> I don't think this is correct. As I understand it, aria-atomic requires that
> the region be reported as a whole for any change within the subtree, no
> matter how small. Also, notifications still depend on aria-relevant.
Ok, got it.
> True when this live region (i.e. this object and its subtre
On 22/08/2012 11:45 AM, Alexander Surkov wrote:
How's this: True when this object and its subtree should be presented as a
whole, when changes within it are considered important enough to be
presented automatically.
maybe: True when the fractional changes in the object subtree should
be collecte
Hi, Pete.
> How's this: True when this object and its subtree should be presented as a
> whole, when changes within it are considered important enough to be
> presented automatically.
maybe: True when the fractional changes in the object subtree should
be collected and presented as a whole.
at l
Alex, I see I missed #3 and #4. See below...
On 8/21/12 4:51 AM, Alexander Surkov wrote:
> Hi, Pete. Few notes.
>
> 1) "explicit-name" description looks a little bit complicated. The
> following short sentence explains well the idea of the attribute:
> "A true value indicates that the accessible
It should be fine.
Thank you.
Alexander.
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Pete Brunet wrote:
>
> On 8/21/12 4:51 AM, Alexander Surkov wrote:
>
> Hi, Pete. Few notes.
>
> 1) "explicit-name" description looks a little bit complicated. The
> following short sentence explains well the idea of the a
On 8/21/12 4:51 AM, Alexander Surkov wrote:
> Hi, Pete. Few notes.
>
> 1) "explicit-name" description looks a little bit complicated. The
> following short sentence explains well the idea of the attribute:
> "A true value indicates that the accessible name is different from,
> and more meaningful
On 21/08/2012 7:51 PM, Alexander Surkov wrote:
2) "sort".
> Comments: If the value is ascending or descending this indicates that an
object's items are sorted and the sorting algorithm used.
why is "items are sorted" not enough and it makes sense to mention the
sorting algorithm?
The problem
That'd be cool at least until it makes AT life harder.
Alex.
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:50 AM, James Teh wrote:
> On 15/08/2012 2:45 PM, Alexander Surkov wrote:
>>
>> Firefox exposes exactly what CSS display is. If the value is not
>> inline/block/inline-blcok then should it be mapped to one of
Hi, Pete. Few notes.
1) "explicit-name" description looks a little bit complicated. The
following short sentence explains well the idea of the attribute:
"A true value indicates that the accessible name is different from,
and more meaningful than, the text that is returned from
IAccessibleText::te
