I am trying to figure out exactly what happened on one of our servers but Im
not sure how TSM is supposed to behave in this instance. Any insight is
greatly appreciated...
Scenario: TSM 5.1. Incremental backup. Versions Data Exists = 10. Versions
Data Deleted = 2. Retain Extra Versions = 45.
I am trying to figure out exactly what happened on one of our servers but Im
not sure how TSM is supposed to behave in this instance. Any insight is
greatly appreciated...
Scenario: TSM 5.1. Incremental backup. Versions Data Exists = 10. Versions
Data Deleted = 2. Retain Extra Versions = 45.
Strange problem. AIX 4.3.3, TSM 5.1.5.4.
Im trying to run reclamation on our copy storage pool. There is only one
tape left, and reclamation continually starts and ends successfully for it
without moving any data and no time passing:
11/18/03 06:53:26 ANR0984I Process 2215 for SPACE
We're running Informix TDP 4.1, TSM client 5.1 on AIX 4.3.3 trying to
restore to another client running same O/S and TDP/TSM version. Our TSM
server version is at 5.1 on AIX 4.3.3.
The cross-server restore is failing because it is trying to log in as the
INFORMIX node... which doesnt exist. I
Does Informix TDP backup go to backup or archive copygroup?
: Informix TDP AIX Configuration problems
Just a thought, but make sure in /usr/lib you have a link for ibsad001.a
/usr/tivoli/tsm/client/api/bin/libXApi.a and ibsad001.o
/usr/tvioli/tsm/client/informix/bin/bsashr10.o.
Hope this helps.
Gene Greenberg Jr.
Conko, Steven
Make sure the /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/api/bin/dsm.opt file specifies the same
servername as is in /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/api/bin/dsm.sys, and that the
nodename you registered and is listed in that dsm.sys file is different than
the BA client specified in /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsm.sys.
are already working fine). Could you give me a
hand with this ?
Thanks.
Mario
Conko, Steven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Make sure the /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/api/bin/dsm.opt file specifies the same
servername as is in /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/api/bin/dsm.sys, and that the
nodename you registered
.a
/usr/tivoli/tsm/client/api/bin/libXApi.a and ibsad001.o
/usr/tvioli/tsm/client/informix/bin/bsashr10.o.
Hope this helps.
Gene Greenberg Jr.
Conko, Steven
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM
I cant seem to filter out the info I need from searching the archive...
TSM server is AIX 4.3.3-10, TSM5.1.5
TSM client is AIX 4.3.3-09, TSM5.1.5
TDP Informix 4.1.3
Informix - (not sure what version, but I was told its compatible)
Trying to get it set up correctly, the DBA tells me OnBar can
.
--
Date:Wed, 16 Jul 2003 13:13:39 -0600
From:Conko, Steven [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TDP Oracle config question
Thanks for that bit of information... it definitely clears some things up.
According to the docs, we should be using unique TDPO_FS names for each
node
we
2003 13:13:39 -0600
From:Conko, Steven [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TDP Oracle config question
Thanks for that bit of information... it definitely clears some things up.
According to the docs, we should be using unique TDPO_FS names for each
node
we are backing up using TDP, correct?
After
for DP for Oracle to determine if the
deletion is a true delete of a backuppiece or if Oracle is checking for
backuppiece existence prior to backup.
Hope this helps clear things up.
--
Date:Wed, 16 Jul 2003 13:13:39 -0600
From:Conko, Steven [EMAIL PROTECTED
We have a similar issue too. Is collocation of filespaces the only way
(besides carving your system up in to multiple nodes) to acheive multiple
restore sessions? Will it occur autmatically from a singe dsmc restore or do
you need to manually invoke multiple sessions?
Steve
-Original
and will get created during the backup, if it doesn't already
exist. Unless of course, you are specifying something other than the
default (the option is TDPO_FS).
--
Date:Tue, 15 Jul 2003 13:42:36 -0600
From:Conko, Steven [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TDP Oracle config
Thanks for that bit of information... it definitely clears some things up.
