Of Chinnery, Paul
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 1:01 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Protecting against Spyware/Adware
Well, I guess you'd have to define has. We run a hospital IS from a
major healthcare s/ware vendor that has instructions on its customer
website
. Preemptively giving rights to the keys was much faster.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Steve Rochford
Sent: Mon 9/18/2006 4:56 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Protecting against Spyware/Adware
One of the problems with tweaking
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Protecting against Spyware/Adware
One of the problems with tweaking permissions etc is that it can take a
long time to get it right and you leave yourself in an unsupported
position. As an example, we use a package called QL (from
AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Protecting against Spyware/Adware
If the vendor supported the Designed for Windows XP logo they would
support non admin.
The reality is that these vendors can code in a Win98 world because we
the buying public do not care. As long
, September 18, 2006 10:20 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Protecting against Spyware/Adware
If the vendor supported the Designed for Windows XP logo they would
support non admin.
The reality is that these vendors can code in a Win98 world because we
the buying
it
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks
[MVP]
Sent: Mon 18/09/2006 19:56
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Protecting against Spyware/Adware
We need to ask the vendor to step up to the plate. (have I said I'm
big
ED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Chinnery,
PaulSent: Thursday, September
14, 2006 11:04 AMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Protecting
against Spyware/Adware
We're using CounterSpy
Enterprise from Sunbelt Software. Like you, we have seen aperformance hit*
14, 2006 3:11 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Protecting against Spyware/Adware
Nonadmin
I peronally have had way less issues when users that don't need admin
rights don't have them.
Chinnery, Paul wrote:
We're using CounterSpy Enterprise from Sunbelt Software
Return Receipt
Your RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Protecting against Spyware/Adware
document
Return Receipt
Your RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Protecting against Spyware/Adware
document
2) Spy ware hangs around for a long time. Our users used to have admin
rights so there is a lot of legacy spyware around
Create a project to re-build these machines? If you've got a standard
deployment image for workstations, this might not be too disruptive.
3) We still have business
Return Receipt
Your RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Protecting against Spyware/Adware
document
One help might be to run in admin mode (since you have to) but
launch ie and outlook from shortcuts which run as unprivileged accounts - that
might cut down on SOME vectors. HTH(PS - the following
info from Mark Russinovich uses this approach - I can't get it to open on blogger (it's from
.
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Chris
Pohlschneider
*Sent:* 14 September 2006 20:15
*To:* ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
*Subject:* RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Protecting against Spyware/Adware
I have not done a lot of research on this, but if you
Return Receipt
Your RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Protecting against Spyware/Adware
document
- SBS Rocks [MVP]
Sent: 15 September 2006 14:53
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Protecting against Spyware/Adware
www.threatcode.com
and those business critical apps are?
Have you tried hacking up the registry to get them to work?
Dave Wade wrote:
Chris,
I
/technet/technetmag/issues/2006/08/LUABugs/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chinnery, Paul
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 7:15 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Protecting against Spyware/Adware
I agree
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob MOIR
Sent: 15 September 2006 13:50
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Protecting against Spyware/Adware
2) Spy ware hangs around for a long time. Our users used to have
admin
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Crawford, Scott
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 11:56 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Protecting against Spyware/Adware
I'm sure there are apps that are written exceptionally stupidly
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Protecting against Spyware/Adware
2) Spy ware hangs around for a long time. Our users used to have
admin
rights so there is a lot of legacy spyware around
Create a project to re-build these machines? If you've got a standard
deployment
Return Receipt
Your RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Protecting against Spyware/Adware
document
: Friday, September 15, 2006 1:01 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Protecting against Spyware/Adware
Well, I guess you'd have to define has. We run a hospital IS from a
major healthcare s/ware vendor that has instructions on its customer
website on making a couple
We're
using CounterSpy Enterprise from Sunbelt Software. Like you, we have seen
aperformance hit* on computers with just 128 meg of memory but that goes away
when we add more memory. The only issue I ran into, other than
performance, was it blocked a cookie that was necessary for our
Had Trend OfficeScan with Damage Cleanup Service on somewhere
between 60K and 90K devices. Worked great, they had graphs showing how well it
worked based on some custom data collection they did.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
c - 312.731.3132
From:
[EMAIL
Chris,
I gather we tweaked ours so it only used a certain % of system
resources (20% I think) and while it does have some impact on performance it
does seem "livable with" now they have done that..
Dave.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris
Nobody runs as a local administrator. We have zero issues with spyware.
Coincidence?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Chris Pohlschneider
Sent: Thu 9/14/2006 9:44 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] OT: Protecting against
Nonadmin
I peronally have had way less issues when users that don't need admin
rights don't have them.
Chinnery, Paul wrote:
We're using CounterSpy Enterprise from Sunbelt Software. Like you, we
have seen aperformance hit* on computers with just 128 meg of memory
but that goes away when we
Return Receipt
Your RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Protecting against Spyware/Adware
document
: Thursday, September 14, 2006
11:04 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT:
Protecting against Spyware/Adware
We're using CounterSpy Enterprise from
Sunbelt Software. Like you, we have seen aperformance hit* on computers
with just 128 meg of memory but that goes away when
: [ActiveDir] OT: Protecting against
Spyware/Adware
Had Trend OfficeScan
with Damage Cleanup Service on somewhere between 60K and 90K devices. Worked
great, they had graphs showing how well it worked based on some custom
data collection they did.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
Are all of your users in power user group
or user group of their workstation?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Crawford, Scott
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006
11:33 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT:
Protecting
Nope.
Crawford, Scott wrote:
Nobody runs as a local administrator. We have zero issues with spyware.
Coincidence?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Chris Pohlschneider
Sent: Thu 9/14/2006 9:44 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] OT:
]
W:www.quostar.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley,
CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
Sent: 14 September 2006 20:11
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Protecting against Spyware/Adware
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Protecting against Spyware/Adware
Nobody runs as a local administrator. We have zero issues with spyware.
Coincidence?
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Chris Pohlschneider
Sent: Thu 9/14/2006 9:44 AM
To: ActiveDir
] OT:
Protecting against Spyware/Adware
Are all of your users in power user group
or user group of their workstation?
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Crawford, Scott
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006
11:33 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE
I didn't think so :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley,
CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 3:33 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Protecting against Spyware/Adware
? -anon
From: joeSent: Thu 9/14/2006 3:03 PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Protecting against Spyware/Adware
I run as local admin and have zero issues with spyware? Coincidence?
;o)
--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm
@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Protecting
against Spyware/Adware
Yes. You run Mac.
LOL
Sincerely,
_
(, / |
/)
/) /) /---| (/_
__ ___// _ // _ )
/ |_/(__(_) //
(_(_)(/_(_(_/(__(/_(_/
/)
(/ Microsoft MVP - Directory
Serviceswww.akomolafe.com- we know IT-5.75, -3.23Do
Touche
8-)
Mike Thommes
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006
5:04 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT:
Protecting against Spyware/Adware
I run as local admin and have zero issues
Thommes
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *joe
*Sent:* Thursday, September 14, 2006 5:04 PM
*To:* ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
*Subject:* RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Protecting against Spyware/Adware
I
40 matches
Mail list logo
