Glad to be of assistance. I will add that, once properly configured, VM
performance was very good. It was at least as good as the former dedicated
hardware we were using. We aways had very high end enterprise grade hardware.
All very expensive stuff ($100K for a SAN etc). VM is not a great way
Hi Tom
Many thanks for your useful observations. I’m not quite sure of the priorities
given to 4D in the VM but the support guy said he needed some kind of IP packet
specification details which 4D used to give it “full priority”. I think that
was so that other bandwidth demands (such as large
>Everything at this place is on VM - nothing I can do about it as it’s
>contractor managed. (In fact they seem to be able to change
>the “hardware" without me even taking the server down - that’s something I
>never thought I’d see and am too old now to bother
>speculating how they do it :-) !).
…that is the question !
I have a site that I just launched - usual moderate-trauma of initial days but
basically holding up so far and improving by the day.
I now need to try and optimise it a bit as it’s still slightly sluggish and was
wondering what people were running in terms of hardware.
4 matches
Mail list logo
