Eric Forgeot wrote -
>I thought it was a good idea to use 2 K: fields to write both the
>mode and the key, but this solution of K:D % EDorian is maybe
>better. Will you forgive me if I use it in the future ? :)
Wouldn't it be better and less misleading to be able to say K:^f^c % EDorian
or bet
> That depends. Do you just want the information to be
present
> somewhere in the headers? Or would you like software to be
able to
> use the information sensibly?
both if possible. I want pple to be able to find again this tune
if they had only the tune somewhere else, or to come bac
- Original Message -
From: "Wil Macaulay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "abcusers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 8:18 PM
Subject: [abcusers] Announce: Skink version 1.0a5
> See
> http://www.geocities.com/w_macaulay/skink.html
>
> Version 1.0a5 June 19 2002
> New Features
>So you plan to create a new notation ?
>Will it be a descriptive one ?
See "The School of Classical Dance"
by V. Kostrovitskaya and A. Pisarev,
translated by John Barker.
and "101 Classical Dance Lessons"
by V. Kostorvitskaya, translated by John Barker.
The former is a complete description of
>The two symbolic notations I'm aware of are Labanotation and
Banesh
>notation (a bit simpler version). You might want to look into
that.
Yes, I talked in my last email about Don Herbison-Evans' software
to handle Labanotation system, and create movies of people dancing
from a Labanoation coding
