The people I have spoken with said that after the most recent software
update they haven't had any issues. Harris/Stratex/Aviat obviously has a
longer/better track record.
On Thursday, January 16, 2020, Jon Langeler
wrote:
> Are Bridgewave radios flawlessly stable at this point? They’ve only
Are Bridgewave radios flawlessly stable at this point? They’ve only been out a
few years so I wasn't sure if the software was there.
Jon Langeler
Michwave Technologies, Inc.
> On Jan 15, 2020, at 11:25 AM, Jason McKemie
> wrote:
>
> I believe the Navigator is around the same price. They
“If you are paying for a pole attachment, then you are covered by the easement
of the pole owner. “
IANAL but this is not true. If there is an easement granted for “electrical
service” but nothing else, then it does not cover
fiber/telephone/catv/water/gas/magic.
Spend some time in the
I often use Dia for things like you describe.
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 01:29:43PM -0500, Mark - Myakka Technologies wrote:
> Matt,
>
> I've used
> https://wiki.gnome.org/action/show/Apps/Dia?action=show=Dia
>
> in the past. Older software, but did what I needed.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Mark
Bridgewave has been doing radios for a very long time, but yes, this model is
new.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Jon Langeler"
To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group"
Sent:
Yes, I've heard a lot of not so great things about their older millimeter
wave gear, however.
On Thursday, January 16, 2020, Mike Hammett wrote:
> Bridgewave has been doing radios for a very long time, but yes, this model
> is new.
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
How does the system gain compare between the Aviat and Bridgewave radios? I
don't see anything listed on the publicly available spec sheet for the
Bridgewave.
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 1:29 PM Tim Hardy wrote:
> Just so we’re comparing apples to apples, Aviat’s values are typical.
> Guaranteed
Oh, yay. I have a Flex4G-1 link on the shelf that I'm planning on
deploying soon.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 5:43 PM Seth Mattinen wrote:
> On 1/16/20 13:34, Jason McKemie wrote:
> > Yes, I've heard a lot of not so great things about their older
> > millimeter wave gear, however.
>
>
> I have
So, the two radios seem to be pretty similar as far as features and price
go (looks like Aviat may be a bit cheaper, but I'd have to look closer at
what all is included as far as warranty, etc on each).
The main advantages for Aviat seem to be a bit better system gain, and a
better/longer track
On 1/16/20 13:34, Jason McKemie wrote:
Yes, I've heard a lot of not so great things about their older
millimeter wave gear, however.
I have had a bad experience with two new Flex4G-1 links, the fancy
new 10 gigabit ones that came out in 2018. It was so bad I bought a
Siklu for one path
Is the lower system gain partially due to the field replaceable diplexer?
On Thursday, January 16, 2020, Tim Hardy wrote:
> Latest info I have lists the system gain for the Bridgewave Navigator
> balanced version, 80 MHz bw, 4096 QAM at 72.5 dBm compared to the Aviat
> radio at 77.5 dBm
>
> On
Latest info I have lists the system gain for the Bridgewave Navigator balanced
version, 80 MHz bw, 4096 QAM at 72.5 dBm compared to the Aviat radio at 77.5 dBm
> On Jan 16, 2020, at 2:43 PM, Mathew Howard wrote:
>
> How does the system gain compare between the Aviat and Bridgewave radios? I
>
For what it's worth, we haven't had any problems with our new-ish
Bridgewave millimeter links.
I'm wondering if Bridgewave actually makes the Navigator themselves anyway
though... these radios appear to be more than a little bit similar...
http://www.al-wireless.com/zenith-x
On Thu, Jan 16,
13 matches
Mail list logo
