Re: [Acme] IETF 97 follow-up PRs

2016-11-29 Thread Richard Barnes
Could you please click the button on GH to indicate that? :) On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 4:01 PM, Jacob Hoffman-Andrews wrote: > On 11/29/2016 01:00 PM, Richard Barnes wrote: > > Updated: > > > > https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/208 > LGTM >

Re: [Acme] IETF 97 follow-up PRs

2016-11-29 Thread Jacob Hoffman-Andrews
On 11/29/2016 01:00 PM, Richard Barnes wrote: > Updated: > > https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/208 LGTM ___ Acme mailing list Acme@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme

Re: [Acme] IETF 97 follow-up PRs

2016-11-28 Thread Martin Thomson
On 29 November 2016 at 13:37, Richard Barnes wrote: > I actually thought you were the one that suggested we keep the "status" > fields :) The minutes not being dispositive, I pulled up the audio > recording of the meeting ([1], around 35:00), and didn't find anything there >

Re: [Acme] IETF 97 follow-up PRs

2016-11-28 Thread Jacob Hoffman-Andrews
On 11/18/2016 05:11 PM, Richard Barnes wrote: > #207 - Change agreementRequired to userActionRequired > https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/207 LGTM > > #208 - Remove the 'requirements' abstraction > https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/208 Posted feedback:

Re: [Acme] IETF 97 follow-up PRs

2016-11-23 Thread Richard Barnes
PRs have been updated to address comments. On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Daniel McCarney wrote: > I added some minor editorial feedback on #207[0] and #208[1]. > > Thanks for collecting these up Richard! > > [0] - https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/207 > [1] -

[Acme] IETF 97 follow-up PRs

2016-11-18 Thread Richard Barnes
Hey ACME folks, I've posted a few PRs implementing decisions made at the F2F: #207 - Change agreementRequired to userActionRequired https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/207 #208 - Remove the 'requirements' abstraction https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/208 #209 - Add an external