>
>
>
> How does it compare performance wise with git9 ?
>
> https://github.com/oridb/git9
>
Based on the unscientific testing I just did of cloning the same repo
(dgit's) a few times, they're in the same ballpark (~13s on 9front amd64.)
git9 had a couple faster runs and dgit a couple slower
> Den tors 7 maj 2020 16:17Dave MacFarlane skrev:
>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 9:12 PM Sean Hinchee wrote:
>>
>>> As a footnote, there's a decent git client written in Go that works
>>> alright on plan9 [4], but it's slow and memory intensive at the
>>> moment.
>>>
>>>
>> [...]
>>
>> [4]
I don't know if he's on here, but Al Kossow (aek at bitsavers dot org), the
Software Curator at the Computer History Museum in Mountain View, CA
(SillyCon Valley, just down the road from the Googleplex) might be
interested in this, if he isn't already aware of what's going on. He's an
expert on
>
> If one is running a mail server and has it inside their firewall and if
> using one IP then t has to use NAT. Couldn't one presumeably use the setup
> above and run a mail server on Plan 9 and bypass having to use NAT? And
> also do the same thing for a web server?
Yes, I do that. The
> state of shiny for Plan 9 from your advantage point? It deserves a
since you posted this question to the list:
what is shiny?
--
9fans: 9fans
Permalink:
https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T303744e1ec6d2108-M24bd2c157af206cb71b81655
Delivery
fn detopicbox { ssam '
,x@\n\n-+.+\n.+\n.+\n.+\n@ g@^Permalink:
https:\/\/.+\.topicbox\.com@ g@^Delivery options: https:\/\/.+\.topicbox\.com@
d'
}
--
9fans: 9fans
Permalink:
