Thanks. That is what I thought I remembered reading. Unfortunately, that
will hold us up since the server with the problem clients is an LM and
can't be upgraded until those problem clients go away.
How about upgrading a replica target server to higher than the replica
source servers?
On Thu,
When I upgraded from 6.3.5 to 7.1.7, I tried upgrading one lib manager server.
My other two 6.3.5 clients would not communicate. Had to upgrade them.
Don't know how it is now, but that was my experience a few hears ago.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager On Behalf Of
Currently all 7-servers in our environment are RHEL7 and ISP 7.1.7.400. Due
to the way we perform certain backups (soon to be phased-out), we can not
upgrade our ISP servers to 7.1.8/8.1.2 due to the automatic SSL/TLS
enforcement which disables the webclient/interface (and no, V8.1.7+ does
not
Thanks all, we will look into it.
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 4:03 PM Michael Prix wrote:
> Hello Stefan,
>
> one more thought:
> I assume that the behaviour is because expiration ran on the instance
> while in
> the future. Thus, at least some CTL-files got expired and when switching
> the
>
Hello Stefan,
one more thought:
I assume that the behaviour is because expiration ran on the instance while in
the future. Thus, at least some CTL-files got expired and when switching the
date back, there are some missing data.
VMVERIFYIFLATEST YES in combination with VMVERIFYACTION FORECEFULL
Hello Stefan,
i assume the only solution will be
1. rename the DC node which is storing the TSM4VE data
2. create a new DC node using the old node name, and reestablish the proxy
relationships
3. do a full-backup for all VMs
Regards Uwe
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: ADSM: Dist Stor
Thanks Michael, we are opening a pmr @IBM to see what they will say about
it.
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 5:01 PM Michael Prix wrote:
> Hello Stefan,
>
> as far as I know the only possibility is to restore the latest good
> backup.
> Until some versions ago it was not even possible to start the
We are starting to seriously look at moving a lot of our VMware VM backups
from all IP based backups of individual VM's to using VE.
However, the more we look through the documentation for VE, the more
questions we have and the more confused we are as to what resources we need
(physical or
Hello Stefan,
as far as I know the only possibility is to restore the latest good backup.
Until some versions ago it was not even possible to start the instance
sucessfully until the time of the last shutdown was reached. I tried these
tests with the 6.x and 7.x versions once or twice and
Hi all,
I've got a new one.
A customer of ours has set the date of the SP server to December 2019.
As you may know, it's currently not December. :-)
They accepted the date change in SP with an accept date.
Now the issue is when they move the date back to what it actually is they
get this error:
Yes..I saw that link and fore v>8.1.3 it supposedly works.
We have done file in the past and found performance to be poor...especially
server dedup. Was curious about what others have observed.
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 3:00 PM Michael Prix wrote:
> Hello,
>
> well, as always, it depends:
>
Hello,
well, as always, it depends:
https://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg22012594
--
Michael Prix
On Thu, 2019-06-13 at 13:13 -0400, J. Eric Wonderley wrote:
> Is this activity supported with SP?
>
> I recall in the past it was not but you could go to devc=file
>
> Thanks much
Is this activity supported with SP?
I recall in the past it was not but you could go to devc=file
Thanks much
Hello Leif,
thanks for you answer.
I'm sorry, I was quite busy in the next time also beause of God vacations.
I tried with the image: winpe_x64_TSM8_1_4_1_generic_legacy_boot.iso
But I don't came trough... see error files on attached files:
output1.txt and 2
I will for sure enconter a TSM
Hi Michael,
it is planned to add support for Windows 2016 and Windows 2019 for the ERP
clients in 1H19.
The support pages will be updated when the tests have finished.
Greetings, Dominic.
Hello,
had a look at the All Requirements for that product, as a customer wants to
upgrade his SAP environment to Windows2016, and Windows 2012R2 is now on
extended support only.
It seems that there is no support for SAP in the future, as all documents
available state no support for any recent
Hello,
works flawlessly on my systen, same version and OS as yours.
Have fun with IBM support.
--
Michael Prix
On Mon, 2019-06-03 at 14:02 +0200, Stefan Folkerts wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm wondering if this is a weird database error or if my syntax isn't
> correct and the error on my syntax
Hi all,
I'm wondering if this is a weird database error or if my syntax isn't
correct and the error on my syntax isn't handled correctly.
