At a guess from the Novell SAP tables, the object is an old NetWare
3.x (or earlier) server object in the tree, or an old print
server/queue. If it is an old queue then print queues are marked as
deny read/write IIRC, so it is as expected. It could also be a box
with NCPFS running.
If you get
Hi Jim!
I know that this will involve running reclamation on the ATA storage pool
but we felt using a DISK device class would waste to much storage because of
fragmentation.
Why did you think fragmentation was a waste of space? If a file expires, the
space it allocated on a diskpool becomes free
Good day,
below is my license information :- As you can see all is okay but it still
fails to validate the license.
Please help
Last License Audit 2004-06-01 14:57:55.00
Number of space management clients in use 0
Number of space management clients licensed 0
Is Tivoli Disaster Recovery
try an AUDIT LICENSE for recounting
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von
Crawford, L. (Lindy)
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 2. Juni 2004 12:16
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: Anr2841w Server is NOT IN COMPLIANCE with license terms.
Good
Hi
Ive tried that so many times already...
-Original Message-
From: Schaub Joachim Paul ABX-SECE-ZH [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02 June 2004 12:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AW: Anr2841w Server is NOT IN COMPLIANCE with license terms.
try an AUDIT LICENSE for recounting
I suggest that you read the actlog from your last startup. TSM loads the
licences and explains if there is a problem.
You may need to re-copy the licence files and adsmlicn.dll(Windows) from the
multi-coloured installation CD for your server current version.
If that doesn't fix it, run the
Have you done a search on that error number at the IBM site?
A possible cause is the computer's clock being wrong.
Richard Sims
Hello everyone!
I was just wondering if anyone would happen to know how to create an admin
schedule that will archive a specific servers f:\archive filesystem on the
third day of every month for 365 days? I know that I will need an MC of
365 for an archive copy group, but how is it possible to
Yes . . . exactly.
From reading about the EMC DL700, it truly emuilates tape libraries, tape
drives and tape cartridges. Actually, it can concurrently emulate multiple
libraries (of the same kind of different kinds), different kinds of tape
drives (lto, dlt, etc), with emulated tape cartridges.
Why did you think fragmentation was a waste of space? If a
file expires, the space it allocated on a diskpool becomes
free space, so it shouldn't be considered wasted.
Just how does a disk pool handle storage?
I know TSM tracks every file, but is storage handles per file?
For example . . .
How about scheduling a script with the following code on daily basis. The
3rd every month it will create a onetime-schedule for archiving. Just make
sure the syntax for define and delete schedule and association is correct.
SELECT DAY(CURRENT_DATE) FROM SYSCAT.TABLES WHERE DAY(CURRENT_DATE)=3
It seems like my current TSM setup has servers grouped into
like processing (or similiar) categories for backup scheduling.
Is there any benefit in keeping the groups currently in
place, but adding a schedule per server and maybe a schedule
per platform? Creating a matrix of schedules instead of
I have a 3583 library that I use with TSM from AIX to do informix backups -
which take about three hours a day. I have it hooked up to a windows box
which is not running TSM server or client. From within AIX I can script
certain things using tapeutil - is there any such beast which can be used
The only advantage I can think of being able to schedule or
force a backup of a server *now* without requiring all servers
in that same group to backup.
Mike
For this, you can use DEFine CLIENTAction. We have even set this up as a
script, so we can pass the nodename or comma-separated list of
You could always add the DSM_* environemtn variables to the client node.
DSM_DIR=
DSM_CONFIG=
and add the DSM_DIR to the PATH variable. There is a section in the Windows
B/A client manual titles Setting environment variables that describe
these. One of the reasons listed is:
1. You want to
Client v5.2.1 os win2000, server v5.1.9.0 on solaris 2.8.
Help out there. Below is the error message I am recieving, as well as
the client option definition. Can't seem to get this file excluded.
THanks for the help, message and definitions follow.
ANE4987E (Session: 887, Node: ARTHUR)
I think if you defined some reasonable size of serial storage pools even on
disk, that this would cut the fragmentation and still make it usable.
I wonder how fragmentation is handled if you use TSM to manage the disks as
RAW instead of cooked with a file system on them? (Andy, any input?)
At 09:00 AM 6/2/2004, you wrote:
Client v5.2.1 os win2000, server v5.1.9.0 on solaris 2.8.
Help out there. Below is the error message I am recieving, as well as
the client option definition. Can't seem to get this file excluded.
A little more information would be very useful - what does Query
Senario:
We are moving an application from one AIX server to another.
The 1st AIX server had archived files. I did a set access to allow the
2nd AIX server to retrieved files archived by the 1st AIX server.
Now, I intend to retain the client definition of the 1st AIX server to
allow access to the
The physical client machine need not be present in order to access its
files from another machine.
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The only dumb question is
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Muhammad Sadat
I have first client requiring BMR on Windows. I know that cristie BMR
is
integrated with Tivoli. I have a question since I have not yet tested
it
out:
1- While backups have been taken by Tivoli server, and BMR
When would an aggregrate be reclamed when using a DISK device pool?
Rick
Once again check out
http://ew.share.org/callpapers/attach/Long_Beach_Conference/S5725a.pdf
There is a table that compares Disk Pools (Random Access) to Seq File Disk
pools. The answer is aggregrate reconstruction is
Hey!
