OK Got it
There are 2 API keys needed one for Google Maps and one for Google Places.
Just for the record..
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Sujit Shah wrote:
> Hmm.. I am able to get the Address Validate to work but not the
> Auto-Complete.
>
> JSON Parse Object is saying: "This API project is
Hmm.. I am able to get the Address Validate to work but not the
Auto-Complete.
JSON Parse Object is saying: "This API project is not authorised to use
this API..."
This is using my own key. I have replaced it in both places ie
Demo_Validate and Demo_Predict
??
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 12:32 PM,
Very good! Thanks.
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 11:11 AM, Scott Staley via 4D_Tech <
4d_tech@lists.4d.com> wrote:
>
> The 4D method user group did a presentation that included an address
> validation app using google maps api. The url to the website page that
> includes the 4D sample database is shown
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Keisuke Miyako via 4D_Tech <
4d_tech@lists.4d.com> wrote:
> WEB GET VARIABLES only parses form variables (x-www-form-urlencoded).
>
> and then, jQuery post() only sends x-www-form-urlencoded.
...snip...
Thanks for the fantastic answer. I can easily imagine spendi
The 4D method user group did a presentation that included an address
validation app using google maps api. The url to the website page that
includes the 4D sample database is shown below.
https://4dmethod.com/2015/07/08/next-meeting-july-30-priority-mail/
fyi... The sample database uses
I am wondering if anyone has developed code to integrate with their API
within the context of a 4D Form?
--
xxx
"There must be ingenuity as well as intention, strategy as well as
strength. "
**
4D I
WEB GET VARIABLES only parses form variables (x-www-form-urlencoded).
and then, jQuery post() only sends x-www-form-urlencoded.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5529685/post-doesnt-send-data-as-json-but-as-x-www-form-urlencoded-instead
so with this setup,
you are basically working with a strin
WEB GET HTTP BODY($body)
http://doc.4d.com/4Dv15/4D/15.4/WEB-GET-HTTP-BODY.301-3275031.en.html
> On Apr 4, 2017, at 5:16 PM, Kirk Brooks via 4D_Tech <4d_tech@lists.4d.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I need a little guidance here. I have a web form (in a browser) that is
> submitting data to 4D.
Hi folks,
I need a little guidance here. I have a web form (in a browser) that is
submitting data to 4D. I collect the data on the webform into an object
then stringify it for passing to 4D - like so:
var postData = JSON.stringify(woData);
$.post( "/workorder/data", postData)
.done(function(data)
ALL RECORDS + DELETE SELECTION,
or selecting all records and deleting them in User Mode
logs "delete" action for each record in the journal file.
TRUNCATE TABLE, on the other hand, has its own single action in the journal
file.
"Truncate" clears the address table, whereas "Delete" does not.
the
Nigel,
The Compiler changed some versions back and no longer detects all error sin
one pass...at least in certain situations. A few tips and things to look
out for:
* If you've got a missing method, the Compiler usually stops reporting
errors, even if there are multiple cases of the problem.
* S
Thanks that must be it I should remember that
Regards
Chuck
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 4, 2017, at 5:41 PM, Wayne Stewart via 4D_Tech <4d_tech@lists.4d.com>
> wrote:
>
> Only the first 1024 characters are indexed.
**
4D Int
Chuck,
This may be related:
http://doc.4d.com/4Dv16/4D/16/Creating-and-modifying-indexes.300-3048980.en.html
Only the first 1024 characters are indexed.
Wayne
On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 at 06:57, Charles Miller via 4D_Tech <
4d_tech@lists.4d.com> wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I have in pseudo code the followin
Hi Chuck,
> OK what about when I connect from a v11 single user via sql row 64 BIT Mac
> server. What network layer does it use.
Your v11 SingleUser app is definitely using the legacy network, it does not
know about the New Network Layer.
Your 64 bit Mac Server is definitely using the new netw
Hi All
I have in pseudo code the following
distinct values on a text field, that can be anywhere from 5 or 6
characters to >1000
These text fields are supposed to bed unique in in fact are. However, the
resultant array is not the same size as numbers of records.
I know it is the same, as I adde
> OK what about when I connect from a v11 single user via sql row 64 BIT Mac
> server.
> What network layer does it use. I have been running tests with v15 latest hot
> fix. I have many disparate connection types.
If I had to take a guess, you are using the new network layer (as that is all
th
Apparently my last post still wasn't clear so let me try again -
The new network layer is *required* if you are using:
* 4D Server 64 bit on Mac
* 4D 64 bit on Mac
* 4D 64 bit on Win
^ If you use any of these in your deployment you MUST use the new network layer
because these products do not "un
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Charles Miller
wrote:
> This is true, you need to use the new network layer with a 64 bit MAC
>> server... legacy network doesn't exist.
>>
>>
>> Neil
>>
>>
> Ohm thanks to all. This was not how I understood it.
OK what about when I connect from a v11 single user
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Dennis, Neil via 4D_Tech <
4d_tech@lists.4d.com> wrote:
>
> This is true, you need to use the new network layer with a 64 bit MAC
> server... legacy network doesn't exist.
