Hi roger,
Thanks for the reply, i don't have another drive (the other is HS)
I'am trying to do the fix=no and come to the result.
Regards, Mickael
+--
|This was sent by bobpatrick808...@yahoo.fr via Backup Central.
|Forward
Hi people,
I have a question, i have a bad tape with 5 file on i do an audit fix=yes the
audit marked them to damaged and i try a move data after that and the move data
failure directly after skipping damaged file.
Anybody have a solution to success the move data (or re scratch the tape and
Standard procedure in a TSM implementation is to have a copy storage pool as a
safety, which allows a defective primary storage pool tape’s contents to be
recovered, as via Restore Volume.
Ricnard Sims
Do you have an offsite/copy of the tape? Have you tried Restore Volume?
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 8:15 AM, mik tsm-fo...@backupcentral.com wrote:
Hi people,
I have a question, i have a bad tape with 5 file on i do an audit fix=yes
the audit marked them to damaged and i try a move data after
is marked empty, and all
references to it are removed from the database.
Good luck.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of mik
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 8:15 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Bad tape question
Hi people
Hi everybody and thanks for reply,
My copypool was down because we lost one drive, we migrate the data to the
tapepool to new tapepool on disk to perform an export node to the new TSM
server with new tapedriver (LTO6, current LTO3).
So if i do
restore volume A00015L3 discarddata=yes
The
Try AUDIT VOL ... FIX=NO before giving up on any data. That can clear
files previously marked as damaged.
Try a different tape drive. In general, I have found that a tape which
is starting to go bad, can always be read by trying it on each other
drive until it works. Then after you get the data
Hello,
Does anyone know if there is a way to see the contect of an EXPORT tape?
Q CONTENT does not do it, because the tape does not belong to a storage
pool.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Richard van Denzel
/2009 10:42 AM
Subject:
[ADSM-L] EXPORT tape question
Sent by:
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Hello,
Does anyone know if there is a way to see the contect of an EXPORT tape?
Q CONTENT does not do it, because the tape does not belong to a storage
pool.
Met vriendelijke groet
I have LTO4 tapes with LTO3 barcodes on each tape. When the tapes are
checked in as scratch TSM sees the size of 1.5gb. When used they go to full
status with around 800gb on each tape. Compression is turned on. I believe
this is due to the LTO3 barcodes, since LTO3 compressed tapes are 800gb. I
.
Office: 201.850.6998
Mobile: 917.774.8141
Internet
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
07/17/2008 11:07 AM
Please respond to
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
To
ADSM-L
cc
Subject
[ADSM-L] Tape question.
I have LTO4 tapes with LTO3 barcodes on each tape. When the tapes are
checked
TSM will write data until it hits the physical end of tape.
When you check a tape in, the estimated capacity is set by the device
class definition; you can change that to anything you want, reasonable or
not, with UPDATE DEVCLASS.
Regardless, TSM will use the full capacity of the LTO4 cartridge.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
David Hensley
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 10:07 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Tape question.
I have LTO4 tapes with LTO3 barcodes on each tape. When the tapes are
checked in as scratch TSM sees the size of 1.5gb. When used they go to
full
As a result of expiration, reclamation and removal of a large storage pool.
We are getting back approximately 100 scratch tapes/week
We run an SL8500 library with 1600 cells of which 600 are free.
Is there any difference whether I check these scratch tapes in as they
arrive or place them in an
On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 11:03:35 -0500, Dave Zarnoch [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
But, is there any disadvantages to have so many scratch tapes available
in the silo?
If you've got the slots to spare, fill 'em up. Keep enough free for
unforseen events (maybe 10-20 slots?) but no reason to do more
Zarnoch
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 8:04 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] scratch tape question
As a result of expiration, reclamation and removal of a large storage pool.
We are getting back approximately 100 scratch tapes/week
We run an SL8500 library with 1600 cells of which 600
If you have a space floor and an ideal location to safely store scratch
tapes coming back my preference would be to put them there, then check in
scratch tapes as needed.
