Re: [9fans] clarification on man 9p

2009-10-03 Thread Fernan Bolando
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Russ Cox r...@swtch.com wrote: In general, the File interface is appropriate for maintaining arbitrary file trees (as in ramfs). The File interface is best avoided when the tree structure is easily generated as necessary; this is true when the tree is highly

Re: [9fans] clarification on man 9p

2009-10-03 Thread Gorka Guardiola
There is a version that is. Its source is with the library. - Curiosity sKilled the cat G. On Oct 3, 2009, at 11:26 AM, Fernan Bolando fernanbola...@mailc.net wrote: On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Russ Cox r...@swtch.com wrote: In general, the File interface is appropriate for

[9fans] clarification on man 9p

2009-10-02 Thread Fernan Bolando
Hi in man 9p In general, the File interface is appropriate for maintaining arbitrary file trees (as in ramfs). The File interface is best avoided when the tree structure is easily generated as necessary; this is true when the tree is highly structured (as in cdfs and nntpfs) or is maintained

Re: [9fans] clarification on man 9p

2009-10-02 Thread Russ Cox
In general, the File interface is appropriate for maintaining arbitrary file trees (as in ramfs). The File interface is best avoided when the tree structure is easily generated as necessary; this is true when the tree is highly structured (as in cdfs and nntpfs) or is maintained elsewhere.