Re: [6tisch] Rekeying for minimal-security (was: Updates to minimal-security-06)

Michael Richardson wrote: > Mališa Vučinić wrote: >> Thanks Tero for this feedback! Could you check if this commit takes >> care of it: >> https://bitbucket.org/6tisch/draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-security/commits/ >>

Re: [6tisch] Rekeying for minimal-security (was: Updates to minimal-security-06)

Tero Kivinen wrote: > Or we could rename key_usage to key_usage_and_algorithm and split it so > that (key_usage_and_algorithm & 0x1f) is the actual key_usage, and > (key_usage_and_algorithm >> 5) is the algorithm id, which would still > encode

Re: [6tisch] Rekeying for minimal-security (was: Updates to minimal-security-06)

Mališa Vučinić wrote: > Thanks Tero for this feedback! Could you check if this commit takes > care of it: > https://bitbucket.org/6tisch/draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-security/commits/ > dee6cf8074f2 > The algorithm identifier is added, it is optional

Re: [6tisch] Rekeying for minimal-security (was: Updates to minimal-security-06)

Tero Kivinen wrote: > Note, that there is work ongoing in the IEEE to add algorithm agility > to the IEEE 802.15.4, i.e., make it possible to use other algorithms > than AES-CCM with 128-bit keys. To make it so that this structure would > also allow that it would

Re: [6tisch] Rekeying for minimal-security (was: Updates to minimal-security-06)

Mališa Vučinić writes: > Thanks Tero for this feedback! Could you check if this commit takes care of > it: > > https://bitbucket.org/6tisch/draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-security/commits/dee6cf8074f2 > > The algorithm identifier is added, it is optional and if it is not present the >

Re: [6tisch] Rekeying for minimal-security (was: Updates to minimal-security-06)

Thanks Tero for this feedback! Could you check if this commit takes care of it: https://bitbucket.org/6tisch/draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-security/commits/dee6cf8074f2 The algorithm identifier is added, it is optional and if it is not present the IEEE802154-AES-CCM-128 algorithm is assumed. Apart

Re: [6tisch] Rekeying for minimal-security (was: Updates to minimal-security-06)

On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 8:54 PM Michael Richardson wrote: > > > > I generalized the rekeying text so that it falls under the > processing rules > > of the CBOR Link-Layer Key parameter. The first join of a pledge just > > becomes a special case but there is a