Disadvantages:
This does not happen frequently but sometimes when a tape drive goes bad,
it would mount the tape and mark it
Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Levi, Ralph
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 1:08 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Tape Question 3592 and 3590 drives
Hi All,
Sorry to drag this back up but I don't see a final answer. I have just
added an additional frame to my library
: Tape Question 3592 and 3590 drives
I recommend a service call to IBM. Just last month I saw an issue with
TSM 5.2.7.0 performing the same activity with the same result. There
is
a fixtest at 5.2.7.x addressing the 'No drive available in library'
scenario.
Best of luck!
John G. Talafous
(have the absolute latest altdd and
atape drivers on).
Thanks,
Ralph
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Rainer Wolf
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 9:43 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Tape Question
Hi Debbie,
you can mix
-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Levi, Ralph
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 1:08 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Tape Question 3592 and 3590 drives
Hi All,
Sorry to drag this back up but I don't see a final answer. I have just
added
-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21167566
-Josh
On 06.02.14 at 12:36 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:36:28 -0600
From: Talafous, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Tape Question 3592
Currently, we have a 3494 tape library and 3590 tape drives and 3590 tapes.
We are planning to get a couple of 3592 tape drives. My question is, will
we be able to use the 3590 tapes in the 3592 tape drives? I would think
since the capacity of the 3590 tapes is only 20G/40G it would not be a good
On Jul 27, 2005, at 8:17 AM, Debbie Bassler wrote:
Currently, we have a 3494 tape library and 3590 tape drives and
3590 tapes.
We are planning to get a couple of 3592 tape drives. My question
is, will
we be able to use the 3590 tapes in the 3592 tape drives? I would
think
since the capacity of
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc:
Subject:Re: [ADSM-L] Tape Question
On Jul 27, 2005, at 8:17 AM, Debbie Bassler wrote:
Currently, we have a 3494 tape library and 3590 tape drives and
3590 tapes.
We are planning to get
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 08:39:48AM -0400, Debbie Bassler wrote:
Thanks for the reference information, RichardWe had an IBM rep come in
and he said we could still use the 3494 library with 3592 tape drives, but
I wasn't sure about the tapes.
I'm sure your IBM rep also told you that 3590
On Jul 27, 2005, at 8:39 AM, Debbie Bassler wrote:
...We had an IBM rep come in
and he said we could still use the 3494 library with 3592 tape
drives...
We're undertaking the same kind of upgrade. It's complex, where the
3592 drives have to be in their own frame, you may have to replace
your
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc:
Subject:Re: [ADSM-L] Tape Question
On Jul 27, 2005, at 8:17 AM, Debbie Bassler wrote:
Currently, we have a 3494 tape library and 3590 tape drives and
3590 tapes.
We are planning to get a couple of 3592 tape drives. My question
is, will
we
Hi all
At present we are using an IBM 3494 library with two 3590H1A drives. So far
we are just using the standard 3590 tapes but are looking at adding some of
the extended capacity volumes. Does anyone know if I need to do anything to
the 3494 library for it to be able to check in extended
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 08:34:09AM +0100, Farren Minns wrote:
Hi all
At present we are using an IBM 3494 library with two 3590H1A drives. So far
we are just using the standard 3590 tapes but are looking at adding some of
the extended capacity volumes. Does anyone know if I need to do anything
Thanks for that.
Farren
|+--+-|
|| Bob Booth - CITES | |
|| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |
|| Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor | To:
I have a new tapepool that I only use for a couple of nodes that is using
colocation. Can I change the status of a tape that is in that pool to
readonly so I can remove it, even though it is not full? Will TSM then grab
a new tape to use, or will it complain because the not full tape is not
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
I have a new tapepool that I only use for a couple of nodes
that is using
colocation. Can I change the status of a tape that is in that pool to
readonly so I can remove it, even though it is not full? Will
TSM then grab
a new tape to
]
Subject: Re: Colocation readonly tape question
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
I have a new tapepool that I only use for a couple of nodes
that is using
colocation. Can I change the status of a tape that is in that pool to
readonly so I can remove it, even though
tape question
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
I have a new tapepool that I only use for a couple of nodes
that is using
colocation. Can I change the status of a tape that is in that pool to
readonly so I can remove it, even though it is not full? Will
TSM then grab
TSM 5.1.7.0
AIX 5.0
STK L700 Library
IBM LTO Drives
I have a volume (05) that is giving me a fit! Somehow, during library servicing
( I think), volume was removed from library. The volume contains a small amount of
data, but contains data none the less. There are no read or write
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Jones, Kelli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: woensdag 10 maart 2004 17:14
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: LTO Tape Question
TSM 5.1.7.0
AIX 5.0
STK L700 Library
IBM LTO Drives
I have a volume (05) that is giving me a fit! Somehow, during library
servicing ( I
Try this: Checkout libvol libname 05 checklabel=no remove=no.
