whole page again or just starting
the function again where the error occurs? It would be nice if you could
send me the code to my mail s t e f a n 2 7 0 7 @ g m x . d e
Thanks
Stefan
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com
Some .NET courses
chema'or whether what I'm doing makes sense at
all.so it's probably pretty much out of scope for this group.
-Original Message-
From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of stefan
Sent: 26 September 2006 16:31
To: ADVANCED-DOT
@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Biztalk.
ThanksI will give it a goit is about integration with dotnetbut
I don't think this forum is the correct forum for it.
-Original Message-
From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of s
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/community/newsgroups/server/biztalk.mspx
-Original Message-
From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Nicholls
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 4:54 PM
To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
Subject: Re: [ADVANC
Check you have ASP.NET installed, wsdl mapped correctly in IIS
-Original Message-
From: Discussion of advanced .NET topics.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Davy J
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 3:49 PM
To: ADVANCED-DOTNET@DISCUSS.DEVELOP.COM
Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] Problem with
gives me 405.
Dave.
On 8/13/08, stefan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Check you have ASP.NET installed, wsdl mapped correctly in IIS
>
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentorR http://www.develop.com
View archives and manage your subscr
Michel,
Have you consider to retrieve a copy of the inner object using GetValue,
alter it, and then overwriting the inner object with the modified copy using
SetValue?
HTH,
Stefan
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
>Of Mic
Hi all,
> (Is there a standard way to point at such things?)
Beware of line breaks:
ms-help://MS.NETFrameworkSDKv1.1/cpguidenf/html/cpconcreatingthreads.htm
Regards,
Stefan
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of J.
ts constructor*:
public void Foo() {
using (MyDisposable md = new MyDisposable()) {}
}
Regards,
Stefan
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com
NEW! ASP.NET courses you may be interested in:
2 Days of ASP.NET, 29 Sept 2003, i
the fellow that came in tipped us off to
> this. I am looking for some feedback from others who may
> have used this technique.
I assume he didn't just say not to go that way, but came up with some
kind of motivation. Would you like to share it with us?
TIA,
Stefan
===
uery : " & pstrSQL
Try
If Not mobjSQLConnection Is Nothing Then
lstrError &= " , ConnectionString: " &
mobjSQLConnection.ConnectionString
End If
Catch ex As Exception
End Try
LogEvent(lstrError)
If ContextUtil.IsInTransaction The
r setter.
> P.S. I would like to start playing around with the IL. Can
> anyone recommend any good starting places, tools, or books?
> (Besides the obvious ildasm.exe, etc.) Thanks a lot.
I can recommend Serge Lidin's book, _Inside Microsoft .NE
write property.
Regards,
Stefan
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com
NEW! ASP.NET courses you may be interested in:
2 Days of ASP.NET, 29 Sept 2003, in Redmond
http://www.develop.com/courses/2daspdotnet
Guerrilla ASP.NET, 13
ML
constructs like unclosed f.i. , or elements it will signal
that your documentation is not valid XML.
Regards,
Stefan
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com
NEW! ASP.NET courses you may be interested in:
2 Days of ASP.NET
fixed in
Whidbey.
Cheers,
Stefan
Stefan Delmarco
-Original Message-
From: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Andreas Köpf
Sent: 30 November 2003 16:43
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] RSACryptoServiceProvider efficiently
v, c, p]N.T iff A = A', v = v', c
= c', p = p', N' = N, and T = T'.
Regards,
Stefan
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com
Some .NET courses you may be interested in:
NEW! Guerrilla ASP.NET, 26 Jan 2004, in
James,
I think there's a little confusion here. The 'ORM' you refer to stands for
'Object Role Modelling'. The discussion however focusses on
'Object-Relational Mapping'. Just a matter of 'buzzword bingo', I guess. :)
Regards,
Stefan
> ---
ch
I have two Person objects living in different AppDomains that both
correspond to the same Person record in the database?
These are the kinds of problems that I tend to encounter over and over
again. Any thoughts? Pointers to valuable resources?
TIA,
Stefan
===
Th
think in objects and that these have to be saved
> somewhere sometime, it's much harder to accept you have
> multiple instances with the same values or better:
> representing the same entity.
M ... Okay. But the thing I like from the 'hard way' is t
a flame-like outburst from
Thomas, anyway. And I've no intension to reply on such a post.)
The next couple of months, I'll be busy with other stuff than layerd
enterprise app's, so I don't think these thoughts will be worked out in a
detail yet. But maybe I'll bring in some m
, though, I think that it would be necessary to
> postpone the involvement of the autopersistence mechanism
> until the end of the merge, for obvious performance reasons.
