MessageHi, all.
Active Directory, Windows 2000, SP3, no exchange prep.
Please restrain yourselves from asking *why* do you want to do this?. If
you'd like to know, give me a shout offlist.
I need to grant permissions for SELF to change the First Name and Last Name
(givenName, sn in LDAP
Not every property of an object is listed in the Active Directory Users and Computers
interface. The number of properties is quite large so the interface only displays
those that are commonly used for controlling access. This makes the list easier to
manage.
The list of filtered object types
Last name is sn for Surname. You can use a script with PutEx for this,
I think.
Amit Zinman
Systems Consultant
Integrity Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
03-7522424
058-326753
-Original Message-
From: Andy Grafton [mailto:orangerover;hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 11:27 AM
To:
Hello everyone,
I know this is off topic but you guys and girls always give good advice.
I have been getting event Ids 116, 118 and 200 a lot in my application log.
The chain of events went like this
I installed SP3 for W2K
The next day the Exchange Database went through some type of
So let's see. You call PSS, and then argue with what they're telling you to
do.. Hmmm..
-1018 errors are database corruption, and the only fix it to go back to tape
before the corruption. Sounds pretty logical to me.
--
Roger D. Seielstad -
I had a somewhat similar situation. The difference being that my backups were not
working correctly (another story). So restoring a good backup of the exchange db was
not possible.
I ended resolving the issue by ESEUTIL /P to repair the db errors and later running
ISINTEG -fix a couple of
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=116source=
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=118source=
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=200source=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner;mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of Salandra,
Justin A.
Sent:
David I have already looked at these but thank you
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:discussions;entrysecurity.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange -1018 Error
Tony your advice was spot on. Changing the values as suggested got me what
I wanted.
Now I can add anything I like to the Permissions list in the dialogue box
(and, in fact, remove those I don't like!), which means that we can stick
with a standard and easily understandable interface.
Many
Justin,
I want to go on record as saying that no, SP3 did NOT cause these errors
- at least in my experience with our farm of Exchange 2k servers and
Exchange 5.5 servers.
The only time that we have seen this has been due to a severe corruption
of the database (specifically .edb) and a restore
Well following on from this I'll mention Big Brother - we use it on 100 plus servers,
Windows and Unix. Its Open Source and its free.
There's a fairly rich set of scripts that have been developed and shared by the user
community to cater for those things not monitored by
the basic product.
dave
Agreed, except that it is not free for commercial use.
-Original Message-
From: Thornley, Dave H [mailto:D.H.Thornley;shu.ac.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 4:02 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Monitoring AD
Well following on from this I'll mention Big Brother
Id go with what MS is recommending. Ive gone both ways (with regards to Exchange 5.5)
in restoring a known good database and replaying the transaction logs and having to
recover a corrupted database. I would just make sure to copy off all the contents of
your exchsrvr\mdbdata contents
Well of course, once the logs fill up and crash the drive, your users will
have problems then :0
I would definitely stick with PSS on this. Just curious however, have you
attempted a full online backup with plain ol NTBACKUP?
-Original Message-
From: Salandra, Justin A.
No I haven't
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:DavidA;veronissuhler.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 10:21 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject:RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange -1018 Error
Well of course, once the logs fill up and crash the drive, your users
Title: Message
This
is an example of why it would be nice if the object GUID of the security
principal that performed the write was included in the metadata for
themodified object. I mentioned this to one of the AD developers
during the MEC AD Community session, and he said he would take it
Oops - one of the benefits of working for a university Their 'Better then Free'
licence might still exempt you from paying for all
copies you install though
dave
-Original Message-
From: Andries Thijssen [mailto:Andries.Thijssen;infopulse.nl]
Sent: 12 November 2002 15:18
To:
Title: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange -1018 Error
Having been through this myself I'm only going to add my condolences.
One of our administrators was using her Deleted Items folder to store all the stuff she wanted to keep. It was a classic from the CDW commercialsFred? Where do you put
That is correct - logs don't get flushed unless you do a full backup, not a
differential.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
8.5 and Exchange 2000
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:DavidA;veronissuhler.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 12:47 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange -1018 Error
What version are using? I run differential file backups every weekday
along
Thanks for the info, I have asked MS by e-mail if I could do a eseutil /mh
priv.mdb output.txt, if they say yes I will do it tonight. Also I do not
have circular logging enabled.
-Original Message-
From: Burns, Clyde [mailto:Clyde.Burns;nortonhealthcare.org]
Sent: Tuesday,
You may want to upgrade to 8.6 + latest build. Whether that is an issue with
8.5, I do not know, but there are a heck of a lot of fixes in 8.6
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Shawn.Hayes;compass.net]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 1:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Title: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange -1018 Error
When you
went through it did you have your users working with out problems. My users are currently experiencing no
problems
-Original
Message-
From: Al Garrett
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002
11:16 AM
Roger, I don't think you read the last message completely. Exchange was
set to do a Full backup and Flush the logs, but that job specification
was part of a file system differential job.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November
Which can't work. Especially with ArcServe.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Shawn.Hayes;compass.net]
Sounds good to me. Thank you for your message.
