[Ace] Draft agenda for London

2018-03-13 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
Hi all, I just (belatedly) posted a draft agenda to the datatracker (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/agenda-101-ace/), also copied below. Please holler if there are obvious bugs, you requested time but didn't get a response, etc. I know it's a little bit of short notice, but to the speakers: pl

Re: [Ace] draft-ietf-ace-coap-est-00

2018-03-13 Thread Michael Richardson
peter van der Stok wrote: >> * In section 6- All proxies are required by CoAP blocking to re-assemble >> the entire message at the proxy. It can re-block things going to the next >> proxy. While there is no requirement that the proxy get the entire message >> before sending o

Re: [Ace] draft-ietf-ace-coap-est-00

2018-03-13 Thread Michael Richardson
Jim Schaad wrote: > In section 2 - There will be a problem in that the port format extension is > being eliminated in TLS 1.3 - We may want to divide this into a 1.2 and 1.3 > section for clarity. I don't understand what you are referring to. What is the "port format extension" yo

Re: [Ace] draft-ietf-ace-coap-est-00

2018-03-13 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 09:44:37PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote: > > Jim Schaad wrote: > > In section 2 - There will be a problem in that the port format > extension is > > being eliminated in TLS 1.3 - We may want to divide this into a 1.2 and > 1.3 > > section for clarity. > >