t
6lo<https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/6lo/charter/>
IPv6 over Networks of Resource-constrained Nodes
Also, I noticed 6tisch WG and lpwan BOF are also on Monday right after 6lo WG
session.
Thanks,
-Samita
From: Samita Chakrabarti
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2016 11:56 AM
To: 6lo@ie
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/96/minutes/minutes-96-6lo
Thanks to Zach Shelby and Dominique Barthel very much for the detailed notes.
Gabriel also took some notes which was used to enrich the minutes.
Please take a look and let us know if it requires any correction.
Cheers,
-Gabriel and
Correction:
We have made the following changes in the
draft-ietf-6lo-dispatch-iana-registry-04 document:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6lo-dispatch-iana-registry-04
Thanks.
From: Samita Chakrabarti
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2016 4:23 PM
To: 6lo@ietf.org
Cc: Thierry LYS (thierry
Hello :
I am trying to decipher the RFC 8025 packet header sequence and bit
patterns from reading the document and
http://www.iana.org/assignments/_6lowpan-parameters/.
Sorry, I should have asked these questions before, but it is never too
late...
* I assume the main purpose is to give the
Hello 6lo Colleagues:
Gabriel and I are starting to plan for the upcoming 6lo session at IETF98.
We have requested 2.5 hours slot this time.
Please send us your request to 6lo-cha...@ietf.org on presentations of
drafts with the following information:
Draft name :
Brief description:
Presenter:
bert) <
> pthub...@cisco.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear Samita :
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Samita Chakrabarti [mailto:samitac.i...@gmail.com]
>>
>>
>>
>> Hello :
>>
>>
>>
>> I am trying to decipher the RFC 8025 packet heade
Hello Alexander,
Glad to hear that folks are trying to implement RFC 7668.
You are right in conclusion that no u or g bit handling is required.
>From RFC 7668, section 3.2.2 -- it says that one should use 48-bit BT
device identification and form the 64-bit IID separated by oxFFFE. The BT
al Thubert (pthubert) <pthub...@cisco.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Unsure which format would be best, Samita.
>>
>>
>>
>> There can be a variety of such questions. So maybe a Q in the WiKi
>> could collect this sort of questions when they occur?
>>
>> At leas
Hello 6lo WG:
We have discussed the following document at the IETF meetings and mailing
list about the use of cryptographic ID to identify one device with a
particular IPv6 address during the Neighbor Discovery Process. The crypto-ID
association is helpful when MAC-ID or EUI-64 ID may
isting deployments.
>
> I also support the inclusion of a use case describing the use of 6lo in
> the context of 6TiSCH.
>
> kind regards,
> Xavi
>
>
>
> 2016-09-21 20:00 GMT+02:00 samita Chakrabarti <samitac.i...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hello Folks:
>&g
Hi Michael,
>>such work does not yet exist. I think it would be in charter for 6lo at
this time? It would seem to be an extension to
draft-ietf-6lo-paging-dispatch in >>some way. I wonder if it worth delay to
do this now?
Right, there is no document on 6lo address formation that
Hello everyone,
Meetecho IETF support requests the WG chairs to submit the remote
presentation requests by Nov 11 by filling out a form with details of
presenter's information.
If any of you like to present remotely to 6lo WG this time, please send your
requests to the chairs before Nov
Hi Michael,
Are you proposing that draft-richardson-6lo-ra-in-ie to be discussed and
standardized at 6tisch only?
If this document deals with sending RA over 6loRH, we would like to
understand its relationship with 6lowpan-ND behavior and whether it is
moving away from 6lowpan base requirements.
Hi Suresh,
Thanks for your review comments and the good catch. It will be fixed ASAP.
-Samita
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Suresh Krishnan <
suresh.krish...@ericsson.com> wrote:
> Hi authors,
>I have gone through the draft and I found a minor issue that needs to be
> fixed before I
Thanks to Gabe who submitted the draft in a blaze!!
-Samita
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 6:18 PM, Suresh Krishnan <
suresh.krish...@ericsson.com> wrote:
> Thanks for fixing it quickly Samita. I have sent the document to IETF Last
> Call.
>
> Thanks
> Suresh
>
> On
Hi Yong-Geun,
Here are some comments on the 6lo-applicability document.
6lo-chairs have been asked to take a close look at the document and I have
volunteered to guide the document content along with you/co-authors and WG.
We can meet before the 6lo meeting and lay out ideas on the modification.
A few 'notes and thanks' for the 6lo session this morning.
Thanks to all of you who helped us fixing the initial technical issue of
not being able to display our console on the projector due to some issues
with incompatible adapter and the projector being powered off.
