> Le 9 févr. 2019 à 15:31, John DeSoi via 4D_Tech <4d_tech@lists.4d.com> a
> écrit :
>
> I always use singular table names and the relationship names are singular or
> plural based on their type. [...]
Hi,
using grammatical rules makes reading code closer to human langage. But I
prefer to ha
I always use singular table names and the relationship names are singular or
plural based on their type. For example, I have a structure that imports 4D
code and builds a database of each method path and the related methods it
directly calls:
[Method_Call]ID
[Method_Call]Caller_Method_ID -> [M
> Le 8 févr. 2019 à 20:18, Christian Sakowski via 4D_Tech
> <4d_tech@lists.4d.com> a écrit :
>
>> I went much simpler…
>
> This is quite the same, but the problem with this approach is, that i cannot
> parse relations generically.
I do agree, a name that allows to identify the function is gre
> Le 8 févr. 2019 à 19:50, Ed Hammond via 4D_Tech <4d_tech@lists.4d.com> a
> écrit :
>
> Have any of you come up with a convention for naming relations for use with
> ORDA? What have you found that works? or doesn't?
Hi Ed,
the relation name is the direction in which we go from one field to a
> I went much simpler…
This is quite the same, but the problem with this approach is, that i cannot
parse relations generically.
--
Grüße/Regards,
[heubach-media] | Christian Sakowski
christian.sakow...@heubach-media.de
Tel: +49/(0)40/52 10 59-23
> Am 08.02.2019 um 20:15 schrieb Neil Dennis
Given two tables:
[Invoice]
[InvoiceItems]
I went much simpler…
The many to one from InvoiceItems to Invoice I simply name invoice
The one to many from Invoice to Invoice Items I simply named invoiceItems
Then the dot notation comes out to be
Invoice.invoiceItems
InvoiceItems.invoice
Neil
Yes, since years i use the following:
Given two tables:
[Invoice]
[InvoiceItems]
The id from the invoice is named as:
[InvoiceItems]_Invoice__
(one leading underscore and double underscore as postfix)
For ORDA i name the relation:
[InvoiceItems]_Invoice__MO
(MO means Many to One) which is a
Hey all of you ORDA pioneers and converts!
Have any of you come up with a convention for naming relations for use with
ORDA? What have you found that works? or doesn't?
Edgar Hammond
8 matches
Mail list logo
