Dear all,
FYI:
A new version of I-D, draft-papadopoulos-6tisch-pre-reqs-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Georgios Papadopoulos and posted to the
IETF repository.
Name: draft-papadopoulos-6tisch-pre-reqs
Revision: 00
Title: Exploiting Packet Replication
Hello (and all the best for 2018),
FYI, a new version of draft-papadopoulos-6tisch-pre-reqs-01.txt has been
submitted.
Cheers,
Georgios
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: internet-dra...@ietf.org
> Subject: New Version Notification for
> draft-papadopoulos-6tisch-pre-reqs-01.txt
> Date: De
Hello Xavier,
Thank you so much for your inputs.
I will come back with an updated version, and feedbacks to all your comments.
Thanks again,
Georgios
Georgios Z. Papadopoulos, Ph.D.
Associate Professor, IMT Atlantique
web: www.georgiospapadopoulos.com <h
Hello Pascal,
Please find my comments below.
Georgios
Section 1:
*/ RPL also leverages Routing Stretch to reduce further the amount of control
traffic and routing state that is required to operate the protocol.
GP> The concept of Routing Stretch is not clear to me.
*/ RPL can only provide a be
Hello Xavi and co-authors,
Many thanks for such draft. It is indeed something that we were missing here.
I found some time to go through, and below you will find my comments/questions:
——
“It is well-known that the smaller the guard time, the smaller the tolerated
drift between two nodes, and
Hello,
I like this work and I found it useful.
Some points that we discussed at the IETF 101 in London is already included,
e.g., pan priority, rank priority.
Cheers,
Georgios
> On Jun 15, 2018, at 16:53, Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
> wrote:
>
> Dear WG:
>
> As discussed during the last int
Dear 6TiSCH,
A new version (-02) for draft-papadopoulos-6tisch-pre-reqs has been submitted.
Many thanks Xavi for your review. I will come back asap with my response to
your comments.
Cheers,
Georgios
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: internet-dra...@ietf.org
> Subject: New Version Notifica
Hello Michael,
Many thanks for this work.
Going through the draft, I have a comment/question :
Considering that “The containing Enhanced Beacon is not encrypted.” (Section
3), is it necessary to include “rank priority” at L2 and, thus, revealing this
information?
Thanks,
Georgios
> On Jul 21
Hello Michael,
> On Sep 23, 2018, at 22:38, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
>
> Georgios Z. Papadopoulos wrote:
>> Many thanks for this work. Going through the draft, I have a
>> comment/question :
>
>> Considering that “The containing Enhanced Beacon is not
Hello Xavi,
Once again, many thanks for your valuable comments.
Please see my responses below.
Note that the review was done over the an older version
(draft-papadopoulos-6tisch-pre-reqs-00), while
(draft-papadopoulos-6tisch-pre-reqs-01) was already online.
I hope that the latest renamed versio
Hello Ines,
I have observed very few typos and one comment :
- time-slotted channel hopping (TSCH) —> Time-Slotted Channel Hopping (TSCH)
- (the "pledge)” —> (the “pledge”)
- "6LRs that see this DIO Option SHOULD increment the minimum priority if they
observe congestion on the channel used for
11 matches
Mail list logo
