>
>>> Author of "Learn RouterOS- Second Edition”
>>>
>>> *Link Technologies, Inc* -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services
>>>
>>> *Office*: 314-735-0270 Website: http://www.linktechs.net
>>>
>>> Create Wireless Cove
uthor of "Learn RouterOS- Second Edition”
>>>
>>> *Link Technologies, Inc* -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services
>>>
>>> *Office*: 314-735-0270 Website: http://www.linktechs.net
>>>
>>> Create Wireless Coverage’s with www.towercov
got
them in trouble and led to finding the first one?
*From:* AF mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com>> *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones
*Sent:* Thursday, January 23, 2020 5:43 PM
*To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group mailto:af@af.afmug.com>>
*Subjec
gt;
>> *Link Technologies, Inc* -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services
>>
>> *Office*: 314-735-0270 Website: http://www.linktechs.net
>>
>> Create Wireless Coverage’s with www.towercoverage.com
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* AF *On Behalf Of * Tim Hardy
&
o:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group mailto:af@af.afmug.com>>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement actions - unauthorized
operation in 3650 - 3700 MHz band
According to the Notice of Violation, they were found to be
operating on 3723 - 3732 MHz which is a clear violation of 1
.com
>
>
>
> *From:* AF *On Behalf Of * Tim Hardy
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 23, 2020 7:21 PM
> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement actions - unauthorized operation
> in 3650 - 3700 MHz band
>
>
>
> According to
y, January 23, 2020 5:43 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group mailto:af@af.afmug.com>>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement actions - unauthorized operation in 3650 -
3700 MHz band
The 320 you could go to at least 3695 on 10mhz. Plus the oob so if it was low
3700. But jerkoffs like that tha
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020, 5:03 PM mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>> wrote:
Jamming C band CATV...
*From:*Mathew Howard
*Sent:*Thursday, January 23, 2020 3:59 PM
*To:*AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
*Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement actions - unauthorize
. I’m going to assume the
> second one got them in trouble and led to finding the first one?
>
>
>
> *From:* AF *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 23, 2020 5:43 PM
> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement ac
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement actions - unauthorized operation in 3650 -
3700 MHz band
The 320 you could go to at least 3695 on 10mhz. Plus the oob so if it was low
3700. But jerkoffs like that that don't even make a cursory check for earth
stations
d
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 23, 2020 3:59 PM
> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement actions - unauthorized operation
> in 3650 - 3700 MHz band
>
> It's interesting that the signal they were interfering with was in the
> 3700-4200mhz
Jamming C band CATV...
From: Mathew Howard
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2020 3:59 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement actions - unauthorized operation in 3650 -
3700 MHz band
It's interesting that the signal they were interfering with was in the
3700
It's interesting that the signal they were interfering with was in the
3700-4200mhz band. I wonder what they were doing...
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 4:24 PM Steve Jones
wrote:
> Isnt that the first 3ghz one?
>
> I wish that more people had been nailed, its said other "license" holders
> had no
Isnt that the first 3ghz one?
I wish that more people had been nailed, its said other "license" holders
had no recourse, it took a fixed station to be interfered with
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 3:35 PM Tim Hardy wrote:
> BREVARD WIRELESS, INC. DBA FLORIDA HIGH SPEED INTERNET, LICENSEE OF
>
BREVARD WIRELESS, INC. DBA FLORIDA HIGH SPEED INTERNET, LICENSEE OF STATION
WQMJ660. Brevard Wireless, Inc. dba Florida High Speed Internet agrees to
$16,000 settlement and compliance plan resolving investigation into
unauthorized operation in the 3650-3700MHz band . Action by: Deputy Chief,
belong to WISPA.
>
> *From:* Ken Hohhof
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 11, 2019 12:25 PM
> *To:* 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group'
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Actions
>
>
> Several years back on the first version of the FCC transparency
> requirements, I
One thing about it, if they do a great job, then it is one more reason to
belong to WISPA.
From: Ken Hohhof
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2019 12:25 PM
To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group'
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Actions
Several years back on the first version of the FCC
Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Actions
WISPA will be adding a lot of boiler-plate documents like this once the new AMS
platform is launched by the end of the month.
2020 is going to be an exciting year for the organization.
<https://atheral.co/wp-cont
sday, December 11, 2019 8:28 AM
*To:* af@af.afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Actions
Yes. And I bet a lot of WISPs comply by using some copy-pasta from
someone else's website and just change the name. Big providers will
comply by having the disclosure /somewhere/ on their web
We don't need no stinkin' disclosures. .