(Put your libname in). This removes the tape from what TSM thinks is
in the library without the library and TSM actually having to physically
DO SOMETHING with the tape.
Then you should be able to check it in normally.
If that
It is placed in slot 10.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Karel Bos
Sent: March 10, 2004 11:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: LTO Tape Question
Hi,
Couple of things could be causing this. Most likely, the tape isn't
How can I determine the originating slot? I thought about doing just that but each
time I try to check it in, the slot it attempts to go to varies
---Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: March 10, 2004 11:39 AM
To: Jones, Kelli
Subject: Re: LTO Tape
their labels, IIRC.
Mike Bantz
Systems Administrator
Research Systems, Inc
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jones, Kelli
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 10:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: LTO Tape Question
How can I determine
:
|
|LTO Tape Question
Thanks for the q libr command found out that 400 is my private category.
When I look in my act log I find no references to these volumes they do
not show up in q vol or q libv. Any suggestions about there real status?
Could they be volumes that were mounted in a drive when TSM went down? Also
I
Thanks for the q libr command found out that 400 is my private category.
When I look in my act log I find no references to these volumes they do
not show up in q vol or q libv. Any suggestions about there real status?
Could they be volumes that were mounted in a drive when TSM went down? Also
I
That's been my suspicion of how tapes wind up as private without a
stgpool. So I run this periodically (with a tip of the hat to Paul Seay).
select volume_name from libvolumes where
status='Private' and libvolumes.volume_name
not in (select volume_name from volumes) and
libvolumes.volume_name
Environment:
TSM 5.1.1.6 on AIX 4.3.3 ML10
3494 library with 4 3590 drives. I share the library with our mainframe.
I was watching my TSM server come up this morning noticed the following
messages in my activity log:
ANR8774W Volume D00197 not checked into library 3494LIB but is using
category
, Bruce [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 7:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Tape Question
Environment:
TSM 5.1.1.6 on AIX 4.3.3 ML10
3494 library with 4 3590 drives. I share the library with our mainframe.
I was watching my TSM server come up this morning
ANR8774W Volume D00710 not checked into library 3494LIB but is using
category 400.
What is category 400?
Bruce - The message description tells most of the story, but oddly doesn't
advise the obvious: do 'Query LIBRary' and you should see your
defined category codes (with +1 for 3590).
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 08:26:39 -0400
Kamp, Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Environment:
TSM 5.1.1.6 on AIX 4.3.3 ML10
3494 library with 4 3590 drives. I share the library with our mainframe.
I was watching my TSM server come up this morning noticed the following
messages in my activity log:
The 3494 has categories asigned to scratchprivate tapes in use by TSM.
These categories are defined using the define library command, 400 is the
default for private tapes. ...
Well, actually, that default is 300.
aye to a for replies)
Professional Association of Contract Employees
(P.A.C.E. -- www.pacepros.com)
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Remeta, Mark
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 9:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tape
I know this has been covered before but I can't find it. Does anyone have a
sql query that will tell me what tapes a particular nodes particular archive
is on?
Thanks in advance,
Mark Remeta
Confidentiality Note: The information transmitted is intended only for the
person or entity to whom or
-Original Message-
From: Remeta, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 9:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Tape question
I know this has been covered before but I can't find it. Does
anyone have a
sql query that will tell me what tapes
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 7:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Tape question
I know this has been covered before but I can't find it. Does anyone have a
sql query that will tell me what tapes a particular nodes particular archive
is on?
