Hyper-V is negative for 2008r2.
Joel C. Salomon wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Federico G. Benavento
benave...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Joel C. Salomon joelcsalo...@gmail.com wrote:
My computer died, so I'm in the market for a new one. I figure I'd
like to get back into hacking on
I am agreed with Federico,
vmware. Do not spend time with other emulators.
El 15 de abr de 2010, 9:02 p.m., Federico G. Benavento
benave...@gmail.com escribió:
vmware, the rest just suck, qemu and virtual box being
the slowest
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Joel C. Salomon
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Federico G. Benavento
benave...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Joel C. Salomon joelcsalo...@gmail.com
wrote:
My computer died, so I'm in the market for a new one. I figure I'd
like to get back into hacking on Plan 9 so I plan to install it
From: 9fans-boun...@9fans.net [mailto:9fans-boun...@9fans.net] On Behalf Of
Rodolfo (kix)
Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 2:20 AM
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
Subject: Re: [9fans] Recommended emulators/VMs for P9 install
I am agreed with Federico,
vmware. Do not spend time with other
-Original Message-
From: 9fans-boun...@9fans.net [mailto:9fans-boun...@9fans.net] On Behalf Of
Joel C. Salomon
Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 10:51 AM
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
Subject: Re: [9fans] Recommended emulators/VMs for P9 install
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 2:56
On 16 Apr 2010, at 17:40, Patrick Kelly wrote:
From: 9fans-boun...@9fans.net [mailto:9fans-boun...@9fans.net] On
Behalf Of Rodolfo (kix)
Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 2:20 AM
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
Subject: Re: [9fans] Recommended emulators/VMs for P9 install
I am agreed
The only emulator you're spending time on is Qemu, the rest are
virtualizers or simulators, and there is a significant difference.
Emulators are much slower, because of what they have to do.
Qemu is capable of full emulation, but when host guest architecture match
(or are compatible,
This afternoon I downloaded a trial version of VM Fusion (Version
3.0.2 (232708)) and a fresh plan9.iso.bz2 and installed it on my core
2 due macbook running OS X Leopard (Version 10.5.8).
It works quite nicely, graphics and networking are both working. The
only things that tripped me up were I
On 16 Apr 2010, at 18:48, Patrick Kelly wrote:
The only emulator you're spending time on is Qemu, the rest are
virtualizers or simulators, and there is a significant difference.
Emulators are much slower, because of what they have to do.
Qemu is capable of full emulation, but when host
My computer died, so I'm in the market for a new one. I figure I'd
like to get back into hacking on Plan 9 so I plan to install it
beneath a VM in whatever machine I buy. I'm even considering Windows
7 Pro with Virtual PC, but I think I'd prefer Xen or one of the
Linux-based things (VirtualBox,
.
slds.
gabi
- Original Message
From: Joel C. Salomon joelcsalo...@gmail.com
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs 9fans@9fans.net
Sent: Thu, April 15, 2010 7:11:49 PM
Subject: [9fans] Recommended emulators/VMs for P9 install
My computer died, so I'm in the market for a new one
main issue is interrupt count does not go below 4000. . .need to dig more
into this, probably to compose a mail to the list :), but it does not hurt
too much, at least for now.
that shouldn't be happening unless you're doing a lot of disk/network
io.
if you're using 9atom, one would expect
i would think that 9vx is the logical choice for linux. the free
vmware player works well on vista and win7. i used qemu
for a while and it seemed stable and usable.
My computer died, so I'm in the market for a new one. I figure I'd
like to get back into hacking on Plan 9 so I plan to install
vmware, the rest just suck, qemu and virtual box being
the slowest
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Joel C. Salomon joelcsalo...@gmail.com wrote:
My computer died, so I'm in the market for a new one. I figure I'd
like to get back into hacking on Plan 9 so I plan to install it
beneath a VM in
On Thu Apr 15 14:57:21 EDT 2010, benave...@gmail.com wrote:
vmware, the rest just suck, qemu and virtual box being
the slowest
there are relatively easy things we could do to make virtual box better,
but as it doesn't run well on linux, it's hard to find the motivation.
- erik
Hello erik,
Thursday, April 15, 2010, 8:44:08 PM, you wrote:
main issue is interrupt count does not go below 4000. . .need to dig more
into this, probably to compose a mail to the list :), but it does not hurt
too much, at least for now.
that shouldn't be happening unless you're doing a
There are probably better file server configurations,
but essentially I don't really trust fossil from a performance
or stability standpoint.
it's curious that fossil is typically considered the only choice.
what about ...
- kfs
- cwfs
- ken's fs in another vm.
- erik
18 matches
Mail list logo