What CBMR does is create there own system backup of each servers. In that backup CBMR
is only backing up Boot files, OS and the ITSM Client and this backup is taking each
weekend or every time a major system change have been made. Your ITSM Client is still
backing up everything each day.
HI,
what is the default TCPwindowsize to AIX, HP , Solaris and Linux in the
TSM client? What is the value recommended?
thank you
Janeth
Hi
the range of values in kulobytes is 1 through 2048. For solaris the maximum
is 1024.
the default value is 32. To improve backup and archive operation increase
this parameter on server. To improve restore and retreive operation,
increase it on client
Regards
-Message d'origine-
De :
what is the default TCPwindowsize to AIX, HP , Solaris and Linux in the
TSM client? What is the value recommended?
Janeth - The TSM Performance Tuning Guide talks about that parameter.
See http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/tividd/td/IBMStorageManagerMessages5.2.2.html
Richard Sims
I was under the impression that performing a move data xx
reconstruct=y would reconstruct the aggregate, thus effectively
performing reclamation on a disk type volume. Probably not what the TSM
developers intended it for, but it might be just the ticket for those
moving to disk-only
That can only be done on a sequential access pool. If you try on a
storagepool of device type disk you will get:
ANR1718E MOVE DATA: Reconstruction of file aggregates is supported only for
movement in which the source and target storage pools are sequential-access.
ANS8001I Return code 3.
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Richard Rhodes
Since I have experienced disk subsystem crashes with loss data, I
couldn't
ever use just
one disk system. I think I'd have to have separate disk systems for
the
primary pools and
copy pools (or tape), and maybe
However, I'd be inclined to keep the db and log volumes on local disk
(controller-mirrored, of course. It's hard to beat disk access speeds
from the local bus if you buy the right controller and disk.) A couple
of 72GB local disks (mirrored) gives plenty of room for the OS and the
TSM db
I'm running TSM 5.1.7.0 server on ZOS.The clients are Novell, Windows
and AIX (around 400 total).
Backups are to mainframe DASD. The primary onsite tape pool is an STK VTS.
Backups are collocated by filespace, and we keep 3 versions of active
files.
Our copy storage pool is stored offsite,
I have a 3583 with a 12 slot I/O door on the front. The I/O door is
always locked, so it's pretty much unusable. Even when doing checkin or
label search=bulk, and TSM says to fill the Bulk I/O with tapes, the door
stays locked. The little lock icon on the LCD is always lit. Any ideas
here?
At 03:41 PM 6/2/2004, you wrote:
Any ideas
here? I'd really like to use the I/O door...otherwise i have to use the
main door, and it takes quite a while to Scan/Learn all 5 columns each
time. thanks...
Your library's I/O station is configured as Storage Slots; you should have
it configured as
TSM B/A client 5.2.0.3
Client: Windows 2000 Server
We have some IIS servers where Microsoft is recommending to change the
location of metabase.bin from c:\winnt\system32\inetsrv to a new
subdirectory located at c:\winnt\system32\inetsrv\metabase (see basics
of changes below)
I just want to get
In reading the Q article regarding this, it looks like a registry entry
is changed as well to point IIS to this new location.
Which hopefully gives TSM the help it needs during a disaster recovery..
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;321142Product=i
is50
Mike,
When we get these messages in dsmerror.log:
06/02/2004 01:07:45 ANS1950E Backup via Microsoft Volume Shadow Copy failed.
See error log for more detail.
What error log is the message referring to?
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Mike Dile [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Ted Byrne wrote:
Your library's I/O station is configured as Storage Slots; you should have
it configured as Import/Export. Reference the Setup and Operator Guide for
the 3583. (It's on page 178 in the version of the manual that I have.)
The I/O station is already setup
Hi Joel,
NETDB.nlm was already loaded when I checked. I have also tried
reloading the modules (SMDR, TSANDS, TSAFS ...) but to no avail.
I have looked in the archives of the list but only found something
refering to an older NW install and an older TSM client.
I was wondering if people running
ANS1950E should refer to the Windows event log as another source for
information regarding the failure. There still may be other messages in
dsmerror.log itself that are germane.
Regards,
Mike Dile
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Tivoli Software, IBM Software Group
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wow I didn't know that, good thing I found out now and not later. I can assume
upgrading from TSM v4.2 to TSMee v5.2 is no different to upgrading to standard TSM
v5.2?
Gordon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
A.NETTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mark,
I don't understand why you waste the time to tell people to go somewhere else for
information. If you don't know, save yourself the time and don't respond.
Sadi,
If you go to Cristie's website (http://www.cristie.co.uk) you can download not only a
trial version but also a pdf that
The I/O station is already setup as Import/Export. The icon changes when
it's setup as storage, i verified from the panel that it's setup as
Impt/Expt. Any other ideas?
My apologies - I thought from the reference to the lock icon in your
original email that the padlock icon was showing as
Hi to all
I have 2 Domain Controller on a Windows 2003 Enterprise Edition with on each
of them install Tivoli client 5.2.2.9. The backup of the systemstate on one
of them run perfectly but on the second one got this message error:
ANS4005E error processing SYSTEM STATE file not found
The
43 matches
Mail list logo
