criteria.
Silvia Hagen
Chair Swiss IPv6 Council
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-wg-boun...@ripe.net] Im Auftrag
von Marco Schmidt
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 24. November 2016 14:20
An: address-policy-wg@ripe.net
Betreff: [address-policy-wg] 2016-05 New
Go for it! :-)
+1
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-wg-boun...@ripe.net] Im Auftrag
von Sander Steffann
Gesendet: Montag, 8. Februar 2016 21:24
An: RIPE Address Policy Working Group
Betreff: [address-policy-wg] Working group chair rotation 2
Hello
2015 13:51
An: Silvia Hagen
Cc: address-policy-wg@ripe.net
Betreff: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2015-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis
Published (Assessment Criteria for IPv6 Initial Allocation Size)
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 11:31:54AM +, Silvia Hagen wrote:
There is a widely adopted
This thread is like a great piece of comedy, thanks for entertainment
Silvia
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-wg-boun...@ripe.net] Im Auftrag
von Elvis Daniel Velea
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. Juni 2015 16:16
An: address-policy-wg@ripe.net
Betreff: Re:
Support it
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-wg-boun...@ripe.net] Im Auftrag
von Marco Schmidt
Gesendet: Montag, 8. Juni 2015 15:43
An: policy-annou...@ripe.net
Cc: address-policy-wg@ripe.net
Betreff: [address-policy-wg] 2015-02 Draft Document and
Hi all
I support this proposal
+1
From my background as Chair of the Swiss IPv6 Council and many years of working
with large organizations such as enterprises and governments, I know that
basing an allocation size on number of users and size of network is not
sufficient and does not allow