On Tue, Dec 10, 2019, 4:21 PM Tim Hardy wrote:
>
>
> They issued 24 of these today. Looks like they’re trying to make a
> statement:
>
> NORTH TEXAS BROADBAND, LLC. The Enforcement Bureau cites North Texas
> Broadband, LLC for failure to disclose
font, and
don’t forget the visitor counter that looks like a car odometer.
From: AF On Behalf Of Steve Jones
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2019 10:54 AM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Actions
The concern may also stem from the ADA requirement
The concern may also stem from the ADA requirement. It concerns me. How
specifically does one ensure a website is ADA compliant? Im guessing the
text has to be text, nor image so a text reader can read it to the blind,
but does there have to be some specific font? do i need a wheelchair ramp
I was wondering about that aspect.
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/search/filings?limit=100_name=18-142=date_disseminated,DESC
You can search ECFS for proceeding 18-142 and see everyone's
submissions. There are 60 right now. I'm not sure why that option
exists.except maybe it's easier sometimes
ect or useful.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* AF *On Behalf Of *
> can...@believewireless.net
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 11, 2019 7:04 AM
> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Actions
>
>
>
> I thought this was odd: " By
or useful.
From: AF On Behalf Of can...@believewireless.net
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2019 7:04 AM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Actions
I thought this was odd: " By failing to comply with the Transparency Rule, the
Company has dep
uirements.
>
> *From:* Adam Moffett
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 11, 2019 8:28 AM
> *To:* af@af.afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Actions
>
>
> Yes. And I bet a lot of WISPs comply by using some copy-pasta from
> someone else's website and just change the name. B
: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Actions
Yes. And I bet a lot of WISPs comply by using some copy-pasta from someone
else's website and just change the name. Big providers will comply by having
the disclosure somewhere on their website but buried under a nest of links that
nobody will follow.
Most
Yes. And I bet a lot of WISPs comply by using some copy-pasta from
someone else's website and just change the name. Big providers will
comply by having the disclosure /somewhere/ on their website but buried
under a nest of links that nobody will follow.
Most consumers will be too lazy to
Cooperate and graduate.
From: Steve Jones
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2019 8:21 AM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC Enforcement Actions
THis is a shot across the bow to us though to get with the program.
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 9:20 AM Steve Jones wrote:
I
THis is a shot across the bow to us though to get with the program.
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 9:20 AM Steve Jones
wrote:
> I think in my 15 years here, maybe two customers read the terms of
> service, and probably only one of them would read the disclosure
>
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 9:03 AM Adam
I think in my 15 years here, maybe two customers read the terms of service,
and probably only one of them would read the disclosure
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 9:03 AM Adam Moffett wrote:
> I doubt any consumers are making choices based on legally mandated
> disclosures.
>
> but I can't claim
I doubt any consumers are making choices based on legally mandated
disclosures.
but I can't claim to understand humans.
On 12/11/2019 8:04 AM, can...@believewireless.net wrote:
I thought this was odd: " By failing to comply with the Transparency
Rule, the Company has deprived consumers
I thought this was odd: " By failing to comply with the Transparency Rule,
the Company has deprived consumers of critical information that must be
available when selecting Internet service in the marketplace. As the
Commission has previously stated, clear disclosures help consumers make
https://www.fcc.gov/search#q=enforcement%20advisory=edocs=new=%5B%7B%22bureaus%22%3A%22EB%22%7D%5D
On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 11:21 PM Kurt Fankhauser
wrote:
> Best I can tell North Texas Broadband doesn't even have an active website.
> Perhaps that was why they issued the citation?
>
Best I can tell North Texas Broadband doesn't even have an active website.
Perhaps that was why they issued the citation?
http://www.northtxbroadband.com/
On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 8:54 PM Matt Hoppes <
mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote:
> Who were the others?
>
> On 12/10/19 6:21 PM, Tim
Who were the others?
On 12/10/19 6:21 PM, Tim Hardy wrote:
They issued 24 of these today. Looks like they’re trying to make a
statement:
NORTH TEXAS BROADBAND, LLC. The Enforcement Bureau cites North Texas
Broadband, LLC for failure to disclose information regarding its
network
> They issued 24 of these today. Looks like they’re trying to make a
> statement:
>
> NORTH TEXAS BROADBAND, LLC. The Enforcement Bureau cites North Texas
> Broadband, LLC for failure to disclose information regarding its network
> management practices, performance, and the commercial
37 matches
Mail list logo