According to the docs, we should be using unique TDPO_FS names for each node
we are backing up using TDP, correct?
After doing the query and some further investigation into the BACKUPS table,
it appears we are getting this
Thanks again. One more quick question... does the filespace name, such as
/adsmorc need to be included in the include/exclude list as the docs
state? I suppose if so it would be on the TDP client?
-Original Message-
From: David Longo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16,
TSM Server: AIX 4.3.3, TSM 5.1.5.4
RMAN Server: AIX4.3.3, TDP 5.2
RMAN Client: AIX 4.3.3, TSM 5.1.5, TDP5.2
The installation guide seems to be a little fuzzy on this topic...
At some point during the backup process we get this error in our
tdpoerror.log file:
23:28:55 ANS4994S TDP Oracle AIX
AIX4.3.3,TSM5.1.5.4 - Server
AIX4.3.3,TSM5.1.5 - Client
When restoring compressed files, is it normal for the reported size to be
different from the actual restored size as it is when backing up? Im
restoring a large database and so far the the live report from the dsmc
session reports 1.4GB
Is there any reason you would want your Recovery Plan retention set longer
than your DBbackup retention?
Has anyone else experienced a problem when restoring data where it starts
fine but then at some random point it slows down to a crawl? The wait time
starts to climb to 38 seconds, then resets to 0, then climbs to 38 seconds,
then back to 0 constantly until there is no other choice but to stop the
Thanks. I'll try to provide as much information as I can. If I dont provide
enough please let me know.
Server: AIX 4.3.3, TSM 5.1.5
Client: AIX 5.1, TSM 5.1.5.4
Virtualnodename client: AIX 5.1 TSM 5.1.5.4
collocation is turned off. compression is off. maxnummp for both nodes is
set to 6. we are
We have an AIX server, so I dont know if the syntax is different, but we do
have AIX clients. we run similar commands but dont use any quotes and dont
include the -c, an entry for us is like this:
su - oracle /home/oracle/scripts/backup/db_backup.sh
It usually runs fine. however, there are
On all of our database servers we run an archive nightly but instead of a
regular archive we run a command instead:
su - oracle /home/oracle/scripts/backup/db_backup.sh
this script handles all the processing of the database and calls a dsmc
archive command. on 97% of the servers it works
commmand
su - oracle -c /home/oracle/scripts/backup/db_backup.sh
Amazing what a missing flag will cause.
Conko, Steven [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on 04/02/2003 05:25:07 AM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED
The README files are usually pretty idiot proof provided the idiot reads
them. What version of Solaris are you running? I had a problem installing on
a Solaris 5.7 and 5.8 client because it required certain patches to be
installed from Sun for the libraries. Again, that would show up in the
Are there any issues with upgrading from TSM Server V4.1.2 to version
5.1.x? Or do we have to upgrade to 4.2.x first?
Also, what is the best version to upgrade to? 5.1.5, 5.1.6.2 or something
else?
We are running on AIX 4.3.3 ML 10.
Thanks in advance!
Steven A. Conko
Senior Unix
okay, im going to ask a stupid question... does anybody have any ideas how
to backup a compaq tru64 client running tsm 4.1.3 to an aix 4.3.3 server
running 5.1.5 server? i know these versions arent compatible, but we cant
upgrade the compaq's o/s to allow us to upgrade the tsm client software.
?
Cheers
Andy Wilcox
Midrange Services
Aquila Networks Services Ltd
-Original Message-
From: Conko, Steven [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 March 2003 15:57
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: stupid backup compatibility question
okay, im going to ask a stupid question... does
Extremely slow backups from a sunOS 5.7 client with lots of collisions.
does anyone know how to hardcode the interface to 100 Full Duplex? Sparc 20
model.
Steven A. Conko
Senior Unix Systems Administrator
ADT Security Services, Inc.
Is version 5.1.5 only available as a 32 bit application for AIX 4.3.3? I
found the 64 bit b/a module for AIX 5.1, but only 32 bit for 4.3.3... any
idea why??