Thanks in advance,
Mark Remeta
11, 2003 8:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tape question
-Original Message-
From: Remeta, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 9:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Tape question
I know this has been covered before but I can't find it. Does
]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 12:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tape question
-Original Message-
From: Remeta, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 9:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Tape question
I know this has been covered before but I
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Vedr.: Re: Tape question
Hi,
i tried a variation of your SQL, viz. select node_name, filespace_name
from volumeusage where volume_name='' - i ran this query on a volume
containing objects from a remote server.
it worked fine, but before giving
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tape question
-Original Message-
From: Remeta, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 9:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Tape question
I know this has been covered before but I can't find it. Does
anyone have a
sql query
Hi everybody:
our tsm server database need full backup to 4mm tape with weekly.
my question is how to delete old backup tape and reuse it.
Thank
Tony W
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, December 21, 2002 9:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TSM database full backup to tape question
Hi everybody:
our tsm server database need full backup to 4mm tape with weekly.
my question is how to delete old backup tape and reuse it.
Thank
Tony W
cc:
Sent by: ADSM: Subject: TSM database full backup to
tape question
Dist Stor
Manager
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.EDU
12/21/2002 10:05
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, December 21, 2002 8:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TSM database full backup to tape question
Hi everybody:
our tsm server database need full backup to 4mm tape with weekly.
my question is how to delete old backup tape and reuse it.
Thank
Tony W
Feng,
Hmm, you want to take 800 tapes out of your library, then label 200 more, but you only
have two drives.
I'd suggest that you have some serious problems here.
Are you running expire inventory regularly? does it complete?
Are you reclaiming your tape storage pools regularly?
Before you
-8180
-Original Message-
From: fenglimian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 11:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: help:label tape question
Hi all,
I have a 3494 library with two dirve,the backup-archive server with ADSM
.When the library must label 200
Hi all,
I have a 3494 library with two dirve,the backup-archive server with ADSM .When the
library must label 200 tapes a time,at the same time ADSM must have backup some
date,can these two operations be doing at the same time?
Another question is if I take the opertion:
ADSMlabel libvol
Hello
On Donnerstag, 26. September 2002 05:31, fenglimian wrote:
Hi all,
I have a 3494 library with two dirve,the backup-archive server with ADSM
.When the library must label 200 tapes a time,at the same time ADSM must
have backup some date,can these two operations be doing at the same
Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: John Naylor/HAV/SSE)
Subject: Re: yes/no tape question
If you have several Z-boxes or LPARS sharing the tape drives...You would
have some offline when they are online to other systems. Unless you're in a
Sysplex This was where we
-1900
E-MAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PHONE: (860)403-2281
MC Matt Cooper
(2838)To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Matt.Cooper@AMGREEcc:
TINGS.COM Subject: yes/no tape question
Hello,
I have been running TSM 4.1 on z/OS for a year and a half now,
(started on OS390 2.7). I wanted to take advantage of and follow the
standard usage of our tape systems so I set up the TSM tape system in a way
that I now question. I would like people to let me know if they
Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Brian L. Nick
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 11:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: yes/no tape question for os/390 server people
Matt,
Nope. We use 1 device class and let MVS (os/390 2.10) handle allocation
We have it set up like you do and like John use mountlimits on the
devclasses and rigorous scheduling of the TSM events (via our MVS
scheduler, ZEKE) to minimize tape drive contention.
David
Top of message
-- 05-22-02 09:06 S.SHEPPARD (SHS)Re: yes/no tape question
The situation you describe is easily handled by correctly managing the
hardware and software definitions in OS/390 HCD. Drives which are
defined
...how do I put it in reverse? - ??
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Sam Sheppard
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 12:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: yes/no tape question
Top of message
Hello,
I have been running TSM 4.1 on z/OS for a year and a half now,
(started on OS390 2.7). I wanted to take advantage of and follow the
standard usage of our tape systems so I set up the TSM tape system in a way
that I now question. I would like people to let me know if they are
Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: John Naylor/HAV/SSE)
Subject: yes/no tape question for os/390 server people
Hello,
I have been running TSM 4.1 on z/OS for a year and a half now,
(started on OS390 2.7). I wanted to take advantage of and follow the
standard
(2838)To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Matt.Cooper@AMGRE cc:
ETINGS.COMSubject: yes/no tape question for
os/390 server people
Sent by: ADSM:
Dist Stor Manager
One of my users has a special project to backup 800 Gb for a few days and
then throw it away. Since we've just cleaned the test machine to put up
V4R2, I agreed and let him have the test machine for 3-4 days. The machine
is configured just like production, in particular the DEVC=TAPE:
Fred,
Have you set the estimated capacity to be 100gb.
