[389-users] Re: autosizing the cache

2018-03-13 Thread Sergei Gerasenko
Hi William, With autosizing on I configured the changelog backend: dn: cn=changelog,cn=ldbm database,cn=plugins,cn=config cn: changelog objectClass: top objectClass: extensibleObject objectClass: nsBackendInstance nsslapd-suffix: cn=changelog nsslapd-cachesize: -1 nsslapd-cachememsize: 8858370048

[389-users] Re: autosizing the cache

2018-03-13 Thread William Brown
On Tue, 2018-03-13 at 13:05 -0500, Sergei Gerasenko wrote: > Sorry to resurrect this thread, but I’ve upgraded to 1.3.6 and so my > question is back on the table :) > > My cn=userRoot,cn=ldbm database,cn=plugins,cn=config is currently: > > ... > nsslapd-cachesize: -1 > nsslapd-cachememsize: 15435

[389-users] Re: Admin Gateway over https

2018-03-13 Thread William Brown
On Tue, 2018-03-13 at 10:55 +1000, William Brown wrote: > On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 05:26 +, Eric Wheeler wrote: > > Thanks for the confirmation regarding secure connections and the > > clarification regarding dsgw. I will focus on other alternatives. I > > would be interested in exploring cli tool

[389-users] Re: repl-monitor.pl

2018-03-13 Thread Mark Reynolds
On 03/13/2018 06:00 PM, Sergei Gerasenko wrote: >> Is this a winsync replication agreement? If so, the lag time can not be >> determined if I am correct. > No, it’s all Linux servers. Not sure what winsync is. Me neither sometimes ;-) > >> This information is all determined from the replication

[389-users] Re: repl-monitor.pl

2018-03-13 Thread Sergei Gerasenko
> Is this a winsync replication agreement? If so, the lag time can not be > determined if I am correct. No, it’s all Linux servers. Not sure what winsync is. > This information is all determined from the replication agreement. Are > all the servers using the same version of 389-ds-base? Becau

[389-users] Re: repl-monitor.pl

2018-03-13 Thread Mark Reynolds
On 03/13/2018 05:07 PM, Sergei Gerasenko wrote: > Hi all, > > I think this is more a question for Mark since he wrote repl-monitor :) > > I built a new node and promoted it to be a domain/ca replica. Is this a winsync replication agreement?  If so, the lag time can not be determined if I am corre

[389-users] repl-monitor.pl

2018-03-13 Thread Sergei Gerasenko
Hi all, I think this is more a question for Mark since he wrote repl-monitor :) I built a new node and promoted it to be a domain/ca replica. Everything seems to be working fine *except* repl-monitor.pl has ?:??:?? in the lag column for the CA segment from the pre-existing CA master to the new

[389-users] Re: autosizing the cache

2018-03-13 Thread Sergei Gerasenko
Sorry to resurrect this thread, but I’ve upgraded to 1.3.6 and so my question is back on the table :) My cn=userRoot,cn=ldbm database,cn=plugins,cn=config is currently: ... nsslapd-cachesize: -1 nsslapd-cachememsize: 1543503872 nsslapd-readonly: off nsslapd-require-index: off nsslapd-dncachemems