>
>
> Neil
>
>
Ohm thanks to all. This was not how I understood it.
Regards
Chuck
--
> (Mac and Windows clients) and connect to a MAC server using 64 bit
This is true, you need to use the new network layer with a 64 bit MAC server...
legacy network doesn't exist.
Neil
--
Privacy Disclaimer: This message contains confidential information and is
intended only for the nam
Since you're using a 64-bit Mac server you have to use the new network layer.
If you had a 64-bit Windows server with 32-bit clients, you could use the
legacy (i.e. reliable) network layer.
> On Apr 4, 2017, at 2:13 PM, Charles Miller via 4D_Tech <4d_tech@lists.4d.com>
> wrote:
>
> OK I am a l
> OK I am a little confused. Ifs I build clients using 32 bit volume (Mac and
> Windows clients) and
> connect to a MAC server using 64 bit server, the new network layer is always
> used? or not?
> I thought 32 bit volume desktops did
> *NOT* support the new network layer
That would be 4D 32 b
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Timothy Penner via 4D_Tech <
4d_tech@lists.4d.com> wrote:
> The new network layer is required (legacy network not supported) if you
> are using:
>
> * 4D Server 64 bit on Mac
> * 4D 64 bit on Mac
> * 4D 64 bit on Win
>
> The new network layer is not required (legacy
Re: " To me, Truncate table is sort of the "Holy Hand Grenade"
I love TRUNCATE TABLE...
I think of it as the "Molecular Disruption Device" ( from Ender's Game)
When you really want to clean things up, with no witnesses left standing.
;-)
Randy Engle
XC2 Software LLC
*
> I am using truncate. I just want to make sure that by using this command then
> then running MSC repair,
> I will get new fast indices for these tables and table space will be correct.
> If one uses delete command and deletes
> most of the records table space is screwed up. That was my real que
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 2:04 PM, Douglas von Roeder via 4D_Tech <
4d_tech@lists.4d.com> wrote:
> It's a command whose function is to clear all the tablespace allocated to
> records in a given table along with the associated indexes.
>
> Delete selection is used to delete one or more records, ensuri
Doug,
Yeah, this command lets you do a LOT of damage, very quickly, with no real
recourse... ;-)
Steve
-Original Message-
From: 4D_Tech [mailto:4d_tech-boun...@lists.4d.com] On Behalf Of Douglas von
Roeder via 4D_Tech
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2017 1:35 PM
To: 4D iNug Technical <4d_t
Steve:
Very good point about a transaction.
Reading Chuck's posting, I got the impression that this would be done on an
"as needed" basis.
To me, Truncate table is sort of the "Holy Hand Grenade", sort of like in
the 4D Server betas when Array to selection would delete records.
--
Douglas von
> Yes. You only need the new network layer to support 64-bit 4D on Mac.
The new network layer is required (legacy network not supported) if you are
using:
* 4D Server 64 bit on Mac
* 4D 64 bit on Mac
* 4D 64 bit on Win
The new network layer is not required (legacy network supported) if you are
Yes. You only need the new network layer to support 64-bit 4D on Mac.
> On Apr 4, 2017, at 12:54 PM, Timothy Penner via 4D_Tech
> <4d_tech@lists.4d.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Tim,
>
>>> I think it is important to investigate whether the instability is specific
>>> to application code or not.
>>>
>>>
Tim,
It appears to be back up again, but it was down for a bit, along with the 4D
website.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: 4D_Tech [mailto:4d_tech-boun...@lists.4d.com] On Behalf Of Timothy Penner
via 4D_Tech
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2017 1:16 PM
To: 4D iNug Technical <4d_tech@lists.4
> I like the TRUNCATE TABLE command, but I'm thinking this cannot be used
> within a transaction.
" No transaction must be underway in the process executing TRUNCATE TABLE. If
this if the case, the command does nothing and the OK system variable is set to
0"
> 4D's documentation website is dow
Doug,
I like the TRUNCATE TABLE command, but I'm thinking this cannot be used within
a transaction.
4D's documentation website is down, otherwise I would have confirmed this first.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: 4D_Tech [mailto:4d_tech-boun...@lists.4d.com] On Behalf Of Douglas von
R
Chuck:
I'd go with truncate.
It's a command whose function is to clear all the tablespace allocated to
records in a given table along with the associated indexes.
Delete selection is used to delete one or more records, ensuring that
indexes and relational integrity constraints are enforced for e
On Apr 4, 2017, at 11:02 AM, Neil Dennis wrote:
> I found the new net work layer unusable as well. During heavy loads 4D will
> quit responding. I use legacy network and things work great. This was all
> done on a LAN not a WAN.
>
> I let the 4D engineers know about this at the last 4D summit.
Hi Tim,
> > I think it is important to investigate whether the instability is specific
> > to application code or not.
