Since I am building everything on Unix, and am using the Unix shell
(bash in my case), I had to rewrite much of the mkfile rules,
specifically ones that deal with loops, conditionals and substituting
outputs from commands. Because all those rules are simple, this was a
trivial task. I also
Yep, I did exactly the same. With kencc+a-few-patches+plan9port+few-symlinks
you can easily cross compile plan9.
See my kencc fork changes:
https://github.com/aryx/fork-kencc/commits/master
(and my fork 9 fork:
https://github.com/aryx/fork-plan9
)
On Jul 14, 2014, at 3:19 PM, David du Colombier
On Tue, 8 Jul 2014 02:10:37 +0200
Aleksandar Kuktin akuk...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014 17:41:35 +
Yoann Padioleau p...@fb.com wrote:
Hi,
I was able to cross compile Plan9 from MacOS which is probably quite
similar to cross compiling from Linux.
The first thing was
do you mean size using the size command or size using ls -l?
On 9 July 2014 01:10, kokam...@hera.eonet.ne.jp wrote:
I got a little bit big size of it by compiling it on my 386
Plan9 machine than doing on pi itself.
Is this natural?
Kenji
do you mean size using the size command or size using ls -l?
Yes, however I know now two edittion of the 9pi sources,
one on my 386 mashin, and the other on my pi machine
are slightly different each other. Sorry my noise.
Kenji
I got a little bit big size of it by compiling it on my 386
Plan9 machine than doing on pi itself.
Is this natural?
Kenji
Hi,
I was able to cross compile Plan9 from MacOS which is probably quite similar
to cross compiling from Linux.
The first thing was to compile the plan9 C compilers
on MacOS. I used https://code.google.com/p/ken-cc/ because this fork
of the Plan9 C compilers are easier to compile on non-plan9
this is an interesting exercise; however, it is much harder than it needs
to be. perhaps you have other reasons for doing it the hard way.
i posit that bringing up plan9 on qemu and compiling /sys/src is faster
than compiling on macos: kencc+p9p+cross compile plan9 and bring up plan9
on qemu. i
On 7 July 2014 19:21, Skip Tavakkolian skip.tavakkol...@gmail.com wrote:
i posit that bringing up plan9 on qemu and compiling /sys/src is faster
than compiling on macos: kencc+p9p+cross compile plan9 and bring up plan9
on qemu. i would be happy to be proven wrong.
yes, i think it might.
on
On 7 July 2014 18:41, Yoann Padioleau p...@fb.com wrote:
The first thing was to compile the plan9 C compilers
on MacOS. I used https://code.google.com/p/ken-cc/ because this fork
of the Plan9 C compilers are easier to compile on non-plan9 OSes.
I'm (slowly, as usual) bringing those up to
Hi,
Thx a lot Charles for
On 7 July 2014 19:47, Yoann Padioleau p...@fb.com wrote:
The main issues I had were related to Rune incompatibilities. See:
An annoying change to get not much (have a look at some of the crud they
stuff into that enlarged space),
but that will also be changed to match the current versions.
On 5 July 2014 14:13, Aleksandar Kuktin akuk...@gmail.com wrote:
Are there any pointers or short instructions or a HOWTO or something
similar on the art of cross-compiling Plan 9 from Linux?
It would be easier to compile using 9vx under Linux, or a virtual plan 9
machine in qemu under Linux.
13 matches
Mail list logo