Sounds good. I really like the idea of incorporating thinking about
disconnected scenarios fr
to seeing the database
through all layers'. This is what I consider 'bad design'.
I hope you agree with me about this.
Regards,
Stefan
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Frans Bouma
> Sent: Friday, Febru
a good idea to create
> class AToBMap to mirror table a_b_map. Yet a mapping table
> is usually the simplest and best way, and often the only way,
> to represent a many-to-many relationship in many RDBMSes.
Exactly my point, but formulated a lot clearer.
Regards,
Stefan
=
ot sure what Jeff means by 'auto-persistence', then just ask him
to clarify; do not say that he does not understand the true meaning of
persistence.
Regards,
Stefan
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com
Some .NET courses you may
linked tables. In the application-level
object model the resulting collection often is biased towards one of the
linked classes. Order rows, for instance, will be owned by an order.
Regards,
Stefan
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com
Som
der to its related products, I typically don't
want to be able to edit these products through this order.
Regards,
Stefan
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com
Some .NET courses you may be interested in:
NEW! Guerrilla ASP.NET,
bly called the config file service.exe.config. When running your
code from test.exe, you should however call the config file test.exe.config.
HTH,
Stefan
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com
Some .NET courses you may be interested in:
oblem. However,
throwing them from *static* constructors is not a good idea, since, the
static constructors, as opposed to instance constructors, aren't called
explicitly, so there's no nice mechanism to handle them.
HTH,
Stefan
===
This list
stead of an object, a null reference.
I really do not see the problem.
Regards,
Stefan
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com
Some .NET courses you may be interested in:
NEW! Guerrilla ASP.NET, 17 May 2004, in Los Angeles
http://www.develo
retty easily without bogging down all
DC> uses of enums with needless value checking.
Have a look at System.Enum.IsDefined, for instance.
HTH,
Stefan
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com
Some .NET courses you may be interested in:
NEW
System.Int16.
Surely 2^32 - 1 exeeds the range of an enumerated type that's backed up by a
16-bit integer.
short n = (short) System.Int32.MaxValue;
fails just as well.
Regards,
Stefan
===
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com
Some .NE
of *variables*, but to the scope of types generated
by the array type constructor. Reflection resolves this scope as public,
which seems strange, because one would expect the scope to depend on the
scope of the type argument.
Regards,
Stefan
===
This list is hosted
vector, managed
pointer, unmanaged pointer), but can be generated by user-defined
constructors as well.
Regards,
Stefan
[1] Common Language Infrastructure (CLI). Partition I: Concepts and
Architecture. Available from http://msdn.microsoft.com/net/ecma/.
===
Hi,
First of all, I'm confused of way that you are putting yours comments, once
at a top, once at bottom ;-)
My penny here - how SP2 to win xp effect this ?
--
Best regards
Stefan Turalski
IT Departament - Dev & Research
Kruk Sp z o.o.
Ul. Ostrowskiego 7
53-238 Wrocław
Tel. (+71)
Hi,
Did anyone know nice exaple of assembly leader in C# - I think abort
something like Acrobat Reader shows when it's starting..
--
Best regards
Stefan Turalski
Kruk Sp. z o.o.
IT - Development & Research Department
tel. +48 (071) 79 02 164
e-mail: [EMAIL
of nastly situations.
Who can provide me with more information on this subject?
Yours sincerly,
Stefan Holdermans
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You can read messages from the Advanced DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from Advanced
DOTNET, or
subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
d. (And I really can't think of
any reason to share this kind of information.)
Most of all, I feel it looks kind of _clumsy_ to contain this info in a
assembly.
Stefan Holdermans
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You can read messages from the Advanced DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from Advanced
DO
ituation in which the administrator's account is
not save any longer.
Rui wrote:
> [...] Maybe MS will fix this _minor_ issue later on (it really looks
clumsy :) ).
Or maybe Microsoft will explain why this is a useful -- or even neccecary -
- feauture. :-)
Stefan Holdermans
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
these big things created when you
don't really need them.
P.S. A last note on the sealed modifier that --- appearently --- seems so
natural to us on singleton classes: consider singletons you can inherit
from. Think of cases where you want only one instance for each sub class
to be cr
er they are
static or non-static... I think that we've been using accessor methods
and -- now -- properties for all those reasons. So why would we throw away
that now?
--Stefan
You can read messages from the Advanced DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from Advanced
DOTNET, or
subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
he accessor method gives you far more flexibility and I'd say it's
the right choise here.
--Stefan
You can read messages from the Advanced DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from Advanced
DOTNET, or
subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
lways be
evaluates since it may be a method that, besides returning a boolean,
incorparates some side-effects... but arent't those side-effects bad
practice anyway ;)?)
