*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] C band 5G vs Radar Altimeters
Yet somehow the range-finding in my Mazda can figure out the
distance to the car in front of me and adjust accordingly without a
flat surface or using much bandwidth.
bp
On 12/12/2021 12:22 PM, Chuck McCown via AF wrote:
From a white paper
> round dials (and touch tone did not exist).
>
>
>
> bp
>
> On 12/12/2021 1:17 PM, Chuck McCown via AF wrote:
>> But it was probably not developed in 1955.
>>
>> From: Bill Prince
>> Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2021 1:57 PM
>> To: af@af.afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] C band 5G vs Radar
Altimeters
Yet somehow the range-finding in my Mazda can figure out
the distance to the car in front of me and adjust
2021 1:57 PM
> To: af@af.afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] C band 5G vs Radar Altimeters
>
> Yet somehow the range-finding in my Mazda can figure out the distance to the
> car in front of me and adjust accordingly without a flat surface or using
> much bandwidth.
>
>
>
But it was probably not developed in 1955.
From: Bill Prince
Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2021 1:57 PM
To: af@af.afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] C band 5G vs Radar Altimeters
Yet somehow the range-finding in my Mazda can figure out the distance to the
car in front of me and adjust accordingly
:05 PM
To: Mike Hammett ; AnimalFarm
Microwave Users Group
Cc: Chuck McCown
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] C band 5G vs Radar
Altimeters
ons.
From: Chuck McCown via AF
Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2021 1:05 PM
To: Mike Hammett ; AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Cc: Chuck McCown
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] C band 5G vs Radar Altimeters
Start with every single airliner worldwide and probably every single military
aircraft. This is a glo
: Chuck McCown
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] C band 5G vs Radar Altimeters
There can't be THAT many old planes in the air that have this automated landing
system.
Buy new receivers or install some filters.
5 MHz away? Okay.
10 MHz? Maybe.
200? Bugger off.
They're not making new spectrum, so everyone
Microwave Users Group"
Cc: "Chuck McCown"
Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2021 1:06:03 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] C band 5G vs Radar Altimeters
Lots of old planes in the world. Lots of old front end filters too. And the
system chirps the band to get a more sure return so it needs t
nternet Exchange
>
> The Brothers WISP
>
>
>
>
> From: "Tim Hardy"
> To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group"
> Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2021 9:50:44 AM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] C band 5G vs Radar Altimeters
>
> Deja Vu all over again. Very similar
Hardy"
To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group"
Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2021 9:50:44 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] C band 5G vs Radar Altimeters
Deja Vu all over again. Very similar to the OBE / adjacent channel concerns
voiced in the 6 GHz unlicensed proceeding. The FCC’s total la
...@af.afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jaime Solorza
Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2021 1:14 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] C band 5G vs Radar Altimeters
Well I believe Fort Bliss and other radar users around here are getting revenge
on the 5Ghz DFS users...several wisps
Well I believe Fort Bliss and other radar users around here are getting
revenge on the 5Ghz DFS users...several wisps are complaining!!!
Oh well
On Sun, Dec 12, 2021, 8:52 AM Tim Hardy wrote:
> Deja Vu all over again. Very similar to the OBE / adjacent channel
> concerns voiced in the 6 GHz
Deja Vu all over again. Very similar to the OBE / adjacent channel concerns
voiced in the 6 GHz unlicensed proceeding. The FCC’s total lack of
understanding of receiver filtering in even current devices is astounding and
its fairly clear that money / politics beats physics everyday.
> On Dec
I understand the issue now:
https://youtu.be/942KXXmMJdY
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
15 matches
Mail list logo
