Jim Schaad <i...@augustcellars.com> wrote:
    > In section 2 - There will be a problem in that the port format extension 
    > being eliminated in TLS 1.3 - We may want to divide this into a 1.2 and 
    > section for clarity.

I don't understand what you are referring to.

What is the "port format extension" you are referring to, and where in
section 2 do you think we are depending upon it?

I'm thinking that you are jumping to a conclusion based upon some poorly
written text on our part :-)

But, since I think all the authors are ignorant of that extension, we must be
misleading you unintentionally.

Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Ace mailing list

Reply via email to