t;https://www.linkedin.com/company/aeronet-broadband-corp>
>
>
>
>
>
> [image: Image removed by sender. tw-logo]
> <https://twitter.com/AeroNetPR?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [image: Image removed by sender. y
Fiber+power and syncbox at each AP
From: AF on behalf of Josh Luthman
Reply-To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Date: Friday, September 25, 2020 at 12:54 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Power for 450M via PacketFlux or Rectifier?
Do you mean use fiber for
: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Power for 450M via PacketFlux or Rectifier?
Turn on uGPS on the 450m, add a sync box junior nearby, buy a second gland for
the Aux port, plug it all in, Voila! Sync. No need to run cable all the tower.
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 12:01 PM
t; [image: in-logo]
>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/aeronet-broadband-corp> [image:
>>>>> tw-logo]
>>>>> <https://twitter.com/AeroNetPR?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor>
>>>>>
e:
>>>> tw-logo]
>>>> <https://twitter.com/AeroNetPR?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor>
>>>> [image: yt-logo]
>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCr2Q9WBrAYVm3Fn970Jd6VA>
>>>> www.aeronetpr.com | Met
/company/aeronet-broadband-corp> [image:
>>>> tw-logo]
>>>> <https://twitter.com/AeroNetPR?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor>
>>>> [image: yt-logo]
>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCr2Q9WBrAYVm3Fn970Jd6VA>
>&
7Ctwgr%5Eauthor>
>>> [image: yt-logo]
>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCr2Q9WBrAYVm3Fn970Jd6VA>
>>> www.aeronetpr.com | Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, PR 00968
>>>
>>> *From: *AF on behalf of Josh Luthman <
>>
l about that massive power requirement. We did DC+fiber to
>> avoid ethernet issues.
>>
>>
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> 24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>>
>>
Group
> *Date: *Friday, September 25, 2020 at 10:05 AM
> *To: *AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Power for 450M via PacketFlux or Rectifier?
>
>
>
> I don't need no damn sync. I have a building with more than enough FTB.
>
>
>
> Josh Luth
watts.
From: AF mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com>> On Behalf Of
Josh Luthman
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2020 1:28 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group mailto:af@af.afmug.com>>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Power for 450M via PacketFlux or Rectifier?
If you need sync...power it over that
gigawatts.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* AF *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, September 24, 2020 1:28 PM
>>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Power for 450M via PacketFlux or Rectifier?
>>>
t;
>>
>> *From:* AF *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman
>> *Sent:* Thursday, September 24, 2020 1:28 PM
>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Power for 450M via PacketFlux or Rectifier?
>>
>>
>>
>> If you need sync...power it o
res direct DC power because it uses
> like 1.21 gigawatts.
>
>
>
> *From:* AF *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 24, 2020 1:28 PM
> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Power for 450M via PacketFlux or Rectifier?
>
>
>
Good call out, thanks!
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 3:30 PM Adam Moffett wrote:
> Ok yeah it's worse than I remembered
>
> 3.5ghz 450m is 140W typical, 150W max.
>
> Max input per power port on rack injector is 10 amp.
>
> You should definitely not put more than 3 on one power input. To use the
> ra
Ok yeah it's worse than I remembered
3.5ghz 450m is 140W typical, 150W max.
Max input per power port on rack injector is 10 amp.
You should definitely not put more than 3 on one power input. To use
the rack injector for that you might have to pull two outputs from the
ICT into two different
That's exactly what I was wondering about regarding max amperage.
On 9/24/2020 3:18 PM, Eric Muehleisen wrote:
You might check with Forest on the max output power of the PIDU. We
tried (4) CBRS 450M's on one card which caused weird power reboots on
random AP's. We were using a 600W power supply
You might check with Forest on the max output power of the PIDU. We tried
(4) CBRS 450M's on one card which caused weird power reboots on random
AP's. We were using a 600W power supply, which might have been the issue as
well. 3 AP's have been working just fine however.
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 10:
On this original question, the only thing I'd watch out for is the total
load on the Rack Injector. There's a max current on each input (10A?
12A? I don't remember, but it's on the web page). Each 450m is I think
100W typical and 125W max. If you're on battery then your voltage could
drop do
t needed to be power
cycled regularly but that was 15 years ago and it got replaced with a
PTP500 which has now been replaced with a PTP820.
*From:* AF *On Behalf Of *Sean Heskett
*Sent:* Thursday, September 24, 2020 12:30 PM
*To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Pow
I think he said 3 GHz 450m which requires direct DC power because it uses like
1.21 gigawatts.
From: AF On Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2020 1:28 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Power for 450M via PacketFlux or Rectifier?
If you need
;
> *From:* AF *On Behalf Of *Sean Heskett
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 24, 2020 12:30 PM
> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Power for 450M via PacketFlux or Rectifier?
>
>
>
> Either way is fine, we’ve chosen to do it in the PacketFlux RI so tha
450M via PacketFlux or Rectifier?
Either way is fine, we’ve chosen to do it in the PacketFlux RI so that
everything is standardized across our towers. Support staff and field techs
know that ALL APs get power from a rack injector...so when problems happen look
there and try a reboot
Yep - standardization is a good thing!
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 1:30 PM Sean Heskett wrote:
> Either way is fine, we’ve chosen to do it in the PacketFlux RI so that
> everything is standardized across our towers. Support staff and field
> techs know that ALL APs get power from a rack injector...
Either way is fine, we’ve chosen to do it in the PacketFlux RI so that
everything is standardized across our towers. Support staff and field
techs know that ALL APs get power from a rack injector...so when problems
happen look there and try a reboot.
-Sean
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 9:18 AM Josh B
We're deploying our first 450M gear soon. This site will have a +48VDC ICT
rectifier solution and DC distribution (managed).
We're going to be using a PacketFlux RackInkjector w/ Cambium Sync modules
to provide sync to the 450M 3ghz radios. We could load a PDU module in the
RackInjector as well
25 matches
Mail list logo