Steven A. Conko
Senior Unix Systems Administrator
ADT Security Services, Inc.
i have seen a lot of messages fly by here about various 5.1 tsm clients and
their stability (or sometimes lack thereof). the last i had heard, 5.1.4 was
considered a very stable client and 5.1.5 was not. ibm's website only has
5.1 and 5.1.5 available for AIX clients... are these my only choices?
i believe we had the same problem. try this:
mtlib -l /dev/lmcp0 -vC -Vvolser -tFFFB
steve conko
-Original Message-
From: Tommy Templeton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 11:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mtlib command
Does anyone know the mtlib command
Question about how this scenario plays out
Client starts an archive backup of a database to server at 1700 from cron
job. Archive is straight to tape. Uses all mountpoints assigned to it (4).
Client then starts a scheduled incremental system-level backup at 1800
while original cron'd backup
quick question we've got some tapes in our vault that apparantly dont
show up anywhere in tsm under the volume or libvolume listing. the only
place i have been able to find information about them is in the volhistory
table which shows they were placed into a STGDELETE state back in november
sorry... i tried to search for this but i cant seem to get connected to
adsm.org. any idea what is happening with these errors?
TSM V4.2.2 running on AIX 4.3.3 ML10 connected to 3494 Library with 3590
Tape drives
we have seen this error before... this time happens to be during a backup
stgp
what i do is run the -prev=yes -wait=yes options, capture the total amount
of bytes to be backed up, then when the backup is actually running i run a
small script to query the backup sessions, capture the total bytes backed
up, add them together, then get a percentage and amount remaining.
these
We have some very strange session lost errors showing up on our client.
First the particulars:
Server is AIX 4.3.3 ML 10, TSM V4.2.2
Client is AIX 4.3.3 ML 10, TSM V5.1.5.5 (upgraded several times from V4.2.2
at TSM Support request to deal with this problem)
Client and server are on separate 100
directly to tape or to a disk pool.
My 2 cents
ghag
-Original Message-
From: Conko, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Very Puzzling Sessions lost
We have some very strange session lost errors showing up on our client.
First
ive been going round and round with tsm support on this issue... we have an
AIX 4.3.3 client that has been upgraded several times all the way to 5.1.5
client version without success backing up to an AIX 4.3.3 tsm 4.2.2 server
over a 10/100 ethernet network (100 Full Duplex, no autonegotiate.)
on a new implementation. Is your tcpserveraddress coded
with the dns name or the ip adress? We chenged it to the ip adress and the
problems went away.
There was probably an error somewhere in the vlans but I'm not an ip guru...
Guillaume Gilbert
CGI Canada
Conko, Steven [EMAIL PROTECTED
we're running AIX 4.3.3 server and clients. server is TSM V4.2.2, clients
are generally 4.2 as well.
what should we have our tcpwindowsize and tcpbuffsize set to? i know the
suggested size is 64 and 32 respectively, but the book mentions increasing
them if the resources are available. i have
we're running tsm 4.2 on aix 4.3.3. we run a daily move drmedia but in this
case 3 tapes did not get ejected because they were mounted. however, the
move drmedia command made changes to make it look like they are no longer in
the database. short of actually opening up the library and removing them
a checkin, and a checkout.
-Original Message-
From: Conko, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 9:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: move drmedia but tapes werent ejected
we're running tsm 4.2 on aix 4.3.3. we run a daily move drmedia but in this
case 3
does anyone know how i can find out the underlying, i.e. system level,
problem for the following type of error? im running aix 4.3.3 ML10.