Cheers
Stuart
Infrastructure Services
Operations Bridge
Innogy
Swindon
* 01793 896060
Fax 01793 896065
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pleas note the change of company name from National Power to Innogy
Fred Johanson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICAGO.EDU cc:
Sent by: ADSM:Subject: Tape question
Dist Stor
Manager
[EMAIL
It's set at 50 Gb. But htat usually yields 50-100 on the production machines.
At 10:03 PM 1/14/2002 +, you wrote:
Fred,
Have you set the estimated capacity to be 100gb.
Cheers
Stuart
Infrastructure Services
Operations Bridge
Innogy
Swindon
* 01793 896060
Fax 01793 896065
*
Al
Why do you say that Est capacity has nothing to do with how much can fit on
a cart.
Regards
Stuart
Infrastructure Services
Operations Bridge
Innogy
Swindon
* 01793 896060
Fax 01793 896065
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pleas note the change of company name from National Power
: Tape question
One of my users has a special project to backup 800 Gb for a few days and
then throw it away. Since we've just cleaned the test machine to put up
V4R2, I agreed and let him have the test machine for 3-4 days. The machine
is configured just like production, in particular the DEVC
5:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tape question
Al
Why do you say that Est capacity has nothing to do with how much can fit on
a cart.
Regards
Stuart
Infrastructure Services
Operations Bridge
Innogy
Swindon
* 01793 896060
Fax 01793 896065
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Hello,
We have some empty tapes and some scratch tapes, we assume the TSM will use
the empty tapes first ( within same storage pool ) before using scratch
tapes. But the TSM uses the scratch tapes instead. These empty tapes are in
'READWRITE' stauts and the storage pool defination for the node
this helps,
Jackman
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Guan, Phillip
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 2:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: empty and scratch tape question
Hello,
We have some empty tapes and some scratch tapes, we assume
Jack,
Yes, they are assigned to the correct storage pool.
Phillip
-Original Message-
From: Jack Musselman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 8:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: empty and scratch tape question
Hello,
You are correct, TSM will use
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: empty tape question
Hi Ramnarayan,
We use 'checkout libv' command to check tapes out.
Phillip
-Original Message-
From: Ramnarayan, Sean A [EDS] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 10:09 AM
To: [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 12:31 AM
Subject: empty tape question
Hi,
I have a question about empty tapes needed when TSM does reclamation or
migration. We have some empty tapes inside the library and some are
outside.
How do I force TSM to use the inside
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 12:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: empty tape question
Hi,
I have a question about empty tapes needed when TSM does reclamation or
migration. We have some empty tapes inside the library and some are
outside.
How do I force TSM to use
I have a question about empty tapes needed when TSM does reclamation or
migration. We have some empty tapes inside the library and some are
outside.
How do I force TSM to use the inside one? I found it requested to mount
outside empty tapes even there were still some inside the library.
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 9:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: empty tape question
I have a question about empty tapes needed when TSM does reclamation or
migration. We have some empty tapes inside the library and some are
outside.
How do I force TSM to use the inside
Hi Ramnarayan,
We use 'checkout libv' command to check tapes out.
Phillip
-Original Message-
From: Ramnarayan, Sean A [EDS] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 10:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: empty tape question
Hi
Are you using the checkout
It takes long time.If ur db is big it may take very long time.
U can see experiences in adsm.org.
-Original Message-
From: Guan, Phillip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 8:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: empty tape question
Hi all,
Just
Hi,
I have a question about empty tapes needed when TSM does reclamation or
migration. We have some empty tapes inside the library and some are outside.
How do I force TSM to use the inside one? I found it requested to mount
outside empty tapes even there were still some inside the library.
94 matches
Mail list logo