I have a customer that is seeing absurd amounts of these warnings in the
activity log and, of course, the daily reporting:
06/03/2019 13:20:47 ANR3692W A
Hi
The different off _efi is to make it working on HyperV generation 2. The other
is for VMware and older HyperV version
Regards
leif
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager På vegne af .Maurizio
TERUZZI
Sendt: Monday, 27 May 2019 13.51
Til: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Emne:
Ups sorry
Now you can
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager På vegne af Rainer Tammer
Sendt: Tuesday, 28 May 2019 07.57
Til: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Emne: Re: [ADSM-L] SV: [ADSM-L] SV: [ADSM-L] Restore new fation ISP v8.1.x
Hello,
I can not download the ISO files:
Hello,
I can not download the ISO files:
https://download.backuphosting.dk/Clients/restore%20iso/winpe_x64_TSM7_1_6_5_generic_efi.iso
Server Error
404 - File or directory not found.
The resource you are looking for might have been removed, had its
name changed, or is
Hi Maurizio,
In the wiki article you cited in your email below, what specific issues did
you run into? Did you try the build_recovery_image.cmd script, attached to
the article, that automates building the ISO image?
Best regards,
Andy
Hello Leif ,
thanks for you reponse.
I'm still screwing on the iso images whithout success... hope the
production contue work for some days :)
Looking on the size of the iso... sure is a big work, I have done so
fare non-working images on about 700 mb only.
I have try to download the .iso
Hi
We do have focus on this, but don't expect super service. We try to be updated
as version comes out.
Regards
leif
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager På vegne af Stefan Folkerts
Sendt: Monday, 27 May 2019 11.09
Til: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Emne: Re: [ADSM-L] SV:
This is fantastic, do you plan on maintaining these this when new versions
are released?
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 8:47 AM Leif Torstensen wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> We done a lot of work making WindowsPE boot iso for HyperV and VMware
> baremetal recovery (properly also usable on physical server) and
Hi
We done a lot of work making WindowsPE boot iso for HyperV and VMware baremetal
recovery (properly also usable on physical server) and try to automate the
procedure by asking for node/password, SP server and ipadresse in the boot.
They are place on this site.
That is my take on it. So we plan to take 500GB from the 1TB space
assigned to the ARCHFAILOVERLOG filesystem and expand the ARCHLOG
filesystem with it. If we have any more incidents like this, we will
simply get rid of ARCHFAILOVERLOG and roll with 2TB in ARCHLOG space.
On Thu, May 23, 2019
That is very odd as we have utilized the failover space a couple times and it
worked as advertised.
Now you don’t have any confidence the failover space would work in the future
and I agree with your idea to expand the archive log so you don’t run into this
same situation going forward.
Yes it shows/showed proper usage/stats for the filesystem. It showed
archfailoverlog filesystem at 12% used while archlog was 100% and every ISP
server based DBBackup would run for a while and fails with:
5/20/2019 4:30:05 AM ANR2993E The database backup terminated with a log
problem. DB2
Zoltan,
We have had our archive log fill 4 or 5 times in the last couple years and in
each case the TSM server started using the archive failover space which allowed
the database backup time to complete and clear the full archive log.
We just have ARCHFAILOVERLOGDIR setting in our dsmserv.opt
Hello Guys/Girls,
I discoverd something "strange" during a Full restore on production.
On Windows server 2016 (+ windows 10) since Spectrum protect (tsm)
version 8.1.x the SystemState restore is not more possible (deprecated)
on the online machine.
Instreat everyone should build a WinPE
Hallo Guys,
We just started to use this useful feature called retention sets in v817,
but see that it lacks flexibility, if we wish to move tsm nodes with valid
retention sets from server A to B.
IBM support says.
"You cannot export retention sets nor retention rules."
So you must rebuild
The problem with doing it within the ISP environment was it kept trying to
write additional records to the ARCHLOG filesystem which was at 100% (which
makes no sense - what is the purpose of the ARCHFAILOVERLOG filesystem if
not to prevent this kind of issue) and therefore the DB backup run as an
Dear Folks,
Is this recommended to run replicate node alone since it won't support
protect stgpool command for cloud container storage pool ? Did anyone try
this option for daily more than 10 Tb provided you have sufficient network
bandwidth ? When we test for 1 or 2 Tb it works well but not sure
A native DB2 (without using it as a ISP Instance DB) is capable to do a backup
of archivelogs.
