Re: [AI] Fw: FW: Recruitment rules!First thing is you have business to talk
about my quitting the group. As your abilities are exhausted, pleading with
the moderator is the last resort.
- Original Message -
From: Umesha Economics
To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in
Sent
Re: [AI] Fw: FW: Recruitment rules!Really I do not understand the double
standard of these people. once the moderator says to everyone to stop blaming
one another and another person says OK, thats right and in another mail he
continues the same bad habit. if that is the case, what
Re: [AI] Fw: FW: Recruitment rules!you are absolutely right, there seems groups
within the larger group.
- Original Message -
From: sanjay
To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 4:04 AM
Subject: Re: [AI] Fw: FW: Recruitment rules!
AS per my
: [AI] Fw: FW: Recruitment rules!you are absolutely right, there seems
groups within the larger group.
- Original Message -
From: sanjay
To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 4:04 AM
Subject: Re: [AI] Fw: FW: Recruitment rules!
AS per my
Re: [AI] Fw: FW: Recruitment rules!If your answers/arguments (strong) are
genuent, surely, thoses can be brought to the list irrespective to the
moderator's rulings. If you don't have time, why do you send such replies.
- Original Message -
From: Umesha Economics
To: Access
legal expert, Mr. Rajesh Asudani helped that person in
guiding him to the right channel. That person got the job by
following the advice.
On 2/27/12, P. Subramani subramani6...@gmail.com wrote:
Re: [AI] Fw: FW: Recruitment rules!you are absolutely right, there seems
groups within the larger
; accessindia@accessindia.org.in
Sent: Monday, 27 February, 2012 10:21 PM
Subject: Re: [AI] Fw: FW: Recruitment rules!
Re: [AI] Fw: FW: Recruitment rules!Although this group is not the
ultimate, since it is storehouse, hence people come here for needful.
Asking me to leave the group
Re: [AI] Fw: FW: Recruitment rules!Dear Kakarla, Thanks for your excellent
suggestions/comments. I am simultaneously followingup in the channels
suggested, surely, i may not have the right to criticize the listers, but for
this specific matter. I too have undergone the non-responses from
Re: [AI] Fw: FW: Recruitment rules!The blame shall be on you as well and the
entire community for being insesitive atleast till now. Your insensitive brain
is exposed with your insane which is worth flushing out.
- Original Message -
From: Amrit Pal Singh
To: accessindia
is not a scientific test of it.
Umesha
- Original Message -
From: P. Subramani subramani6...@gmail.com
To: Kakarla Nageswaraiah nageswara1...@gmail.com;
accessindia@accessindia.org.in
Sent: Sunday, 26 February, 2012 1:17 PM
Subject: Re: [AI] Fw: FW: Recruitment rules!
Re: [AI] Fw: FW
and update the list for any
assistance at any stage.
Umesha
- Original Message -
From: P. Subramani subramani6...@gmail.com
To: Amrit Pal Singh amritpa...@gmail.com;
accessindia@accessindia.org.in
Sent: Sunday, 26 February, 2012 1:06 PM
Subject: Re: [AI] Fw: FW: Recruitment rules!
Re
I, too, second your opinion.
- Original Message -
From: Umesha Economics umesha@gmail.com
To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2012 3:04 PM
Subject: Re: [AI] Fw: FW: Recruitment rules!
dear friends,
sorry for the late reply. Dear Subramani, first of all
Re: [AI] Fw: FW: Recruitment rules!these are just vague excuses. By mistake,
someone posts an off-topic matter, most if not all are up in arms against the
poster. I don't agree with the notion that subjectline doesn't indicate actual
matter. If off-topic mails can catch the attention of why
, second your opinion.
- Original Message -
From: Umesha Economics umesha@gmail.com
To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2012 3:04 PM
Subject: Re: [AI] Fw: FW: Recruitment rules!
dear friends,
sorry for the late reply. Dear Subramani, first of all, I
AS per my observations, unless you are personally/virtually known to many
people in a particular group, no matter how important the subject you raise,
your mails may not get the amount of attention as per your expectations.
Search for old postings at:
@accessindia.org.in
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2012 5:50 PM
Subject: Re: [AI] Fw: FW: Recruitment rules!
Re: [AI] Fw: FW: Recruitment rules!these are just vague excuses. By
mistake, someone posts an off-topic matter, most if not all are up in arms
against the poster. I don't agree with the notion
well said, sir.