Thanks to Ines for being
Dear Presenters,
Please send your slides for 6lo to the chairs 6lo-cha...@ietf.org by Monday
noon Chicago time.
Thanks,
-Samita and Gabriel
___
6lo mailing list
6lo@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
Hi Jianquiang and co-authors:
I have browsed through the draft and thank you for bringing this work at
IETF.
A few comments and questions:
1) Is it safe to assume that all the nodes in PLC network are line-powered?
2) How does the IPv6 addresses are assigned in the mesh or tree network?
3) In
Hello 6lo Colleagues:
Based on your requests for slots, here is the preliminary agenda. Please
take a look and let us know if any modifications are needed.
Note, there might be another update of the agenda before March 25th.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/98/agenda/6lo/
Thanks,
-Gabriel
6lo Session 1 (2:30:00)
Wednesday, Morning Session I 0900-1130
Room Name: Zurich A
FYI.
___
6lo mailing list
6lo@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
If anyone plans to present remotely at 6lo, please make your request to me
by COB 7/12.
Thanks,
-Samita
-- Forwarded message --
From: Meetecho IETF support
Date: Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 8:00 AM
Subject: Cutoff date for requesting remote presentations support at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/99/agenda/6lo/
Please take a look and let the chairs know if any modification is needed.
Thanks,
-Samita
___
6lo mailing list
6lo@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
Hello All:
Please let 6lo-chairs know if you like to volunteer for minute taking and
jabber scribe.
Thanks a lot!
-Samita
___
6lo mailing list
6lo@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
Hi All:
The 6lo chairs like to start a discussion on the 6lo fragmentation
requirements and scope of work based on IETF98 interest in the WG about
doing further work on fragmentation.
We are soliciting input from the WG on your thoughts and experiences on
possible 6lowpan fragmentation issue
Hi Carsten,
You mentioned about an implementation that works on route-over for 6lowpan.
Do you have any pointer to that?
Any informational draft or white paper is good - please send that out to
the list.
Thanks,
-Samita
___
6lo mailing list
Hello all:
The Chicago meeting minutes have been posted:
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/98/minutes/minutes-98-6lo-00.txt
Please let 6lo-cha...@ietf.org know if any modification is needed by May
10th.
Thanks,
-Samita
___
6lo mailing list
6lo@ietf.org
ft is a work item of the IPv6 over Networks of
> Resource-constrained Nodes of the IETF.
>
> Title : An Update to 6LoWPAN ND
> Authors : Pascal Thubert
> Erik Nordmark
> Samita Chakrabarti
>
s.
> This draft is a work item of the IPv6 over Networks of
> Resource-constrained Nodes of the IETF.
>
> Title : An Update to 6LoWPAN ND
> Authors : Pascal Thubert
> Erik Nordmark
> S
Hi all,
I will be joining remotely at Prague meeting this time while Gabriel will
be there in person.
I believe our secretary James W. will be there as well.
We will miss Ralph Droms this time as he blessed 6lo co-chairs to go
forward without a tech adviser guide.
Thanks to Ralph for holding our
FYI:
Congratulations to co-authors, reviewers, shepherds and all involved in
publication of the following new documents since last IETF!
IEEE 802.15.4 Information Element for the IETF - RFC 8137 [ non-WG item ]
Transmission of IPv6 over MS/TP networks - RFC 8163
Transmission of IPv6 over
message --
From: 최영환 <y...@etri.re.kr>
Date: Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 5:02 PM
Subject: RE: [6lo] Request for IETF99@Prague 6lo Agenda items
To: Samita Chakrabarti <samitac.i...@gmail.com>
Cc: Gabriel Montenegro <gabriel.montene...@microsoft.com>
Hello Samita,
I’ve submitted the n
The diff file:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-6lo-nfc-07
-Samita
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 5:15 PM, Samita Chakrabarti <samitac.i...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>
> Hello Dave, Pascal, James and WG members:
>
> ipv6-over-nfc-07 has just been published and the author m
Thanks Suresh, for sharing the information. It looks quite relevant to 6lo
WG workarea. We, 6lo-chairs will contact Scott and the ITU-T contact person
provided in the liaison note.
Will discuss with you on a separate email regarding the steps to connect.
-Samita
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 7:53 PM,
opoulos'
> ;
> Cc: draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-t...@ietf.org; an...@ece.iisc.ernet.in; 'Malati
> Hegde' ;; 'Samita
> Chakrabarti' ;; 'Gabriel
> Montenegro'
> ;; 'lo' <6lo@ietf.org>
> <6lo@ietf.org>;; 'Charlie Perkins'
> ;; satishnaid...@gmail.com
> Subject: RE: [E] Re: [6l
Samita Chakrabarti has requested publication of draft-ietf-6lo-nfc-10 as
Proposed Standard on behalf of the 6LO working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lo-nfc/
___
6lo mailing list
6lo
Hi 6lo wg presenters:
Your slides are due by Mon noon, ET in order for the chairs to prepare for
the meeting.