But if used as ISP Instance DB the archivelogs wirhin the configured archivelog
destination will removed by running a full backup within ISP.
Regards Uwe
> Am 21.05.2019 um 16:00 schrieb Hans
Does DB2 have the ability to do just an archivelog backup(no full) and
clear them afterwards like other RDBMs(Oracle/MSSQL)? That would be
convenient where the log space is filling up too fast for a full +
archivelog to go through. Been in that desparate situation several times.
Hans Chr.
On
Jonas:
Yes...I used sharedmem too.
Unfortunately Iused COMMethod instead of COMMmethod...that killed it.
Support helped me fix...working now
Thanks
Eric
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 3:10 AM Jansen, Jonas
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> do you use CA signed certificates?
> We head a similar issue, because TSM
ISP 7.1.7.400 RHEL 7
Our offsite replica server ran out of archlog space eventhough we have
ARCHFAILOVERLOG defined. Both filesystems are 1TB but it barely used 10% of
the failover space while filling up the archlog filesystem to 100%. DB
backup kicked in but couldn't finish (3TB) fast enough
Hi,
do you use CA signed certificates?
We head a similar issue, because TSM only knows abbot 4 CAs. We worked around
this problem by using shared memory connections for database backup. Tis SWG
was published:
https://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21664425
---
Jonas Jansen
IT Center
Hello,
check for tsmdbmgr.opt in the instance directory and
/opt/tivoli/tsm/server/bin/dbbkapi/dsm.sys if they contain valid data.
--
Michael Prix
On Thu, 2019-05-16 at 15:51 -0400, J. Eric Wonderley wrote:
> I'm getting this failure:
> ANR2017I Administrator SERVER_CONSOLE issued command:
I'm getting this failure:
ANR2017I Administrator SERVER_CONSOLE issued command: BACKUP DB devc=dbfile
type=full
ANR0984I Process 3 for Database Backup started in the BACKGROUND at
04:33:11 PM.
ANR4559I Backup DB is in progress.
ANR2280I Full database backup started as process 3.
IBM Spectrum
We are doing the same as you, switching to an alternate solution.
We were told by our IBM representative that the LICENSE to use the software was
still in place after the end date of the contract.
The only thing lost is the ability to get technical support through the IBM
ticketing system.
Hi Paul,
Check here:
https://www.ibm.com/software/passportadvantage/about_software_licensing.html
Del
Del Hoobler
Principal Offering Manager - IBM Spectrum Protect
IBM Corporation
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 05/14/2019
We are moving away from TSM/Spectrum in the coming months. Our annual IBM
Spectrum Protect Suite Terabyte annual software subscription and support
renewal is due however we are looking to not renew it as we will soon be
backing up our servers using a different product. We have been advised in
Hi,
ok, i need to share some additional information :-)
first i observed a huge number of dropped packages on one server. so we
did some tests including iperf which showed nearly the physical
bandwidth. we also took a tcpdump and handed it to our network guys who
didn't see anything giving a
Did you use something like iperf with a long and heavy load? a bad nic or
driver might cause this, so it might still be the network.
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 4:15 PM Bjørn Nachtwey
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> we planned to switch from COPYPOOL to Replication for having a second
> copy of the data,
Hi all,
we planned to switch from COPYPOOL to Replication for having a second
copy of the data, therefore we bought a new server that should become
the primary TSM/ISP server and then make the old one holding the replicates.
what we did:
we started by exporting the nodes, which worked well.
Hi Szabi,
I am from Spectrum Protect development. Please find my email in the mail
closing.
Could you please provide me the ticket number for your support case
directly to my mail?
Will see if I can help you to solve this problem.
Greetings, Dominic.
Hi Dominic,
As our Spectrum Protect servers are running on AIX, I have created a new
Lubuntu VM as the object agent host system. When trying to define a new server
on the Spectrum Protect server, I am getting the following error message:
Protect: >def server SPP-Offload-Linux hla= lla=
Hi Szabi,
I was working with another customer recently who set this up. What exactly
is the problem you are faced with?
Greetings, Dominic.
