Hi Dan,
I think the Echo option should be workable for your case (and in fact would
provide an example of a case where the "time-limited single-use
cryptographic nonce" that I had asked about in my review of
draft-ietf-core-echo-request-tag might be applicable).
I expect the URI-Query proposal
Hi ace wg, chairs, Ben,
We have submitted an update to the OSCORE profile that addresses all comments
from the IESG, and have answered the ADs individually.
Thanks,
Francesca
On 14/04/2021, 18:33, "Ace on behalf of internet-dra...@ietf.org"
wrote:
A New Internet-Draft is available
Hi Lars,
Thank you very much for the review! We have incorporated your changes in the
newly submitted v-18
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ace-oscore-profile-18 ,
including many good changes from the GenART review from Elwyn.
Answers inline.
Thanks again,
Francesca
On
Hi Zahed,
Thank you very much for the review! We have incorporated your changes in the
newly submitted v-18
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ace-oscore-profile-18 , but
you can also see the specific changes in the github:
Hi Murray!
Thank you very much for the review! We have incorporated your changes in the
newly submitted v-18
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ace-oscore-profile-18 , but
you can also see the specific changes in the github commit:
Hi Roman!
Thank you very much for the review! We have incorporated your changes in the
newly submitted v-18
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ace-oscore-profile-18 , but
you can also see the specific changes in the github commits:
Hi Elwyn,
Thank you very much for the in depth review! We have incorporated your changes
in the newly submitted v-18
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ace-oscore-profile-18 , but
you can also see the specific changes in the github:
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Authentication and Authorization for
Constrained Environments WG of the IETF.
Title : OSCORE Profile of the Authentication and
Authorization for Constrained
Hi,
I do not see this as an issue but would like the WG to state their opinion.
Yours,
Daniel
From: Cigdem Sengul
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2021 9:01 AM
To: Daniel Migault
Cc: Daniel Migault ; Ace Wg
Subject: Re: [Ace] MQTT, OSCORE, DTLS profiles -
Hello Daniel,
I should clarify: I did not mean it was not compliant - it was more asking
whether anybody objects to registering ace+json when the framework talks
about a different method.
Kind regards,
--Cigdem
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 1:50 PM Daniel Migault
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am certainly
Hi,
I am certainly missing something, but it is unclear to me why
"application/ace+json" does not comply to "application/x-www-form-urlencoded".
In other words, what would the update of the mqtt draft consist of to be
aligned with the framework. I also have the impression that the use of
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Authentication and Authorization for
Constrained Environments WG of the IETF.
Title : Message Queuing Telemetry Transport (MQTT)-TLS
profile of Authentication and
Hello Daniel,
One thing I didn't have a chance to ask yesterday in the interim was about
the registration of the 'ace+json' application type.
Francesca brought this up as the MQTT profile describes the HTTPS
interactions differently than the core draft which says " When HTTP is
used as a
13 matches
Mail list logo
