegraphs highlighted that a changed existed
between single and multithreaded servers, it did not help to isolate where
the change was occuring.
To understand this I have started
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50769
--
Sincerely,
William
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50750
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/50664
--
Sincerely,
William
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> On 14 Nov 2019, at 22:33, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
>
>
> On 11/14/2019 12:17 PM, William Brown wrote:
>>
>>> On 14 Nov 2019, at 19:06, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/14/2019 09:29 AM, William Brown wrote:
>>>>&
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50730
--
Sincerely,
William
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
___
> 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.o
> On 14 Nov 2019, at 19:06, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
>
>
> On 11/14/2019 09:29 AM, William Brown wrote:
>>
>>> On 14 Nov 2019, at 18:22, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi William,
>>>
>>> before further thinking about this, I
this number change
> results ?
I will add more tests to this to allow varying the ldclt numbers.
>
> Regards,
> Ludwig
>
> On 11/14/2019 03:34 AM, William Brown wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After our catch up, we were discussing performance matters. I
this profiling on a real machine so I can
generate flamegraphs.
—
Sincerely,
William Brown
Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50703
Thanks!
--
Sincerely,
William
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
> On 7 Nov 2019, at 19:40, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
>
>
> On 11/07/2019 04:45 AM, William Brown wrote:
>> What's the correct way to check if the connection is bound as anonymous with
>> the pb_op or connection struct? It's not obviously jumping out at me, and my
>&
What's the correct way to check if the connection is bound as anonymous with
the pb_op or connection struct? It's not obviously jumping out at me, and my
grep skills have failed me?
--
Sincerely,
William
___
389-devel mailing list --
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50682
--
Sincerely,
William
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://pagure.io/389-ds-portal/pull-request/10
https://pagure.io/389-ds-portal/issue/2
--
Sincerely,
William
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/50669
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50670
--
Sincerely,
William
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50668
--
Sincerely,
William
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
> On 22 Oct 2019, at 07:28, Mark Reynolds wrote:
>
>
> On 10/9/19 10:00 PM, William Brown wrote:
>>> On 9 Oct 2019, at 19:55, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi William,
>>>
>>> I like your radical approach :-)
>>>
> On 16 Oct 2019, at 00:27, Mark Reynolds wrote:
>
>
> On 10/14/19 11:13 PM, William Brown wrote:
>>
>>> On 15 Oct 2019, at 15:51, Mark Reynolds wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/14/19 6:35 PM, William Brown wrote:
>>>>&g
> On 15 Oct 2019, at 15:51, Mark Reynolds wrote:
>
>
> On 10/14/19 6:35 PM, William Brown wrote:
>>
>>> On 15 Oct 2019, at 06:58, Mark Reynolds wrote:
>>>
>>> So we are finding these race conditions (leading to heap-use-after-free)
>
Hi,
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50648
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/50007
I'd like some feedback on this - especially look at Mark and Simon here - about
how we should "display" certificates in the list/show commands. What data
should we show?
Right now it's the
nes: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
—
Sincerely,
William Brown
Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs
___
389-
Hi,
Viktor rightly pointed out that I should discuss the content of:
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50641
This change is not obvious due to the design of the default ACI system in
lib389 (as a result the diff shows a whole new file). However the changes are
limited to ou=People.
s? We can always change the conntable to a
>> better datastructure that would help scale this number higher (which would
>> also yield a performance gain).
—
Sincerely,
William Brown
Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs
___
https://pagure.io/389-ds-portal/pull-request/8
There is an issue where the status isn't shown on the UI, but I think we'll
change to PF4 shortly, so we'll fix that then. The self-service aci's needed
are in https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50641#
--
Sincerely,
William
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50641
I noticed this with 389-ds-portal when a user couldn't self-change their
password. Opps!
--
Sincerely,
William
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
> On 9 Oct 2019, at 09:18, Rich Megginson wrote:
>
> On 10/8/19 4:55 PM, William Brown wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>> In our previous catch up (about 4/5 weeks ago when I was visiting
>> Matus/Simon), we talked about nunc-stans and getting it at least cleaned up
>>
Hi everyone,
In our previous catch up (about 4/5 weeks ago when I was visiting Matus/Simon),
we talked about nunc-stans and getting it at least cleaned up and into the code
base.
I've been looking at it again, and really thinking about it and reflecting on
it and I have a lot of questions and
Sorry it took a few days, there was a delay with some other stuff at suse.
With Matus' comments, I have linked the dockerfile on the hub repo, but we
could change the build process if it really causes issues.
You can find the images here. I've taken the RC flag off them, but I still want
> On 4 Oct 2019, at 17:50, Viktor Ashirov wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 7:25 AM William Brown wrote:
> pytestmark = pytest.mark.tier1
>
> I saw this in a test and curious as to it's function? I'm sure it has one :)
> See https://pagure.io/389-d
pytestmark = pytest.mark.tier1
I saw this in a test and curious as to it's function? I'm sure it has one :)
--
Sincerely,
William
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50633
--
Sincerely,
William
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
> On 3 Oct 2019, at 07:34, Simon Pichugin wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 01:20:24PM +1000, William Brown wrote:
>> Hey there,
>>
>> I'm looking at adding the steps for offline builds so that we can start to
>> use rust. I know that you have some steps
Hey there,
I'm looking at adding the steps for offline builds so that we can start to use
rust. I know that you have some steps for preparing the tar for cockpit builds
with npm/js deps.
