’t the Trill switches limited to 1Gbps so far?
>
>
>
> Rory
>
>
>
> From: AF [mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com>] On
> Behalf Of Harold Bledsoe
> Sent: Wednesday, July 4, 2018 12:59 PM
>
>
> To: AnimalFarm Microwave U
All of our Calix gear is on ERPS.
From: Lewis Bergman
Sent: Wednesday, July 4, 2018 7:24 AM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] G.8032v2 or ERPS ring with 10G wireless links
We used ERPS with great results. Sub millisecond caliber with no precepts
packet loss even
8 at 4:12 PM
> To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] G.8032v2 or ERPS ring with 10G wireless links
>
> "You also loose a great deal of bandwidth If one side is blocking an fully
> modulated link and the active path is no running full rate."
>
&g
b37b834b9238.png]
Reply-To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
mailto:af@af.afmug.com>>
Date: Tuesday, July 3, 2018 at 4:12 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group mailto:af@af.afmug.com>>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] G.8032v2 or ERPS ring with 10G wireless links
"You also loose a great
"You also loose a great deal of bandwidth If one side is blocking an fully
modulated link and the active path is no running full rate."
Strong reason not to use a ring in general. In this case, I have two 10G
legs. One is only 550 meters. If is is gone, then something is really
wrong and the
I am not too familiar with the Calix G8032 but some of the things I
could see being issues would be pulling management out of the ring so
that you don't loose connectivity to the radios on the blocked port. You
also loose a great deal of bandwidth If one side is blocking an fully
modulated
I've been studying the exact same question lately.
At the moment I lean towards ERPS only because it seems simpler to
configure. :)
On 7/3/2018 12:21 PM, Carl Peterson wrote:
No. Going to do this on Calix E7-2s - We already have some of them in
place, we pay Calix for support and software