ANS4014E Error processing '/u103/oradata/adachr01/payroll_dat.dbf': unknown
system error (157) encountered. Program ending.
hello *sm'ers. we have been getting continuous Session is lost errors ever
since upgrading our aix 4.3.3 client to ML 10, and we have even upgraded the
TSM client to 5.1.5 (server is 4.2). TSM support insists it is system or
network level but so far we have been unable to identify any system or
sorry... client 5.1.5, server 4.2
-Original Message-
From: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 4:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: unknown system error
does anyone know how i can find out the underlying, i.e. system level,
problem for the
Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Conko, Steven
Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2002 7:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Gigabit Ethernet speed
anybody have any tips on what type of Network transfer rate we should be
seeing for our backups over gigabit ethernet? the clients backup
anybody have any tips on what type of Network transfer rate we should be
seeing for our backups over gigabit ethernet? the clients backup via copper
Gb ethernet dedicated for backups to a tsm server connected to a 3494 tape
library with 10 3590 tape drives via fibre channel/brocade switch.
there
From: Conko, Steven [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 12/17/2002 04:19 PM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Idle system fails with Media mount not possible
strange one... and ive looked at everything i can think of.
In client dsmerror.log:
12
to increase my MMP on the one node just to
get a
/stripes=2 backup.
The saga continues...
Conko,
Steven To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:
M Fax
to delete the drive and
redefine so that they can be used. It was a bug in a certain code of TSM
but I can't remember which one or even if that is truly your problem.
Thanks,
Rob.
From: Conko, Steven [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 12/18/2002 09:03 AM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED
: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 9:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Idle system fails with Media mount not possible
Does it fail on the same file or directory every time, and does that file or
directory attract
a management class which is pointing to a different storage pool
Conko, Steven [EMAIL
working
clients. If all your clients don't belong to a common domain, then check
the server for missing copygroup definitions, incorrect target pool,
target pool with no associated volume, and/or policysets that haven't been
'activate'd.
Conko, Steven [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist
yes, everything is going to the disk storage pool that has pleny of space.
these systems dont use multiple management classes.
-Original Message-
From: John Naylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Idle system fails
that they can be used. It was a bug in a certain code of TSM
but I can't remember which one or even if that is truly your problem.
Thanks,
Rob.
From: Conko, Steven [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 12/18/2002 09:03 AM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
i finally figured out why my incrementals to the diskpool were failing...
large files were trying to go directly to tape ALL MY TAPE PATHS ARE
OFFLINE!! how the heck does that happen?
i know this is a stupid question, but here goes...
what is your reclamation threshold set to for that storage pool? are there
other tapes available to reclaim to?
-Original Message-
From: John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
strange one... and ive looked at everything i can think of.
In client dsmerror.log:
12/17/02 15:01:54 ANS1228E Sending of object
'/tibco/logs/hawk/log/Hawk4.log' failed
12/17/02 15:01:54 ANS1312E Server media mount not possible
12/17/02 15:01:57 ANS1312E Server media mount not possible
hi all! running into a problem here.
TSM Server = AIX 4.3.3/TSM 4.2, 3494 Tape Library, 3590 type drives
TDP Client = WinNT 4.0, TSM Client 4.2, TDP Version
Getting this error in the Server Activity log:
12/15/02 22:01:25 ANE4993E (Session: 139502, Node: MAILJAXEX) TDP
MSExchgV2
to what you have below. I would search activity
log like this : 'Q AC BEGIND=12/15/2002 BEGINT=00:00 ENDD=12/15/2002
S=MAILJAXEX'
Thanks,
Robert Rippy
From: Conko, Steven [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 12/16/2002 10:45 AM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
we run a 3494 tape library with 3590 tape drives. after our backup are
finished, we run a backup stgpool to a copy pool on about 1.6TB of data. as
you can imagine, even with 8 drives this takes some time. are there any
server, device or other parameters we can tune to improve the tape-to-tape
the application
owners to review their required CRITICAL/MUST HAVE data and send it to
isolated pools for copies to take offsite.
just some thoughts...
Dwight
-Original Message-
From: Conko, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 1:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
-L;VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Conko, Steven
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 10:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Multiple sessions per tape
We're running ADSM 4.2 on AIX 4.3.3, 3494 library, 3590 drives.
Is there any way to control the number of sessions per tape or is it
restricted
We're running ADSM 4.2 on AIX 4.3.3, 3494 library, 3590 drives.
Is there any way to control the number of sessions per tape or is it
restricted to one?
Steven A. Conko
Senior Unix Systems Administrator
ADT Security Services, Inc.
65 matches
Mail list logo