Re: [6tisch] [6tisch-security] IP-IP-IP example?

Thomas Watteyne wrote: > - with IP-IP-IP, all nodes in the network would need to know at least > the global and link-local IPv6 addresses of the JRC, as well as the > IPv6 address of the LBR. You write "all-nodes", but can we agree that it's only the Join

[6tisch] IP-IP-IP example?

Michael, We just discussed IP-IP-IP versus CoAP at the 6TiSCH WG meeting. I stated that: - with IP-IP-IP, all nodes in the network would need to know at least the global and link-local IPv6 addresses of the JRC, as well as the IPv6 address of the LBR. - With the CoAP proxy option, we could use

Re: [6tisch] nits on draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-sf0-02

Great. So we can close this e-mail thread then. Thanks On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 2:54 PM, Prof. Diego Dujovne < diego.dujo...@mail.udp.cl> wrote: > Thomas, > During the last Webex I commented that > I used these comments to modify and correct > the draft. I eliminated (almost) every

Re: [6tisch] nits on draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-sf0-02

Thomas, During the last Webex I commented that I used these comments to modify and correct the draft. I eliminated (almost) every instance of "effectively used cell" and fixed the problems raised by Randy. Regards, Diego 2017-03-28 9:31 GMT-03:00 Thomas

Re: [6tisch] nits on draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-sf0-02

@Diego, @Authors, Any comments? Thomas On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Yasuyuki Tanaka < yasuyuki9.tan...@toshiba.co.jp> wrote: > Nice comments! > > I also want to see the definition of "effectively used cell" and > how to calculate PDR. > > In addition, I don't think that we would count the

[6tisch] 6TiSCH WG meeting @IETF98 in 3h46m

All, A reminder for those remote that the 6TiSCH session starts in a little less than 4 hours. You can join the live audio+video stream at https://ietf98.conf.meetecho.com/, and participate (almost) as if you were in Chicago. Thomas -- ___ Thomas Watteyne,