Thanks to those who already submitted their slides.
-Samita
___
6lo mailing list
6lo@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
Hello all:
Tomorrow we have 6lo session at 1:30p in Duluth.
Still looking for minute takers and a jabber scribe. Please volunteer.
Thanks,
-Samita
___
6lo mailing list
6lo@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
Hi Younghawn:
I have volunteered to take over the shepherding job for this document.
Here are my comments:
Please update -10 with these comments. Let me know if you have any further
questions. Though the -09 draft might expire before the submission gate
opens in the IETF week, I believe you
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/101/materials/minutes-101-6lo-00
Thanks to Dominique for taking the minutes. If anyone else also took minutes on
etherpad, please let the chairs know.
If there is any modification need or you like add any missing pieces, please
send the suggested text.
I am okay with the changes .
Thanks,
-Samita
From: 6lo [mailto:6lo-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
Sent: Tuesday, April 3, 2018 1:32 PM
To: Dave Thaler ; Warren Kumari ; The
IESG
Cc: 6lo-cha...@ietf.org;
Thank you Carles for the implementation update of BLEmesh.
Great work in finding out and sharing the ble existing base implementations
pros and cons. That is helpful for 6lo wg and it is good to know that
Contiki now supports RFC 7668.
-Samita
On Mar 16, 2018 4:38 AM, "Carles Gomez
version of the document.
Thanks,
-Samita
On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 1:33 PM Samita Chakrabarti
wrote:
> Hi Lijo and co-authors,
>
> Are you aware of any IPR involving the method described in the
> 6lo-deadline draft?
>
> If yes, please record the IPR at
> https://datatracker.ietf.o
Samita Chakrabarti has requested publication of draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-time-02
as Proposed Standard on behalf of the 6LO working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-time/
___
6lo
Thanks Lijo, for the update.
-Samita
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 6:00 AM Lijo Thomas wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Published a new version -02 of our draft
> which addressed the review comments from Georgios and Samita.
>
> Will be happy to receive your feedback and further inputs ...
>
>
Hi Lijo and co-authors,
Are you aware of any IPR involving the method described in the 6lo-deadline
draft?
If yes, please record the IPR at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft=draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-time
as soon as possible. Shepherd writeup will wait for the confirmation
Posting again…
From: Chakrabarti, Samita
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2018 6:32 PM
To: 'Lijo Thomas' ; 'Georgios Z. Papadopoulos'
Cc: draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-t...@ietf.org; an...@ece.iisc.ernet.in; 'Malati
Hegde' ; 'Samita Chakrabarti'
; 'Gabriel Montenegro'
; 'lo' <6lo@ietf.org>; 'C
Hi Lijo:
1. We received a few comments + I need to do a shepherd review
2. So, you might need another minor revision
3. After that we will submit for IESG ( I,e AD review)
-Samita
-Original Message-
From: Lijo Thomas [mailto:l...@cdac.in]
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2018 9:06 AM
To:
Hi Ryan,
Thank you very much for volunteering for minute taking.
We usually ask the minute takers to use the Etherpad for minute takers.
-Samita
From: 6lo [mailto:6lo-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ryan Hu
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2018 3:18 PM
To: Samita Chakrabarti
Cc: lo <6lo@ietf.org>
S
Great, Thank you Rahul!
Will update chairs’ slides with the information on minute takers and jabber.
-Samita
From: 6lo [mailto:6lo-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Rahul Jadhav
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2018 3:45 PM
To: Samita Chakrabarti
Cc: lo <6lo@ietf.org>
Subject: [E] Re: [6lo] L
Hello 6lo group,
Greetings!
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/102/materials/agenda-102-6lo-00
Please take a look at the uploaded agenda and make sure your requests are
properly noted.
For any changes, updates please send a note to 6lo-chairs.
Thanks!
-Samita
Hello 6lo:
It's that time again to request help on minute taking and jabber scribe...
Dominique always extends his help in minute taking and the co-chairs really
appreciate that.
Multiple minute takers are always welcome and the jabber scribe gets a star :)
Thanks,
Samita & Gabriel
Please check out
https://www.internetsociety.org/blog/2018/03/rough-guide-ietf-101-internet-things/
for IOT happenings at IETF101.
-Samita
___
6lo mailing list
6lo@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
53 matches
Mail list logo