Hi TSM gurus,
The traceflag INSTR_CLIENT_DETAIL in clients up to 5.5 produced a short
listing like:
--
Final Detailed Instrumentation statistics
Elapsed time: 2.178 sec
Section Total Time(sec)
On Feb 26, 2010, at 7:46 AM, Thomas Rupp wrote:
I tried testflag instrument:detail but this only created an empty
file named dsminstr.report.p2384
Thomas -
How did you invoke it? A null file will result if the client invocation was
via the GUI, per Technote 1195708.
Richard Sims
Hi Richard,
thanks for your reply!
When running from the command line it now gives the expected results.
Thanks and have a nice weekend
Thomas
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] Im Auftrag von
Richard Sims
Gesendet: Freitag, 26.
I understand that all too well. Backup Compliance and this client now
outsources the email archival to another company. Unfortunately they need to
get this one persons' email from before they implemented the archival.
They have EXCHANGE09 server already built and in the same Exchange domain,
but
Hi Bill,
Recreate a storage groups with the same name and database names
as the old storage group. Make sure the names exactly match,
including upper/lower case.
Change the properties of the databases by checking the box that says:
This database can be overwritten by a restore
You should then be
Thanks everyone. Got exactly what I wanted.
1 other question is, is there a way to tell how many objects were added to the
DB a day/week by server.
Thanks
Eric
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Huebschman, George J.
Sent:
On Feb 26, 2010, at 10:40 AM, Jones, Eric J wrote:
Thanks everyone. Got exactly what I wanted.
1 other question is, is there a way to tell how many objects were added to
the DB a day/week by server.
The best harvest point for that is the TSM accounting records. The Summary
table may be
I'm finally stumped.
Installed a client on a vista machine.
Set up the scheduler to be managed by the accepter.
All went ok until the backup.
I always get status of missed.
Tried the steps in the using tsm scheduling through a firewall technot with
no success.
All ports appear to be open,
I have never worked with Vista.
Have you tried running from the TSM Scheduler service as a
troubleshooting test?
Can you do manual backups?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Lee, Gary D.
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2010 11:07 AM
To:
Gents, you've been very helpful on previous issues, I'm hoping for help
on one more.
I'm trying to setup a windows server with the SAN Client (5.5.3.0 due to
TSM Server being at that level).
According to tsmdlst the devices for the drives (17 18) are mt0.0.0.3
and mt1.0.0.3. However,
Hi list,
I am getting the following error on one of my drives when performing a MOVE
DATA:
ANR8302E I/O error on drive DRIVE01 (MT4.0.0.3) with
volume (OP=OFFL, Error Number=1, CC=0, rc = 1, KEY=05,
ASC=53, ASCQ=02, SENSE=70.00.05.00.00.00.00.58.00.00.00.-
How are these drives connected? Have you done any port/cable swapping to see if
the problem moves?
Geoff Gill
TSM/PeopleSoft Administrator
SAIC M/S-B1P
4224 Campus Pt. Ct.
San Diego, CA 92121
(858)826-4062 (office)
(858)412-9883 (blackberry)
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist
The code means :Media Removal Prevented.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Mario
Behring
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2010 10:33 AM
To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
Subject: [ADSM-L] ANR8302E I/O error
Hi list,
I am getting the following
On Feb 26, 2010, at 11:33 AM, Mario Behring wrote:
Hi list,
I am getting the following error on one of my drives when performing a MOVE
DATA:
ANR8302E I/O error on drive DRIVE01 (MT4.0.0.3) with
volume (OP=OFFL, Error Number=1, CC=0, rc = 1, KEY=05,
ASC=53, ASCQ=02,
Geoff,
There are 2 drives defined.DRIVE01 and DRIVE02.
DRIVE02 is connected via SCSI cable to the SCSI controller at the TSM Server.
DRIVE01 is connected to DRIVE02 (cascade) and has a SCSI termination on it.
Mario
From: Gill, Geoffrey L.
Hi Fred,
I´ve checked the codes on the Messages manual.but I am not sure what does
it mean anyway
I was performing a MOVE DATA and TSM is putting the source tape at DRIVE02 and
the destination tape at DRIVE01.which is the one with this error
Mario
Hi Richard,
Firmware is the same on both drives97F2
Element number is correctly referenced on both drives also.256 and 257.
Mario
From: Richard Sims r...@bu.edu
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Sent: Fri, February 26, 2010 1:53:17 PM
Subject: Re: ANR8302E
I also changed the device drivers from IBM Tape Drivers to the TSM Device
Driver just to see what would happen...but the error persists
Mario
From: Richard Sims r...@bu.edu
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Sent: Fri, February 26, 2010 1:53:17 PM
Eric,
I have a couple of options for you. I am not sure of your
background, mine is non-technical, so if any of this sounds foolishly
obvious, I apologize.
First, TSM is not natively SQL. The SQL tables that these
queries run on are created from the underlying B Tree db (pre
Hi All,
I'm wondering if anyone is running TSM V6.1.3.1 on an IBM server similar to a
p5 p570? I definitely need more memory for V6, since I only have 8GB and the
documentation says the minimum memory for all but the tiniest server should be
12 GB, 16 GB if using deduplication. I'm
Hello Nancy,
I am running TSM Server 6.1.3.1 on a logical partition of Power5 570. This is
my current configuration:
][/]lparstat -i
Node Name :
Partition Name :
Partition Number : 3
Type
Hi,
A library has 4 tape drives. Can I assign the drives to more than one
storage pools. One stg could be primary and another copy or active pool. I
need to get the maximum performance during backup using all drives and then
copy them in a lower speed to another pools.
Thanks
22 matches
Mail list logo