How are you doing this? I was hoping we could share some kind of prepare for
offline or pre-build script
https://github.com/marcus2376/389wiki/pull/17
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/48707
--
Sincerely,
William
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi everyone,
I've added a new repo in our project namespace - 389-ds-portal. This is a
lib389 + flask webportal for self-service of accounts including password
changes.
It's still not complete, and there is a bit to go before it's
configurable/production ready, but I think it could be
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50632
--
Sincerely,
William
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Hi everyone,
We talked about this twice this year about having common meetings that we can
all attend - it's time we took some steps to making this happen!
I think it's possible we could all actually do this at the same time - we
discussed a possible time on tuesday as:
11am UTC+0, 1pm Brno
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50626
--
Sincerely,
William
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50625
--
Sincerely,
William
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50624
--
Sincerely,
William
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50623
--
Sincerely,
William
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Reminder to review this please!
> On 5 Sep 2019, at 08:55, William Brown wrote:
>
> https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/50584
>
> https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49212
>
> https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50585
>
> Thanks!
>
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50571
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50577
Thanks!
--
Sincerely,
William
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
> On 3 Sep 2019, at 00:19, Matus Honek wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 3:43 AM William Brown wrote:
>>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> RC images have been pushed: https://hub.docker.com/r/389ds/dirsrv
>
> First, I'm not with processes on Docker Hub, so
Hey all,
RC images have been pushed: https://hub.docker.com/r/389ds/dirsrv
I'll try to accomodate as much feedback as possible, aiming for 1.4.2 to be out
first fully supported release. Sounds okay?
> On 29 Aug 2019, at 12:55, William Brown wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'
ts.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50577
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/50576
--
Sincerely,
William
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi all,
I've been wanting this for a long time and I think we're almost there - I'd
like us to start offering docker images of 389 Directory Server as part of our
upstream release process.
I have discussed this with Mark already and we both think we are reasonably
happy with the idea and the
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50571
--
Sincerely,
William
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Hi everyone,
Just thought I'd let you know that I received a few pieces of positive feedback
about dsconf recently to my private mail address. Great work to everyone on the
team for all your work to make lib389 and the new command line tools a reality.
People are really starting to notice, and
il to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedorap
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50564
--
Sincerely,
William
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
, could you please take a look?
> The lib389 part for Accounts is much bigger now and has much more to
> offer.
>
> Thanks,
> Simon
—
Sincerely,
William Brown
Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs
___
389-devel mail
; ___
> 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Gu
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50493
—
Sincerely,
William Brown
Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50492
—
Sincerely,
William Brown
Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50485
—
Sincerely,
William Brown
Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le
ldap server I always wish I had"
when I was an admin. Great work to everyone on this, I know it's been ages to
get here, but it's just wonderful to see it in action.
—
Sincerely,
William Brown
Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50484
Found after doing production deployment of 389 in container. Likely there are
more to come as I add replicas!
--
Sincerely,
William
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
could present here especially around:
* lib389 and the ds* tools
* cockpit
* docker and containerisation
Good luck in your submissions!
https://cfp.ldapcon.org/ldapcon2019/cfp
—
Sincerely,
William Brown
Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs
and our
upstream release process.
Thoughts?
—
Sincerely,
William Brown
Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le
Hi all,
I've been very unwell since my return to Australia, so if there is anything
urgent you need to me took at please contact me directly to notify me - I'm not
looking at pagure this week. Sorry about this :(
—
Sincerely,
William Brown
Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50458
—
Sincerely,
William Brown
Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le
> On 13 Jun 2019, at 14:17, William Brown wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> There have been a few changes to systemd files recently so I wanted to check
> about how to correctly supply environment variables to the server. For
> example, KRB5_KTNAME. Are we doing this sti
//fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives:
> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
>
>
> --
> Viktor
>
>
> --
> Viktor
> _______
> 389-d
> On 18 Jun 2019, at 14:38, Viktor Ashirov wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 2:33 PM William Brown wrote:
>
>
> > On 18 Jun 2019, at 14:19, Viktor Ashirov wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 2:10 PM William Brown wr
> On 18 Jun 2019, at 14:19, Viktor Ashirov wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 2:10 PM William Brown wrote:
>
> >
> > Memalign is pretty important - the short version is "we can not remove it".
> > I didn't say "remove", I said
, maybe you can leave a comment in the
> issue linked above with the justification for upstream to reconsider?
You mean upstream LSAN/ASAN in this case, yes?
—
Sincerely,
William Brown
Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs
___
389-devel mailin
ect.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists
> On 14 Jun 2019, at 11:25, Viktor Ashirov wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 9:28 AM William Brown wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 13 Jun 2019, at 16:09, Viktor Ashirov wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 3:26 PM William Brown wrote
> On 13 Jun 2019, at 17:00, Mark Reynolds wrote:
>
>
> On 6/13/19 4:02 AM, William Brown wrote:
>>
>>> On 12 Jun 2019, at 17:36, Mark Reynolds wrote:
>>>
>>> http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/design/repl-agmt-status-design.html
>>
>&
101 - 200 of 787 matches
Mail list logo