Marco Bombardi
Globe Center AMS
Infrastructure Technology
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office: +1 818 549.6153
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:JSchwartz;BBandT.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 6:24 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
We are using ARCServe, and will be making the switch to Backup Exec 8.6 next
year
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Shawn.Hayes;compass.net]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 10:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Exchange -1018 Error
Title: Message
No
offense Justin, but what are you waiting for? 1018s are bad news and the sooner
you get to work on this and follow PSS's recommendations the better.
It
will bite you in the a$$ if you attempt to work around this.
-Original Message-From: Salandra, Justin
Can AD become corrupted? If so, can it be fixed with anything other
than restoring from backup?
Eric Etheredge, MCDBA
Systems Manager
Office of the Standing Trustee
Walter O'Cheskey, Trustee
Lubbock, Texas
Trustee's Website: www.ch13-12westtex.org
Case Information Website: www.trustee13.com
Yes it can. It is sometimes possible to repair it with ntdsutil or
esentutl.
see http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q315131 and
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q305500
Tim Hines, MCSA, MCSE (2000 NT4)
MVP - Active Directory
- Original
Very early in our AD deployment we had one server reporting AD corruption.
The other servers were OK. We simply demoted the server, waited for
replication so that the server was removed from AD and re-promoted the
server. At this point it got a new copy of the database and problem solved.
Not
Hi Justin,
I've experienced exactly what you describe (certain cr@p array controllers
not doing their job), and restoring the LAST GOOD backup and replaying the
logs is exactly the way to go IF your logs are on a separate spindle set.
If not, there is a good chance that one or more of the log
Title: Message
The reason I am waiting on this is because this server is my forest
root, my Exchange server, my DNS server to the Internet, my WINS server and my
Intranet Server all in one. If I
could find a way to fix the problem quickly while fixing the server online I
would avoid down
[Regarding the monitoring comparison]
I got a response from HP that I should send this URL to you guys.
http://www.openview.hp.com/products/smartplugins/spis/Documents/Product_
HTML-516.asp
Regards,
/Jimmy
--
Jimmy Andersson, Q Advice AB
Microsoft MVP - Active Directoryv
Whistler Tech Beta
Diane did this server have any FSMOs you had to move or was it a Global
Catalog Server?
-Original Message-
From: Ayers, Diane [mailto:DMA8;pge.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 2:58 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Question about Active Directory
Very early in
I have just learned that the company that does my backups may have
overwritten my most recent good backup with a bad one. This will be
confirmed for me tomorrow morning by the actual person responsible since he
was out today. Since I may not have a good backup, I think I may just have
to do the
Does this mean I get a free bar of chocolate? g
-Original Message-
From: Bombardi,Marco,GLENDALE,GC AMS - eMAD
[mailto:Marco.Bombardi;us.nestle.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 1:38 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Monitoring AD
Sounds good to me. Thank you for
Title: Message
Do you
have another machine you can install Exchange on that would hold your
store?
If so
I would recommend adding another machine to your site and moving stuff off of
this machine as soon as possible.
If you
do not have this ability then I would let management know how bad
I've yet to do a real product comparison between the NMS vendors. From my
initial observations I felt that HP was the best at doing the actual
monitoring across multiple platforms. They don't have the ability to monitor
the mainframe systems either.
My real issue comes down to how these products
Hi Justin,
A restore will only stop Exchange services while the restore is happening.
Running ESEUtil only requires that Exchange services be stopped, so you can
leave the other services running, serving your users while you are fixing
your Exchange problem.
Sorry to hear about your last good
I'm still new here... :-)
Marco Bombardi
Globe Center AMS
Infrastructure Technology
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office: +1 818 549.6153
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:JSchwartz;BBandT.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 12:21 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE:
Try
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/product.cfm?id=785
ActiveAdministrator
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner;mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of Eric
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 14:29
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] Question about Active
Title: Message
Robbie
-
I
agree 100%, and will voice that same opinion the next time I'm able to.
The fact that the auditing mechanism is the only way to find out what happened
is inadequate, for the reasons that I stated (group membership, built-in users,
etc.) and more, to be sure.
I
Just don't tell Dave's Legal Dept that.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:ActiveDir-owner;mail.activedir.org] On Behalf Of Andries
Thijssen
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 10:18
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Monitoring AD
Agreed, except that it
Last weekend, we demoted 233 DCs. We went from a branch deployment to a
region deployment of DCs.
I noticed to today that although the DCs demoted, removed the computer
accounts from the DC OU, removed the entry in the SYSTEM folder under the
SYSVOL FRS volumes, the demoted DCs did not remove
45 matches
Mail list logo