___
Dominic Müller-Wicke | IBM
Hi all,
I am currently testing IBM's Spectrum Protect Plus (SPP) software and I am
wondering whether there is anybody out there who is actually using this product
in a live environment. I would be interested in your experiences with
installation, configuration, offloading and in general. Our
Also seeing these messages, checked acsls and acsls returns the volume is there
result=VOLUME_UNAVAILABLE. (PROCESS: 2890)
05/05/2019 10:10:57 ANR8313E Volume SC3533 is not present in library
TAPELIB1_T10K. (PROCESS: 2890)
05/05/2019 10:10:57 ANR1402W
Something is marking the tapes unavailable.
I also see this error message
tsm: UATSMP09>select count(*) from volumes where access='UNAVAILABLE'
Unnamed[1]
120
Don't know if this is related to the tape errors, because of tape errors or is
this causing the tape
Anyone ever see fail/timeout errors like this?:
04/29/2019 12:04:20 ANR3691E The transaction failed for process
CONVERT
STGPOOL, process number 40838, because of a
transaction
timeout. (SESSION: 50394593, PROCESS: 40838)
04/29/2019 12:04:20
The most recent backup of any object (file or directory) should always be
kept, as long as that object exists on the file system. That is, the active
backup copy never expires. So even if the directory was last backed up a
year ago, as long as that directory continues to exist, it should not be
I just replied to you prior post, so there is some overlap. But now my
suggestion can be more specific:
dsmc query backup \\wnjcr03p\f$\ -inactive
That will show all active and inactive objects in the root of F:
The point-in-time restore from the GUI requires directory backups that were
I ran a dirsonly selective backup of the F drive: selective f:\ -subdir=yes
-dirsonly
I figured this would allow the PIT restore to have the dirs. it needed.
It backed up:
Total number of objects inspected: 183,714
Total number of objects backed up: 183,714
But, when I now fire up
Yea, I think this hits our problem exactly!
This server holds Windows shares. It doesn't change much - in the past 32 days
only 18k files/dirs have changed out of over 2.3m.
Now, a year or so ago we made a big change on all our win server backups.
Prior to this change, we had a default
Hi Richard,
Check the management class to which the directories are bound, and see what
the RETEXTRA and VEREXISTS settings are.
Off the top of my head, this sounds like a topic covered in an older post:
https://www.mail-archive.com/adsm-l@vm.marist.edu/msg07963.html
As an alternative, the
Hi,
TSM server 7.1.5
Win Server 2012R2 with BA client 7.1.6.2, then upgraded to 7.1.8.4
We're trying to do a Point-In-Time restore of a directory on a Win server F
drive. (Just one sub dir, not the whole drive.) The mgt class is 32 32 32 32 -
one month PIT restorable.
When we bring up the
Hello everyone.
I have been getting this error (GVM5113E) for about 6 months or so in the
vSphere Webclient. No green check by "View schedules and manage data movers".
When I click Configure schedules and data movers I get the GVM5113E.
IBM Error messages seem to stop at GVM5112E. I feel like
HI all,
many thanks for all who sent an answer. It was very helpful for me.
thanks
regards
Michael Stahlberg
On 4/17/19 3:42 PM, Mondore, E Andrew wrote:
> We are also planning to migrate from AIX to Linux. One thing to note is that
> if you are using physical tape drives like we are, you
Hi guys,
I'm wondering if more people are running TSM in a cluster configuration. We
always used Linux clusters based on Veritas Cluster Service (VCS). Ever since
we were switched to IBM hardware we also had to switch to a different multipath
driver and that is where the problems started.
We
I think it depends on the size/load on the server.
For smaller environments we even use the midrange read intensive SSD's in
raid 1 (2 of them) or sometimes even raid 5 with a spare and they run for
years, this works just fine for S en M blueprints.
For very intensive environments we tent to use
HI all,
after long working with ADSM/TSM and migrating from Solaris to AIX about
9 years ago, we are now asked to refresh our hardware again. It came out
that our old backup server are the only AIX server we still have and we
should thinking about migrating to linux. I'm not real happy about it,
We are constantly battling issues with using internal hard disk storage as
tier-1 and ISILON/NFS as tier-2 storage with magtape as tier-3 (can't get
enough disk to hold everything).
So I was thinking, is there any reason NOT to make 1-storage pool that
encompasses the internal disk and ISILON
Uwe,
This was 100% it.
The "q server" output showed transitional but the admin was strict on the
8.1 system.
I did not realize that this would cause issues with a ping server and an
export server command.
