Re: [Ace] draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-10.txt: Leaving implementers in the dark

2018-02-19 Thread Ludwig Seitz
On 2018-02-18 17:45, Carsten Bormann wrote: On Feb 18, 2018, at 08:35, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: Hi Carsten, We should maybe add that this information is provisioned either during manufacturing, via a commissioning tool or some other mechanisms. Not sure whether this will indeed add more but

Re: [Ace] Working group adoption of draft-vanderstok-ace-est

2018-02-19 Thread Hannes Tschofenig
I support the adoption of this document. My concerns with earlier versions of the document have been addressed with the recent draft updates. I have read the latest version of the draft and I believe it is even ready for a working group last call once adopted. Ciao Hannes PS: Sorry for my late

Re: [Ace] draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-10.txt: Leaving implementers in the dark

2018-02-19 Thread Michael Richardson
Ludwig Seitz wrote: > I agree that onboarding is a valid concern (which is why I wrote > appendix B), > but lets not delay draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz any further by adding a whole > new set of functionality in it. Back at the beginning of ACE it was clear that onboarding was an