> >
> > for instance, it is possible to create a bare bone copy of you database
> > with the export structure command. you can then open a copy of your
> > production data with
On Apr 4, 2017, at 11:02 AM,Keisuke Miyako wrote:
> I think it is important to investigate whether the instability is specific to
> application code or not.
>
> for instance, it is possible to create a bare bone copy of you database with
> the export structure command. you can then open a copy
I seem to remember a tech note or example that would fix index problems
that you would have when deleting most of the record in a able or or
truncating it. I can not seem to find it. I wanted to make sure that if we
run a repair after doing this that all will be as it should. The two tables
we are
Tim
Oh that this was V15!!!..its not a complaint about the compiler its doing a a
damned fine job here its like Mr Trebus living
room(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edmund_Trebus)
> On 4 Apr 2017, at 17:31, Charles Miller via 4D_Tech <4d_tech@lists.4d.com>
> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 1
Maybe related to this?
ACI0096385 [135142] Check Syntax Error Count Not Consistent.
^ Still in progress.
^ filed for v15.x / 16.x / 16R2
* I thought this was database specific though.
The bug description explains that it's just the number that seems wrong, but
the actual list seems correct.
A wor
John,
We tried running this in 32 bit mode (Windows) and it was unusable. We
contacted 4D and they told us not to use it for 32 bit, but only 64 bit. Have
not tried that yet as we have been unable to get the 64 bit version working
with our OEM system (web area issues using the integrated brow
Chuck
If it was closer to the days when i wrote load of errors i might have worked
out(but then i was so daft i could not have worked it out)..now that i am
clever enough to work it out i don’t need to work it out because i don't write
100s of errors
…end of a long day clearing 100*n errors ge
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 12:36 PM, John DeSoi via 4D_Tech <
4d_tech@lists.4d.com> wrote:
> Are folks having trouble with the new network layer using it in 32 bit
> mode or 64 bit mode? Just wondering if 64 bit mode is also problematic.
It is my understanding that 32 mode only runs on old network l
Are folks having trouble with the new network layer using it in 32 bit mode or
64 bit mode? Just wondering if 64 bit mode is also problematic.
John DeSoi, Ph.D.
> On Apr 4, 2017, at 10:56 AM, lists via 4D_Tech <4d_tech@lists.4d.com> wrote:
>
> Of the sites we are running at, all but the smalle
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Nigel Greenlee via 4D_Tech <
4d_tech@lists.4d.com> wrote:
> Chuck
>
> Yep thats pretty much what i am figuring..but I was just curious if anyone
> know what the 'trigger points’ that cause it to give up are-if we knew what
> they were we could clear up those errors
Chuck
Yep thats pretty much what i am figuring..but I was just curious if anyone know
what the 'trigger points’ that cause it to give up are-if we knew what they
were we could clear up those errors first(I have been at this one all day today
and most of yesterday)
Nigel Greenlee
> On 4 Apr 20
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Nigel Greenlee via 4D_Tech <
4d_tech@lists.4d.com> wrote:
> Just out of curiosity does anyone know why the compiler does this(its a
> long time since i have had more than 2 errors in the compiler because i
> compile everytime i change a piece of code to check for s
Hi
I have always been curious-but really never had to see this in this way.
I am currently updating a system which has never been compiled-not with a view
to compiling but to clear up syntax errors. So i started with some number of
errors(somewhat north of 100)…i cleared some stuff..and then s
Of the sites we are running at, all but the smallest ones exhibit the same
slowness, non-responsiveness after several days (number of days depended on
usage load), logged off clients not clearing from the server and occupying
licenses. We can actually see the system response time increase as mo
Of the sites we are running at, all but the smallest ones exhibit the same
slowness, non-responsiveness after several days (number of days depended on
usage load), logged off clients not clearing from the server and occupying
licenses. We can actually see the system response time increase as mo
Am 04.04.2017 um 14:54 schrieb npdennis via 4D_Tech <4d_tech@lists.4d.com>:
>
>> if you have no issues using the database in user mode over the same network,
>> then perhaps some methods are choking the network in a way that does not
>> happen over the legacy layer.
>
> I found the new net work
> if you have no issues using the database in user mode over the same network,
> then perhaps some methods are choking the network in a way that does not
> happen over the legacy layer.
I found the new net work layer unusable as well. During heavy loads 4D will
quit responding. I use legacy net
Doug,
I've been running a db over WAN since v2004. I've found v15 to be more
stable than any of the others but I'm also running it on the legacy
setting. I've changed to the new one a couple of times and it always gets
complaints from users about responsiveness or sluggishness. I don't have
any v16
Hello,
I think it is important to investigate whether the instability is specific to
application code or not.
for instance, it is possible to create a bare bone copy of you database with
the export structure command. you can then open a copy of your production data
with that structure file.
i
I would like to hear from anyone using v16 in a WAN environment.
Frankly every time I have tried out v16 or for that matter any v15 R release I
have been shocked at how poor the network connection stability has been.
It seems to stem from the new networking layer and certainly it seems to be
mo
55 matches
Mail list logo