I created a new admin, set to transtional and used the old servers dsmadmc
to login to the
Hi Stefan,
i assume the admin-id you are using during the "ping server" is running in
"strict-mode" on the 8.1.7 instance, but not on the 7.1.3 instance.
This will cause the error message "down level".
Regards, Uwe
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager Im Auftrag von
No, I have not and it seems very valuable, thank you very much. I will look
into this tomorrow.
On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 at 18:41, Zoltan Forray wrote:
> Assume you saw this discussion:
>
>
> https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?threads/tsm-replication-between-servers.32369/
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at
Assume you saw this discussion:
https://adsm.org/forum/index.php?threads/tsm-replication-between-servers.32369/
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 12:30 PM Stefan Folkerts
wrote:
> I don’t think so, the q server output says that it is transitional.
>
> On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 at 16:35, Zoltan Forray wrote:
>
I don’t think so, the q server output says that it is transitional.
On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 at 16:35, Zoltan Forray wrote:
> Probably due to the enforced-by-default TLS/SSL level of anything at/beyond
> 7.1.8.x/8.1.2.x. See this article:
>
>
Probably due to the enforced-by-default TLS/SSL level of anything at/beyond
7.1.8.x/8.1.2.x. See this article:
https://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg22004844
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 3:06 AM Stefan Folkerts
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This page of the 8.1.7 knowledge center:
>
>
>
Hi all,
This page of the 8.1.7 knowledge center:
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSEQVQ_8.1.7/srv.admin/r_adm_repl_compat.html
States:
Before you set up replication operations with IBM Spectrum Protect™, you
must ensure that the source and target replication servers are compatible
When I moved over from Mainframe to midrange a very long time ago, I was used
to the old mainframe TMS/CA-1 tape management software.
Never understood why TSM did not implement a scratch pool as in that product to
keep track of its scratch tapes, even if just to keep the usage stats.
I too have
I voted for it as well. We can get some of this information from ACSLS but
it would be nice to have something that is not tied to Oracle/STK.
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 10:21:12AM +0100, Hans Christian Riksheim wrote:
> Voted.
>
> A few years ago I made an RFE requesting the ability to do audit
Hi Stefan,
You don't need to configure Servermon, at least not the built-in version
included at 8.1.7 and above.
It's your choice to run it or not and you can also use "setopt
alwaysonservermon off" to stop it. However, I'd recommend you address the
warning rather than stop it altogether
hello,
every 10 minutes this message appears in actlog.
so we do not want to run servermon or even configure it on our spectrum
protect server.
i only found alwaysonservermon yes as parameter in dsmserv.opt.
so i tested alwaysonservermon no and it seems to work.
am i right?
with best
I have a 11 TB TSM server backing up data in container pools with 50+ TB
daily ingest.
On Wed 3 Apr, 2019, 4:44 PM Dwight Cook, wrote:
> So who all out there has TSM servers with DB's in the 3+ TB range that
> ingest 50+-ish TB's per night into a container storage pool?
> Doesn't matter if it
So who all out there has TSM servers with DB's in the 3+ TB range that
ingest 50+-ish TB's per night into a container storage pool?
Doesn't matter if it is 7.1 or 8.1 or AIX or Linux
I'm seeing behavior that I would classify as ~odd~ and wondering if others
might be too.
Dwight E. Cook
We will be running a Spectrum Protect Plus beta program in the near
future. If you have interest in participating we are open to new
candidates! Please send Mary Anne Filosa (mfil...@us.ibm.com) an email to
be considered.
Mary Anne FIlosa
Mary Anne Filosa
Systems Storage - Customer
Voted.
A few years ago I made an RFE requesting the ability to do audit library
without using half a day shutting down all the library clients but it was
rejected. Hope this goes better.
hc
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 9:28 AM Jansen, Jonas
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> maybe some of you may require
Hello,
maybe some of you may require automated media lifecycle to. In case you wish
this feature, vote for this feature request:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe_ID=131259
Best regards,
---
Jonas Jansen
IT Center
Gruppe: Server & Storage
Abteilung: Systeme &
Steven,
I can help you out if you are looking for a tool to validate Spectrum
Protect for Virtual Environments vSphere backups with a comprehensive
validation that includes a test against an SLA and a quick test to see if
the VM actually boots after the restore and many other features.
I'm not
> The windows guys have their tools for that and the unix guys have
their tools. What this means is that they never get updated.