--Stefan
You can read messages from the Advanced DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from Advanced
DOTNET, or
subscribe to o
I think the type contructors is thread safe.
How otherwise is the framework guarding this rule if not by locking some
internal object (not the being-initialised class ofcourse) in order to
guarantee that only one thread runs inside the type contructor?
stef
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002 15:01:22 -0700,
methods thread-safe, anyway.
-- Stefan
You can read messages from the Advanced DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from Advanced
DOTNET, or
subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
Paul wrote:
> Is it Possible to create an enum Using Reflection?
Yep... use the classes in the System.Reflection.Emit namespace.
Alternatively, you can apply the CodeDOM.
-- Stefan
You can read messages from the Advanced DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from Advanced
DOTNET, or
subscribe to ot
g to be run!?
--Stefan
You can read messages from the Advanced DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from Advanced
DOTNET, or
subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
Looks more like documentation error to me...
- Original Message -
From: "Luca Marchesi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2002 11:54 AM
Subject: A bug in Thread.Abort()?
Hy everybody.
The SDK says
" If
Alex,
>It's an ASP.Net based website - so currently I'm think that perhaps we
could
>use remoting to force the caches on all machines to repopulate when a
change
>occurs on one web server...
I'd add a couple of questions more on that topic:
"And what if some of the machines failed to 'repopulat
Let's generalize the problem: What kind of licensing tricks should I apply
in order to make sure that only the customer to whom I sold an app is going
to use it? (I guess making sure this won't happen is far too ambitious ---
but can we at least come up with a protection that is *difficult* to cra
On Sat, 29 Jun 2002 13:59:36 +0800, Ben Kloosterman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Another solution is after the DB has been updated - update each cache and
>ensure readers of those items are locked until the entire transaction
>update has finished. at least that way you see all the transaction o
e Business
>object infrastructures like EJB's etc. creeping into the .Net Framework
>arena (though I have been rolling my own for a while now...)
>
>Any suggestions/discussion gladly appreciated!
>
>- Alex
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Stefan Avramtchev [mailto
I think I know what you need but in my perception the only way to reach
outside the .NET AppDomain goes via Remoting.
Inter-process comms always impose overhed. But how much bigger the overherd
of .NET Remoting versus the DCOM overhead is I do not know and I'll
appresiate if somebody gives us an
the upper
layer (Order : IOrder). This way you can define methods like
SaveOrder(IOrder order) in the data layer and pass Order objects to it from
the business layer.
-- Stefan
You can read messages from the Advanced DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from Advanced
DOTNET, or
subscribe to other DevelopMen
age of the docs
in the Help Browser that displays syntax lines filtered by the language
filter, I get an error: 'An error occurred in a script on the page'.
Actually, the language-filter icon isn't displayed at all. I just can't
resolve what is causing this error. Can anyone help m
uld there be an
extra column in the UserGroup table that indicates whether a group is a
system group?
I guess this is an issue that arises quite often, so I'm very interested in
hearing how others solve this problem. I really haven't decided which way to
go with the implementation of my app, so
from actually be mutated.
HTH,
Stefan
- Original Message -
From: Steven Livingstone
To: 'Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.'
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 5:00 PM
Subject: XmlNodeChangedEventHandler
In the code below I raise an exception when a non-int
Is it possible to take a set of assemblies and see which methods/classes
have been Jit compiled, and which haven't yet (i.e. not executed)?
Thanks
S
_
This e-mail may be confidential and does not necessarily represent the
views of CD9Design. If you are not the intended recipient of
n the OnMenuItemClick
method is added to the event handlers for the Click event of the MenuItem, the name of
the field that holds the reference to the clicked MenuItem will be assigned to the
variable name.
HTH,
Stefan
You can read messages from the Advanced DOTNET archive, unsubscribe
for the Read method on your server component.
HTH,
Stefan
- Original Message -
From: Dirk Reuss
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 1:05 PM
Subject: Why has a MarshallByRefObject Stream.Read(..) byte[] as IN Parameter
Hello,
I implemented a Stream for
mes desire. At the end of the road, the Stream class just doesn't proof
itself suitable for a distributed scenario.
-- Stefan
You can read messages from the Advanced DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from Advanced
DOTNET, or
subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
ssume this creates a byte array at the server and passes it to the client --
doesn't it? (I'm not really into parameter modifiers, so please correct me if I'm
wrong...)
-- Stefan
- Original Message -
From: Axel Heitland
To: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topic
outputs true, if lib.dll isn't signed and the app isn't running in the C:\Temp folder.
Seems a bug to me. Or are we missing something here?