- Original Message -
From: harish har...@accessindia.org.in
To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2012 8:38 PM
Subject: Re: [AI] Fw: FW: Recruitment rules!
Hi All
Let me make it very plainly, that every one here has come by his / her own
...@accessindia.org.in
To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2012 8:38 PM
Subject: Re: [AI] Fw: FW: Recruitment rules!
Hi All
Let me make it very plainly, that every one here has come by his / her own
will.
At no point of time we had made any claims that AI
Re: [AI] Fw: FW: Recruitment rules!I have strong answers to all of your
arguments. but I don't want to answer because of 2 reasons. 1. I have no time
for arguing for unproductive things and convincing the insensitive minds. 2.
the moderator has given his ruling and it would be inappropriate
[AI] FW: Recruitment rules!
- Original Message -
From: P. Subramani
To: Kotian, H P ; accessindia@accessindia.org.in
Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2012 1:06 PM
Subject: Re: [AI] FW: Recruitment rules!
Hello! I am apalled to see no response to this mail enquiry from any group
member on
While I completely agree with the need for people to respond to your
thoughts, which indeed are important. however, you must realise that,
responding or, not to any particular mails, is people's own decision.
I don't really think, you should this kind of things across to the
list.
On 2/25/12, P.
Re: [AI] Fw: FW: Recruitment rules!Although I agree with your contention of
listers' choice to respond or not, If it was limited to me or a few fine. But
this particular matter concerns the entire blind community especially the
employment seekers and and none seem to bother. So I am forced
you consult advocacy
cells set up by AICB, etc.? I too did not get response to my requests
a number of times but I never complained.
On 2/25/12, P. Subramani subramani6...@gmail.com wrote:
Re: [AI] Fw: FW: Recruitment rules!Although I agree with your contention of
listers' choice to respond
: Re: [AI] Fw: FW: Recruitment rules!
Hello,
Many a time, we don't get replies to our mails. In such cases, try to
forward or change the subject line to attract the attention of the
listers. Do not loose your ppatience; do not burst out with so many
negative comments. It doesn't matter whether
@accessindia.org.in
Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2012 6:25 PM
Subject: Re: [AI] Fw: FW: Recruitment rules!
Hello,
Many a time, we don't get replies to our mails. In such cases, try to
forward or change the subject line to attract the attention of the
listers. Do not loose your ppatience; do not burst out
and consider
that
he has the right to say anything to whole ccommunity.
- Original Message -
From: Kakarla Nageswaraiah nageswara1...@gmail.com
To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in
Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2012 6:25 PM
Subject: Re: [AI] Fw: FW: Recruitment rules!
Hello,
Many a time, we
-
From: Kakarla Nageswaraiah nageswara1...@gmail.com
To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in
Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2012 6:25 PM
Subject: Re: [AI] Fw: FW: Recruitment rules!
Hello,
Many a time, we don't get replies to our mails. In such cases, try to
forward or change the subject line
of the CCPD? Why don't you consult advocacy
cells set up by AICB, etc.? I too did not get response to my requests
a number of times but I never complained.
On 2/25/12, P. Subramani subramani6...@gmail.com wrote:
Re: [AI] Fw: FW: Recruitment rules!Although I agree with your
contention
Re: [AI] Fw: FW: Recruitment rules!Dear vamshi, I am in full agreement with
your thoughts of the usefullness of AI. What angers me is the fact this matter
has the implication for the entire community and the silence of listers gives a
terrible disregard for such matters. I don't wish to cast
Re: [AI] Fw: FW: Recruitment rules!Dear Vivek, I am in total agreements with
your views and hence my angry mails.
- Original Message -
From: VIVEK KAVYA
To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2012 9:13 AM
Subject: Re: [AI] Fw: FW: Recruitment rules
Re: [AI] Fw: FW: Recruitment rules!Dear Hazifa, Nice to know that I am alone on
this subject, there are many in the same boat.
- Original Message -
From: Hozefa Tambawala
To: accessindia@accessindia.org.in
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2012 9:00 AM
Subject: Re: [AI] Fw: FW
Re: [AI] Fw: FW: Recruitment rules!Dear Akhilesh, Thank you for your
observations and your efforts to do the needful in this matter. With due to
the habits of you and all, this FW mail was routed through the moderator so as
to catch the attention of all. My anger is that we are unable
32 matches
Mail list logo