So true. Folks won't update their client unless there is a problem and I
have to push it on them (I eagerly wait for IBM's Software Withdrawal
notices (or major
Hi Rick
What I'd like is for a yearly refresh of the client to the latest stable level.
So .0 unless there is a particular patch that we need.
What actually happens is that I'm not permitted to use TSM to roll out client
updates. The windows guys have their tools for that and the unix guys
Hi Everyone!
Curious what others do for holding onto BA client versions.
For the long term, what versions of clients do you hang onto?
All maintenance levels? ie: 7.1.8.0
All patch levels? ie: 7.1.8.x
Just highest patch levels? ie: 7.1.8.4 (just highest last digit)
Rick
Thanks Skylar.
I noticed it was possible to inactive by running "tdpsqlc inactivate "
but the problem from our TSM side is that we don't notice these things and
doing regular investigations into this matter is a chore. Wondered if there
could be some settings or other tricks to automate this.
A few ways to do it:
1. Run a full incremental backup on the node after the database is removed
2. Use the client-side EXPIRE command with a list of paths to mark inactive
3. If the entire node is going away, use the server-side DECOMMISSION NODE
command (take note of the caveats in the
Newbie question(only 18 years of experience with TSM) :
How do I ensure that deleted databases get inactivated and expired
according to the copygroup settings? As far as I know inactivation of
copies >retonly occurs when the database is backed up. If the database is
removed all active copies will
Hi All,
Is there a way to exclude docker filesystems? I.e. is it possible to useva
wildcard in exclude.fs?
Richard.
I have a database backup where the DBA just excluded 100 databases (out of
171). To prevent backup "failures" (and trouble tickets) I tried to
exclude them in the command line, but there were 3500 characters just in
the excludes. Windows server 2012R2 can handle over 8000 characters in the
It depends on the signal you use. A standalone "kill" or a "kill -15"
yes. That's called SIGTERM, all it does is send a termination signal to
the process.
https://major.io/2010/03/18/sigterm-vs-sigkill/
-
Thanks,
Marc...
Marc Lanteigne
So you are saying that issuing the server HALT command via console is no
different than the OS level kill?
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 9:15 AM Marc Lanteigne
wrote:
> That's what I said.
>
> > From the /etc/init.d/tsminst1 wrapper script, it does do a kill
> > command, but without any signal, which
That's what I said.
> From the /etc/init.d/tsminst1 wrapper script, it does do a kill
> command, but without any signal, which means it defaults to -15
> (SIGTERM). That sends a message to the process to shutdown gracefully.
It's in the manual as one of the proper ways to start/stop the server:
tsminst1 is a script in /etc/rc.d/init.d which determines the pid of the
running dsmserv process and then issues a kill against it. From the
tsminst1 script
stop() {
echo "Stopping $prog instance $instance ..."
if [[ -e $pidfile ]]
then
# make sure someone
"systemctl stop tsminst1" is not a kill. That's a service command to tell
the application it manages to shut down gracefully.
>From the KC:
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSEQVQ_8.1.0/srv.install/t_srv_startsrv_autolnx-linux.html
6.To start or stop the server, issue one of the
Hi Eric,
Just like Zoltan said, you really need to prevent a kill of TSM. This will
leave the DB2 database in an inconsistent state and thus result in a DB2 crash
recovery which can indeed be a lengthy process. Just use a halt to stop TSM and
the DB2 database will be closed properly.
Kind
Out of curiosity, why do you do a "systemctl stop tsminst1" (which if I
recall does a kill) vs just HALT the ISP server immediately after the DB
backup finishes? Our patching takes about the same time (we do it monthly)
since the IBM lin_tape drivers have to be removed before kernel patching
and
We are running rhel7 on a dell r730 and we just did a full and
dbsnap...ususally take about 1.5h for both to complete.
Typically then shutdown with systemctl stop tsminst1.
I think last time we stopped tsm about an hour after the db finished its
backups. Likely restarted tsm about an hour after
I have to ask what OS/hardware/ISP are you running? What procedure are you
using to prep for the OS patching (we stop client sessions/all admin
processes - do a full DB backup - halt the server)
Our offsite replica server is RHEL 7 on Dell R740xd with 192GB and 3TB SSD
with the DB currently at
801 - 900 of 97247 matches
Mail list logo