Stefan
- Original Message -
From: Beaulieu, Paul
To: 'Stefan Holdermans' ; Beaulieu, Paul ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
m.Collections.Specialized;
var collection: NameValueCollection = new NameValueCollection();
collection.Add("first", "foo");
collection.Add("second", "bar");
for (var key: String in collection) {
print(collection.Item(key));
}
HTH,
Stefan
om it.
Last week, Martin Naughton brought the exact same issue to the list: you might want to
track that thread:
http://discuss.develop.com/archives/wa.exe?A2=ind0208b&L=advanced-dotnet&T=0&F=&S=&P=6287.
Regards,
Stefan
- Original Message -
From: Abdulla,
Keyen,
This seems a popular feature these days...
We had two threads dedicated to this issue the last weeks: you might want to
check them out...
Regards,
Stefan
- Original Message -
From: "Keyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, A
Hi,
In C# en Visual Basic.NET one can apply custom attributes to assemblies by means of
[assembly:Foo]
and
respectively, where Foo is the name a custom-attribute class.
Is there anyway to apply custom attributes to assemblies in JScript.NET?
Thanks,
Stefan
You can read messages from
pt.NET adopts the C#-syntax here:
[assembly:Foo]
and
[module:Bar]
I just found this out by trying: it does not seem to be described in the docs. Is it?
Regards,
Stefan
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Steele
To: Moderated discussion of advanced .NET topics.
Sent:
oth a purely managed C++ program and it's equivalent in C# compile to
IL and fit into the CLR. How could a performance difference occur? Of cource, when you
mix managed and unmanaged code in a C++ program, you could gain a significant
performance gain, but then it wouldn't be fair comparison,
Jason,
I'm not sure about b), but you can do a): just have a look at the
System.Delegate.CreateDelegate method.
HTH,
Stefan
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
>Of Jason Whittington
>Sent: Tuesday, December
atform-dependent
character arrays within a struct, i.e. CHAR[] or WCHAR[].
HTH,
Stefan
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
>Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 7:25 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Ne
if there was only one
comparison, like you are implying to be what you were expecting?
Wouldn't you then just simply check for equality?
HTH,
Stefan
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
>Of Simon Hewitt
>Sent: Thursday, Feb
ybe attach some source code?
Regards,
Stefan
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
>Of Erik Johnson
>Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 3:25 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc: Erik Johnson
>Subject: Remoting: Custom
o two
MSDN-Magazine articles on this topic [2, 3].
HTH,
Stefan
[1] Don Box. Essential .NET, Volume I: The Common Language Runtime. Addison
Wesley. 2000.
[2] Dharma Shukla, Simon Fell, and Chris Sells. 'Aspect-Oriented Programming
Enables Better Code Encapsulation and Reuse', in:
different semantics for calling
virtual method in constructor and non-constructor code.
Regards,
Stefan
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
>Of Stephen Dunn
>Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 3:59 PM
>To: 'Moderated discussion o
aid. The point is that,
appearantly, you can't just call the virtual method from the constructor for
it's not reliable: it might, for instance, try to access some uninitialzed
members. Being critical for object construction does not make such a call
more reliable...
Regards,
Stefan
alk in park, you know... Just think of it as the
construction/initialization complement of Dispose. Maybe you should define
an IDispoable-like interface for it: IInitializable or something...)
Cheers,
Stefan
lished some VB6-written COM
libraries three years ago and still running into ByRefs they can't get rid
of because of version-compatability issues. Just another thing that shows me
that .NET is really providing improvement.
Regards,
Stefan
og += msg;
}
}
}
The comment says it all.
(Maybe I'm wrong, but isn't this where this discussion is about? Can someone
please confirm? Either Rob or myself is missing the point completely.)
Regards,
Stefan
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[ma
log
if (msg != null) {
this.log += "\n";
if this.log += msg;
}
}
}
Regards,
Stefan
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
>Of Richard Blewett
>Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:31 AM
>To: '
want to
replace the component, you could issue a FreeLibrary call and bring the new
component in.
Perhaps, there's much more simple approach---but this's the first I can
think of...
HTH,
Stefan
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
4A 77 )
.ver 2:0:6:0
}
But when I compile without defining the DEBUG symbol, the reference does not
end up in the manifest.
HTH,
Stefan
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew
>Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 4:
Mathhew,
It seems you're right... The VB.NET compiler does include unused references.
I'm afraid the only option you have here is invoking the compiler from the
command line and omit the unneeded references.
Regards,
Stefan
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Doug,
>VB6 had conditional compilation similar to the #if #end if in
>C/C++/C#. Did that make it into VB.NET and if it did, can you
>use it in the identical way to the example given by Stefan? I
>didn't notice in the posts any refernce to using the feature
>in the VB.
83 matches
Mail list logo
