The programs I've been involved with did not have anything to do with
the FCC. Sounds like they have more technical competency than some
other agenciesand that's a good thing.
On 4/6/2020 4:40 PM, Eric Muehleisen wrote:
No persistence. We objected and they sent someone out almost
bizarre speedtest
results from the Google test.
From: AF On Behalf Of Eric Muehleisen
Sent: Monday, April 6, 2020 3:26 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] RDOF 25/3 spectrum
The FCC won't drive around and test themselves, but they will follow you as you
drive
No persistence. We objected and they sent someone out almost immediately.
This was during CAFII. I assume RDOF will be the same. I've yet to hear of
anyone actually providing validation testing. I know the FCC has a couple
different methods of remote validation but I haven't seen it personally. We
I'm glad they came out and checked. You're probably a more believable
witness than some Internet customers are. How persistent did you have
to be to get someone to come out?
On 4/6/2020 4:25 PM, Eric Muehleisen wrote:
The FCC won't drive around and test themselves, but they will follow
you
The FCC won't drive around and test themselves, but they will follow you as
you drive around and test. We disputed several locations that had won CAF2
and the FCC sent out two contractors to come out and verify our
speeds/claims. We spent 2-3 hours with them one morning testing in various
The company owner/administrator talking to the government either
believes the incorrect assumptions or is wholly committed to the lie.
So they confidently report that they're delivering 25 Meg like they're
supposed to. Evidence to the contrary is a fluke or an error. The FCC
isn't going to
But seemingly, if everyone’s lying, won’t the FCC/etc. come down hard in
response? Example A: 477’s, where many I’ve seen have a fabrication factor,
sometimes a very high one.
> On Apr 6, 2020, at 12:13 PM, Adam Moffett wrote:
>
> I've seen a number of grant funding proposals based on 25M and
I've seen a number of grant funding proposals based on 25M and 100M speeds.
In general what they do is lie. Or they're wrong.
First you use the capacity planning tool provided the manufacturer and
remember that you can populate the values however you want to. Your
prediction doesn't have to
So if I understand we’ll have to provide 25/3 to ALL locations that receive
RDOF funding? If so, how would that happen without the 6GHz that isn’t out yet
and won’t be by the time this round funds?
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
